vaahtorainauksen tutkimus vtt:n tutkimusympäristöissätwo major benefits compared to traditional...

16
Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissä Metsäteollisuuspäivät Savonlinna 19.-20.9.2018 Harri Kiiskinen, VTT [email protected] Phone: +358 40 527 3853 18.09.2018 VTT beyond the obvious 1

Upload: others

Post on 27-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissä

Metsäteollisuuspäivät Savonlinna 19.-20.9.2018

Harri Kiiskinen, VTT

[email protected]: +358 40 527 3853

18.09.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 1

Page 2: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Foamed water – A disaster?

18.09.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious

Page 3: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Foamed water – A disaster? An opportunity

18.09.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious

Page 4: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Why foam technology Two major benefits compared to traditional papermaking

1) Formation – sheet uniformity. Practically always good

for all fibers Good formation with long fibers.

2) Possibility to highly porous structures a method for

raw-material efficiency & new fiber based products.

Widens the product property window

New product possibilities for wood fibres

• Insulation, filtering, absorbing, packaging, …

Material combinations

• Mixture of high & low density materials

Page 5: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Wiggins TeapeRadfoam

Piloting & small, full scale production machines

Oblivion / secrecy

New emergence

Preparing for commercialization

Entering production

Historical perspective on foam forming

70’s

80’s

90’s

2008

2015

2020

Foam forming is in industrial

use for specialty products

Page 6: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Fiber foam Multi-phase system

• Water, air, solid material

Fiber suspension + air

• Surface active agent

• Typical air content 40 – 70%

• Foam stability can be controlled

• Typical bubble diameter ~100 µm

No fiber flocculation

• Small bubbles fill the free space

There is no scientific literature related

to fibrous foams

Page 7: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Foam Generation

Simulations by Topi Kähärä, JyU

Page 8: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Experimental – Lab Studies

Page 9: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

From Water-laid to Foam-laid Process

Piloting

Genera-tion of foam

On-line foam

measure-ments

Pumping of foam

Headbox

Vacuum system

Running concepts

Page 10: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

VTT Foam Forming PilotsSAMPO• Pilot-scale research environment for non-

pressed materials

• Foam Forming Technology

• Vertical headbox

• Horizontal geometry

• Impingement and TAD dryers

• D=600 mm, max speed 200 m/min

• Start-up 2017

SUORA• Pilot-scale research environment for

papermaking board manufacturing processes

and product development

• Water-laid and Foam-laid webs

• Stratified foam forming

• Small amounts of raw material • <100 kg abs dry

• D=300 mm, max speed 2000 m/min

• Built 2006, rebuild 2010, foam start-up 2013

Page 11: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Aqueous cellulose-based foams

Average bubble size was shown to correlate

well with fiber foam stability (Salminen et al.

2014).

Bubble size distribution derives to the pore

structure of fiber network (Al-Quararah et al.

2015, Ketoja, ACS meeting 2016).

Density of fiber foam affects fiber network

strength, bulk, formation and dryness after

wet pressing (Torvinen et al.2015).

Flocculation tendency of fibers is

proportional to rr N (Kiiskinen et al. 2016).

18.09.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious

Low

density

foam

Water

Low

density

foam

Wate

r

High

density

foam

High

density

foam

Page 12: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Foam forming in the field of nonwovens

Air-laid- High porosity

- Limited strength

Foam forming

provides means

of handling long fibers in wet conditions

and to produce high porosity web

Str

ength

Porosity

100 kg/m3

300 kg/m3

Wet-laid- Strong webs- Limited fiber length- High densities

Page 13: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Compression strength and Recovery50% compression

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Recovery

(aft

er

50 %

com

pre

ssio

n),

%

Density, kg/m3

CTMP +SDS

BSKP +SDS

EPS

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Com

pre

ssio

n s

tre

ss (

50 %

com

pre

ssio

n),

kP

a

Density, kg/m3

CTMP +SDS

BSKP +SDS

EPS

Compression strength EN 826 standard (at 10% strain)

No strength additivesCTMP (Chemithermomechanical Pulp)

BSKP (Bleached Softwood Kraft Pulp)

SDS (Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate)

Page 14: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

Lightweight,

mouldable boardReplacement for plastic

Growth mediaSound insulation Nonwovens

Packaging and cushioning

Construction

Foam forming as a manufacturing

platform for future fiber products

Page 16: Vaahtorainauksen tutkimus VTT:n tutkimusympäristöissäTwo major benefits compared to traditional papermaking 1) Formation –sheet uniformity. Practically always good for all fibers

KIITOS!

[email protected]

Phone: +358 40 527 3853

18.09.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious