Single European Sky ATM Research

(SESAR)

Friday 6th June 2008

Agenda

1. 11:00 Introductions

2. 11:10 Presentations from guest speakers

3. 12:00(ish) Open question forum

4. 13:30(ish) Lunch

Running Order

• DGCA – Peter Griffiths• DAP – John Arscott• Me• EXCOM – Olaf Dlugi• Eurocontrol – Dr Erik Merckx• SJU – Patrick Ky• NATS – David Hilton

SESAR

Why?

Society· Noise & Climate

change

· Safety

· Security

· Sustainable growth

· Mobility

· Carbon

Emissions

Airspace Users· Cost pressure (+fuel)

· 9/11 and economic downturn

· Low cost airlines

· VLJs, UAVs

· Military operations

· GA

Airports· Capacity limitation

ANSPs· Corporatisation /

privatisation

· Under pressure of users

Supply Industry· Concentration

· Global

Aviation - an evolving Environment

2005: 10.5 millions

Traffic expected to double by 2020

2010: 12.5 millions 2020: 17.2 millions

2005 2010 2020

Closing the capacity gap

Traffic

Capacity with current system

2005 2013 2020

An ATM System reaching its limits

PotentialCapacity with

current system

Ongoing Short/Medium

Term Programmes

}Gap: need for

future system

New Solutionsfrom R&D

A new system is required

Background - SESAR

• SESAR is a project to “develop the new generation European ATM System”.

• Its aim is to deliver a new operational platform for ATM for Europe.• Joint funding was agreed for the project’s first phase by the

European Community and Eurocontrol at a total cost of 60m Euros.• ATA and stakeholders formed the SESAR Consortium to take the

project definition phase forward.• Deliverable of the Project Definition Phase is the ATM Master Plan.

The three phases of SESAR

2005 2010 2015 2020

2005 2010 2015 2020

SESAR PhasesDefinition

Development

Deployment

SESAR Impact on Operational ATM system

Olaf Dlugi

D5 – SESAR Master Plan

Olaf Dlugi

The SESAR Definition Phase is co-financed by the European Community and EUROCONTROL

SESAR Consortium including EUROCONTROL

SESAR overview : The Definition Phase

24 months

Deployment sequence analysis

Build the ATM

Master Plan

Define organisation & work- programme 2008-2013

The Market Its Requirements

PerformanceRequirements

The Top Product How to

Build it ActionPlan Go!

D2D2D3D3

D4D4 D5D5D6D6

Analyse air

transport value and

role of ATM

D1D1

ATM Target

Concept selection

Everything you always wanted to know about the

Master Plan

• One overall plan for all:– Plus individual roadmaps & – Supporting Changes

2006 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Implementation

R&D

21 22

Available for Operations

List of concerned operationalor technical changes

• Contains • Planning information for Deployment and R&D

• Not a one-off Master Planning process

• Passed to SJU for execution and maintenance

Th

e S

ES

AR

Ma

ste

r P

l an

Pro

du

cts

of

the

SE

SA

R D

efin

itio

n P

has

eD5 is only the tip of the iceberg

TaskDeliverables

Electronic Master Planwww.atmmasterplan.eu

Renewed ECIP/LCIP

D5

Agreed strategicguideline

Working andPlanning area

Derived agreed &committed actions

R&DDeploymentOperations

Trajectory based operations preparation

Net-centric trajectory management

Advanced automation in a shared trajectory environment

Full 4D-trajectory management & self separation

Best practices

Advancedseparation modes

Commitment to deployment now

Commitment to R&D Investment

Agreed way Forward

Performance Benefits by 2020

• The 2020 European ATM system will accommodate 15.8M flights/year;

• Average improvement of delays by 40 % per flight;

• Fuel savings (ATM related) of 14 MTons CO2

• ATM costs per flight reaches an average of €630/flight;

Benefits

• Societal Benefits (in 2020)– Direct, indirect and induced aviation contributions €470Bn /year to

European GDP

• Quantified Operational Benefits (cumulated between 2008 - 2020)– €8Bn Cost-effectiveness – €9Bn Capacity Gain & Delay Reduction– €8Bn Fuel cost savings– €2Bn Quality of Service - Low visibility

• Further Benefits– Flexibility, Interoperability, …

CONCLUSION

• Shared Master Plan

• Systematic approach to Master Planning

Erik Merckx

The ATM Master Planand

EUROCONTROL’s role

UK Stakeholders ForumLondon, 6 June 2008

Dr. Erik MerckxEUROCONTROLDeputy Director ATM Programmes

Overview

• Traffic and Capacity Profiles 2009 - 2013• ATM Master Plan Framework • EUROCONTROL’s roles• Stakeholder consultation and monitoring mechanisms

Traffic and Capacity Profiles 2009-2013

35% Additional capacity between

2007-2013

From 28000 to 37500

flights / day

Stakeholder Engagement in the Business FrameworkStakeholder Engagement in the Business Framework

Institutional FrameworkInstitutional Framework

Single European Sky

Target Concept &

Architecture

Target Concept &

Architecture

Common Specifications& Prototypes

Common Specifications& Prototypes

Development Framework

TargetsTargets

PerformanceFramework

ATM Master Plan Management

DeploymentFramework

SESAR ATM

System

SESAR ATM

System

Support to Regulation & Standardisation

Framework

DraftIR and

CS

DraftIR and

CS

IndustryStandardsIndustry

Standards

ATM Master Plan Framework

EUROCONTROL’s Roles in the ATM Master Plan

• Implementation of Short Term Implementation Programmes

• Responsibilities as Founding Member of the SESAR JU

• Leading and Contributing to a number of Work Packages as a Member of the SESAR JU

• Support to Single Sky Legislation

Outside SJU

Inside SJU

Inside and

outside SJU

EUROCONTROL as SJU Founding Member

• Manage the cooperative development of the European ATM Network• Co-ordinate the overall network validation activities• Identify SESAR components for progressive implementation including support to

regulatory measures, as required• Organise and co-ordinate long term ATM research activities• Maintain and up-date the ATM Master Plan, ensuring consistency with other

relevant convergence plans• Manage horizontal safety activities related to SESAR, including appropriate safety

management and safety regulation, the latter in co-operation with EASA• Ensure the involvement of all civil/military stakeholders, through adaptation of the

relevant EUROCONTROL consultation mechanisms• Organise and co-ordinate ATM training in support of SESAR development as

appropriate

EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1

• All implementation programmes that need completion by 2013 …

• That are ongoing …• And mature ….• Together with stakeholders…• That are needed to meet the

performance requirements of the ATM at 2013 ….

• That are the baseline for further R&D work …

• In IP2 and IP3

EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1

• Examples:– CCAMS– ESP– DMEAN– DLINK– FASTI– CASCADE– 8.33 kHz– Airport CDM– ARN V5/V6– ……

• Already indicated in D2 to have good CBAs and further qualified in D5

EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1

• The Agency to complete the IP1 programmes that are in line with the ATM Master Plan

• Stakeholders to implement the IP1 programmes

• Update the ECIP to measure performance against IP1

• Use the renewed ECIP/LCIP mechanism as a formal, EC approved instrument for States to report against IP1 (SES) achievements

EUROCONTROL Role in IP 2

3 - Validation Infrastructure

13 - NIMS

10 - ATC

11 - AOC

12 - Airport 14 - SWIM

9 - Aircraft4 - En Route Operations

7 - Network Operations

5 - TMA Operations

6 - Airport Operations

8 - Information Management

15- Gnd CNS

2 - R&D Overall Consistency

A/1 - WP Management

D - ATM NetworkR&D Programme

16 - Transversal Areas

B - Target concept & Architecture

C - Master PlanMaintenance

E - LT & InnovativeResearch

SJUSJU

Possible Agency WP leadership

Agency WP leadership

DFS

DSNA AENA

NATS LFV

ENAV

Airbus

Indra-Thales Thales-SelexIndra-Selex

Thales-Selex

Stakeholder consultation and monitoring

The performance of European ATM

Agency performance

EUROCONTROL

SCG

Stakeholder consultation and monitoring

EUROCONTROL

SCG

The Performance of European ATM

Patrick Ky

SESAR Development

London, June 6th 2008

The SESAR Joint Undertaking

• Created by EC Council Reg. N°219/2007• Responsible for the execution of the ATM Master Plan, and in

particular the management of the SESAR Development phase

• Two founding members: the EC and EUROCONTROL• Public-private partnership

SESAR Work Flows

ATM Master Plan (endorsed by EU Ministers, adopted by SJU Admin Board)

MPUpdates

R&DValidation

Regulation Implementation

ATM Master Plan (endorsed by EU Ministers, adopted by SJU Admin Board)

MPUpdates

R&DValidation

ATM Master Plan (endorsed by EU Ministers, adopted by SJU Admin Board)

MPUpdates

R&DValidation

SJUSJU

SESSES EurocontrolEurocontrol

Standardisation

SJU organisationExec Director

P Ky

Director AdminFinance

C. BORGHINI

Deputy Exec DirectorProgramme Director

Legal

Comm & stakeholders relations: E Platteau

HR

Finance

Legal

HR

FinanceM DEDIC

LegalC POUZA

HRP COURTOIS

Chief Ops/ Validation

M. STANDAR

Chief Regulatory Affairs

Chief Architect:P. HOTHAM

Chief EconomistA. SIEBERT

WOrk Programme Manager

F. GUILLERMET

The SESAR Partnership

• EU funding (700 M€, TEN-T and FP7) and regulatory actions• EUROCONTROL funding and in kind contribution (700 M€): alignment of

relevant EUROCONTROL activities• Industry (700 M€+): alignment of business strategy and product

development– 15 candidate members as part of an initial core group (CFI 07/07)– Membership agreements to be signed end 2008– Second round of partnership in 2009-2010

Candidate Members (initial core group)

• ANSPs:– AENA, DFS, DSNA, ENAV, NATS, [LFV, Austrocontrol, AVINOR,

ISAVIA, IAA, NAVIAIR, FINAVIA, EANS]• Manufacturing Industry:

– AIRBUS, [ALENIA, Galileo Avionica, Telespazio], INDRA, [SELEX SI, SELEX COM], [THALES Air Systems, THALES Avionics], [SINTEF, SAAB, Kongsberg, Park Air Systems, Thrane&Thrane, Airtel ATN], HONEYWELL

• Airports:– SEAC: ADP, BAA, FRAPORT, MUNICH, SCHIPHOL, UNIQUE– (AENA, LFV, AVINOR)

Indicative Work Programme

Validation Infrastructure

NIMS

ATC

AOC

Airport SWIM

AircraftEn Route Operations

Network Operations

TMA Operations

Airport Operations

Information Management

Grd CNS

TH/SEL

R&D Overall Consistency

WP ManagementATM Network

R&D Programme

Transversal Areas

Target concept &Architecture

Master PlanMaintenance

LT & InnovativeResearch

SJUSJU

Validation Infrastructure

ENAV

NIMS

EUROCONTROL

ATC

TH/IN

AOC

Airport

IN/SEL SWIM

SEL/TH

Aircraft

AIRBUS

En Route Operations

DSNA

Network

EUROCONTROL

TMA Operations

NATSAirport

Operations

AENA

Information Management

LFV

R&D Overall Consistency

WP ManagementATM Network

R&D Programme

Transversal AreasEUROCONTROL

Target concept &Architecture

DFS

Master PlanMaintenance

EUROCONTROL

LT & InnovativeResearch

EUROCONTROL

SJUSJU

SESAR JU management principles

• A small entity, complementary to existing organisations and processes (SES and EUROCONTROL)

• A delivery-oriented work programme:– Concrete deliveries every 1-2 years– Pilot projects enable validation of quick wins in different operational

environments• Need to coordinate with other initiatives:

– NEXTGEN, ICAO• Geared towards implementation:

– The business case– Link with standardisation bodies

Other parties involvement

• Ad Hoc working arrangements to be put in place before end 2008:– Airspace users– Staff representatives– Military Authorities, National Supervisory Authorities, EASA– Independent experts

• External calls for tenders:– On specific fields where an external input is necessary:

• Because of need for independence (e.g. COM study)• Because of need for specific technical input (e.g. AOC)

– On pre-defined topics (e.g. long term research)

Conclusion

• The SESAR definition phase has agreed on a common way forward

• The Joint Undertaking is a tool pooling resources together into a single programme

• It is a partnership, and builds its work upon consolidated and aligned activities

• Working arrangements are being organised to ensure participation of all relevant stakeholders

www.sesarju.eu

SESAR Joint Undertaking

Rue du Luxembourg 3

Brussels

Tel: +32 2 5078000

David Hilton

NATS

SESAR Stakeholders Seminar 6th June

NATS (& Europe) Need SESAR!

• Implementation of SESAR is vital to ensuring the continued growth of civil aviation in UK and European airspace:

– NATS has some of the busiest airspace in Europe– NATS are approaching the airspace projects benefit limit– NATS advanced controller tools programme only bridges the

capacity gap until circa 2015• The European ATM Network can gain shorter term benefits from knowledge

sharing and the sharing of best practices with our European partners in the SESAR JU

– Future capacity will only be realised through such open collaboration in a performance partnership

• Advanced 4D Trajectory Management tools are however essential to increase capacity in the longer term

• Convergence to common methods of operations and architecture roadmaps will increase ANSP efficiency and lower our operating costs

• Interoperability and standard interfaces will reduce our capital investment programmes

NATS Expectations of SESAR

– SESAR will create a viable, safe, efficient and environmentally acceptable future for European Aviation

– SESAR will facilitate and act as the catalyst for a true Single European Sky

– SESAR will enable the early delivery of benefits to our customers

– SESAR Advanced Concepts will deliver the performance targets we all aspire to

Plan refinement:•Arrival capacity•Departure planning•Impacting events•Weather

•Forecasts, •Airline Plans,•Schedule Dev,•Military Exercises,•Major Events•Airspace Design

Negotiation on: •Schedules•Airspace,•Routes, •Resources.

FLIGHT OBJECT

YEARS 6 MONTHS

Medium / Short-term Planning

Long-term Planning

Execution

HOURS MINUTES

Business Development

Trajectory

SBT

Shared Business Trajectory

SBT SBT SBT SBT RBTBDT

Reference Business Trajectory

DAYS

•Local capacity mgt. •Traffic balancing •Real time synchronisation•Tactical De-Confliction

European ATM in 2020

The evolutionary implementation of the SESAR concepts will transform ATMThe evolutionary implementation of the SESAR concepts will transform ATM

Reducing Uncertainty

European ATM in 2020 – Key Expectations

Stable and predictable operation– Business Trajectories published well in advance of the day of

operation– Airspace structures support the preferred trajectories– Decisions affecting the network are made collaboratively– Resources are managed for the best overall outcome– The system has built in resilience for business continuity– Deviation from Business trajectory minimised

Safety– All aircraft intentions and trajectories “known” and “published”

in real time via data-link– Separation assured using Performance Based Navigation (PBN)

with containment along published trajectories– Controller tactical intervention minimised – traffic flows

managed rather than controlled

Environment – No planned airborne holding– Ground based delays with engines on < 3mins over actual taxi

time from gate to runway– Tailored glideslope to reduce local noise & emissions– Continuous descent from cruise altitude (min power/min

emissions)

The Products • Must be developed along a service and performance driven performance driven

roadmap, and of course be feasible and affordable roadmap, and of course be feasible and affordable • Must be interoperable at both a regional and global levelMust be interoperable at both a regional and global level

• Interoperability on its own is not enough – alignment of stakeholder roadmaps will be the key to success

• Must have balanced costs against benefitsMust have balanced costs against benefits• Must deliver benefits early where feasible – but without diverting Must deliver benefits early where feasible – but without diverting

from the ultimate SESAR goal from the ultimate SESAR goal The Customers

• Must have a SESAR menu to choose from• Must be assured of a clear governance and leadership structure clear governance and leadership structure

for product development and deployment with their engagementfor product development and deployment with their engagement• StrengthenedStrengthened

The Stakeholders• Must commit and ensure that Phase 1 - ECIP/LCIP is deliveredMust commit and ensure that Phase 1 - ECIP/LCIP is delivered• Must establish a single European legislative frameworkMust establish a single European legislative framework• Must drive for efficiency and better regulatory principlesMust drive for efficiency and better regulatory principles• Must endorse and commit to the Master PlanMust endorse and commit to the Master Plan

SESAR - Some Key Must Haves

The Master Plan

• Visit the e-ATM Master Plan Portal at www.atmmasterplan.eu for a detailed and interactive view of the information contained in the ATM Master Plan.

• This portal will let you:• Navigate easily through the complex architecture of the master plan

through clickable diagrams and roadmaps • Browse the master plan according to predefined categories targeting

your specific needs (by chapter, by type of stakeholder, by key performance area, etc.)

• Access the documentation of the SESAR definition phase through our ATM Master Plan Library

• Stay informed of latest news and updates through our e-newsletter and RSS services.

• Provide feedback and suggestions for modification on the content or display of the information available on the portal.

Lunch

Spares (SCG)

Item 2.6Item 2.6SES Reporting Working GroupSES Reporting Working Group

Reference: Information Paper SCG/8/IP03Reference: Information Paper SCG/8/IP03

Danny DEBALSDanny DEBALS

LCIP ManagerLCIP Manager

SCG/8 – 14/15th May 2008

BACKGROUND

• SCG/2 – Agreed to convene an E/LCIP TF to address adaptation to SES and SESAR

• SCG/4 – TF report presented + Action Plan to implement its recommendations is subsequently developed + approved at SCG/5

• SCG/6 – Reaffirmed the need for avoidance of double reporting (+ later also by SSC), and Agency+EC invited to streamline reporting requirements and find synergies in order to avoid the double reporting

• SCG/7 – SES Reporting WG arrangements presented and approved. SCG requested that SCG members be involved in the WG.

Progress since SCG/7• EC (DG-TREN) and Agency experts worked together and drafted

proposals on:

– The approach to “translate” the (SES) reporting requirements into LCIP-type questions, and already translated a sub-set of these requirements

– The approach to “translate” ECIP objectives into SES-related implementation objectives

– Specific chapter(s) of the LCIP, with specific signature arrangements, will be devoted to the SES reports

– The reporting period of the SES Reports will be set per calendar year to synchronise it with the LCIP cycle (also recommended by SSC)

– Prefilling (where possible) + separate full-guidance

• This work was presented to the SCG representatives on 30 April, and received full support

Next Steps

• Continue with the work of the Drafting group in the development of the adapted LCIP Template

• Develop guidance material as appropriate

• Present progress of the work end of May

• EC to assess and accept the outcome of the work – June 2008

• Initial approach for an enhanced “ECIP/LCIP” mechanism, including updated templates and guidance material, to be presented to stakeholders at SES Reporting Workshop planned for Sep 2008

• SES-related implementation objectives to progressively replace existing ECIP objectives where relevant - Two ‘translated’ SES-related objectives to be introduced into ECIP 2009-2013.