phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry

48
Phosphoproteome Analysis by Mass Spectrometry Jau-Song Yu ( 余余余 ) Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College of Chang Gung University ( 余余余余余余余余余余余余余余余 )

Upload: aisha

Post on 17-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Phosphoproteome Analysis by Mass Spectrometry. Jau-Song Yu ( 余兆松 ) Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College of Chang Gung University. ( 長庚大學基礎醫學所分子生物學科 ). Reversible Phosphorylation of Proteins. OH. Protein/Enzyme. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Phosphoproteome Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

Jau-Song Yu (余兆松 )

Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College of Chang

Gung University

(長庚大學基礎醫學所分子生物學科 )

Page 2: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Reversible Phosphorylation of Proteins

Protein/Enzyme

Protein/Enzyme

OH

PO4

Protein kinaseProtein phosphatase

Cellular Processes:

Metabolism, contractility, membrane transport and secretion,transcription and translation of genes, cell division,fertilization, memory, carcinogenesis, apoptosis, etc.

(Ser, Thr or Tyr)

Page 3: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

The 1992 Nobel Prize in Physiology or MedicineNOBELFÖRSAMLINGEN KAROLINSKA INSTITUTETTHE NOBEL ASSEMBLY AT THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE (12 October 1992)

The Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute has today decided to award the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for 1992 jointly to Edmond H. Fischer and Edwin G. Krebs for their discoveries concerning "reversible protein phosphorylation as a biological regulatory mechanism".  SummaryThousands of proteins participate in a complex interplay in a cell. They are the tools of the living organism, regulating its reactions and activities. For example, proteins maintain the metabolic flux, dictate growth and cellular division, release hormones, and mediate muscular work. Protein interactions are strictly controlled. One of the most important regulatory mechanisms is reversible protein phosphorylation. This means that enzymes phosphorylate and dephosphorylate proteins. Both these enzymatic processes are in turn regulated, often in several steps, allowing amplification and fine control. The 1992 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is awarded to the American biochemists Edmond Fischer and Edwin Krebs. They purified and characterized the first enzyme of this type. Their fundamental finding initiated a research area which today is one of the most active and wide-ranging. Reversible protein phosphorylation is responsible for regulation of processes as diverse as mobilization of glucose from glycogen, prevention of transplant rejection by cyclosporin, and development of a cancer form like chronic myeloic leukemia.

Page 4: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Phosphoryl groups affect the structure and catalytic activity of proteins

Glycogen phosphorylase

(Glucose)n + Pi (glucose)n-1 + glucose 1-phosphate

Page 5: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

AMP

P-Ser14

GlucosePLP

Regulation of glycogen phosphorylase

Pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)

Un-P: 20 aa (+) residues at its N terminusInteract with multiple acidic aa

P-Ser14: interferes this interaction, more active conformation

Page 6: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

The 2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine8 October 2001The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet has today decided to award The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for 2001jointly to Leland H. Hartwell, R. Timothy (Tim) Hunt and Paul M. Nurse for their discoveries of "key regulators of the cell cycle"

SummaryAll organisms consist of cells that multiply through cell division. An adult human being has approximately 100 000 billion cells, all originating from a single cell, the fertilized egg cell. In adults there is also an enormous number of continuously dividing cells replacing those dying. Before a cell can divide it has to grow in size, duplicate its chromosomes and separate the chromosomes for exact distribution between the two daughter cells. These different processes are coordinated in the cell cycle.

This year's Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine have made seminal discoveries concerning the control of the cell cycle. They have identified key molecules that regulate the cell cycle in all eukaryotic organisms, including yeasts, plants, animals and human. These fundamental discoveries have a great impact on all aspects of cell growth. Defects in cell cycle control may lead to the type of chromosome alterations seen in cancer cells. This may in the long term open new possibilities for cancer treatment.

Page 7: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 8: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Kinase distribution by major groups in human and model systems

SCIENCE, 298, 1912-34 (2002)

The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome

G. Manning,1* D. B. Whyte,1 R. Martinez,1 T. Hunter,2 S. Sudarsanam1,3

Page 9: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Strategy for kinase activity detection in cells

Page 10: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Kinase assay in immunoprecipitate (IP) Cells *homogenization (10-cm dish/0.5 ml lysis buffer) *centrifugation (12000~15000 rpm, 15 min, 4oC)Supernatants *protein concentration determination *1 mg protein/0.5 ml extracts *add Ab against specific kinase (5 g) *incubation (1 h, 4oC) *add protein A/G-S4B (50% v/v, 25 l, shaking) *centrifugation (6000 rpm, 1min, 4oC) *wash/cfg 3 times in Buffer BImmunoprecipitates *suspended in 20 l Buffer A *substrate (5-10 g), [-32P]ATP.Mg2+ (0.2-20 mM) *shaking for 10-30 min at RT *adding SDS-sample bufferSDS-PAGE

Autoradiography

Lysis buffer-----10 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.4, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,0.5 mg/ml aprotinin Buffer A --- 20 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.0, 0.5 mM dithiothreitolBuffer B --- 0.5 M NaCl in buffer A

(quantitative method)

cfg

Page 11: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

JNK activity assay in IP

(Chan et al., 2000)

Page 12: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Kinase assay by immunoblotting with phospho-specific Ab

(Qualitative to semi-quantitative method)

JNK1

p-JNK1

C CL P 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 4

Time post PDT (hr)

p-JNK2

(Hsieh et al., 2003)

Page 13: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Determination of protein phosphorylation sites

Protein/Enzyme

Protein/Enzyme

OH

PO4

Protein kinaseProtein phosphatase

(Ser, Thr or Tyr?)

(What a.a. and where?)

Page 14: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Mark O. Collins, Lu Yu and Jyoti S. Choudhary: Analysis of protein phosphorylation on a proteome-scale. Proteomics (7) 2751 – 2768, 2007

Edman Degradation(32P-release)

Strategy of Phosphorylation Site Analysis

Phosphoamino acid analysis

(Ser, Thr or Tyr?)

Page 15: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

1 2 3 4 5

6

32P-labeled proteins in IP fractions from A431 cells

Phosphoamino acid analysis

(1) (3)

(7-10 days)

(16 hrs)

Page 16: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Edman Degradation (32P-release)

Page 17: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 18: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 19: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 20: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 21: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 22: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 23: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 24: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Modern Strategy of Phosphoproteome Analysis

B.

C.

A.

Mark O. Collins, Lu Yu and Jyoti S. Choudhary: Analysis of protein phosphorylation on a proteome-scale. Proteomics (7) 2751 – 2768, 2007

efficiency accuracy Scale

Edman degadation

low excellentSingle protein

MS analysis high good Systemic

Page 25: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

SKRSTMVGTPYC

Y11 y10 y9 y8 y7 y6 y5 y4 y3 y2 y1

b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 b9 b10 b11

SKRSTMVGTPYC

Y11 y10 y9 y8 y7 y6 y5 y4 y3 y2 y1

b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 b9 b10 b11

P

Page 26: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

1. Ionization

2. MS2 MS3

-98

-elimination (NaOH…)

Page 27: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

1409.600

1499.6421263.578

1311.572

1521.623

827.321 1180.5472816.4271054.524 2465.179

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

4x10

Intens. [a.u.]

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500m/z

H-SKRSpTMVGTPYC –OH 1409.608

-98Da

MS

Page 28: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

H-SKRSTMVGTPYC -OH 1311.572

b5

TOF/TOF

Intens. [a.u.]

129.022

381.919

215.988

69.952b5 542.053283.908

431.059

1262.511

157.001

344.017

1206.757

507.080

477.012

1119.588597.040

580.035

744.183

495.014

673.110

324.969

930.523782.079

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

4x10

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 m/z

1311.572

372.919

Page 29: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

129.022

381.919

b2 215.988

69.952 b5 542.053283.908 431.0591262.511

157.001

344.017

1206.7571119.588597.040

744.183

b6 673.110

324.969

930.523782.079

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

4x10

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 m/z

1311.572

H-SKRSpTMVGTPYC -OH 1409.560

H-SKRSTMVGTPYC -OH 1311.572

b5

b51311.582

542.175b 3372.134 1409.560

b5640.155b4

459.149

b7

870.250129.081216.108

b6

771.162

930.349

1010.307284.032

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

4x10

Intens . [a.u .]

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 m/z

b2b9

1028.189

b8

927.360

-

b3 372.919

b4 458.919

METHOD 1

1329.634

Page 30: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Proteomics 2008, 8, 4416–4432

Page 31: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Systematic analysis of protein phosphorylation by MS

Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomicsBlagoy Blagoev, Shao-En Ong, Irina Kratchmarova & Matthias Mann

Nature Biotechnology 22 1139-1145 (2004 )

Mass spectrometry and data analysis. Mass spectrometric analyses were done with nanoscale LC-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and LC-tandem mass spectrometry and a quadrupole time-of-flight instrument (QSTAR-Pulsar, ABIMDS-SCIEX) with sample introduction with a 96-well autosampler (Agilent HP1100).

MS MS+6 MS+10

Page 32: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Upregulated proteins

Page 33: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Downregulated proteins

Page 34: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Figure 2. Western blot analysis of selected EGFR effectors. HeLa cells were stimulated with EGF for the indicated time intervals, matching the proteomics experiments.

1.1--7.1--15.4--2.1

3.5--3.6--2.7--1.7

23.6--20.5--8.8--3.7

34--28.6--17.9--2.8

1.8--8.6--6.1--1.7

1.0--2.1--4.0--1.2

29.7--11--3.2--2.8

9.3--10--2.7--1.7

0.44--0.57--0.66--0.76

42--60--18.8--7.1

39--40--31.5--17.8

Fold activation

Page 35: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Receptor internalization

Ras-MAPK pathways

Actin remodeling

Novel proteins

Page 36: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Quantitative proteome analysis of the P-STM antibody-recognizable phosphorylation site on lamins A/C in mitotic HeLa S3 cells

(Yu et al. Biochem J, 1998)

Page 37: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

*Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C., and .Department of Life Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Yang, Fong, Yu and Liu (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 7034-40

Page 38: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Edman Degradation(32P-release)

Page 39: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Immunoblot analysis of auto-kinase during the activation and inactivation processes with a phospho-specific antibody (P-STM Ab) against th

e identified phosphorylation-site sequence

(Yu et al., Biochem. J. 1998)

Page 40: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Anti-phosphopeptide antibody, P-STM as a novel tool for detecting mitotic phosphoproteins: Identification of lamins A and C as two major targets Tsai et al. J. Cell. Biochem. 94, 967–981 (2005)

MPM2Other mitotic-specificphosphoantibody

Nocodazole (Noc) 1.disrupts microtubules by binding to β -tubulin2. disruption of mitotic spindle function3. Arrests the cell cycle at G2/M phase

Okadaic acid (OA)protein phosphataseinhibitor

Page 41: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

5, 19, 22 199 390, 392 416,

403, 404

480 525

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 17;101(33)

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 17;101(33)

Eur J Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;62(2):237-47

Eur J Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;62(2):237-47.

Cell. 1990 May 18;61(4):579-89.

J Cell Biol. 1996 Dec;135(6 Pt 1):1441-55

EMBO J. 2002 Apr 15;21(8):1967-77

Eur J Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;62(2):237-47

Cell. 1990 May 18;61(4):579-89

Eur J Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;62(2):237-47.

It’s not easy to assess the dynamic change of specific phosphorylation site on lamin A/C during cell cycle

12SGAQASS19TPL22SPTR 389LSP392SPTSQR

SKRS[pT402] MVGTPYC

Page 42: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Cell. 1990 May 18;61(4):579-89.

Mutations of phosphorylation sites in lamin A that prevent nuclear lamina disassembly in mitosis.Heald R, McKeon F.Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.The nuclear envelope is a dynamic structure that completely disassembles in response to MPF/cdc2 activity in mitosis. A key feature of this process is the hyperphosphorylation of the major structural proteins of the envelope, the nuclear lamins A, B, and C. Two highly conserved serine residues of the lamin protein (Ser-22 and Ser-392 of lamins A and C) are symmetrically positioned 5 amino acids from the ends of the large alpha-helical domain and are shown in the accompanying paper by Ward and Kirschner to be among four sites phosphorylated during nuclear envelope breakdown. Mutations in Ser-22 and Ser-392 that prevent phosphorylation at these sites block the disassembly of the nuclear lamina during mitosis. We propose a model for the regulation of lamin assembly in which phosphorylation just outside the ends of the alpha-helical domain controls the assembly dynamics of the lamin coiled-coil dimers.

Page 43: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Ong, S.E. Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M.

Department of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Germany.

Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376–386 (2002). NATURE PROTOCOLS 1, 2650 (2006)

Page 44: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry
Page 45: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

PNAS USA 100, 15434–15439 (2003)

Fig. 2. Optimization of adsorption and elution conditions for a functional p38 inhibitor matrix.

Fig. 1. Identification of a p38 inhibitor analogue suitable for immobilization.

Page 46: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Fig. 3. Efficient affinity purification of protein kinases specifically targeted by immobilized p38 inhibitor. HeLa whole cell lysate was subjected to PI 51 affinity chromatography, and the bound proteins were eluted with a combination of ATP and free PI 51.

16-benzyldimethyl-n-hexadecylammonium chloride (16-BAC)

Page 47: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry

Fig. 5. In vitro characterization of protein kinases inhibited by SB 203580.

Fig. 6. Structural determinants of SB 203580 sensitivity.

Page 48: Phosphoproteome Analysis by  Mass Spectrometry