relativistic accretion disks: their dynamics and emission yuan, ye-fei (袁业飞) department of...
TRANSCRIPT
Relativistic accretion disks: their dynamics and emission
Yuan, Ye-Fei(袁业飞)Department of Astronomy, USTC
(2011.04.26)
Collaborators:
Cao, X.; Shen, Z.Q. (SHAO);
Li, Guangxing; Huang, L. (USTC)Ref.: ApJ, 699, 722-731(2009), ApJ, 715, 623-635(2010)
Outline
Relativistic Accretion Disks Ray Tracing Method Relativistic SSD/Slim Disks Images of Sgr A* : Relativistic ADAF Main Conclusions
Relativistic Accretion Model
Kerr Metric:
Reference Frames: LNRF, CRF, LRF
LNRF(ZMAO) u
CRF
)(,2/12
)(
r
AVuLRF VV r )(
Four velocity of the fluid: uμ(Ω,V)
Basic Equations:
Fr
A
dr
dsTr
Mr2
,6
24
0 )(2
ADAF
SSD/Slim
Ray Tracing Methodβ
α
(α,β).Integral of motion of photons:
EQqEL
ppH
LEapQ
PL
pE
z
z
z
t
/,/
1,0,2
1
2
1
cotcos
2/1
222222
Two impact parameters:
obspaq obsobs
obs
2/1222 )cotcos(
sin
Equation of photon trajectroy:
Analytic solution of photon’s trajectory:
where,
MCD spectra Influenced by BH spin Prominent in XRBs
Relativistic SSD/Slim: One temperature disk
Why XRB?
•Mass Estimation
•Inclination Angle (Superluminal Motion)
•Bright, Easy to Observe
What can MCD tell us about Spin?
•Effect of Spin
•Degeneracy Between Spin and Inclination Angle
Li.L.X .et. al 2006, Shafee. R .et.al 2006
Our motivations
•Study the spectra from slim accretion disks
•Study the influence of spin and Inclination angle on the emergent spectra
•Quantify the error of Standard Accretion Disk model in estimating spin
Physical Effects: Heat Advection
Li, Yuan, Cao (2010)
Physical Effects: Disk Thickness
•Left: No Thickness, Right: With Thickness, M_dot=2, a=0.98, 600
Global solution of the disk
Li, Yuan, Cao (2010)
Emergent Spectra
Li, Yuan, Cao (2010)
Implications For Spin Estimation
Li, Yuan, Cao (2010)
Measured Spin of GRS 1915+105
Sgr A* --- The Black Hole Candidate in Milky Way Galaxy
Mass : 4 x 106 M⊙
D : 8 kpc
Angular size of horizon : ~ 20 μas
From: Lei Huang
UN beam 1.11 mas x 0.32 mas @ 9o Super-resolution 0.02 mas
unresolved (no extended structure) → single component zero closure phases → symmetrical structure (~E-W) elongated emission → consistent with λ≥ 7mm data
The first image of Sgr A* @3.5mm
Shen et al. 2005 NatureFrom Zhiqiang Shen
Yuan, Shen, Huang, 2006, ApJL
@7mm
@1.3mm
@3.5mm
Huang, Cai, Shen, Yuan, 2008, MNRAS
@1.3mm @3.5mm
θobs=0
θobs=45
θobs=90
Global structure of ADAF
Yuan, Cao, Huang, Shen (2009)
Radiation Transfer Equation
Radiation Transfer Equation
)(
),,(
)(
/),(
),(
~
),(~),(
~
30
0
3
00
xx
xkk
uk
xjj
x
II
xjIxukd
Id
obsem
emem
em
em
emem
em
θobs=0
Images of Sgr A*
Yuan, Cao, Huang, Shen (2009)
θobs=90, 45, 0Images @ 7 mm
a=-9.998 -0.5 0 0.5 0.998
Yuan, Cao, Huang, Shen (2010 )
θobs=90, 45, 0
a=-9.998 -0.5 0 0.5 0.998
Images @ 3.5 mm
Yuan, Cao, Huang, Shen (2009)
θobs=90, 45, 0
Images @ 1.3 mm
a=-9.998 -0.5 0 0.5 0.998
Yuan, Cao, Huang, Shen (2009)
Yuan, Cao, Huang, Shen (2009)
Main conclusions
•Effects of BH spin:
For a>0, the larger the spin, the smaller the shadow of BH, and the brighter the inner part of the disk.
For a<0, there is no significant difference.
•Effects of the viewing angles:
The larger the viewing angles, the smaller the BH shadow which is even obscured at edge on case, and the brighter the inner part of the disk.
•Effects of the observing wavelength:
The shorter the observing wavelength, the smaller of the images.
•Application to SgrA*: fast spin or large inclination?
Thanks!