resistant, wy.pptx

Upload: burnet-institute-myanmar

Post on 07-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    1/28

    Failure and change to second line

    Prepared By: Dr. Wut Yi

    STO, C&S

    BI-MM

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    2/28

    Indications for Switching

    Toxicity

    New Problem (TB, Pregnant)

    Failure

    Virologic failure

    Immunologic failure

    Clinical Failure

    Difficulty adhering to the regimen Current antiretroviral regimen is suboptimal

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    3/28

    FDA-Approved Drugs for HIV Therapy

    NNRTIs

    Delavirdine (DLV)

    Efavirenz (EFV)

    Nevirapine (NVP)

    PIs

    Amprenavir (APV) discontinued

    2004

    Atazanavir (ATV)Darunavir (DRV)

    Fosamprenavir (FPV)

    Indinavir (IDV)

    Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV)

    Nelfinavir (NFV)

    Ritonavir (RTV)Saquinavir (SQV hgc)

    Tipranavir (TPV)

    Abacavir (ABC)

    Didanosine (ddI)

    Emtricitabine (FTC)

    Lamivudine (3TC)

    Stavudine (d4T)Tenofovir (TDF)

    Zalcitabine (ddC) withdrawn 2005

    Zidovudine (ZDV)

    3TC/ABC

    3TC/ABC/ZDV

    3TC/ZDVFTC/TDF

    NRTIs

    Fusion Inhibitors (FIs)

    Enfuvirtide (ENF)

    Maraviroc (CCR5 inhibitor)

    Multiple Class

    EFV/FTC/TDF

    Integrase InhibitorsRaltegravir

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    4/28

    RESPONSE TO TREATMENT

    Virological

    Immunological

    Clinical

    Falling and then

    undetectable viral load

    Rise in CD4 count

    (10/month)

    Weight gainand rise in Karnofski score

    Symptoms, PPE less

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    5/28

    How to detect treatment failure

    Asymptomatic withCD4 < 200

    (Monitor Adherence)

    WHO class III or IV

    Clinical monitoringevery month

    CD4 every 6 months

    Clinical monitoring atleast every month

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    6/28

    How to detect?

    Reason for failure1. Treatment failure

    no optimal treatment

    regimen

    non-adherence

    bad absorption, druginteractions

    Resistance

    HIV-2

    2. Other reasons

    side effects of ARVs or

    other drugs

    IRIS

    OI or other HIV relatedproblems.

    Non-HIV relatedproblems

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    7/28

    How to detect?

    MonitoringAdherence(Importance

    *100000000)

    Monitoring Viral Load 6 monthsapart

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    8/28

    How is ART failure defined?

    Clinical:

    New/recurrent OI or malignancy after

    6 months on ARTBeware IRIS

    Immunological:

    Fall CD4 to pre-treatment level, or

    50% fall from peak level, after 6months ART, persistant CD4 countsbelow 100/mm3

    CD4 repeated 3 months apart

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    9/28

    How is ART failure defined?

    Virological failure

    Plasma viral load above 5000 copies/ml in

    a person on ART

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    10/28

    Immunogical Success

    Increase in CD4 count at 12 weeks: 10-50cells/mm

    Increase in CD4 count at 16-32 weeks: 30-50cells/mm

    Increase in CD4 count/year: 80-150 cells/mm

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    11/28

    Remember

    CD4 counts can vary significantly and donot always predict virological failure

    20% with no CD4 increases have undetectable VL(Ukraine 14/15 pts with no significant CD4 hadundetectable VL)

    40% with immunological failure have undetectableVL

    40-70% of those with virological failure dont have

    immunological failure Infection, pregnancy, alcohol, stress

    CD4 alone is not a reliable method to

    assess effectiveness of ART

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    12/28

    Remember

    Despite immunological and virological failure, patients doclinically very well for years

    only 1/3 have immunological failure after 3 years of virilogicalfailure if the ART continued

    Long-term outcomes on 2nd and 3rd line regimens areinferior to 1st line regimens

    1st mean 11 months, 2nd mean 7 months

    No FDC, o pill burden, food restrictions, side-effects

    Options for 2nd line therapy are limited Registration, cost, cold-chain

    rapid changes can quickly use up all ARV options

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    13/28

    Remember

    If failure is due to poor adherence, then changing therapywill have no benefit

    Always exclude co-existent OI or IRIS

    If possible, clinical or immunological failure should alwaysbe confirmed with a viral load measurement of >1000copies/ml prior to changing to a second-line regimen

    Failure due to ARV resistance will not occur before 12months of ART for treatment nave patients, and 6months of ART for treatment experienced patients.

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    14/28

    When to Change

    Should be a combination of bothclinical and immunological failure

    Decision to change to 2nd line made bydoctor in consultation with HIV specialist

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    15/28

    ABC or 3TC (sAZT)#

    ddI or TDF

    EFV or NVPNRTI sparing option if the triple NRTIapproach were used in first-linetherapy

    Standard second-line option if NRTI/NNRTIapproach were used in first-line therapy

    Second line ARV drugs in adults and adolescents

    PI/r*

    * Ritonavir-boosted PIs (ATV/r, FPV/r, IDV/r, LPV/r and SQV/r) are considered as the key component in second-line regimens and its

    use should be reserved for this situation. LPV/r is the only PI currently available as a FDC and a new formulation that doesn't need

    refrigeration was recently launched. In the absence of a cold chain and where the new LPV/r formulation is not available, NFV can be

    employed as the PI component but it is considered less potent than a RTV-boosted PI.

    # The use of 3TC (AZT) are listed for strategic use as resistance to both drugs is predicted to be present following failure on the

    respective first-line regimen listed. 3TC will maintain the M184V mutation which may potentially decrease viral replicative capacity as

    well as induce some degree of viral resensitization to AZT or TDF; AZT may prevent or delay the emergence of the K65R mutation.However, it must be stressed that the clinical efficacy of this strategy in this situation has not been proven.

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    16/28

    ABC or 3TC (sAZT)#

    ddI or TDF

    EFV or NVPNRTI sparing option if the triple NRTIapproach were used in first-linetherapy

    Standard second-line option if NRTI/NNRTIapproach were used in first-line therapy

    Second line ARV drugs in adults and adolescents

    PI/r*

    * Ritonavir-boosted PIs (ATV/r, FPV/r, IDV/r, LPV/r and SQV/r) are considered as the key component in second-line regimens and its

    use should be reserved for this situation. LPV/r is the only PI currently available as a FDC and a new formulation that doesn't need

    refrigeration was recently launched. In the absence of a cold chain and where the new LPV/r formulation is not available, NFV can be

    employed as the PI component but it is considered less potent than a RTV-boosted PI.

    # The use of 3TC (AZT) are listed for strategic use as resistance to both drugs is predicted to be present following failure on the

    respective first-line regimen listed. 3TC will maintain the M184V mutation which may potentially decrease viral replicative capacity as

    well as induce some degree of viral resensitization to AZT or TDF; AZT may prevent or delay the emergence of the K65R mutation.However, it must be stressed that the clinical efficacy of this strategy in this situation has not been proven.

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    17/28

    ABC or 3TC (sAZT)#

    ddI or TDF

    EFV or NVPNRTI sparing option if the triple NRTIapproach were used in first-linetherapy

    Standard second-line option if NRTI/NNRTIapproach were used in first-line therapy

    Second line ARV drugs in adults and adolescents

    PI/r*

    * Ritonavir-boosted PIs (ATV/r, FPV/r, IDV/r, LPV/r and SQV/r) are considered as the key component in second-line regimens and its

    use should be reserved for this situation. LPV/r is the only PI currently available as a FDC and a new formulation that doesn't need

    refrigeration was recently launched. In the absence of a cold chain and where the new LPV/r formulation is not available, NFV can be

    employed as the PI component but it is considered less potent than a RTV-boosted PI.

    # The use of 3TC (AZT) are listed for strategic use as resistance to both drugs is predicted to be present following failure on the

    respective first-line regimen listed. 3TC will maintain the M184V mutation which may potentially decrease viral replicative capacity as

    well as induce some degree of viral resensitization to AZT or TDF; AZT may prevent or delay the emergence of the K65R mutation.However, it must be stressed that the clinical efficacy of this strategy in this situation has not been proven.

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    18/28

    How can we minimize ART failure?

    Do not prescribe ART at the first visit

    Financial problem

    Follow up regularly

    Regimen and dosage(take right time, right dose andreduce pill burden)

    Adherence

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    19/28

    AZT

    300 mg BID

    Side Effects(SE):y Nausea, vomiting,HA, fatigue - common, early

    y Later: anemia, leukopenia, GI, myositis, insomnia

    y Pigmentation of nail beds, lactic acidosis, fatty Liver

    Food Interactions: None with or without food is ok

    Food decreases AZT-related nausea

    Use non-AZT regimen if initial Hb

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    20/28

    DDI (Didanosine)

    Tabs 200 mg BID for wt >/= 60 kg

    125 mg BID for wt < 60 kg

    If use buffered tablets, 2 or more tablets

    must be used at each dose to provideadequate buffer

    Tablets must be chewed or dissolved

    y Powder--slightly different absorption and doses

    y QD dosing: 400 mg/d for >/=60 kg, 250mg

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    21/28

    DDI toxicity

    Peripheral Neuropathy

    Nausea

    Diarrhea, abdominal pain

    Pancreatitis Lactic acidosis, fatty liver

    Not combined with D4T (combined toxicity)

    Not combined with Tenofovir (drug interactions)

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    22/28

    TDF

    300 mg (one pill) once daily Nucleotide

    eliminates a phosphorylation step foractivation

    Reduce dose of DDI if taken concomitantly Side effects (Rare):

    nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia

    can be associated with lactic acidosis,

    pancreatitis, hepatotoxicity, worsening renalfailure (? genetic)

    Resistance Pattern:Slow--Multiple mutations

    Activity against Hepatitis B

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    23/28

    Abacavir (ABC)

    Dosing: 1 x 300mg tablet BID

    Food Interactions: no food interactions

    Toxicity

    Diarrhea,Nausea, Headache all mild

    Lactic acidosis, fatty liver (rare)

    Allergic reaction (HSR) : 5%

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    24/28

    ABC

    Systemic symptoms: feels sick, fever, malasie

    Rash, GI, Respiratory

    Peak day around day 11

    Symptoms related to doses

    Decision to stop because ofHSR isforever. Irrevocable. Therefore make it

    wisely. Role of initial education, partnership.

    Have patient return any unused ABC.

    Future: Genetic Testing for who will havereaction

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    25/28

    FTC

    Flourinated 3TC-very similar

    Dosing: 1 x 200mg capsule QD

    Food Interactions: no food interactions

    Activity against Hepatitis B

    Toxicity

    Mild abdominal discomfort

    Occasional nausea

    Hyperpigmentation

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    26/28

    Preferred boosted PI

    Lopinavir/ritnavir

    Atazanavir/ritonavir

    ( Ritonavir boosted= increase the drug level ofother PI

    = increase dosing interval

    = slow mutation and slow resistant)

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    27/28

    Kaletra (Lip/r)

    Dose: 400/100mg twice daily (Thermostable formulation: 2tablets twice daily; old formulation: 3 tablets twice daily)

    Advantages of the thermo-stable formulation: lower pill

    burden, no food restriction. Generally well-tolerated Most common adverse effects : nausea and diarrhoea,

    increase of hepatic transaminases Class adverse reactions: insulin resistance, fat accumulation

    and hyperlipidaemia

    can increase the risk of nephrotoxicity with TDF If given with rifampicin need to increase the dose to

    533/133mg twice daily, and monitor closely for hepatitis (riskincreased).

  • 8/6/2019 Resistant, WY.pptx

    28/28

    Third line

    Darunavir (DRV)

    Ritonavir

    Raltegravir

    Etravirine (ETV)