rhc.-j. liu et al., catal. today 72, 173 (2002). conventional catalyst preparation (impregnation) =...
TRANSCRIPT
アークプラズマ法によって調製した高分散担持金属触媒の局所構造解析 日隈 聡士1,2・池上 啓太1,2・町田 正人1,2 (熊本大学1・京都大学ESICB2)
Arc-plasma (AP) preparation = Directly deposition
Ingot
precious
metal
Powder
Water-soluble
salt
Supported
catalyst
Loss
Loss
Loss
anode
condenser
Arc power supply
cathode
catalyst support
Ingot precious
metal
Plasma
insulator
trigger
electrode
trigger power
supply
stirring
mechanism
Al2O3
CeO2
ZrO2
AlPO4 Ingot
precious metal
Rh, Pd, Pt
(1) enhanced catalyst
activation,
selectivity
and lifetime
(2) a highly dispersed
active species
(3) reduced energy
requirements
(4) shortened
preparation time
C.-j. Liu et al., Catal. Today
72, 173 (2002).
Conventional
catalyst preparation
(Impregnation)
= Multistage process
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300
Catalytic activity for CO
oxidation over Rh/AlPO4
S. Hinokuma et al., Top. Catal., 52, 2108 (2009).
S. Hinokuma et al., Catal. Today, 175, 593 (2011).
S. Hinokuma et al., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, in press.
AP av. b : 2.4±1.1 nm
imp av. a : 6.4 ±5.5 nm
Temperature/ ̊C
CO
convers
ion
/ %
0 61 2 3 4 5
5
10
15
0
20
Distance / Å
FT
magnitude / a
.u.
AP
imp
1/8
1/16 Rh foil
Rh2O3
Rh-O
Rh-O-P
Rh-Rh
Rh-O-Rh
EXAFS of Rh/AlPO4
(Rh K-edge) a
a Interval of k-space to r-space of FT is 3.0-13.8 Å–1.
b Average size of Rh nanoparticles on AlPO4.
Introduction
Unsupported Rh nanoparticles prepared by arc-plasma process
In this work Experimental
previous research
arc-plasma gun
(APG: Fe)
vacuum
(TMP/RP)
Preparation condition arc-plasma gun
(APG: Pd or Cu)
container
(Al2O3, CeO2)
Synchronous (syn) pulse
syn
asyn (aged) (fresh)
900 ˚C, 25 h,
10% H2O/air
◇ Supports : Al2O3 , CeO2
◇ Cathodes : Fe and M (M=Pd, Cu)
◇ Pressure : 1.0×10-3 Pa
◇ Discharge voltage: 125 V
◇ Condenser capacity: 360 μF
Fe-M/Al2O3 or CeO2
Experimental setup of dual arc-plasma Characterization
◆ XRD ◆ XRF ◆ XPS
◆ Specific surface areas (SBET) ◆ FT-IR
◆ Metal dispersion (CO chemisorption) ◆ HRTEM
◆ CO oxidation catalytic activity test
(0.1% CO, 1.25%O2, He balance, W/F=5.0×10-4 g・min・cm-3)
◆ XAFS (BL9C, NW10A, KEK)
PF-AR
ring
X-ray
Proposal No. 2012G749
Light source: Bending magnet, Double-crystal monochromator: Si(111) or (311)
support
Dual-mode
arc-plasma
metal metal bimetal
1. to clarify effects of synchronous and asynchronous pulse deposition
2. to evaluate a local structure and catalytic performance
3. to compare with catalytic properties of wet-impregnation (imp) catalysts
Plasma
Results and Discussion
2 nm2 nm
2 7 Energy / keV
asyn
2 7 Energy / keV
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2 3 4 5
av. : 2.3
±0.7 nm
Fra
cti
on
/ %
Particle size / nm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2 3 4 5
av. : 2.3
±0.7 nm syn
TEM images and EDX spectra of Fe-Pd
Fe: 67wt% Pd: 33wt% Fe: 100wt%
Pd: 0wt%
Fra
cti
on
/ %
Particle size / nm
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
1/3
Distance / Å
FT
magnitude / a
.u.
syn
asyn
PdO
Pd foil
Pd-Fe
Pd-O Pd-O-Pd
Pd-Pd
Pd K-edge EXAFS and fitting parameters
1.2wt% Fe-1.0wt% Pd/Al2O3(fresh)
shell CNa
(±0.2)
r/Åb
(±0.03)
σ2/10–2 Å2c
(±0.05) R/%
syn Pd-O 2.7 2.01 0.45 2.0
Pd-Fe 0.5 2.70 0.65
Pd-Pd 0.8 2.73 0.59
asyn Pd-O 2.7 2.01 0.27 2.5
Pd-Pd 0.6 2.71 0.59
PdO Pd-O 4.0 2.02 0.27 0.5
Pd-O-Pd 4.0 3.05 0.52
Pd-O-Pd 8.0 3.43 0.55
Pd foil Pd-Pd 12.0 2.74 0.59 0.1
Interval of k-space to r-space of FT is 3.0-16.0 Å–1. aCoordination number. bInteratomic distance. cDebye-Waller factor.
Catalytic properties of CeO2-supported catalysts
CeO2
Fe-Pd
syn
CeO2
Pd
CeO2
Fe
asyn
S. Hinokuma et al., Catal. Today, 201, 92 (2013).
CO/Pda
/ %
SBET
/ m2・g-1
Pd0b
/ %
Fe-Pd (fresh)
syn
Fe-Pd (fresh)
asyn
167 57 36
166 74 51
T10c
/ C
105
98
a Determined by pulsed CO chemisorption at 50 C. Reduction by H2 at 200 C. b Determined by Fe2p and Pd3d XPS. c Temperature at which CO conversion reached to 10%
Fe0b
/ %
65
77
0.22
0.25
Pd
/ wt%
Fe
/ wt%
0.31
0.43
5 nm
Fe AP Cu AP Fe-Cu syn
5 nm 5 nm
Particle size / nm
Fra
cti
on
/ %
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 1 2 3 4 5 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 1 2 3 4 5 Particle size / nm
Fra
cti
on
/ %
Particle size / nm
Fra
cti
on
/ %
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 1 2 3 4 5
2.9±0.7 nm 2.7±0.7 nm 2.8±0.7 nm
TEM images and size distributions
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
7100 7110 7120 7130 7140
Energy / eV
imp (aged)
imp (fresh)
AP (aged)
AP (fresh)
FeO
Fe foil
Fe2O3
Cu K-edge EXAFS Fe K-edge XANES
2.4wt% Fe-3.1wt% Cu/Al2O3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 1 2 3 4 5
1/3
AP (fresh)
imp (fresh)
AP (aged)
imp (aged)
Distance / Å
FT
magnitude / a
.u.
Cu foil
CuO
Cu-O
Cu-O
Cu2O
CuFeO2 2
Cu-O-Fe
Cu-O-Cu
Cu-Cu
Cu-O-Cu
Cu-O-Cu
Cu-O
Shell CN a
(±0.2)
r/Å b
(±0.03)
σ2/10–2 Å2 c
(±0.05) R/%
AP (fresh) Cu-O (CuFeO2) 0.60 1.83 0.10 0.1
Cu-O (CuO) 2.60 1.95 0.26
AP (aged) Cu-O (CuFeO2) 0.50 1.81 0.19 0.01
Cu-O (CuO) 3.40 1.95 0.55
imp (fresh) Cu-O (CuO) 3.20 1.94 0.60 0.5
imp (aged) Cu-O (CuO) 3.10 1.95 0.60 0.7
Cu foil Cu-Cu 12.00 2.54 0.95 0.4
Cu2O Cu-O 2.00 1.84 0.46 3.9
CuO Cu-O 4.00 1.96 0.52 1.9
CuFeO2 Cu-O 2.00 1.83 0.58 2.2
Interval of k-space to r-space of FT is 2.0-15.0 Å–1. aCoordination number. bInteratomic distance. cDebye-Waller factor. CuFeO2
Cu(I)
Fe(II)
1.785
~1.825Å
X-ray absorption spectra (XAFS) of Al2O3-supported catalysts
Catalytic activity over CeO2-supported catalysts CO adsorption (in situ FT-IR at 50 ˚C) The amount of CO adsorption on Cu
Fe
/ wt%
Cu
/ wt% Cu+/Cu
COads
/ μmol・g-1 CO/Cu CO/Cu+
0.20 - AP (aged) - 0.3 - -
- 0.15 AP (aged) 0.89 5.7 0.24 0.27
0.18 0.11 AP (aged) 0.79 10.7 0.62 0.79
0.17 0.11 imp (aged) 0.66 1.9 0.11 0.17
- 0.13 imp (aged) 0.84 3.7 0.18 0.21
Conclusions
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300 400
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300 400
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300 400
CO
co
nvers
ion
/ %
aged
fresh aged
fresh
aged
fresh
Fe AP Fe-Cu AP
Cu AP
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300 400
CO
co
nvers
ion
/ %
0
20
40
60
80
100
Temperature / ̊C
aged
600 ̊C Fe-Cu imp
0 100 200 300 400
Temperature / ̊C
0.4% Pt/Al2O3
imp (aged)
SBET / m2・g-1
fresh
aged
Fe-Cu
AP
169
6
0.1% CO, 1.25% O2,
He balance. 10 ˚C·min−1,
W/F=5.0×10⁻4 g·min·cm−3.
200020502100215022002250
Fe-Cu/CeO2 syn (aged) Cu/CeO2 AP (aged) Fe/CeO2 AP (aged)
2250 2200 2150 2100 2050 2000 2250 2200 2150 2100 2050 2000 2250 2200 2150 2100 2050 2000
Wavenumber / cm-1
O2
He
CO
0.05 0.01
Absorb
ance / a
.u.
O
C
Cu
0.05
本研究は文部科学省の委託(元素戦略プロジェクトおよび元素戦略拠点形成型プロジェクト)を受けて実施した。
パルス放電を同期した多元系AP法によって平均粒子径2~3 nmの均一なFe-PdおよびFe-Cuナノ粒子を調製し、大型研究施設(KEK, PF)を利用して局所構造を測定した。
XAFS測定によって、AP法により調製したFe-Pd触媒ではFe3Pd1、Fe-Cu触媒ではデラフォサイト型CuFeO2に類似の局所構造を有する表面化合物が生成していることが明らかになった。
高分散の複合金属ナノ粒子の形成によって、活性な低酸化状態の金属が安定化した。これが要因となって、単独金属および湿式含浸法で調製した触媒より高いCO酸化活性を示した。
CO吸着量およびin situ FT-IR測定から、Fe-Cu/CeO2のCO吸着サイトは低酸化状態のCuである。熱処理によるCeO2のシンタリングにも関わらず、CuFeO2は高分散状態を保持することが分かった。
10 nm
Rh2.2 A = d111(Rh)
002
111
[110]