setawwa 2010, 29-58 choules
DESCRIPTION
Part 2TRANSCRIPT
BeachwellsBeachwells
Largest Beachwell Seawater Catchment Facilities in the World,Catchment Facilities in the World,• 32 Vertical beachwells split into 3 clusters,
• 5 hectars of Karstic costal land dedicated t b h llto beachwells,
• 220,000 cubic meters per day of nominal pumping capacity,
• 80 meters depth wells individually,
• Very low Silt Density Index of the raw water.water.
Pressure FiltersPressure Filters
High Speed Filtration Units for Seawater Pre‐treatment• 5 Dual Media pressure Filters• 5 Dual Media pressure Filters,
• 9 Single Media Filters,
• 11 Cartridge Filters for pre‐treated water polishing.g p p g
Reverse OsmosisReverse Osmosis
8 Reverse Osmosis first pass trains• 8 individual trains on first pass equipped• 8 individual trains on first pass equippedwith 7300 reverse osmosis membranes,
• 8 individual high efficiency work exchangersfor energy recoveryfor energy recovery,
• 8 high voltage high pressure pumps forpermeate production
4 Reverse Osmosis second passtrains for Boron removaltrains for Boron removal• Double stage trains for water recoveryimprovement,
4 i di id l t i i d ith 2800• 4 individual trains equipped with 2800reverse osmosis selective membranes forBoron removal
3D Plant View3D Plant View
Sydney SWROSydney SWRO
250,000 m3/D (66 MGD)
2007 –2010
US$0 8 Billion (plant/intake/outfallUS$0.8 Billion (plant/intake/outfall only)
Design & Construct
SydneySydney
Client: Sydney Water Corporation (SWC)Type of Contract: Design, Build & OperateProduct Flow: 66 MGD (250 ML/Day)Product Quality: <115 ppm TDS 0 4 ppm BoronProduct Quality: <115 ppm TDS, 0.4 ppm Boron• Provides 15% of the total water to Sydney• Three (3) permits required( ) p q
Kurnell ResidentsKurnell Residents
Caltex Refinery
Towra Point
( Ramsar Wetland)
Caltex Refinery
Towra Point
( Ramsar Wetland)
Caltex Refinery
Approx 300m
Inlet Riser
Caltex Refinery
Approx 300m
Inlet Risers
Serenity Cove
Film Studios
Serenity Cove
Film Studios Botany Bay National Park
Approx Site
BoundaryTunnels
(Approx
alignment)
Approx Site
BoundaryTunnels
(Approx
alignment)
Desalination Plant
Construction Site
Desalination Plant
Construction Site
Outlet
Riser
Outlet
Risers
Sydney Process FlowSydney Process Flow
SydneySydney
PretreatmentPretreatment
Operation at 33%-66% with all filters online –Operation at 33% 66% with all filters online • > low filtration rate (<4m/h)• SDI<3, filtration cycles > 55 hoursSDI 3, filtration cycles 55 hours• No acid dosing => better Boron rejection on the 1st pass and less
NaOH dosing
Operating at 100%• Filtration rate 6.7 m/h• Filtration cycle >40 hours• SDI < 3 at all times
F i lf t d t 7 9 /L• Ferric sulfate dose-rate 7-9 mg/L• Influent turbidity 2 NTU, up to 10 NTU during shock chlorination
Fujairah 2 SWRO/MEDj /
Hybrid Plant ‐ SWRO 136,000 m3/D (36 MGD) – MED 455,000 m3/D (120 MGD) – combined 156 MGD
2007 –20102007 2010
US$860 Million (SWRO & MED)
Design & Construct
F2 LocationF2 Location
Project SpecificsProject Specifics
ProcessProcess
3D View SWRO3D View SWRO
Site ConditionsSite Conditions
17
KindasaKindasa
Kindasa, 25,500 m3/Day (6.7 MGD) SWRO – Media Filtration followed by UF
Kindasa : Plant OverviewKindasa : Plant Overview
Self cleaning StrainersBrine to Outfall
Ng
ass RO Acid storage and
pre treatments pmen
t
1stp pre treatment
chemical dosing
st Pass HP Pu
mps
Boo
sters
e do
sing
equ
ip
BackwashO
Pre treatmentChemical dosing Seawater Intake
1s &
Lime
Post treatment
Raw Seawater in
BackwashTankBackwash
Pumps
Substation
2nd pass ROPost treatment
Chemical dosingRaw Seawater
Filtered Seawater
Ultra‐filtered SeawaterSubstationMV & LV SwitchgearVariable Speed drivesAdmin & Control Building
Permeate
Brine
HV/MV Transformers
MV/LV TransformersProduct to Storage Tank
150m
Ashkelon – 326,000 m3/Day (86 MGD) SWRO
Considerations
Pre‐treatment options
Evolving technologies
Short term
Medium term
Long term
Costingg
Siting
Pre‐treatment Options
Desal Plants, Evolving TechnologiesDesal Plants, Evolving TechnologiesShort termE i i h l i i i• Existing technologies, minor improvements
• Brine management, i.e. ZDD
M di tMedium term• Nano‐membranes (up to 15% reduction in energy), huge impact on the over 100,000 SWRO membranes we have installed ,worldwide
Long term• Forward osmosis
• Alternate membranes
• Bi‐products from brine
Financial Considerations, CapexFinancial Considerations, CapexIdentifying obstacles to cost‐effective operations
L l ll l lLarge scale vs. smaller scale plants
Location• Cost of land
• Proximity to existing potable water distribution network
P i it t l t i l t k• Proximity to electrical power network
Public Outreach
Plant Availability
Intake & Pre‐treatment Selection• Subsurface vs. open intake
• Quality of water with incidence on number of process steps
Environmental & Permitting Concerns associated with above
Financial Considerations, Opex
Up to 50% of the Opex costs can be in energy consumption
Financial Considerations, Opex
Energy Consumption• Minimize the process train, eliminate pumpspumps
• Use latest proven energy recovery devices
• Plan for future developments (i.e. b )membranes, etc)
• Length and head losses of distribution network
Chemical ConsumptionChemical Consumption• Reduce the amount of chemicals needed by minimizing the pre‐treatment process
• Minimize the amount of waste created
Others• Consider life cycle costs when designing y g gand constructing the plant
Citing Selection & ChallengesCiting Selection & Challenges
Subsurface intake• Reduces power consumption by 5‐10%
• Reduces chemical consumption by 5‐10%
R d th ll f t i t f th l t b 10 20%• Reduces the overall footprint of the plant by 10‐20%
• Reduces impingement & entrainment issues
Existing Potable water networkExisting Potable water network• Reduces overall cost
• Permitting and land issues• Permitting and land issues
Existing Power network• Reduces overall cost• Reduces overall cost
ConclusionConclusion
N i l t t t f ll li tiNo single pre‐treatment for all applications
Incorporate lessons learnt
Ad t t l l i t & ltAdapt to local environment & culture
THANK YOU