training & development methods for cq components

23
Corporate Intervention Methods for Developing CQ Components For a More Efficient Use of Corporate Resources of CQ Development Yu-Ling Peng Steven Guest MBA Full Time March 10 th , 2016 1

Upload: yu-ling-peng

Post on 12-Apr-2017

262 views

Category:

Recruiting & HR


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Corporate Intervention Methods

for Developing CQ Components

For a More Efficient Use of Corporate

Resources of CQ Development

Yu-Ling Peng

Steven Guest

MBA Full Time

March 10th, 2016

1

CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. Method

3. Theories Overview

4. Synthesis of Theories

5. Final Framework

6. Conclusions

7. References

2

1. Introduction

3

1.INTRODUCTION

• Background

Globalization + Cross-cultural capabilities

• Cultural Intelligence, CQ

CQ = head + body + heart (Earley & Mosakowski, 2004)

• Research gap

No developmental model for individual CQ components

• Research question

What can a company do to improve different CQ components of

people?

• Intended contribution

+ More Efficient Use of Corporate Resources

- Research Gap

4

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

1.INTRODUCTION

5

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

• Relevance to the author

International experience

Training, HR

2. Method

6

2.METHOD

7

CQ i. Cognitive CQ ii. Physical CQ iii. Emotional/

motivational CQ

Training of Competences K.S.A.

i. Knowledge ii. Skills iii. Attitude

• 12 CCT Methods (Black & Mendenhall, 1989) • Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1994)

I. Theories Review

II. Synthesis of Theories

III. Proposal of Framework – Corporate Intervention Methods

IV. Conclusion

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

3. Theories Overview

8

9

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

3.THEORIES OVERVIEW

Theory Area

i. Cultural Intelligence, CQ

ii. Training of Competences

iii. Training Cycle

iv. Self-efficacy, confidence

v. Andragogy (adult education)

vi. Training of Cross-cultural

Competences

Key Message

• CQ = head + body + heart (Earley & Mosakowski, 2004)

• 3 categories of competences: cognitive (K), psychomotor (S), affective (A) (Bloom, 1956)

• A – D – D – I – E (ISD model; Harzing &Ruysseveldt , 2004)

• ¨Perceived capability¨, can be developed (Bandura, 1994)

• Adult leaners direct their own learning, with more pragmatic purposes (Knowles, 1980)

• Categorization of 12 Cross-cultural training methods, CCT

methods (Black & Mendenhall, 1989)

4. Synthesis of

Theories

10

11

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

• Matching CQ components with K.S.A.

4.SYNTHESIS OF THEORIES

Three Components of CQ

(Earley & Mosakowski, 2004)

• Head (The cognitive)

• Body (The physical)

• Heart (The emotional/motivational)

Knowledge- K,

Skills- S,

Attitude- A

Taxonomy of Educational

Objective (Bloom, 1956)

Learning Outcome

Typology (Kraiger, 1933)

K • Cognitive (knowledge-based) • Cognitive outcomes

S • Psychomotor (action-based) • Skill-based outcomes

A • Affective (emotion-based) • Affective outcomes

Three Main Categories of Competences The Three Components

of CQ

12

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

• Matching Ways to Improve Self-efficacy with ¨A¨

4.SYNTHESIS OF THEORIES

12 CCT Methods (Black & Mendenhall, 1989)

Self-Efficacy (Bandura, 1994)

Area briefings

Lectures

Books

Films

Classroom language training

Case studies

Culture assimilators

Sensitivity training

Interactive language training

Role-plays

Field trips

Simulations

Mastery experiences

Modeling

Social persuasion

Knowledge- K, Skills- S,

Attitude- A

K

S

A

Three Main Categories of

Competences

12 CCT Methods, Self-efficacy

13

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

• Matching 12 CCT methods with K.S.A.

4.SYNTHESIS OF THEORIES

12 CCT Methods

(Black & Mendenhall, 1989)

Area briefings

Lectures

Books

Films

Classroom language training

Case studies

Culture assimilators

Sensitivity training

Interactive language training

Role-plays

Field trips

Simulations

?

Knowledge- K, Skills- S,

Attitude- A

K

S

A

12 CCT Methods Three Main Categories of

Competences

14

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

• Corresponding relationships

4.SYNTHESIS OF THEORIES

12 CCT Methods (Black & Mendenhall, 1989)

Self-Efficacy (Bandura, 1994)

Area briefings

Lectures

Books

Films

Classroom language training

Case studies

Culture assimilators

Sensitivity training

Interactive language training

Role-plays

Field trips

Simulations

Mastery experiences

Modeling

Social persuasion

K. S. A.

K

S

A

Three Main Categories of

Competences 12 CCT Methods, Self-efficacy

Three Components of CQ

(Earley & Mosakowski, 2004)

• Head (The cognitive)

• Body (The physical)

• Heart (The motivational)

The Three

Components of CQ

5. Final Framework –

Corporate Intervention

Methods

15

16

CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR

DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS

5. FINAL FRAMEWORK -- Corporate Intervention Methods

Corporate Intervention Methods

Area briefings

Lectures

Books

Films

Classroom language training

Case studies

Culture assimilators

Sensitivity training

Interactive language training

Role-plays

Field trips

Simulations

Mastery experiences

Modeling

Social persuasion

Target Components

of CQ

• Head (The cognitive)

• Body (The physical)

• Heart (The motivational)

Research question

What can a company do to improve different CQ components of people?

6. Conclusions

17

6.CONCLUSIONS

• Each CQ components can be tackled with different CCT methods

and/ or methods to build self-efficacy

More efficient use of corporate resources

a. Combine methods in sequential stages to make the results even better

b. Put these intervention methods into perspective: A-D-D-I-E

c. Involve (adult) trainees in the whole A-D-D-I-E process

• Limitations

Lack of cross-cultural-specific methods for Motivational CQ (Heart)

• Future work

a. Identification of cross-cultural-specific methods for Motivational CQ (Heart)

b. Identification of factors that influence effectiveness of these methods

18

Thank You

Corporate Intervention Methods for

Developing CQ Components For a More Efficient Use of Corporate Resources of CQ

Development

Yu-Ling Peng

Steven Guest

MBA Full Time

March 10th, 2016

19

7. REFERENCES

Ang, S. & Earley, P.C. (2003), Cultural Intelligence: An Analysis of Individual Interactions Across Cultures.

Stanford University Press

Ang, S., Livermore, D & Van Dyne, L. (2010). Cultural intelligence: A Pathway for Leading in a Rapidly

Globalizing World. Pfeiffer.

Ang, S., Ng, K-Y. & Van Dyne, L. (2009), From Experience to Experiential Learning: Cultural Intelligence as a

Learning Capability for Global Leader Development. Academy of Management Learning & Education.

Ang, S. & Van Dyne, L. (2008), Handbook on Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement and Applications. M.E.

Sharpe.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. Academic Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.

Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational

Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. David McKay.

Hampden-Turner, C. & Trompenaars, F. (1997). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global

Business. McGraw-Hill USA.

Cooper, D., Doucet, L., & Pratt, M. (2007). Understanding ‘appropriateness’ in multinational organizations.

Journal of Organizational Behavior.

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of

internationalization. Journal of Studies in Intercultural Education.

Earley, P.C. & Mosakowski, E. (2004), Cultural Intelligence. Harvard Business Review.

20

7. REFERENCES

Earley, P.C., & Peterson, R.S. (2004), ‘The Elusive Cultural Chameleon: Cultural Intelligence as a New Approach

to Intercultural Training for the Global Manager,’ Academy of Management Learning and Education.

Elizabeth A. Tuleja, (2014), Developing Cultural Intelligence for Global Leadership through Mindfulness. Journal

of Teaching in International Business.

Evan D. Wood, Heather Y.Z. & St. Peters. (2013), Short-term cross-cultural study tours: impact on cultural

intelligence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Fowler, S.M., & Blohm, J.M. (2004), An Analysis of Methods for Intercultural Training. Handbook of Intercultural

Training. Sage.

Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J. and Minkov M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd

Edition, McGraw-Hill USA.

Grafinger, D. J. (1988) Basics of Instructional Systems Development. INFO-LINE Issue 8803.

Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2000). An intercultural communication model for use in global interorganizational

networks. Journal of International Marketing.

Hammer, M. R. (1987). Behavioral dimensions of intercultural effectiveness: A replication and extension.

International Journal of Intercultural Relations.

Harrow, A.J. (1972). A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives.

David McKay.

Harzing, A., & Ruysseveldt, J. (2004). International Human Resource Management. Sage Publications.

Kealey, D. J. (1996). The Challenge of International Personnel Selection. Handbook of intercultural training.

Sage.

Knowles, M. S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Follett.

21

7. REFERENCES

Knowles, M. S. (1984a). Andragogy in Action. Jossey-Bass.

Knowles, M. S. (1984b). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Gulf Publishing.

Knowles, M. S. (1995). Design for Adult Learning. American Society for Training and Development.

Kraiger, K., Ford, J., & Salas, E., (1993). Application of Cognitive, Skill-Based, and Affective Theories of Learning

Outcomes to New Methods of Training Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology.

Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of

Educational Goals. Handbook II: The Effective Domain. David McKay.

Lenartowicza, T., Johnsonb, J.P. & Konopaskec, R. (2014), The Application of Learning Theories to Improve

Cross-cultural Training Programs in MNCs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Li, Ming, Mobley W.H. & Kelly, A. (2013), When Do Global Leaders Learn Best to Develop Cultural Intelligence?

An Investigation of the Moderating Role of Experiential Learning Style. Academy of Management Learning &

Education.

Lisak, A. & Erez, M. (2014), Leadership emergence in multicultural teams: The power of global characteristics.

Journal of World Business.

Molenda, M. (2003). In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Performance Improvement.

Quiñones, Miguel A. (Ed); Ehrenstein, Addie (Ed). Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace: Applications of

Psychological Research. American Psychological Association.

Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and Attributional Effects on Children's Achievement: A Self-efficacy Analysis.

Journal of Educational Psychology.

22

7. REFERENCES

Stroh, L. K., & Caligiuri, P. M. (1998), Increasing Global Competition through Effective People Management.

Journal of World Business.

Thomas Rockstuhl, Stefan Seiler, Soon Ang, Linn Van Dyne & Hubert Annen, (2011), Beyond General

Intelligence (IQ) and Emotional Intelligence (EQ): The Role of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) on Cross-Border

Leadership Effectiveness in a GlobalizedWorld. Journal of Social Issues.

Tung, R.L. (1982), ‘Selection and Training Procedures of U.S., European, and Japanese Multinationals,’

California Management Review.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational

Psychology.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulating Academic Learning and Achievement: The Emergence of a Social

Cognitive Perspective. Educational Psychology Review.

23