software agent 인지 구조 john r. anderson, "human symbol manipulation within an integrated...

13
Software Agent 인인 인인 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 313–341, 2005 4 주주 : 주 1 주주 주주주주 / 주주주 : 주주주

Upload: julian-carson

Post on 27-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

Software Agent 인지 구조

John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture,"

Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 313–341, 2005

4 주차 : 제 1 발제 인지구조 / 발제자 : 최봉환

Page 2: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

Outline

• Introduction• ACT-R• Use of brain imaging• The capacity for re-representation: A uniquely human trait?

Page 3: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

Introduction

• Overview of ACT-R theory– illustrative application of it to algebra equation solving

• Algebra equation solving– uniquely human cognitive activity– "what is unique about human cognitive?"

• Comparing human brain with ACT-R– preliminary mapping ACT-R component to brain

functional fMRI

Page 4: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

ACT-R Theory

• ACT-R– Adaptive Control of Thought–Rational

= cognitive architecture

• Theory– for "how human cognition works"

Page 5: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

ACT-R Architecture

• RoleInput = Problem repre-

sentation(3x - 5 = 7)

Mental representa-tion

(3x = 12)

Communication,Procedural Control

Goal : Strategy decision(unwind stratage)

Retrieve Critical In-formation(7+5=12)

Output(x=4)

massive parallelism & central bottle neck

Page 6: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

Algebra equation manipulation

• Why algebra equation solving problem– substantial complexity– tractably characterized and studied

• unlike many human accomplishments (cf : Natural language)

• Problem–

– solved by unwind strategy

Page 7: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

The ACT–R model

• General instruction–

Page 8: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

The ACT–R model : speedup

• Speedup– Compilation

• collapse multiple steps into single step

– Reduction of retrieval times• subsymbolic learning

– instruction strongly encoded during day0• arithmetic fact repeated major learning happening at the symbolic

level – production rules

Page 9: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

Regions of interest

Caudate procedural

prefrontal retrieval Anterior cingulate

goal

Paretal problem state or

imaginalmotormanual

Page 10: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

Measuring activity

• Measuring activity– BOLD : blood-oxygen-level-dependent

• measure neural activity directly have been attempted

– profile of activity in modules

• t = time, s = scales the time, a = determines the shape of BOLD response,m = govern magnitude

• f(x) = engage function

Page 11: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

Characterizing the differences among the brain regions

Page 12: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

Assessing goodness of fit

• Measure the degree of mismatch against the noise in the data

Page 13: Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp

토의 제안

• 인간과 동일한 구조를 모사하는 것의 의미는 ?– 인간과 동일할 필요가 있는가 ?

• 인간에게 원하는 것과 컴퓨터에게 원하는 것이 다를 것 같은데 ..

– 인간과 동일한 것을 증명할 필요는 있는가 ?• 1+3 = 4 = 2+2=4 라면 내부구조의 의미는 ?

• 성능은 ?– 간단한 문제라서 잘 풀리는 것이 아닌지 ?– 수학적인 문제 혹은 논리적인 문제에만 적용 가능한 건 아닌지

• 모호함에 대한 해결책은 ?– ACT-R 은 Deliberative Agent 인듯한데 모호한 정의에 대한 묘사는

어떻게 ?– Goal based Agent 로 구성되어 있는데 목적지는 어떻게 찾을 것인가 ?