visitor evaluations communications report

37
Candidate Number: KYVH7 Evaluation Report ARCLG190 Museum Communication Leventis Gallery Visitor Evaluations INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AT UCL

Upload: allison-kopplin

Post on 06-Apr-2017

90 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

Candidate  Number:  KYVH7  

     

Evaluation  Report  ARCLG190  Museum  Communication  

Leventis  Gallery  Visitor  Evaluations  INSTITUTE  OF  ARCHAEOLOGY  AT  UCL  

Page 2: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

1  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

Table  of  Contents  

 

EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY  …………………………………………………………………………………………………………2  

CONTEXT  FOR  THE  EVALUATION  PROJECT  AND  ITS  TARGET  AUDIENCE  ……………………………….3  

PURPOSE  OF  THE  EVALUATION  PROJECT  &  EVALUATION  QUESTION  …………………………………..4  

METHOD(S)  USED  AND  WHY  ……………………………………………………………………………………………….5  

PRESENTATION  AND  DISCUSSION  OF  KEY  FINDINGS  ……………………………………………………………7  

CONCLUSIONS  &  RECOMMENATIONS  ……………………………………………………………………………….13  

EFFECTIVENESS  OF  THE  METHOD  AND  THE  TOOL  ………………………………………………………………14  

REFERENCES  ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………15  

APPENDIX  I:  EVALUATION  BRIEF…………………………………………………………………………………………16  

APPENDIX  II:  INTERVIEW  QUESTIONS  …………………………………………………………………………………18  

APPENDIX  III:  INTERVIEW  RESULTS  …………………………………………………………………………………….22  

 

   

Page 3: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

2  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY  

 

The  purpose  of  this  report  is  to  detail  the  33  visitor  interviews  conducted  between  11  and  

17  December  2015  by  MA  Museum  Studies  students  in  the  Institute  of  Archaeology’s  (IoA)  

Leventis  Gallery  at  University  College  London  (UCL).  Along  with  the  non-­‐visitor  interviews  

and  visitor  observations  also  conducted  by  the  same  researchers,  these  interviews  

constitute  the  front-­‐end  evaluation  for  an  exhibit  on  tools  and  the  human  mind  to  be  

installed  in  the  Leventis  Gallery  in  May  2016.  From  the  data  collected,  the  installation  group  

understands  the  visitor  profile  of  the  current  exhibition,  their  motivations  for  visiting,  and  

their  opinions  on  current  and  potential  use  of  space  and  content  of  exhibitions.    

 

TOP  FINDINGS:  

The  collected  data  shows  of  the  33  interviews  conducted:  

• All  visitors  were  connected  to  UCL:  student  or  staff  (28  as  students).  

• 30  visit  the  gallery  at  least  once  per  week.  

• None  cited  viewing  the  exhibition  as  their  primary  reason  for  entering  the  gallery.  

• 16  reported  it  is  unclear  We  Need  to  Talk:  Connecting  Through  Technology  is  

separate  from  the  permanent  display  and  4  reported  it  was  not  immediately  clear.  

• 30  reported  an  interest  in  seeing  either  stone  or  modern  tools  in  the  future  

exhibition;  25  expressed  an  interest  in  both.  

• Anthropology,  Archaeology,  Medicine/Psychology,  and  Technology  were  themes  

visitors  were  interested  in  regarding  tools;  Medicine/Psychology  being  most  popular  

(10).    

• 10  expressed  specific  interest  in  interactive  elements;  only  3  were  not  interested.  

   

Page 4: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

3  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

CONTEXT  FOR  THE  EVALUATION  PROJECT  AND  ITS  TARGET  AUDIENCE  

 

CONTEXT  

The  Leventis  Gallery  is  located  on  the  ground  floor  of  UCL’s  IoA  en  route  to  the  UCL  lecture  hall  G6,  an  office,  and  IoA  toilets.  Over  half  of  the  space  is  comprised  of  a  permanent  archaeological  exhibition  on  the  Levant  and  public  seating/study  areas.  Two  cases  and  additional  sections  of  the  gallery  are  dedicated  for  the  use  of  the  Exhibition  Project,  an  optional  module  for  MA  Museum  Studies  students,  which  annually  develops  an  exhibit.  Currently,  We  Need  to  Talk:  Connecting  Through  Technology  fills  this  section  of  the  gallery.  The  subject  for  this  next  temporary  exhibit  will  be  tools  and  the  human  mind.  A  front-­‐end  evaluation  study  is  required  for  the  successful  development  of  this  future  exhibition.  

 

TARGET  AUDIENCE  

• Visitors  in  the  Leventis  Gallery  

   

Page 5: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

4  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

PURPOSE  OF  THE  EVALUATION  PROJECT  &  EVALUATION  QUESTIONS  

 

PURPOSE  

Thirteen  UCL  MA  Museum  Studies  (2015-­‐2016)  students  conducted  visitor  interviews  with  the  purpose  of:  

• Gathering  data  from  visitors  to  the  current  exhibits  in  the  Leventis  Gallery.  

• Conducting  a  front-­‐end  evaluation  to  be  used  in  the  development  of  the  upcoming  

exhibit  on  tools  and  the  human  mind  by  combining  visitor  interview  data  with  the  

simultaneously  conducted  non-­‐visitor  interview  and  visitor  observation  data  to  

achieve  this.    

 

EVALUATION  QUESTIONS  

The  evaluation  team  sought  to  answer  the  following  questions1:  

• Who  uses  the  foyer  space  on  the  ground  floor  of  the  Institute?    

• Why  do  people  use  the  area?    

• Do  people  realise  that  there  are  two  different  exhibitions  in  this  area?    

• What  do  people  think  We  Need  to  Talk:  Connecting  Through  Technology  exhibition  is  

about?    

• What  do  visitors  want  to  see  in  a  future  exhibit  about  tools  and  the  human  mind?2  

The  questionnaire3  did  this  by  dividing  the  questions  into  three  main  parts:  

• Part  1  –  Purpose  of  visit  and  use  of  space  

• Part  2  –  Interests  relating  to  the  future  exhibition  

• Part  3  –  Visitor  demographics  

 

   

                                                                                                                         1  Appendix  I:  Evaluation  Brief  2  This  question  was  added  to  the  original  Evaluation  Brief  by  the  evaluation  team  during  review.  3  Appendix  II:  Interview  Questions  

Page 6: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

5  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

METHOD(S)  USED  AND  WHY  

 

METHOD  

The  applied  research  method  used  was  interviews  with  both  open-­‐ended  and  structured  

components.  The  study  used  qualitative  methods  to  allow  for  individuality  and  originality  in  

the  responses  and  identify  interesting  exceptions  to  the  majority  (Diamond  1999:23).  This  

evaluator  has  produced  qualitative  and  quantitative  data,  from  which  the  team  can  analyse  

the  content  statistically  and  extract  patterns  and  repeated  themes  from  the  responses  

(Diamond  1999:  89  &  151).    

 

EVALUATORS  

The  evaluation  team  was  comprised  of  13  MA  Museum  Studies  Students  who  are  familiar  

with  the  gallery  space  and  the  IoA  as  well  as  the  content  of  the  exhibitions  and  therefore,  

did  not  need  much  preparation  time  before  the  study  commenced  (Diamond  1999:  18).  

 

QUESTIONS  

The  interview  questions  were  approved  by  the  entire  evaluation  team  and  tested  with  a  

pilot  test  prior  to  the  conducted  research  (Diamond,  Luke  Uttal  2009:  80).  The  interview  

employed  a  mixture  of  open  and  closed  questions.  The  closed  questions  largely  related  to  

individual  demographics  and  visiting  history  (largely  YES/NO  questions)  (Diamond  1999:  89);  

the  open  questions  provided  the  interviewee  with  more  room  to  express  their  opinions  to  

openly  and  creatively  inform  the  development  of  the  future  exhibition  (Diamond  1999:  88).    

 

 

 

 

Page 7: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

6  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

RECRUITMENT  

Individual  evaluators  chose  their  own  time  and  date  for  research  and  determined  their  own  

method  of  recruitment;  due  to  low  visitor  numbers  during  their  time  slot,  this  evaluator’s  

team  chose  to  invite  every  visitor  who  entered  the  space  to  participate.    

 

ETHICS  

All  evaluators  introduced  themselves  as  IoA  MA  Museum  Studies  students  and  kept  the  

identities  of  the  participants  anonymous  by  coding  interviews  by  interview  number.  The  

evaluators  explained  the  purpose  of  the  study  prior  to  the  interview  and  thanked  all  

interviewees  for  their  participation  at  the  conclusion  (Diamond  1999:  33,  83-­‐90).      

Page 8: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

7  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

PRESENTATION  AND  DISCUSSION  OF  KEY  FINDINGS  

 

VISITOR  DEMOGRAPHICS    

21  of  the  visitors  were  alone  and  nearly  two-­‐thirds  were  female.  All  visitors  interviewed  had  a  connection  to  UCL,  the  overwhelming  majority  (28/33)  as  students.  Additionally,  a  significant  portion  of  those  interviewed  were  individuals  under  the  age  of  26.  

 

 Figure  1.  Responses  to  Questions  13:  “Age  Profile”  and  16:  “Occupation.”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

 

 

Figure  2.  Responses  to  Question  14:  “Group  Size.”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

0  

2  

4  

6  

8  

10  

12  

14  

16  

18-­‐21   22-­‐25   26-­‐34   35-­‐44   45-­‐54   55+  

Staff  

Students  

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

Individual   Pairs   Trios  

Group  Size  

Group  Size  

Page 9: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

8  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

 

Figure  3.  Responses  to  Question  18:  “Gender.”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

 

MOTIVATIONS  

Though  30  of  the  33  are  considered  frequent  visitors  (1+  day  per  week),  not  one  interviewee  cited  the  exhibition  itself  as  their  primary  motivation  for  being  in  the  gallery.  The  overwhelming  majority  (28/33)  were  present  for  either  student  or  work  related  activities.  The  remaining  5  interviewees  indicated  they  were  using  the  gallery  as  a  public  IoA  space.  

 

 

Figure  4.  Responses  to  Question  4:  “Are  you  a  frequent  visitor?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

 

 

Gender  

Male  

Female  

Are  you  a  frequent  visitor?  

Yes  

No  

Page 10: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

9  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

Student  Business   Work   Leisure   Toilet    

22    

 6  

 2  

 3  

Figure  5.  Responses  to  Question  1:  “What  is  the  purpose  of  your  visit  here  today?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

 

CLARITY  OF  THE  SPACE  

 

 

Figure  6.  Responses  to  Question  7:  “Is  it  clear  that  there  are  two  exhibitions  in  this  space?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

19  of  33  interviewed  responded  it  was  either  not  clear  or  not  immediately  clear  the  gallery  held  two  exhibitions.  Nearly  half  of  those  (9/19)  had  looked  at  the  exhibits  that  same  day.    

To  differentiate  the  two  exhibitions:  

• 10  indicated  “better,”  “larger,”  “eye-­‐catching”  or  “more  signage”  • 5  said  physically  “dividing”  or  “separating”  the  two  exhibitions  • 2  responded  visitors  could  discover  themselves  if  given  “more  information”  or  

“interacting  with  the  exhibitions”  • 2  were  unsure    

 

Better  Signage   Physical  Separation   Visitor  Interaction   Not  Sure  or  N/A    

10    

 5  

 2  

 2  

Figure  7.  Responses  to  Question  7.2:  “If  no,  how  do  you  think  you  could  make  that  clearer?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

Is  it  clear  there  are  two  exhibiXons  in  this  space?  

Yes  

No  

Not  immediately  

Page 11: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

10  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

OPINIONS  ON  THE  WE  NEED  TO  TALK:  CONNECTING  THROUGH  TECHNOLOGY  EXHIBIT  

 

 

Figure  8.  Responses  to  Question  6:  “Did  you  have  the  chance  to  see  the  We  Need  to  Talk:  Connecting  Through  Technology  exhibition  today?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

 

Of  the  21  individuals  who  had  previously  seen  the  exhibit  (16  on  the  day  and  5  on  previous  days),  11  responded  positively  when  asked  their  opinions  of  We  Need  to  Talk.  

Positive  responses  include:  

• “interesting,”  “enjoyed  it,”  “glad  it’s  there”  • positive  comments  on  the  contrast  to  the  permanent  exhibition  or  amount  of  

objects  covered  

Negative  responses  include:  

• “unchallenging,”  “not  very  imaginative,”  “not  a  clear  theme,”  “Eurocentric  bias”  

 

Positive  Responses   Negative  Responses   Neutral  Responses   No  Responses    

11    

 3  

 3  

 4  

Figure  9.  Responses  to  Question  6.1:  “What  did  you  make  of  it?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.    

 

 

Visitors  who  have  seen  'We  Need  to  Talk'  today  

Yes  

No  

Not  Today  

Page 12: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

11  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

INTEREST  IN  A  FUTURE  EXHIBIT  ON  TOOLS  AND  THE  HUMAN  MIND  

30  of  33  interviewees  indicated  an  interest  in  either  stone  or  modern  tools;  25  expressed  an  interest  in  both.  Only  2  stated  they  were  “not  really”  or  “not  interested”  in  the  topic.  3  responded  with  noncommittal  “sure,”  “might  be”  and  “depends,”  and  1  was  confused  over  the  definition  of  “tool;”  these  responses  were  not  included.    

 

 Figure  10.  Responses  to  Questions  9:  “Are  you  interested  in  seeing  stone  tools  and  learning  how  they  might  have  

contributed  to  the  evolution  of  the  human  mind?”  and  Question  10:  “Are  you  interested  in  seeing  more  modern  tools?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

 

 Figure  11.  Responses  to  Questions  9:  “Are  you  interested  in  seeing  stone  tools  and  learning  how  they  might  have  

contributed  to  the  evolution  of  the  human  mind?”  and  Question  10:  “Are  you  interested  in  seeing  more  modern  tools?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.    

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

30  

Stone  Tools   Modern  Tools  

Yes  

No  

Interest  in  Both  Stone  and  Modern  Tools  

Yes  

No    

Not  Interested  

Page 13: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

12  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

In  response  to  Question  8:  “What  subjects  relating  to  the  theme  of  tools  and  the  human  mind  would  you  be  interested  in?”:  

• 25  interviewees  identified  interest  specific  themes  • The  field  of  medicine/psychology  was  named  over  other  fields  (10/25)4  • 2  indicated  a  general  inerest  in  the  topic  • 1  was  not  interested  • 1  stated  the  topic  was  “overdone”    • 3  were  confused  by  the  question  • 1  did  not  answer  

 

 

Figure  12.  Responses  to  Question  8:  “What  subjects  relating  to  the  theme  of  tools  and  the  human  mind  would  you  be  interested  in?”  Authors  own.  Appendix  III:  Interview  Results.  

 

From  the  23  interviewees  who  responded  to  Question  11:  “What  else  would  you  like  to  be  able  see  /  do  in  the  exhibition?”  two  recurring  interests  developed:  

• Handling  Objects  (7)  • Interactives  and  Technology  (10)  

3  responded  they  were  specifically  not  interested  in  more  interactive  elements.      

                                                                                                                         4  This  mirrors  the  significant  portion  of  the  interviewees  who  were  psychology  students  waiting  for  a  class  in  G6.  This  is  discussed  further  in  “Effectiveness  of  the  Method  and  the  Tool,”  pg.  14.  

0   2   4   6   8   10   12  

Anthropology  

Archaeology  

Medicine/Psychology  

Technology  

Interest  in  Specific  Themes  

Interest  in  Specific  Themes  

Page 14: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

13  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

CONCLUSIONS  &  RECOMMENDATIONS  

 

CONCLUSIONS  

Based  on  the  presented  findings,  this  evaluator  concludes:  

• Visitors  to  the  gallery  are  connected  to  UCL,  overwhelmingly  as  students  of  the  university.  

• The  purpose  of  these  visits  are  not  to  view  the  exhibits  themselves.    • The  two  exhibits  are  not  clearly  distinguished  from  one  another,  even  to  visitors  

who  looked  at  the  exhibitions  that  very  day.    • There  is  considerable  interest  in  seeing  both  stone  and  modern  tools  as  well  as  

interactive  elements  and  handling  opportunities  in  the  developing  exhibition  on  tools  and  the  human  mind.    

• Interest  in  exhibit  content  correlates  to  subjects  the  student  studies.5    

RECOMMENDATIONS  

Given  this  small  sample,  comprising  only  a  third  of  the  entire  research,  and  taking  into  account  the  abilities  of  a  small  development  team  with  time  and  resource  limitations,  this  evaluator  recommends  the  following  for  the  development  of  the  future  exhibition  on  tools  and  the  human  mind:  

• Utilize  eye-­‐catching  design  techniques  that  invite  waiting  or  passing  individuals  to  interact  with  the  exhibit  and  the  iPads.  

• Create  a  visual  marker  to  distinguish  the  two  exhibitions  for  visitors  (i.e.  banner  or  large  introductory  sign  to  the  temporary  exhibit).  

• Develop  an  exhibit  that  clearly  defines  the  term  “tool”  and  covers  the  progression  or  evolution  of  these  tools  from  stone  to  modern.  

• Connect  the  content  of  the  developing  exhibition  to  the  class  subjects  taught  in  G6  (if  available).    

It  should  be  noted  these  recommendations  are  preliminary  and  have  not  been  compared  to  the  remaining  components  of  this  front-­‐end  study:  non-­‐visitor  interviews  and  visitor  observations.  The  results  from  all  three  components  should  be  compiled  and  interpreted  to  obtain  more  valid  recommendations  for  the  development  team.    

   

                                                                                                                         5  Discussed  further  in  “Effectiveness  of  the  Method  and  the  Tool,”  pg.  14.  

Page 15: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

14  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

EFFECTIVENESS  OF  THE  METHOD  AND  THE  TOOL  

 

COMMUNICATION  

Each  of  the  13  evaluators  were  allowed  to  prompt  the  interview  questions  spontaneously,  presenting  each  question  to  the  interviewee  in  a  different  way  and  therefore,  the  data  may  not  be  consistent  and  difficult  to  standardize  (Diamond  1999:  88).  The  evaluator  also  carries  the  possibility  of  imparting  his  or  her  own  bias  on  the  exhibit  due  to  the  extensive  knowledge  the  evaluators  have  on  the  gallery  (Diamond,  Luke  &  Uttal  2009:  69).  

Both  the  evaluation  team  and  interviewees  were  a  mix  of  native  and  non-­‐native  English  speakers,  which  could  result  in  miscommunication  in  an  English  interview;  additionally,  the  origin  of  even  the  native  English  speakers  (USA,  UK,  Australia)  could  cause  confusion  amongst  themselves  if  colloquial  terms  were  employed  during  the  interview.    

The  vocabulary  and  language  of  the  questions  themselves  can  alter  the  data  if  an  interviewee  interprets  the  definition  of  a  word  differently  than  the  evaluator.  This  occurred  specifically  with  regards  to  the  term  “tool”  appearing  in  Questions  8,  9,  and  106.  Three  interviewees  expressed  confusion  around  the  definition  of  the  term  “tool”  and  two  specifically  requested  an  explanation,  the  way  in  which  the  evaluator  shaped  the  interviewees  understanding  of  the  term  “tool”  in  turn  determines  his  or  her  response  to  the  question.    

In  interpreting  the  data  evaluators  also  have  their  own  language  they  use  to  code  the  responses  as  this  evaluator  has  done  with  Question  87.  This  data  may  differ  with  each  evaluator’s  unique  coding  system.  Similarly,  the  lack  of  clarity  in  the  interview  responses  causes  difficulty  for  an  evaluator  to  interpret.  One  interviewee  said  “sure”  in  response  to  both  questions  regarding  interests  in  seeing  stone  or  modern  tools,  both  closed-­‐ended  “YES/NO”  questions.  “Sure”  does  not  fall  squarely  within  “YES”  or  “No,”  therefore  this  evaluator  did  not  include  this  response.      

 

INTERVIEW  TIMES  

A  greater  number  of  females  were  interviewed  than  males.  This  could  be  a  result  of  the  time  and  day  of  the  interviews,  a  more  even  gender  distribution  would  be  expected  with  a  longer-­‐running  evaluation  resulting  in  a  larger  number  of  interviews.  

The  data  compiled  shows  a  high  interest  in  seeing  psychology  and  medically  related  content  in  the  exhibit  on  tools  and  the  human  mind.  This  directly  correlates  to  the  high  number  of  psychology  students  interviewed  while  waiting  for  a  lecture  in  G6.  This  group  may  not  be  representative  of  the  larger  visitor  population  and  also  may  not  be  returning  to  see  the  future  exhibit  if  they  no  longer  have  a  class  in  G6.                                                                                                                                6  Appendix  II:  Interview  Questions  7  See  Figure  12.  

Page 16: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

15  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

REFERENCES  

 

Diamond,  J.  1999.  Practical  Evaluation  Guide:  Tools  for  Museums  and  Other  Informal  Education  Settings.  Walnut  Creek,  CA:  AltaMira  Press.  

 

Diamond,  J.,  Luke,  J.J.  &  Uttal,  D.H.  2009.  Practical  evaluation  guide:  tool  for  museums  and  other  informal  educational  settings  (2nd  ed.).  Lanham,  Md.:  AltaMira  Press.    

Page 17: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

16  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

APPENDIX  I:  EVALUATION  BRIEF  

IOA Foyer exhibition space

Evaluation Brief

Evaluation aim The aim of this evaluation study is to collect some preliminary data about awareness and use of the exhibition space at the foyer on the ground floor of the Institute both from visitors and non-visitors. Findings will be used to inform the development of a new exhibition on Tools and the Human Mind. Evaluation questions To meet its aim, the evaluation sets out to answer the following questions, using either observations or interviews: Observations with visitors:

· Who uses the foyer space on the ground floor of the Institute?

· How is the spaces used?

· Are there different patterns of use at different times and dates?

· How long do people stay in the area?

· Are there any distinct modes of engagement at the exhibition space? Interviews with visitors:

· Who uses the foyer space on the ground floor of the Institute?

· Why do people use the area?

· Do people realise that there are two different exhibitions in this area?

· What do people think We Need to Talk: Connecting Through Technology exhibition is about?

Interviews with visitors:

· Who uses the foyer space on the ground floor of the Institute?

· Why do people use the area?

· Do people realise that there are two different exhibitions in this area?

· What do people think We Need to Talk: Connecting Through Technology exhibition is about?

Interviews with non-visitors:

· Do people in the local area (including passers-by, people who live and/or work in the area, UCL students and staff) know of the IOA?

o If so, do they know where it is located?

o How did they find out about it?

Page 18: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

17  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

· Do people in the local area (including passers-by, people who live and/or work in the area, UCL students and staff) know that the IOA is part of UCL?

· Have they ever been there? o If yes, when/why/what for? o If no, why not?

o What do they think they might find there (activities people carry out in the building)?

· Specifically, are people in the local area aware of the exhibition space on the ground floor of IOA?

O If yes, have they ever been?

o What did they do/see there? · {Explain what this space is about} Would they like to visit the exhibitions? What type (or theme) of exhibition they would like to see? And how it relates to their interests?

We Need to Talk: Connecting Through Technology concept Communication is an important part of our lives and technology plays a big role in how we interact with each other. Changes in technology have brought people together, spreading ideas around the world or in the same room. New technologies have often been marketed as an easy way to communicate with people. But these changes have also been met with worry that technology can isolate or control an individual or group. We Need to Talk: Connecting Through Technology looks at how communication technologies have influenced individuals and societies across different periods of time, and addresses the eagerness and anxieties that ensue. Evaluation methods You will be divided in three group and you will either: 1) observe visitors at the exhibition space, or 2) interview visitors at the exhibition space, or 3) interview non-visitors near the IOA and around UCL. Each student will conduct a minimum of 2-3 observation or interviews at busy periods. Framework for implementation Data  collection  will  take  place  between  11  and  16  December  2015.

   

Page 19: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

18  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

APPENDIX  II:  INTERVIEW  QUESTIONS  

Visitor interview

Hello. My name is ..... and I am a student here at the Institute of Archaeology. The Institute is developing a new exhibition {interviewer: point to the temporary exhibition area and the interactive ‘totem’}. We would like to find out what our visitors think about that and I was wondering if you might help us. It will take about 10 minutes and we can have a sit {Interviewer: point at sitting area}.

PART 1

1. What is the purpose of your visit here today? {prompt: do you have a class, did you come to see the exhibition etc}

2. Have you been here before? YES / NO

3. When was the last time you visited?

4. Are you a frequent visitor? If so, why? E.g. (staff, students)?

5. Have you had a chance to see the exhibitions in the space?

5.1. If yes, when and what did you look at? (qualify, have they seen parts, whole, etc.?)

Page 20: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

19  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

6. {i f no t her e to s e e the exhib i t ion} Did you have the chance to see the We need to Talk: Connec t ing Through Techno logy exhibition today ?

6.1 What did you make of it?

7. Is it clear that there are two exhibitions in this space? YES / NO

7.1. If yes, what do you think they are about? {Interv i ewer : on ly ask i f v i s i to r s have no t a l r eady cover ed th i s}

7.2. If no, how do you think you could make that clearer?

Page 21: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

20  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

PART 2

A group of Museum Studies students will develop a new exhibition which will replace the one over there {point at two display cases} as well as the content in the interactive display {point at totem}. The exhibition will be about tools and the human mind.

8. What subjects relating to the theme of tools and the human mind would you be interested in?

9. Are you interested in seeing stone tools and learning how they might have contributed to the evolution of the human mind? YES/NO

10. Are you interested in seeing more modern tools? YES/NO

11. What else would you like to be able to see/do in the exhibition? (specific objects, other time periods interactives, lectures, online resources, etc.)

12. Is there anything else you would like to add?

Page 22: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

21  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

PART 3

Finally, may I ask you a few questions about you?

13. Age profile for themselves {Interviewer: show visitors the age groups below and ask them to point out which group they belong to}

Your age

q under 18 (what is your age?) _________

q 18-21 q 22-25 q 26-34 q 35-44 q 45-54

q 55-59 q 60-64 q 65-74 q 75+ q prefer not to say

14. Group size: 1 2 3 4 5 >5

15. Who with? Colleagues Friends (peers)

Family Family and Friends

16. Occupation: Student Staff Other

17. Where do you normally live?

! London ! Home Counties (which?) _________________________________________________ ! Rest of the UK ! Overseas (which country?)

{Interviewer: thank the visitor and note visitor’s gender}

Male / Female

 

Page 23: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

22  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

APPENDIX  III:  INTERVIEW  RESULTS  

 

   

9LVLWRU�4XHVWLR

QQDLUH�1XP

EHU(YDOXDWRU

'DWH

7LPH

4�����$

JH3URILOH

4����*

URXS�VL]H4����:

KR�:LWK

4���

2FFXSDWLRQ

4�����/RFDWLRQ

�.HUU\�-RFHO\Q

����'HFHP

EHU�����DP

������

��6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

�.HUU\�-RFHO\Q

�����'HFHP

EHU�����DP

������

��6WDII

/RQGRQ

�:LOO

�������'HFHP

EHU�����DP

������

�6WXGHQW

6XUUH\

�:LOO

�����'HFHP

EHU�����DP

������

�6WXGHQW

�5HVHDUFK�3

+'�

6XVVH[

�:LOO

�����'HFHP

EHU�����DP

������

�6WXGHQW

(VVH[

�:LOO

�����'HFHP

EHU������3

0�����

��

VWXGHQW/RQGRQ��IURP

86$�

�0DU\�.

LWW\���'

HFHPHEHU

������30

������

�6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

�0DU\�.

LWW\���'

HFHPHEHU

������30

������

�6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

�0DU\�.

LWW\���'

HFHPHEHU

������30

������

�6WXGHQW

2YHUVHDV�

1HWKHUODQGV

��0DU\�.

LWW\���'

HFHPHEHU

������30

������

�6WXGHQW

5HVW�RI�8

.

��0DU\�.

LWW\���'

HFHPHEHU

������30

������

��6WDII

/RQGRQ

��(PPD�/\GLD

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

��VWDII

/RQGRQ

��/\GLD�(

PPD

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

)ULHQGV��SHHUV�VWXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��(PPD�/\GLD

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

IULHQGV��SHHUV�VWXGHQW

+RP

H�&RXQW\

�6XUUH\�

��(PPD�/\GLD

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

��VWXGHQW

2YHUVHDV��8

6$�

��%HWKDQ\�4

LQJ4LQ

����'HFHP

EHU�����3

0�����

���

6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��%HWKDQ\�4

LQJ4LQ

����'HFHP

EHU�����3

0�����

���

6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��%HWKDQ\�4

LQJ4LQ

����'HFHP

EHU�����3

0�����

���

6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��%HWKDQ\�4

LQJ4LQ

����'HFHP

EHU�����3

0�����

���

6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��$OOLVRQ

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

��6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��$OOLVRQ

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

��6WXGHQW

+HUWIURGVKLUH

��$OOLVRQ

�����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

��6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

,QWHUYLHZ�'HWDLOV

3DUW����'HP

RJUDSKLFV

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 24: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

23  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

9LVLWRU�4XHVWLR

QQDLUH�1XP

EHU(YDOXDWRU

'DWH

7LPH

4�����$

JH3URILOH

4����*

URXS�VL]H4����:

KR�:LWK

4���

2FFXSDWLRQ

4�����/RFDWLRQ

��$OOLVRQ

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

��6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��$QQFKHQ

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

��6WDII

/RQGRQ

��$QQFKHQ

����'HFHP

EHU������

������

��6WDII

+HDUWIRUGVKLUH

��D6WDFH\�,VDEHO

�����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

)ULHQGV��SHHUV�6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��E6WDFH\�,VDEHO

�����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

)ULHQGV��SHHUV�6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��6WDFH\�,VDEHO

�����'HFHP

HEU�����

������

��6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��6WDFH\�,VDEHO

�����'HFHP

HEU�����

������

��6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��6WDFH\�,VDEHO

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

��6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��D6WDFH\�,VDEHO

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

)ULHQGV��SHHUV�6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��E6WDFH\�,VDEHO

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

)ULHQGV��SHHUV�6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

��F6WDFH\�,VDEHO

����'HFHP

EHU�����

������

)ULHQGV��SHHUV�6WXGHQW

/RQGRQ

,QWHUYLHZ�'HWDLOV

3DUW����'HP

RJUDSKLFV

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 25: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

24  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����*

HQGHU4���3

XUSRVH�RI�YLVLW4���9

LVLWHGEHIRUH

4���/DVW�9

LVLW4����9

LVLWIUHTXHQF\

4���+

DYH�\RXVHHQ"

4�����:

KHQ�DQG�ZKDW�GLG�\RX�ORRN�DW

)HPDOH

9LVLW�WR�EDWKURRP

��VWXGHQW<HV

$�IHZ

�GD\V�DJRIUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU

<HV���JODQFHG

EXW�QHYHU�FORVHO\ORRNHG

,Q�SDVVLQJ��QHYHU�UHDOO\�VWRSSHG�WR�H[DPLQH

FORVHO\��0RVWO\�ORRNLQJ�DW�SRWWHU\

0DOH

/HFWXUHU<HV

DERXW�����ZHHNV

DJR<HV��,P

�DOHFWXUHU

<HV

%HFDXVH�,P

�KHUH�DOO�WKH�WLPH�,�GRQW�UHDOO\

ORRN��*HQHUDO�UHFROOHFWLRQ�LV�WKDW�,�HQMR\�WKH

H[KLELWLRQV��/LNH�WKH�IDFW�YLVLWRUV�FRPH�IURP

RXWVLGH�WR�OHDUQ��*RRG�WR�KDYH�LW�E\�WKH

OHFWXUH�KDOO�EHFDXVH�WKH�VSDFH�LV�UHQWHG�RXW�PDQ\�SHRSOH�FDQ�VHH�LW�

)HPDOH

/HFWXUH<HV

$�ZHHN�DJR

)UHTXHQW�YLVLWRU�VWXGHQW�

<HV

%RWK�H[KLELWLRQV

)HPDOH

6WXG\�DW�,2

$<HV

DERXW�D�\HDU�DJ,QIUHTXHQW��QRWEDVHG�LQ�/RQGRQ

1R��QRW�\HW

)HPDOH

/HFWXUH<HV

/DVW�ZHHN

IUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU�VWXGHQW�

\HV*ODFLQJ�ORRN��QRW�D�JRRG�ORRN

)HPDOH

/HFWXUH\HV

ODVW�ZHHN

IUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU�VWXGHQW�

+DG�D�FKDQFH

WR��EXW�KDYH�QRW�

)HPDOH

&ODVV

<HV

���GD\V�DJR�IUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU

�VWXGHQW�<HV

�MXVW�WKH�SRWV�RQ�WKH�OHIW�

)HPDOH

�JR�WR�WKH�OLEUDU\�<HV

7KXUVGD\IUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU

�VWXGHQW�<HV

�WKH�FHUDPLFV�DQG�WKH�P

DOO�PDGQHVV�ERDUG

JDPH�

0DOH

&RXUVH

<HV

7KXUVGD\IUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU

�VWXGHQW�<HV

�QRWKLQJ�VSHFLILF��MXVW�ZDONHG�SDVW�

)HPDOH

�NLOOLQJ�WLPH�

<HV

�ODVW�0RQGD\�

IUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU�VWXGHQW�

<HV

�ELWV�RI�LW��WKH�SRWWHU\�VWXII�

0DOH

:RUN

<HV

)ULGD\IUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU

�VWDII�<HV

�WKH�VWXGHQW�H[KLELWLRQV��EHFDXVH�WKH�SRWVDUH�VWDWLF�

0DOH

:RUNV�LQ�EXLOGLQJ

<HV

/DVW�ZHHN

IUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU\HV

'LGQW�UHDOO\�ORRN

)HPDOH

6WXGHQW�VLWWLQJ�RQ�FRXFKHVUHOD[LQJ�EHIRUH�DQ�H[DP

\HVIULGD\

�����'HFHP

EHU�)UHTXHQW�YLVLWRU�

VWXGHQW\HV

/RRNHG�DW�SRWWHU\�DQG�WKH���V�ERDUG�JDPH�

)HPDOH

VWXGHQW\HV

)ULGD\�����'

HFHPEHU�

)UHTXHQW�YLVLWRUIRU�WXWRULDOV

\HV/RRNHG�DW�DOO�RI�LW

)HPDOH

3HDFH�DQG�TXLHW�EHIRUH�FODVV

\HVWKDW�P

RUQLQJIUHTXHQW�YLVLWRU

\HV/RRNHG�DW�LW�D�IHZ

�ZHHNV�DJR��DW�P

DOO�ERDUGJDP

H�

0DOH

:RUNV�SDUW�WLP

H�ZLWK�VWXGHQWV

<HV

��)UHTXHQW�YLVLWRU

<HV

+DV�VHHQ�ERWK��HQMR\V�GLVSOD\�YHU\�P

XFK

3DUW����&XUUHQW�([KLELWLRQ

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 26: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

25  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����*

HQGHU4���3

XUSRVH�RI�YLVLW4���9

LVLWHGEHIRUH

4���/DVW�9

LVLW4����9

LVLWIUHTXHQF\

4���+

DYH�\RXVHHQ"

4�����:

KHQ�DQG�ZKDW�GLG�\RX�ORRN�DW

0DOH

6WXG\LQJ

<HV

��HYHU\�GD\

<HV

,PSOLHG�WKDW�KH�P

RVWO\�KDG�ORRNHG�DWDUFKDHRORJ\�GLVSOD\��VDLG�WKDWV�WKH�VWXII�KH

ZRUNV�Z

LWK

)HPDOH

7RLOHW<HV

��

UHJXODUO\��ZDLWLQJ

EHIRUH�OHFWXUHV�ELRORJ\��LQ�*

�\HV

ORRNHG�DW�EULHIO\�EHIRUH�OHFWXUHV

0DOH

ZRUNV�KHUH��3

K'�VWXGHQW�

\HV��

UHJXODUO\�ZRUNLQJ�KHUH

\HVVHHV�WKHP

�GDLO\

)HPDOH

6WXGHQW�YLVLWLQJ�WKH�/LEUDU\

<HV

��:HHNO\

<HV

)UHTXHQWO\��FHUWDLQ�SDUWV�WKDW�FDWFK�\RXU�H\H�L�H���'

�WRSRJUDSK\�PRGHO

)HPDOH

6WXGHQW�OHFWXUH

<HV

��:HHNO\

2FFDVVLRQDOO\

/HWV�7DON��7HFKQRORJ\��&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ

)HPDOH

6WXGHQW�OHFWXUH

<HV

��:HHNO\

1R

��

)HPDOH

6WXGHQW�OHFWXUH

<HV

��:HHNO\

<HV���EULHIO\VFDQ

:KHUHYHU�,�DP

�VWDQGLQJ�DW�WKH�PRP

HQW

0DOH

'RLQJ�P

DLQWHQDQFH�ZRUN�LQ

WKH�IR\HU��8&/�0

DLQWHQDQFHVWDII����Z

DV�MXVW�WDNLQJ�D�TXLFNEUHDN

<HV

<HDUV�DJR

1R

1R

��

0DOH

7DNLQJ�KLJK�UHV�SDQRUDPLF

SKRWRJUDSKV�RI�WKH�/HYDQWH[KLELWLRQ

<HV

$�IHZ

�GD\V�DJR1R

<HV

/RRNHG�DW�WKH�/HYDQW�H[KLELWLRQ��/RRNHG�DW�LWRYHUDOO��LQWHUHVWHG�LQ�FXUDWRULDO�SURFHVV��WRGD\�Z

LOO�EH�D�EHWWHU�FKDQFH�WR�ORRN�DWLQGLYLGXDO�REMHFWV��'

LG�QRW�ORRN�DW�:H�1

HHG7R�7DON���QRW�UHDOO\�KLV�LQWHUHVW�

)HPDOH

:DLWLQJ�IRU�D�SV\FKRORJ\

OHFWXUH<HV

7KXUVGD\���WK'HF

<HV�UHJXODUO\�

OHFWXUHV�LQ�*�

HYHU\�ZHHN

<HV

*HQHUDO�RYHUYLHZ

�RI�WKH�REMHFWV�LQ�WKH�:H

1HHG�WR�7DON�H[KLELWLRQ��HVSHFLDOO\�WKH�ROG

1RNLD�P

RELOH�SKRQH

)HPDOH

:DLWLQJ�IRU�D�SV\FKRORJ\

OHFWXUH<HV

7KXUVGD\���WK'HF

<HV�UHJXODUO\�

OHFWXUHV�LQ�*�

HYHU\�ZHHN

<HV

*HQHUDO�RYHUYLHZ

�RI�WKH�REMHFWV�LQ�WKH�:H

1HHG�WR�7DON�H[KLELWLRQ��HVSHFLDOO\�WKH�ROG

1RNLD�P

RELOH�SKRQH

)HPDOH

6WXGHQW�VWXG\LQJ�LQ�WKH�,R$

�*RLQJ�WR�WKH�GRZ

QVWDLUVWRLOHWV�

<HV

7KLV�PRULQLQJ

���WK�'HF�

<HV�UHJXDOUO\�

ZDLWLQJ�EHIRUHOHFWXUHV

<HV

%UL[WRQ�SRXQG��SULQWLQJ�SUHVV��EDQQHG�ERRNVDQG�OLWWOH�FRP

SXWHU�WKLQJ\�LQ�:H�1

HHG�WR7DON

0DOH

:DLWLQJ�IRU�D�SV\FKRORJ\

OHFWXUH<HV

7KXUVGD\���WK'HF

<HV�UHJXODUO\�

OHFWXUHV�LQ�*�

HYHU\�ZHHN

<HV

%URZ

VLQJ�WKH�GLVSOD\V�EHIRUH�FODVV�,QWHUHVWHG�LQ�WKH�ERDUG�JDP

H�DQG�ORRNHG�DWWKH�REMHFW�ODEHO�IRU�WKDW��+

DG�D�JR�RQ�RQH�RIWKH�L3

DGV�

3DUW����&XUUHQW�([KLELWLRQ

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 27: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

26  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����*

HQGHU4���3

XUSRVH�RI�YLVLW4���9

LVLWHGEHIRUH

4���/DVW�9

LVLW4����9

LVLWIUHTXHQF\

4���+

DYH�\RXVHHQ"

4�����:

KHQ�DQG�ZKDW�GLG�\RX�ORRN�DW

)HPDOH

:DLWLQJ�IRU�D�SV\FKRORJ\

OHFWXUH<HV

7XHVGD\���WK'HF

<HV�UHJXODUO\�

OHFWXUHV�LQ�*�

HYHU\�ZHHN

7KLQN�VR$QFLHQW�YDVHV�DQG�MHZ

HOOU\

0DOH

:DLWLQJ�IRU�D�SV\FKRORJ\

OHFWXUH<HV

7KXUVGD\���WK'HF

<HV�UHJXODUO\�

OHFWXUHV�LQ�*�

HYHU\�ZHHN

*ODQFHG�DW�LW

1RWKLQJ�VSHFLILF

)HPDOH

:DLWLQJ�IRU�D�SV\FKRORJ\

OHFWXUH<HV

7KXUVGD\���WK'HF

<HV�UHJXODUO\�

OHFWXUHV�LQ�*�

HYHU\�ZHHN

1R

��

0DOH

:DLWLQJ�IRU�D�SV\FKRORJ\

OHFWXUH<HV

7KXUVGD\���WK'HF

<HV�UHJXODUO\�

OHFWXUHV�LQ�*�

HYHU\�ZHHN

*ODQFHG�DW�LW

1RWKLQJ�VSHFLILF

3DUW����&XUUHQW�([KLELWLRQ

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 28: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

27  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����+

DYH�\RXVHHQ�Z

H�QHHGWR�WDON"

4������:

KDW�GLG�\RX�PDNH�RI�LW

4���LV�LW�FOHDU�WKHUH

DUH�WZR�H[LKLELWLRQV"

T�����LI�\HV�ZKDW�DERXW

4�����LI�QR�Z

KDW�FRXOG�EH�FOHDUHU

\HV��LYH�VHHQ�LWEXW�GLGQW�NQRZ

�LWZDV�FDOOHG�WKDW�

/LNH�WKH�IDFW�WKHUH�DUH�D�ORW�RIGLIIHUHQW�NLQGV�RI�REMHFWV�IURP

DQFLHQW�SRWWHU\�WR�PRGHUQ�SLHFHV�

<HV��QRZ

�WKDW�\RXVD\�LW�EXW�QRWKLQJ

UHDOO\�GLVWLQJXLVKLQJ,�Z

RXOG�VD\�DUFKDHRORJLFDO�PDWHULDO�DQG

FRPPXQLFDWLRQ�WHFKRORJ\

,�NQRZ�WKHUH�DUH�VLJQV�EXW�WKH\�GRQW

UHDOO\�VHHP�WR�VWDQG�RXW��EXW�Z

KHQ�LORRN�DW�LW�LW�VHHP

V�UHDOO\�ZHOO�GRQH�IRU

IRU�D�VWXGHQW�H[KLELWLRQ��,W�MXVW�IHHOVOLNH�D�KDOOZ

D\�

1R

��<HV

7KH�ILUVW�RQH�VHHPV�WR�EH�P

DLQWDLQLQJ�WKHLQWHUHVWV�RI�JUDQG�VFKRODUV�WKDW��Z

HQW"�WR�WKH�LQVLWXWH��0

DWHULDOV�IURP�WKH�P

LGGOHHDVWHUQ�DUHD���LQWHUHVWV�RI�WKH�VFKRODUV�DWWKH�WLP

H�RI�WKH�LQVWLWXWH��EHLQJ�IRXQGHG"��7KH�VHFRQG�FRYHUV�Z

KDWV�QHZ��Z

KDWVQRZ

�DQG�KRZ�WR�GLVSOD\�WKLV�

��

<HV��GLGQW

UHDOLVH�WKH�QDPH

(PMR\HG�WKH�FRQWUDVW�EHWZ

HHQROG�DQG�QHZ

��OLNHG�WKH�GLIIHUHQWHOHP

HQWV�DQG�IRFXV

1RW�DW�ILUVW��UHDOLVHG

LW�ZDV�WZ

R�VHSHUDWHVSDFHV�ODWHU�RQ�IURP

ILUVW�YLVLW�

1RW�FOHDU�DW�ILUVW��LQWHUDFWLQJ�Z

LWK�WKHH[KLELWLRQV�P

DNHV�LW�FOHDUHU

1R

��<HV

2OG�DQG�QHZ

�DUFKDHRORJ\���

QR��

\HV)DLUO\�REYLRXV�IURP

�VLJQDJH��WKRXJK�WKHELW�E\�WKH�GRRU�LVQW��LQWHUDFWLYH�WRWHP

��

QR�$IWHU�H[SODLQJ�FRQFHSW��,QWHUHVWLQ

QR�

0RUH�VLJQDJH�WR�P

DNH�WKH�GLIIHUHQFHFOHDUHU

QR��

<HV

�SRWV�IRU�WKH�RQH��DQG�WDONLQJ�IRU�WKHRWKHU�

\HV�LW�Z

DV�DOULJKW��QRW�FOHDU�

��VHSHUDWH�URRP

V�ZRXOG�EH�FOHDUHU�

<HV

�FRQWUDVWLQJ�WR�WKH�UHVW�RI�WKHJDOOHU\��LQWHUHVWLQJ�WR�WKLQN�DERXWWHFK�LQ�D�Z

D\�VLPLODU�WR�DUFK�

\HV�WKH�ILUVW�LV�FODVVLFDO�DUFK��WKH�RWKHU�LV

FRQWHPSRUDU\�WHFKQRORJ\�

<HV

�LQWHUHVWLQJ��QLFH�WR�EH�DEOH�WRUHDG�GLIIHUHQW�WKLQJV�Z

KLOH�,�ZDLW�

\HV�

<HV

�UHDOO\�JRRG�\HV

�WKH�ILUVW�KDV�OLWWOH�LQIR��WKH�VHFRQG�LV�RQFRP

PXQLFDWLQJ�EXW�LW�GRHVQW�WDNH�DQ\

QDUUDWLYH�IURP�WKH�SHUQDP

HQW�H[KLELW��

1R

��1R

��6LJQDJH�EHWZ

HHQ�WKH�WZR�GLVSOD\V

\HV/LNHG�LW��P

RGHUQ�HOHPHQWV�Z

HUHDQ�LQWHUHVWLQJ�LQFOXVLRQ�

QR��

/DUJHU�VLJQDJH�EHWZHHQ�H[KLELWLRQV

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 29: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

28  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����+

DYH�\RXVHHQ�Z

H�QHHGWR�WDON"

4������:

KDW�GLG�\RX�PDNH�RI�LW

4���LV�LW�FOHDU�WKHUH

DUH�WZR�H[LKLELWLRQV"

T�����LI�\HV�ZKDW�DERXW

4�����LI�QR�Z

KDW�FRXOG�EH�FOHDUHU

\HVHQMR\HG�LW

QRW�DW�ILUVW��

%HWWHU�VLJQDJH

\HVQR

��EHWWHU�VLJQDJH

QRW�WRGD\��

6RUW�RI��DEOH�WR�ILJXUHLW�RXW�EHFDXVH�RI

GLIIHUHQW�WLPH�SHULRGV

����

\HV��

<HV

����

QRW�WRGD\��

1R

��

*UDSKLF��H\H�FDWFKLQJ�VLJQDJH��P

DNHLW�FOHDUHU�IRU�SHRSOH�QRW�IDP

LOLDU�ZLWK

DUFKDHRORJ\QRW�WRGD\�

GRHVQW�VHH�DVRIWHQ

JODG�LWV�WKHUH��OLNHV�KDYLQJVRP

HWKLQJ�FKDQJLQJ�UHJXODUO\�EXWGRHVQW�ORRN�LQ�GHWDLO

QR��

VLJQV�HDUOLHU�RQ�LQ�VSDFH�LQGLFDWLQJ�WZR

VHSDUDWH�H[KLELWV

1RW�7RGD\

'LGQ¶W�VHH�KRZ

�LW�ZDV�UHODWHG�WR

$UFKDHRORJ\��Z

KLFK�LV�D�JRRGWKLQJ

<HV

/HWV�7DON���&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�QRZ

�DQGKDYH�KDG��P

RQH\�DQG�H[FKDQJH�VHFWLRQLVQW�FOHDU��$

UFKDHRORJ\���-XVW�SRWWHU\IURP

�WKH�1HDU�(

DVW� 1RW�FOHDU���FDVHV�LQ

/HWV�7DON�DUH���H[KLELW��7RWHP�VHHP

VXQUHODWHG

��

<HV

$ERXW�7HFKQQRORG\�DQG&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ

1R

��6LJQ�SRVWLQJ���VSOLW�RQH�VLGH�IURP

�WKHRWKHU��P

D\EH�D�ELJ�EDQQHU

1R

��1R

��%DQQHU�WR�GLVWLQJXLVK�WKH�WZ

R1RWLFHG�LW��QHYHU

UHDOO\�ORRNHG�WRRPXFK

1RWKLQJ�LQ�SDUWLFXODU

1R

��0RUH�LQIRUP

DWLRQ�RQ�HDFK�H[KLELW

1R

��1R

��1RW�VXUH

1R

��<HV

����

<HV

/LNHG�ORRNLQJ�DW�WKH�ROGWHFKQRORJ\�RQ�GLVSOD\

1R

��

.HHS�H[KLELWLRQV�RQ�RSSRVLWH�VLGHV�RIWKH�JDOOHU\��0

DNH�WKH�RXWVLGH�RI�WKHFDVHV�P

RUH�GLIIHUHQW

<HV

/LNHG�ORRNLQJ�DW�WKH�ROGWHFKQRORJ\�RQ�GLVSOD\

1R

��

.HHS�H[KLELWLRQV�RQ�RSSRVLWH�VLGHV�RIWKH�JDOOHU\��0

DNH�WKH�RXWVLGH�RI�WKHFDVHV�P

RUH�GLIIHUHQW

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 30: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

29  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����+

DYH�\RXVHHQ�Z

H�QHHGWR�WDON"

4������:

KDW�GLG�\RX�PDNH�RI�LW

4���LV�LW�FOHDU�WKHUH

DUH�WZR�H[LKLELWLRQV"

T�����LI�\HV�ZKDW�DERXW

4�����LI�QR�Z

KDW�FRXOG�EH�FOHDUHU

<HV

6XUSULVLQJO\�XQFKDOOHQJLQJ��$

OO�WKHFRP

PXQLFDWLRQ�P

HWKRGVGLVFXVVHG�UHODWH�WR�WKH�SROLWLFDODQG�HFRQRP

LF�HOLWH��1RW�YHU\

LPDJLQDWLYH��'

RHVQW�VKRZFRP

PXQLFDWLRQ�LQ�D�QHZ

�ZD\��1

RWVROG�RQ�WKH�LGHD�RI�WKH�ERDUG

JDPH�DV�P

HWKRG�RIFRP

PXQLFDWLRQ��(

XURFHQWULF�ELDVWR�H[KLELWLRQ�

<HV

&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�DQG�ROG�SRWV

��

<HV

1RW�D�FOHDU�WKHP

H1R

��

0DNH�D�GLYLGH�JDS�EHWZ

HHQ�WKH�WZR

H[KLELWLRQV��0D\EH�P

RYH�RQH�LQWRDQRWKHU�URRP

���WKH�VSDFH�EHWZHHQ�WKH

GRRUV�WR�WKH�JDOOHU\�DQG�WKH�OHFWXUHKDOO�

<HV

1RW�KHU�DUHD�RI�LQWHUHVW��P

RUHLQWHUHVWHG�LQ�WKH�DQFLHQW�Z

RUOG<HV

'LIIHUHQW�WLP

H�SHULRGV��DQFLHQW�WLPHV�YV�

PRGHUQ�WLP

HV��

1R

��1R

��%HWWHU�VLJQDJH

1R

��1R

��1$

1R

��<HV

3RWV�DQG�UHFHQW�KLVWRU\

��

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 31: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

30  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����VXEMHFWV�UHODWLQJ�WR�WKH�WKHP

H�\RXG�EH�LQWHUHVWHG�LQ4����LQWHUHVWHG�LQ

VHHLQJ�VWRQH�WRROV4�����,QWHUHVWHG�LQ�P

RUHPRGHUQ�WRROV"

,�WKLQN�LI�\RX�ZHQW�IURP

�DFLHQW�WR�PRGHUQ�LWV�QLFH�WR�KDYH

WKDW�NLQG�RI�EUHDGWK�\HV

\HVGDG�XVHG�WR�EH�D�QHXURORJLVW��VFDQQLQJ�P

RWRU�DFWLYLWLHVLQWHUHVWLQJ�WR�VKRZ

�SDUWLFXODU�WDVNV�DQG�WRROV�DQG�ZKDW

SDUWV�RI�EUDLQ�GR�WKLV��$QDORJXHV�WRROV��P

DSSLQJ�VDPH

DUHDV�LQ�SDVW"\HV��UHODWHG�WRVFDQQLQJ�LGHD

\HV

<HV��DOO�DUFKDHRORJ\�LQ�JHQHUDO

<HV��OHDUQW�D�VLP

LODUWRSLF�ODVW�\HDU�UHOHYDQW�WR

XQGHUJUDGH�GHJUHH

<HV��3

HRSOH�GRQW�XQGHUVWDQGFRQFHSWV�RI�P

RGHUQDUFKDHRORJ\��H�J�

GHYHORSPHQW�RI�D[H�IURP

VWRQH�WR�PHWDO�Z

RXOG�EH�JRRGWR�JHW�YLVLWRUV�WR�WKLQN

0RVW�WKHP

HV��QR�H[DPSOHV�JLYHQ���VWXGLHG�VLP

LODU�WRSLFV\HV

\HV

<HV��Z

ULWLQJ�WRROV��PXUDOV�WR�LSDGV

\HV\HV

)HHOV�WRSLF�KDV�EHHQ�RYHU�GRQH��KDV�VHHQ�VLPLODU

H[KLELWLRQV�EHIRUHQR

\HV��VKRXOG�EH�PRUH���VW

FHQWXU\�FHQWULF

:ULWLQJ�LQVWUXP

HQWV�DQG�WHFKQRORJ\\HV

\HV

$[HV�DQG�EURQ]H�DJH�IOLQWV

\HV\HV

�ZRXOGQW�NQRZ

�ZKDW�WR�H[SHFW�Z

LWK�WKDW�WLWOH��TXLWH�EURDG�\HV

\HV�LQWHUDFWLRQ�EHWZ

HHQ�JOREDO�H[DPSOHV�RI�WRROV�DQG�WKH

KXPDQ�P

LQG�\HV

\HV���6

SHFLDOL]DWLRQ��D�SRLQW�LQ�WLPH�RI�P

DVVLYH�SUROLIHUDWLRQDQG�KRZ

�GRHV�WKDW�FRQQHFW�ZLWK�EURDGHU�GHYHORSP

HQWV�:DQW�WR�VHH�D�ELJJHU�SLFWXUH�UDWKHU�WKDQ�D

W\SRORJLFDO�UHJLRQDO�FKURQRORJLFDO�GLYHUVLW\�\HV

\HV

WHFKQRORJ\<HV

\HV

&RP

SOH[LWLHV�RI�WRRO�PDNLQJ�SURFHVV��HYROXWLRQ�RI�WRROV

\HV\HV

+RZ

�SHRSOH�XVH�WRROV�DQG�LQWHUDFW��HYROXWLRQ\HV

\HVYHU\�ILUVW�WRRO��KRZ

�LW�ZDV�FRQVWUXFWHG��Z

KHUH�LW�FDPH�IURP

�HYROXWLRQ�IURP

�WKDW�DUHD�FRPSDUHG�WR�RWKHU�DUHDV��KXP

DQGHYHORSP

HQW�LQ�GLIIHUHQW�SODFHV�

\HV����DW�ZKDW�SRLQW

GLG�ZH�HYROYH�WR�XVHWRROV"

\HV����HOHFWULF�VFUHZGULYHUV

VNXOOV�IURP�PHGLFDO�SURFHGXUHV��VXUJHU\�WRROV

\HVQR��WKH�ROGHU�WKH�EHWWHU

3DUW����)XWXUH�([KLELWLRQ

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 32: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

31  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����VXEMHFWV�UHODWLQJ�WR�WKH�WKHP

H�\RXG�EH�LQWHUHVWHG�LQ4����LQWHUHVWHG�LQ

VHHLQJ�VWRQH�WRROV4�����,QWHUHVWHG�LQ�P

RUHPRGHUQ�WRROV"

DQ\�NLQG�RI�HDUO\�VWRQH�WRROV��HVSHFLDOO\�SDOHROLWKLF\HV��YHU\�LQWHUHVWHGLQ�RULJLQV�RI�WRRO�XVH

QR��H[FHSW�LQ�WKH�FRQWH[W�RIKRZ

�ZH�GHYHORS�IURP

�HDUO\�WRPRGHUQ��RWKHUZ

LVH�QRW�UHDOO\LQWHUHVWLQJ

HOHFWURFRQYXOVLYH�WKHUDS\��SV\FKRORJ\��ROG�PHGLFDO�WRROV�

KXPDQ�P

LQG�DQG�KRVSLWDO�HTXLSPHQW

D�OLWWOH�EXW�PRUH

LQWHUHVWHG�LQ�PRGHUQ

\HV

SDUW�RI�WKH�EUDLQ�DVVRFLDWHG�ZLWK�WRROV��LP

DJHV�RI�WKH�EUDLQZLWK�UHOHYDQW�DUHDV�KLJKOLJKWHG��FRJQLWLYH�DUHDV

\HV��EXW�QRWDUFKDHRORJLFDO�SRLQW

RI�YLHZ\HV��FRJQLWLRQ�DQG�WRROV�PXVLFDO�LQVWUXP

HQWV

/RQJ�WLPH�SURJUHVVLRQ�RI�WRROV�WHFKQRORJ\

<HV��EXW�QRW�WKHHQWLUH�H[KLELW

<HV��3

URJUHVVLRQ��QRW�VSOLW�����

(YROXWLRQ�RI�WRROV� �LQWHUHVWLQJ��SURJUHVVLRQ�RI�WHFKQRORJ\

WKURXJK�WKH�DJHV<HV

<HV��3

URJUHVVLRQ��GHILQLWHO\

1R�LGHD��,P

�QRW�LQWHUHVWHG1R

'HSHQGV�RQ�WKH�WRROV��1

RQHFRP

H�WR�PLQG

0HGLFFDO�ORERWRP

\�WRROV�EHFDXVH�,�DP�D�SV\FKRORJ\

VWXGHQW<HV

<HV��,I�LW�Z

DV�H[SODLQHG�ZKDW

WKH\�ZHUH�DQG�Z

K\�WKH\UHKHUH

1RW�VXUH

6XUH

6XUH

,QWHUHVWHG�LQ�KRZ�SHRSOH�VROYH�FRQFHSWXDO�SUREOHP

V�E\XVLQJ�UHDGLO\�DYDLODEOH�UHVRXUFHV�DQG�YLVXDOLVDWLRQSUDFWLFHV��L�H��P

LQG�DV�D�WRRO��,QWHUHVWHG�LQ�&RP

SXWHU6FLHQFHV�DV�D�ODUJH�VFDOH�WRRO��>7KLV�DQVZ

HU�UHODWHV�WRLQWHUYLHZ

HHV�SHUVRQDO�EDFNJURXQG��8&/�&

RPSXWHU

6FLHQFHV�VWDII�@�

1RW�UHDOO\

1RW�UHDOO\��0

RUH�LQWHUHVWHG�LQDEVWUDFW�DQG�FRFHSWXDODSSURDFKHV�WR�WRROV

(J\SWLDQ�P

HGLFDO�WRROV���WKH�LPSOHP

HQW�XVHG�IRU�UHPRYLQJ

WKH�EUDLQ<HV��YHU\�FRRO

<HV

3V\FKRORJLFDO�P

HGLFDO�WUHDWPHQWV��GHVFULSWLRQV�RI�WKH�P

LQG<HV

<HV��P

D\EH�PHGLFDO�WRROV

IURP�8&/V�FROOHFWLRQ

1RW�WKDW�P

DQ\��'RHVQW�XQGHUVWDQG�WKH�WKHP

H�VR�ZRXOG�OLNH

LW�H[SODLQHG�DQG�LW�DOVR�QHHGV�WR�EH�PRUH�GHILQHG��&

RXOGPL[�XS�Z

KDW�WKH�H[KLELWLRQ�WDONV�DERXW��EXW�GRHVQW�WKLQN�LWVKRXOG�WDNH�RQ�WRR�P

XFK�VR�SUREDEO\�EHWWHU�WR�IRFXV�RQ��PDLQ�VXEMHFW�

<HV��$

OWKRXJKGRHVQW�DJUHH�Z

LWKWKH�OLQNDJH�EHWZ

HHQVWRQH�WRROV�DQGOHDUQLQJ���VXFK�DVWKH�LGHD�WKDW�D

KDPPHU�FKDQJHV

QHXURVFLHQFH�

<HV��$

OWKRXJK�WKLV�VKRXOG�EHDERXW�WKH�HYROXWLRQ�RI�WRROVQRW�MXVW�ROG�DQG�QHZ

��6KRXOG

IRFXV�RQ�SURJUHVVLRQD�DQGDGYDQFHP

HQW�

3DUW����)XWXUH�([KLELWLRQ

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 33: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

32  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4����VXEMHFWV�UHODWLQJ�WR�WKH�WKHP

H�\RXG�EH�LQWHUHVWHG�LQ4����LQWHUHVWHG�LQ

VHHLQJ�VWRQH�WRROV4�����,QWHUHVWHG�LQ�P

RUHPRGHUQ�WRROV"

(YROXWLRQ�LQ�SV\FKRORJ\��'

HYHORSPHQW�RI�WRROV�RYHU�WLP

H�$UFKDHRORJ\

0LJKW�EH

�4XHVWLRQHG�Z

KDW�ZH�P

HDQWE\�WRROV��0

DFKLQHV

7RROV�XVHG�IRU�LQYDVLYH�SURFHGXUHV�RQ�WKH�EUDLQ<HV

1R��3

UHIHU�WR�VHH�UHFHQWKLVWRU\�DQG�DQFLHQW�WRROV�QRW

PRGHUQ

3V\FKRORJ\

<HV

<HV

1$

<HV

<HV

3V\FKRORJ\

<HV

<HV

3DUW����)XWXUH�([KLELWLRQ

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 34: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

33  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4�����:

KDW�HOVH�WR�VHH�GR4�����$

Q\WKLQJ�HOVH�WRDGG�

,I�\RX�KDYH�VRPH�RI�WKH�HDUO\�WHFKQRORJ\�,�JXHVV�LW�Z

RXOGEH�QLFH�WR�KDYH�D�Z

RUNVKRS�RU�OHFWXUH�DERXW�KRZ�LWV

PDGH�DQG�KRZ

�LWV�XVHGQR

ZDQW�WR�VHH�KRZ

�ZHUH�GLIIHUHQW�IURP

�SULPDWHV�RU�HYHQ

RWKHU�DQLPDOV��+

RZ�KXP

DQV�DUH�GLVWLQFW�DQG�ZKDW�LW

PHDQV�LQ�WHUP

V�RI�LQWHOOLJHQFH��8VH�RI�WRROV�DQG�KRZ

�WKDWVSUHDGV���FRP

PXQLFDWLRQ��ILGHOLW\�RI�WUDQVP

LVVLRQ�ZKDW�LW

UHTXLUHG�WR�SURGXFH�[��1HHG�VHSHUDWLRQ�RI�VSDFH��EUDLQ

GHYHORSPHQW��KDQG�H\H�FRRUGLQDWLRQ��WUDQLQJ�DQGOHDUQLQJ��P

XVFOH�PHP

RU\��

1RW�D�WHFKQRORJ\�SHUVRQ��)RXQG�LSDGV�LQWHUHVWLQJ�WR�JR

RQ�ZKLOH�Z

DLWLQJ�IRU�OHFWXUHV

7KH�VSDFH�KDV�D�UDQJH�RIREMHFWV�DQG�WKHP

HV��4XLWH

KDSS\�ZLWK�WKH�DUHD�DQGVHW�XS

1RWKLQJ�LQ�SDUWLFXODU��VHHQ�VLP

LODU�WKHPHV�FRYHUHG�LQ

H[KLELWLRQV�EHIRUH��$�JRRG�WRSLF�WR�FRYHU�LQ�JHQHUDO��ORWV

WR�WDON�DERXW��IOXLG�WKHPH�

&XUUHQW�IHDWXUHV�JUHDW�FRQVLGHULQJ�UHVRXUFHV

$OZD\V�IHOW�WKH�DUHD�Z

DV�DELW�GDUN��EHWWHU�OLJKWLQJPLJKW�P

DNH�LW�PRUH

DWWUDFWLYH�DQG�DFFHVVLEOH

1RWKLQJ�LQ�SDUWLFXODU

)RFXV�RQ�PRGHUQ�VLGH�RI

WKHPHV��P

RUH�LQIRUPDWLRQ

DQG�H\H�FDWFKLQJ�GLVSOD\V

,QWHUDFWLYHV�DUH�FRRO��GLGQW�IHHO�WKH\�ZHUH�GLVWLQFW

HQRXJK�WKRXJK��H�J��VLPLODU�VHW�XS�DQG�VW\OH�WR�RQH

DQRWKHU��DQG�QR�LPPHGLDWHO\�REYLRXV�

)HHOV�WKH�H[KLELWLRQ�VSDFHLV�DZ

NZDUG��WRR�ORQJ�DQG

WKLV�PDNHV�LW�D�IDLUO\

XQHQJDJLQJ�DUHD��SOXV�LWVE\�D�OHFWXUH�KDOO�Z

KLFKPHDQV�SHRSOHV�GRQW

DOZD\V�H[SORUH�WKH�VSDFH

�,�GRQW�NQRZ�

QR

�VWRQH�DJH�VWXII�QR

�QR�,�ZRXOGQW�NQRZ

�QR

�QR��FDQW�WKLQN�RI�DQ\WKLQJQR

WKLQJV�WR�KDQGOH��ZKLFK�LV�GLIILFXOW�LQ�WKLV�VHWWLQJ��3

URGXFW�ZKDW�WKHVH�WRROV�Z

HUH�XVHG�IRU´

³VXIILFHQWFRQWH[WXDO�EDFNJURXQGLQIR��7KH�DUFKDHRORJ\�LVYHU\�H[FOXVLYH´

KDQGOLQJ�REMHFWVQR

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 35: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

34  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4�����:

KDW�HOVH�WR�VHH�GR4�����$

Q\WKLQJ�HOVH�WRDGG�

WH[WLOHV��LQWHUDFWLYH�HOHPHQWV

QR

$�JUDQG�VFRSH�RI�WRRO�HYROXWLRQ��GLYHUVH�DJHV

QR

KDQGOLQJ�DUHD��VHH�KRZ�WRROV�Z

HUH�XVHG

$�ODWH�QLJKW�RSHQLQJ�Z

RXOGEH�JRRG��GUDZ

V�SHRSOH�LQ�PDNH�LW�VRFLDO�

ZRXOG�OLNH�D�OHFWXUH�SDQHO��GRHV�QRW�OLNH�LQWHUDFWLYHV

�JLPPLFN\��QR�RQH�XVHV�WKHP

�QR

����

YLGHRV�VKRZLQJ�KRZ

�WRROV�DUH�XVHG�LQ�FRQWH[W��

LQWHJUDWH�PXOWLSOH�DUHDV�SHUVSHFWLYHV��OLNH�FRP

ELQLQJDUFKDHRORJ\�DQG�VFLHQFH�RI�WKH�EUDLQ

QR

1�$

1�$

1�$

1�$

1�$

,�GLGQW�QRWLFH�WKHUH�ZHUH

L3DGV�LQ�WKH�URRP

�IRU����ZHHNV��0

DNH�WKDW�FOHDUHU

1�$

1�$

7RROV�UHODWLQJ�WR�DUFKLWHFWXUH�DQG�FRQVWUXFWLRQ��UHODWHV�WRLQWHUYLHZ

HHV�EDFNJURXQG�1R

0RGHOV�DV�D�Z

D\�RI�FRPPXQLFDWLQJ��0

DWKHPDWLFV�DV�D

WRRO��+RZ

�6FULSW�Z

ULWLQJ�DQG�UH�ZULWLQJ�FDQ�KHOS�\RX�VROYH

SUREOHPV��UHIHUHG�WR�DQ�H[KLELWLRQ�RI�WKH�%

HDWOHV�O\ULFV�DWWKH�%

ULWLVK�0XVHXP

����

'HVFULSWLRQV�RI�P

HGLFDO�HTXLSPHQW��OLNHV�GHWDLO���,W

GRHVQW�QHHG�WR�EH�PRUH�LQWHUDFWLYH�

/LNHV�WKH�FROOHFWLRQ�DQG�WKHEOHQG�RI�ROG�DQG�QHZ

'HVFULSWLRQV�RI�P

HGLFDO�HTXLSPHQW��OLNHV�GHWDLO���,W

GRHVQW�QHHG�WR�EH�PRUH�LQWHUDFWLYH�

1R

:RXOG�OLNH�WR�VHH�D�WKHP

DWLF�DSSURDFK��'LIIFXOW�WRSLF�VR

ZRXOG�QHHG�D�FOHDU�GYHORSP

HQW�RI�WKH�FRQFHSW��9LGHRV�RI

WRROV�RI�WKH�PLQG�EHLQJ�XVHG��$

EOH�WR�KROG�DQG�HQJDJHZLWK�WRROV��XVH�WRROV��,QWHUDFWLYHV�VKRXOG�XVH�P

LQG�WRROVDQG�QRW�OHDUQ�P

RUH�DERXW�VRPHWKLQJ�OLNH�VP

RNH�VLJQDOV�1R

,QWHUDFWLYHV���IRRWDJH�RI�WKH�XVH�RI�WRROV��+DQGOLQJ

UHSOLFDV�RI�WRROV�1R

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 36: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

35  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

   

4�����:

KDW�HOVH�WR�VHH�GR4�����$

Q\WKLQJ�HOVH�WRDGG�

,QWHUDFWLYHV�DQG�LQYROYH�LQ�VRPH�Z

D\�H[SHULHQFHV�ZLWK

WRROV��HJ��WKURXJK�VHHLQJ�YLGHRV�RI�SHRSOH�XVLQJ�WKHP�

,W�LV�FRRO�WR�KDYHH[KLELWLRQV�LQ�WKLV�VSDFH�

,QWHUDFWLYHV�DQG�KDQGOLQJ�LWHPV

1R

,QWHUDFWLYHV�DQG�KDQGOLQJ�LWHPV

1R

,QWHUDFWLYHV1R

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V

Page 37: Visitor Evaluations Communications Report

36  |  E v a l u a t i o n   R e p o r t   K Y V H 7    

 

'DWH

7LPH

,QWHUYLHZHU�V�

��RI�5HMHFWLRQV

��RI�,QWHUYLHZV

������������DP

���DP.HUU\�-RFHO\Q

���

������������DP

���SP:LOO�$

OOLVRQ�

������������SP

��SP0DU\�.

LWW\�

�����������SP

��SP%HWKDQ\�4

LQJ�4LQ

��

�����������SP

��SP/\GLD�(

PPD

��

�����������SP

��SP$QQFKHQ

��

������������DP

���SP6WDFH\�,]]\

��

7RWDO��

��

7RWDO�QXPEHU�RI�SHRSOH�LQWHUYLHZ

HG�ZDV���DV�Z

H�KDG�WZR�JURXSV

0XVHXP

�&RP

PXQLFDWLRQ�9LVLWRU�,QWHUYLHZ

V