rfi impact at candidate remote station sites - … word 2007 rfi impact at candidate remote station...

63
Name Designation Affiliation Date Signature Submitted by: R P Millenaar Chief Site Engineer SPDO 16/11/11 Accepted by: R T Schilizzi Director SPDO 16/11/11 Approved by: R T Schilizzi Director SPDO 16/11/11 RFI IMPACT AT CANDIDATE SKA REMOTE STATION SITES ANONYMOUS EDITION Document number ................................................................. WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision .......................................................................................................................... B Author........................................................................................................ R.P. Millenaar Date ............................................................................................................... 16‐11‐2011 Status .................................................................................................... Final Confidential

Upload: vuongnguyet

Post on 14-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

Name Designation Affiliation Date Signature

Submittedby:

RPMillenaar ChiefSiteEngineer

SPDO 16/11/11

Acceptedby:

RTSchilizzi Director SPDO 16/11/11

Approvedby:

RTSchilizzi Director SPDO 16/11/11

RFIIMPACTATCANDIDATESKAREMOTESTATIONSITESANONYMOUSEDITION

Documentnumber ................................................................. WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003Revision ..........................................................................................................................BAuthor........................................................................................................ R.P.MillenaarDate ............................................................................................................... 16‐11‐2011Status....................................................................................................FinalConfidential

Page 2: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page2of63

DOCUMENTHISTORY

Revision DateOfIssue EngineeringChange

Number

Comments

‐ 14‐11‐2011 ‐ Firstdraft

A 16‐11‐2011 ‐ FinalFullEdition

B 16‐11‐2011 ‐ FinalAnonyousEdition

DOCUMENTSOFTWARE Package Version Filename

Wordprocessor MsWord Word2007 RFIImpactatcandidateremotestationsites‐Anonymous1.0.docx

Blockdiagrams

Other

ORGANISATIONDETAILSName SKAProgramDevelopmentOffice

Physical/PostalAddress

JodrellBankCentreforAstrophysics

AlanTuringBuilding

TheUniversityofManchester

OxfordRoad

Manchester,UK

M139PLFax. +44(0)1612754049

Website www.skatelescope.org

Page 3: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page3of63

TABLEOFCONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................. 6

2 SCOPE ........................................................................................................ 6

3 METHOD .................................................................................................... 6

4 REMOTESTATIONCONFIGURATION ................................................................... 74.1 Site‐specificconfigurationY ......................................................................................................74.2 Site‐specificconfigurationX......................................................................................................9

5 INFORMATIONSUPPLIED ............................................................................... 115.1 Y ..............................................................................................................................................115.2 X ..............................................................................................................................................11

6 RESULTS ................................................................................................... 126.1 Y ..............................................................................................................................................136.2 X ..............................................................................................................................................38

7 REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 63

FIGURESFigure1:Locationsof25remotestations(red)inthe(…)(Y)configuration.Theinner180kmspiralsin

blue.Thewhitegridis5degreesonaside,correspondingtoafixedN‐Slengthof560kmandanE‐Wdimension(whichvarieswithlatitude)of510kmalongtheTropicofCapricorn(Yellowline). .............................................................................................................................................8

Figure3:Locationsof25 remotestations (red) in (…) (X)configuration.The inner180kmspirals inblue.Thewhitegridis5degreesonaside,correspondingtoafixedN‐Slengthof560kmandanE‐Wdimension(whichvarieswithlatitude)of510kmalongtheTropicofCapricorn(Yellowline). ...........................................................................................................................................10

Figure5:Y,Site1 ..................................................................................................................................13Figure6:Y,Site2 ..................................................................................................................................14Figure7:Y,Site3 ..................................................................................................................................15Figure8:Y,Site4 ..................................................................................................................................16Figure9:Y,Site5 ..................................................................................................................................17Figure10:Y,Site6 ................................................................................................................................18Figure11:Y,Site7 ................................................................................................................................19Figure12:Y,Site8 ................................................................................................................................20Figure13:Y,Site9 ................................................................................................................................21Figure14:Y,Site10 ..............................................................................................................................22Figure15:Y,Site11 ..............................................................................................................................23Figure16:Y,Site12 ..............................................................................................................................24Figure17:Y,Site13 ..............................................................................................................................25Figure18:Y,Site14 ..............................................................................................................................26Figure19:Y,Site15 ..............................................................................................................................27Figure20:Y,Site16 ..............................................................................................................................28

Page 4: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page4of63

Figure21:Y,Site17 ..............................................................................................................................29Figure22:Y,Site18 ..............................................................................................................................30Figure23:Y,Site19 ..............................................................................................................................31Figure24:Y,Site20 ..............................................................................................................................32Figure25:Y,Site21 ..............................................................................................................................33Figure26:Y,Site22 ..............................................................................................................................34Figure27:Y,Site23 ..............................................................................................................................35Figure28:Y,Site24 ..............................................................................................................................36Figure29:Y,Site25 ..............................................................................................................................37Figure30:X,Site01 ..............................................................................................................................38Figure31:X,Site02 ..............................................................................................................................39Figure32:X,Site03 ..............................................................................................................................40Figure33:X,Site04 ..............................................................................................................................41Figure34:X,Site05 ..............................................................................................................................42Figure35:X,Site06 ..............................................................................................................................43Figure36:X,Site07 ..............................................................................................................................44Figure37:X,Site08 ..............................................................................................................................45Figure38:X,Site09 ..............................................................................................................................46Figure39:X,Site10 ..............................................................................................................................47Figure40:X,Site11 ..............................................................................................................................48Figure41:X,Site12 ..............................................................................................................................49Figure42:X,Site13 ..............................................................................................................................50Figure43:X,Site14 ..............................................................................................................................51Figure44:X,Site15.Notethatthedistancescaleislargerthan150km.Transmittersbeyond150km

shouldnotbeincludedincomparisons. ....................................................................................52Figure45:X,Site16 ..............................................................................................................................53Figure46:X,Site17 ..............................................................................................................................54Figure47:X,Site18 ..............................................................................................................................55Figure48:X,Site19 ..............................................................................................................................56Figure49:X,Site20 ..............................................................................................................................57Figure50:X,Site21 ..............................................................................................................................58Figure51:X,Site22 ..............................................................................................................................59Figure52:X,Site23 ..............................................................................................................................60Figure53:X,Site24 ..............................................................................................................................61Figure54:X,Site25.Notethatthedistancescaleislargerthan150km.Transmittersbeyond150km

shouldnotbeincludedincomparisons .....................................................................................62

TABLESTable1:Thelocationsofthe(…)(Y)remotestations.............................................................................7Table2:(…)(X)remotestations .............................................................................................................9

Page 5: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page5of63

Glossary

EMI ElectroMagneticInterferenceITU InternationalTelecommunicationsUnionFoM FigureofMeritPFD PowerFluxDensity(indBWm‐2Hz‐1)PSD PowerSpectralDensity(indBWHz‐1)RAS RadioAstronomyServiceRFI RadioFrequencyInterferenceRQZ RadioQuietZoneSKA SquareKilometreArraySPDO SKAProgramDevelopmentOffice

Page 6: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page6of63

1 Introduction

Atanearlystageinthedevelopmentofsite‐specificconfigurationsfortheSKA,theresultofwhichhasbeendescribed in [1], itwasagreedamongst the twositeproponentsandSPDOtodevelopaFigureofMerit(FoM)forspectrumcrowdingatremotestationlocations.Ofthesethereare25andallofthemaresituatedoutsidetheRadioQuietZone(RQZ)thatwillbeimplementedatthecentrallocation, and thereforedonotbenefit fromoptimal radio interference conditions. The locationofeach remote station is a compromise in radio quietness (away from human presence), andaccessibility in termsof roads, fibrehook‐upandpowerdelivery (close tohumanpresence),whilealsooptimisingforscienceimagingquality.Inaprocessstartingfromgenericspecificationstofinallocations the SPDO has worked with the site proponents to design the course locations of theremote stations. Final adjustments of these locations were done by the proponents on theirconfiguration to find thebest compromise.Partof thisprocesswasadesktopanalysis,evaluatingtheimpactoflicensedradiotransmittersaroundeachofthetargetstationsbycalculatingthepowerspectraldensity(PSD)ofreceivedsignalsatthatlocationoriginatingfromtransmittersinthatarea.The informationgained in thesecalculations ispresented in this report.Thepurpose is toprovideevaluatorsanddesignengineersanoverviewofexpectedRFIimpactattheremotestations.Thiswork is tobecomplementedbyasurveyof the radio interferenceenvironmentatall remotestationsoncesiteselectionhasbeendone.Already,aspartoftheinvestigationsinthesiteselectionprocess, four of these remote site locations for each candidate host have been visited by a localteamtoperformmeasurements,usingtheequipmentdevelopedbytheSPDOandsiteproponentsfortheRFImeasurementcampaignin2010/11.Theresultsfortheseremotesitesarereportedin[2]and[3],inananonymousfashion.Thisreportconnectsthesemeasurementswiththeresultsofthedesktopanalysisforthesefourcaseseach.

2 Scope

ThisdocumentreportsonthespectrumcrowdingFoMresultsintheformofplotsofreceivedsignallevelsateachofthe25proposedremotestationlocations.Thisreporthastwoeditions:

• Fullreport• Anonymous version,where all references to country/countries and specific locationshave

been removed. ItusesXandY todistinguishbetweenproponentsandsequencenumbersforremotestations.(thisreportedition)

3 Method

ThefollowingmethodwasdiscussedandagreedamongstSPDOandsiteproponents:Foreachofthe25remotestationlocations,

• collect information on transmitters in databases selected to provide a complete andaccurate overview of transmitter frequencies, EIRP, bandwidth, antenna height andradiationpattern,distance,

• collectinformationoninterveningterrainfromtransmittertoremotestation,• calculatepropagationattenuation,usingtheterrain informationandantennadistanceand

heightintheITU‐RP.526‐11model,• findreceivedPSD levelsat theremotestation,byapplyingthepropagationattenuationto

theemittedlevelinthedirectionofthestation.Theagreedrangeoftransmitterstobeconsideredwasupto150kmfromthelocationoftheremotestation.

Page 7: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page7of63

4 RemoteStationConfiguration

4.1 Site‐specificconfigurationY

Theremotestationlocationsinthe(…)(Y)arrayaregiveninTable1.

SiteRFImeas.sitenr. Elevation Country Longitude Latitude

01 n/a Y 02 n/a Y 03 n/a Y 04 n/a Y 05 n/a Y 06 n/a Y 07 n/a Y 08 n/a Y 09 n/a Y 10 n/a Y 11 Y1 n/a Y 12 n/a Y 13 n/a Y 14 n/a Y 15 n/a Y 16 Y2 n/a Y 17 n/a Y 18 n/a Y 19 n/a Y 20 n/a Y 21 Y3 n/a Y 22 n/a Y 23 Y4 n/a Y 24 n/a Y 25 n/a Y

Table1:Thelocationsofthe(…)(Y)remotestationsTheremotestationlocationsareplottedonthemapinFigure1,togetherwiththelocationoftheelementsntheinnerareaof180kmradius.

Page 8: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page8of63

Figure1:Locationsof25remotestations(red)inthe(…)(Y)configuration.Theinner180kmspiralsinblue.Thewhitegridis5degreesonaside,correspondingtoafixedN‐Slengthof560kmandanE‐Wdimension(whichvarieswithlatitude)of510kmalongtheTropicofCapricorn(Yellowline).

IMAGEREMOVED

Page 9: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page9of63

4.2 Site‐specificconfigurationX

Theremotestationlocationsinthe(…)(X)arrayaregiveninTable2.

Sitenumber

RFImeas.sitenr. SiteName

Elevation(m) Country Longitude Latitude

01 X1 02 03 04 05 06 07 X2 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X3 22 X4 23 24 25

Table2:(…)(X)remotestationsTheremotestationlocationsareplottedonthemapinFigure2,togetherwiththelocationoftheelementsintheinnerareaof180kmradius.

Page 10: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page10of63

Figure2:Locationsof25remotestations(red)in(…)(X)configuration.Theinner180kmspiralsinblue.Thewhitegridis5degreesonaside,correspondingtoafixedN‐Slengthof560kmandanE‐Wdimension(whichvarieswithlatitude)of510kmalongtheTropicofCapricorn(Yellowline).

IMAGEREMOVED

Page 11: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page11of63

5 Informationsupplied

The site proponents have carried out the collection of transmitter details and have done thecalculations for received PSD levels. The information was supplied to the SPDO in either of twoforms,describedinthefollowingsections.

5.1 Y

A document [5] was supplied, which describes the work done, the information used and theresultingplotsofreceivedPSDlevels.Thefollowingdetailshavebeenprovidedin[5]:“TransmitterdatabaseThesourceforthetransmitter informationisthe(INFORMATIONREMOVED)ThisanalysisusestheFebruary2011data.Itmustbenotedthat:a)Thepowerlevelinthedatabaseisthemaximumallowedbytheservice,notnecessarilytheactualpowertransmitted.b) Some of the licensed services may not be in operation any longer; others may only transmitintermittently.c) Fordirectional transmitters, anantennagain, 3dBbeamwidth, front‐to‐back ratio andazimuthdirectionareprovided,sothesidelobelevelinthedirectionoftheproposedsiteisestimatedfromthesevalues.Forthesereasons,thelevelsintheplotsarebasedonaworst‐casetransmittedpowerlevelandmayoverestimatethespectralcrowdingatthesite.”

5.2 X

RawdatafilesweresuppliedwithinformationrequiredtogeneratetheplotsofreceivedPSDlevels.ThelatterwasdonebytheSPDO.Thefollowingdetailshavebeenprovidedbycorrespondence:“1. All transmitters within 150km of a site were used, with a minimum predicted level of ‐100dBuV/m(…)2.Thedatabasesusedarethefollowing:i.GSMdatabaseprovidedby(INFORMATIONREMOVED)Thedatabasewasinitiallyobtainedin2005,andrecentlyupdatedinthelast12month.ii.(INFORMATIONREMOVED)BroadcastingFrequencyPlan,updated2009‐effectivelytelevisionandradiotransmitters.(INFORMATIONREMOVED).iii. (INFORMATION REMOVED) Land‐Mobile database (transmitters for mobile coverage ie. VHFmobile)iv.(INFORMATIONREMOVED)FixedLinkdatabase(ie.microwavelinksetc.)v. (INFORMATION REMOVED) Self help database (self help database includes all low poweredtransmittersestablishedbysmalltownstoprovidelocalcommunitycoverageoftelevisionsignals)vi.(INFORMATIONREMOVED)alsothedatabasesofindividualoperatorstoconfirm,andsupplementthe (INFORMATION REMOVED). This was to cover the gap for national operators, who obtainnationallicensesandwillgenerallyonlysendupdatesto(INFORMATIONREMOVED)inbatches.Thisdatabasewasalsousedtocoveranygaps.(INFORMATIONREMOVED) The network plan always uses themaximumpossible EIRP ‐ so,worstcasescenario.(INFORMATIONREMOVED).“

Page 12: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page12of63

6 Results

Theresultsarepresentedintwoseriesof25plots,eachwiththreesubpanels,fromthetop:1.ReceivedPSDlevelsindBW/Hzforthefrequencyrangeof300to25000MHz.Thelowerboundaryissetto300MHzbecausethisisthelowestforeseeablefrequencyinuseattheremotestations(dishonly).ThiswastheagreedlowerfrequencyforthisFoManalysis.ItmustbenotedinfactthatintheplotsprovidedbyYthelowerboundaryappearstobeat400MHz.TheinformationprovidedbyXincluded much lower frequencies (<100MHz) but the plots that were produced by SPDO andpresentedhere,duplicatethefrequencyscale.Evaluatorsshouldthereforedisregardsignalsbelow400MHzwhenmakingcomparisons.Thesubpanelalsodisplays,inred,thethresholdPSDlevel(ΔPindBW/Hz)specifiedbyITU‐RRA.769‐2forVLBI,see[4],alsoreferredtoas‘Recommendation769’.In this reference the threshold interference levels for VLBI observations are given as spectral pfdlevels (SH indBWm‐2Hz‐1) inTable3.Toconvertthese levelstothesamePSDunitsasusedforthereceivedlevelsthefollowingexpressionisused(asperexpression5in[4]):

ΔP769VLBI = SH − 20 log( f ) −10 log( c2

4π) = SH − 20 log( f ) −158.5(dBWHz−1) ,

wherefistheobservingfrequencyinRec.769Table3.Thisequationfollowsfromtherelationshipofantennagainandeffectivearea,wherethegainissetto0dBi,asspecifiedinRec.769.Itisusefultoplotthisthresholdleveltoassessthereceivedinterferencefromlicensedtransmitters,but it should be noted that Rec. 769 sets protection levels for the bands reserved for the ‘RadioAstronomy Service’ (RAS) only. Here a plot with linearly interpolated levels between specifiedobservingfrequenciesisused.ReceivedlevelshigherthantheRec.769levelsaretobeexpectedforfrequenciesoutsidetheprotectedbands,asisdemonstratedintheseplots.2.ReceivedPSDlevelsin

1)(forYplots)dBabovetheRA.769‐2thresholdlevelforVLBIunder1,versusdistanceinkm;or2) (for X plots) dBW/Hz (as in 1)with automatic scaling to allow accurate display of levels,versusdistanceinkm.

Itmustbenotedthatthedistanceoftransmittersinsomecasesismorethantheagreed150km.Itisnot clear how complete the survey is for the larger distances and therefore evaluators shoulddisregardsignalsbeyond150kmwhenmakingcomparisons.3.ReceivedPSDlevelsindBabovetheRA.769‐2thresholdlevelforVLBIasdescribedunder1,versusbearingindegrees,where0°isNorth.

Page 13: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page13of63

6.1 Y

Plotsreproducedfrom[5].

Figure3:Y,Site1

Page 14: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page14of63

Figure4:Y,Site2

Page 15: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page15of63

Figure5:Y,Site3

Page 16: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page16of63

Figure6:Y,Site4

Page 17: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page17of63

Figure7:Y,Site5

Page 18: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page18of63

Figure8:Y,Site6

Page 19: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page19of63

Figure9:Y,Site7

Page 20: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page20of63

Figure10:Y,Site8

Page 21: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page21of63

Figure11:Y,Site9

Page 22: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page22of63

Figure12:Y,Site10

Page 23: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page23of63

Figure13:Y,Site11

Page 24: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page24of63

Figure14:Y,Site12

Page 25: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page25of63

Figure15:Y,Site13

Page 26: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page26of63

Figure16:Y,Site14

Page 27: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page27of63

Figure17:Y,Site15

Page 28: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page28of63

Figure18:Y,Site16

Page 29: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page29of63

Figure19:Y,Site17

Page 30: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page30of63

Figure20:Y,Site18

Page 31: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page31of63

Figure21:Y,Site19

Page 32: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page32of63

Figure22:Y,Site20

Page 33: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page33of63

Figure23:Y,Site21

Page 34: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page34of63

Figure24:Y,Site22

Page 35: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page35of63

Figure25:Y,Site23

Page 36: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page36of63

Figure26:Y,Site24

Page 37: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page37of63

Figure27:Y,Site25

Page 38: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page38of63

6.2 X

Plotsgeneratedfromrawdatasupplied.

Figure28:X,Site01

Page 39: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page39of63

Figure29:X,Site02

Page 40: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page40of63

Figure30:X,Site03

Page 41: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page41of63

Figure31:X,Site04

Page 42: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page42of63

Figure32:X,Site05

Page 43: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page43of63

Figure33:X,Site06

Page 44: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page44of63

Figure34:X,Site07

Page 45: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page45of63

Figure35:X,Site08

Page 46: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page46of63

Figure36:X,Site09

Page 47: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page47of63

Figure37:X,Site10

Page 48: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page48of63

Figure38:X,Site11

Page 49: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page49of63

Figure39:X,Site12

Page 50: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page50of63

Figure40:X,Site13

Page 51: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page51of63

Figure41:X,Site14

Page 52: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page52of63

Figure42:X,Site15.Notethatthedistancescaleislargerthan150km.Transmittersbeyond150kmshouldnotbeincludedincomparisons.

Page 53: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page53of63

Figure43:X,Site16

Page 54: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page54of63

Figure44:X,Site17

Page 55: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page55of63

Figure45:X,Site18

Page 56: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page56of63

Figure46:X,Site19

Page 57: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page57of63

Figure47:X,Site20

Page 58: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page58of63

Figure48:X,Site21

Page 59: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page59of63

Figure49:X,Site22

Page 60: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page60of63

Figure50:X,Site23

Page 61: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page61of63

Figure51:X,Site24

Page 62: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page62of63

Figure52:X,Site25.Notethatthedistancescaleislargerthan150km.Transmittersbeyond150kmshouldnotbeincludedincomparisons

Page 63: RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites - … Word 2007 RFI Impact at candidate remote station sites ‐ Anonymous 1.0.docx Block diagrams Other ORGANISATION DETAILS Name SKA

WP3‐050.020.010‐TR‐003 Revision:B

Page63of63

7 References

[1] ArrayConfigurationsforCandidateSKASites:DesignandAnalysis,R.P.Millenaar,R.C.Bolton,J.

Lazio,Rev.C,SPDO,4‐11‐2011[2] SKA Site SpectrumMonitoring Sites: X1‐X4 and Y1‐Y4,MeasurementMode:MaxHoldMode

(MH),Rev.1.0,A.J.Boonstra,R.P.Millenaar,30‐9‐2011[3] SKASiteSpectrumMonitoringSites:X1‐X4andY1‐Y4,MeasurementMode:RuralMode(RM),

Rev.1.0,A.J.Boonstra,R.P.Millenaar,28‐9‐2011[4] Protectioncriteriausedforradioastronomicalmeasurements,RecommendationITU‐RRA.769‐

2,2003[5] (INFORMATIONREMOVED)