training & development methods for cq components
TRANSCRIPT
Corporate Intervention Methods
for Developing CQ Components
For a More Efficient Use of Corporate
Resources of CQ Development
Yu-Ling Peng
Steven Guest
MBA Full Time
March 10th, 2016
1
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Theories Overview
4. Synthesis of Theories
5. Final Framework
6. Conclusions
7. References
2
1.INTRODUCTION
• Background
Globalization + Cross-cultural capabilities
• Cultural Intelligence, CQ
CQ = head + body + heart (Earley & Mosakowski, 2004)
• Research gap
No developmental model for individual CQ components
• Research question
What can a company do to improve different CQ components of
people?
• Intended contribution
+ More Efficient Use of Corporate Resources
- Research Gap
4
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
1.INTRODUCTION
5
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
• Relevance to the author
International experience
Training, HR
2.METHOD
7
CQ i. Cognitive CQ ii. Physical CQ iii. Emotional/
motivational CQ
Training of Competences K.S.A.
i. Knowledge ii. Skills iii. Attitude
• 12 CCT Methods (Black & Mendenhall, 1989) • Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1994)
I. Theories Review
II. Synthesis of Theories
III. Proposal of Framework – Corporate Intervention Methods
IV. Conclusion
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
9
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
3.THEORIES OVERVIEW
Theory Area
i. Cultural Intelligence, CQ
ii. Training of Competences
iii. Training Cycle
iv. Self-efficacy, confidence
v. Andragogy (adult education)
vi. Training of Cross-cultural
Competences
Key Message
• CQ = head + body + heart (Earley & Mosakowski, 2004)
• 3 categories of competences: cognitive (K), psychomotor (S), affective (A) (Bloom, 1956)
• A – D – D – I – E (ISD model; Harzing &Ruysseveldt , 2004)
• ¨Perceived capability¨, can be developed (Bandura, 1994)
• Adult leaners direct their own learning, with more pragmatic purposes (Knowles, 1980)
• Categorization of 12 Cross-cultural training methods, CCT
methods (Black & Mendenhall, 1989)
11
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
• Matching CQ components with K.S.A.
4.SYNTHESIS OF THEORIES
Three Components of CQ
(Earley & Mosakowski, 2004)
• Head (The cognitive)
• Body (The physical)
• Heart (The emotional/motivational)
Knowledge- K,
Skills- S,
Attitude- A
Taxonomy of Educational
Objective (Bloom, 1956)
Learning Outcome
Typology (Kraiger, 1933)
K • Cognitive (knowledge-based) • Cognitive outcomes
S • Psychomotor (action-based) • Skill-based outcomes
A • Affective (emotion-based) • Affective outcomes
Three Main Categories of Competences The Three Components
of CQ
12
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
• Matching Ways to Improve Self-efficacy with ¨A¨
4.SYNTHESIS OF THEORIES
12 CCT Methods (Black & Mendenhall, 1989)
Self-Efficacy (Bandura, 1994)
Area briefings
Lectures
Books
Films
Classroom language training
Case studies
Culture assimilators
Sensitivity training
Interactive language training
Role-plays
Field trips
Simulations
Mastery experiences
Modeling
Social persuasion
Knowledge- K, Skills- S,
Attitude- A
K
S
A
Three Main Categories of
Competences
12 CCT Methods, Self-efficacy
13
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
• Matching 12 CCT methods with K.S.A.
4.SYNTHESIS OF THEORIES
12 CCT Methods
(Black & Mendenhall, 1989)
Area briefings
Lectures
Books
Films
Classroom language training
Case studies
Culture assimilators
Sensitivity training
Interactive language training
Role-plays
Field trips
Simulations
?
Knowledge- K, Skills- S,
Attitude- A
K
S
A
12 CCT Methods Three Main Categories of
Competences
14
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
• Corresponding relationships
4.SYNTHESIS OF THEORIES
12 CCT Methods (Black & Mendenhall, 1989)
Self-Efficacy (Bandura, 1994)
Area briefings
Lectures
Books
Films
Classroom language training
Case studies
Culture assimilators
Sensitivity training
Interactive language training
Role-plays
Field trips
Simulations
Mastery experiences
Modeling
Social persuasion
K. S. A.
K
S
A
Three Main Categories of
Competences 12 CCT Methods, Self-efficacy
Three Components of CQ
(Earley & Mosakowski, 2004)
• Head (The cognitive)
• Body (The physical)
• Heart (The motivational)
The Three
Components of CQ
16
CORPORATE INTERVENTION METHODS FOR
DEVELOPING CQ COMPONENTS
5. FINAL FRAMEWORK -- Corporate Intervention Methods
Corporate Intervention Methods
Area briefings
Lectures
Books
Films
Classroom language training
Case studies
Culture assimilators
Sensitivity training
Interactive language training
Role-plays
Field trips
Simulations
Mastery experiences
Modeling
Social persuasion
Target Components
of CQ
• Head (The cognitive)
• Body (The physical)
• Heart (The motivational)
Research question
What can a company do to improve different CQ components of people?
6.CONCLUSIONS
• Each CQ components can be tackled with different CCT methods
and/ or methods to build self-efficacy
More efficient use of corporate resources
a. Combine methods in sequential stages to make the results even better
b. Put these intervention methods into perspective: A-D-D-I-E
c. Involve (adult) trainees in the whole A-D-D-I-E process
• Limitations
Lack of cross-cultural-specific methods for Motivational CQ (Heart)
• Future work
a. Identification of cross-cultural-specific methods for Motivational CQ (Heart)
b. Identification of factors that influence effectiveness of these methods
18
Thank You
Corporate Intervention Methods for
Developing CQ Components For a More Efficient Use of Corporate Resources of CQ
Development
Yu-Ling Peng
Steven Guest
MBA Full Time
March 10th, 2016
19
7. REFERENCES
Ang, S. & Earley, P.C. (2003), Cultural Intelligence: An Analysis of Individual Interactions Across Cultures.
Stanford University Press
Ang, S., Livermore, D & Van Dyne, L. (2010). Cultural intelligence: A Pathway for Leading in a Rapidly
Globalizing World. Pfeiffer.
Ang, S., Ng, K-Y. & Van Dyne, L. (2009), From Experience to Experiential Learning: Cultural Intelligence as a
Learning Capability for Global Leader Development. Academy of Management Learning & Education.
Ang, S. & Van Dyne, L. (2008), Handbook on Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement and Applications. M.E.
Sharpe.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. Academic Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.
Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. David McKay.
Hampden-Turner, C. & Trompenaars, F. (1997). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global
Business. McGraw-Hill USA.
Cooper, D., Doucet, L., & Pratt, M. (2007). Understanding ‘appropriateness’ in multinational organizations.
Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of
internationalization. Journal of Studies in Intercultural Education.
Earley, P.C. & Mosakowski, E. (2004), Cultural Intelligence. Harvard Business Review.
20
7. REFERENCES
Earley, P.C., & Peterson, R.S. (2004), ‘The Elusive Cultural Chameleon: Cultural Intelligence as a New Approach
to Intercultural Training for the Global Manager,’ Academy of Management Learning and Education.
Elizabeth A. Tuleja, (2014), Developing Cultural Intelligence for Global Leadership through Mindfulness. Journal
of Teaching in International Business.
Evan D. Wood, Heather Y.Z. & St. Peters. (2013), Short-term cross-cultural study tours: impact on cultural
intelligence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.
Fowler, S.M., & Blohm, J.M. (2004), An Analysis of Methods for Intercultural Training. Handbook of Intercultural
Training. Sage.
Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J. and Minkov M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd
Edition, McGraw-Hill USA.
Grafinger, D. J. (1988) Basics of Instructional Systems Development. INFO-LINE Issue 8803.
Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2000). An intercultural communication model for use in global interorganizational
networks. Journal of International Marketing.
Hammer, M. R. (1987). Behavioral dimensions of intercultural effectiveness: A replication and extension.
International Journal of Intercultural Relations.
Harrow, A.J. (1972). A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives.
David McKay.
Harzing, A., & Ruysseveldt, J. (2004). International Human Resource Management. Sage Publications.
Kealey, D. J. (1996). The Challenge of International Personnel Selection. Handbook of intercultural training.
Sage.
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Follett.
21
7. REFERENCES
Knowles, M. S. (1984a). Andragogy in Action. Jossey-Bass.
Knowles, M. S. (1984b). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Gulf Publishing.
Knowles, M. S. (1995). Design for Adult Learning. American Society for Training and Development.
Kraiger, K., Ford, J., & Salas, E., (1993). Application of Cognitive, Skill-Based, and Affective Theories of Learning
Outcomes to New Methods of Training Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of
Educational Goals. Handbook II: The Effective Domain. David McKay.
Lenartowicza, T., Johnsonb, J.P. & Konopaskec, R. (2014), The Application of Learning Theories to Improve
Cross-cultural Training Programs in MNCs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.
Li, Ming, Mobley W.H. & Kelly, A. (2013), When Do Global Leaders Learn Best to Develop Cultural Intelligence?
An Investigation of the Moderating Role of Experiential Learning Style. Academy of Management Learning &
Education.
Lisak, A. & Erez, M. (2014), Leadership emergence in multicultural teams: The power of global characteristics.
Journal of World Business.
Molenda, M. (2003). In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Performance Improvement.
Quiñones, Miguel A. (Ed); Ehrenstein, Addie (Ed). Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace: Applications of
Psychological Research. American Psychological Association.
Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and Attributional Effects on Children's Achievement: A Self-efficacy Analysis.
Journal of Educational Psychology.
22
7. REFERENCES
Stroh, L. K., & Caligiuri, P. M. (1998), Increasing Global Competition through Effective People Management.
Journal of World Business.
Thomas Rockstuhl, Stefan Seiler, Soon Ang, Linn Van Dyne & Hubert Annen, (2011), Beyond General
Intelligence (IQ) and Emotional Intelligence (EQ): The Role of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) on Cross-Border
Leadership Effectiveness in a GlobalizedWorld. Journal of Social Issues.
Tung, R.L. (1982), ‘Selection and Training Procedures of U.S., European, and Japanese Multinationals,’
California Management Review.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational
Psychology.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulating Academic Learning and Achievement: The Emergence of a Social
Cognitive Perspective. Educational Psychology Review.
23