yanbo zhao petros ioannou

1
Dynamic Train Headway Selection and Its Effect on Capacity Yanbo Zhao Petros Ioannou Email: [email protected] , [email protected] . Evaluation & Results Motivation & Introduction Proposed Method Headway Policy Switch Location Velocity Brake Characteristics Driver Response Track Track Grade Track Curvature Track Occupy Status Comm Obtain Inputs Define and Start () f a t () l at Set Time Step Interval T (0) (0) 0 l f S S min l H L 0 k Add safe margin and output ( ) 0 f V kT min H ( 1) (( 1) ) ( ) ()() k T l l l kT V k T V kT a d ( 1) (( 1) ) ( ) ()() k T f f f kT V k T V kT a d ( 1) (( 1) ) ( ) ()() k T l l l kT S k T S kT V d ( 1) (( 1) ) ( ) ()() k T f f f kT S k T S kT V d max (( 1) ) (( 1) ), 0 f l S S k T S k T min l S L H min l H S L 1 k k No No Yes Yes 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Time (second) Position (feet) Following Train Leading Train 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Time (second) Position (feet) Following Train Leading Train 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 6400 6420 6440 6460 6480 6500 6520 Inner Distance (feet) Time (second) Input Factors Signal Signal Signal Fixed Block System Moving Block System Brick-wall Headway Policy Brick-wall Headway Policy Communication Network Train Dispatch Center Communication Based Train Control System Leading Train Following Train Braking distance Dynamic Headway Policy Communication Based Continuous Updating Reducing Headway Improving Capacity Train Communication Interval Time Communication Delay H = max {Hmin, Following Train Emergency Stopping Distance + Leading Train Length} Numeric Headway Calculation Algorithm Failure Tolerance Headway Selection Decelerate Trains to New Operation Velocity Check The Received Signal If Green, Switch Successfully If Not, Continue Deceleration Dynamic Headway Policy to Brick-wall Policy when Communication Network Fails Brick-wall Policy to Dynamic Headway Policy when Communication Network Recovers Passenger Train Freight Train Length, feet 250 3000 Maximum Service Brake Rate (feet/min 2 ) 5280 1950 Maximum Emergency Brake Rate (feet/min 2 ) 10560 3900 Brake System Response Time (sec) 0.5 0.5 Brake System Build-up Time (sec) 2.0 2.0 Velocity (mph) 60 40 Driver Reaction Time (sec) 0.5 0.5 Communication Delay (sec) 1 Track Grade 0 Track Curvature Radius (feet) 0 Safe Margin Distance (feet) 200 Time Interval in Timetable Headway Policy (min) 5 Timetable Policy (5 min) Brick-wall Policy Dynamic Policy Case 1 P-P 26550 ft 3286 ft 1858 ft Case 2 P-F 20600 ft 3758 ft 3410 ft Case 3 F-P 29300 ft 6036 ft 4376 ft Case 4 F-F 23600 ft 6508 ft 4847 ft Factor Value Headway (ft) Line Capacity (trains/hour) Initial Velocity (mph) 20 3627 29.1 30 4138 38.3 40 4847 43.6 50 5755 45.0 60 6862 46.2 Service/Eme rgency Brake Capability (feet/min2) 975/1950 6436 32.8 1560/3120 5244 40.2 1950/3900 4847 43.6 2340/4680 4583 46.1 2925/5850 4318 48.9 Driver Reaction Time Difference (sec) -2 4730 44.7 -1 4788 44.1 0 4847 43.6 1 4906 43.1 2 4965 42.5 Track Grade -35403 39.1 -25189 40.7 -15005 42.1 0 4847 43.6 +14710 44.8 +24589 46.0 +34482 47.1 Communica tion Delay (sec) 0 4789 44.1 0.4 4800 43.9 0.8 4824 43.7 1.0 4847 43.6 1.2 4859 43.4 1.6 4870 43.2 2.0 4905 43.0 Input Parameters Sensitivity Analysis (Case F-F) Headways of Different Policies Signal Signal Signal vf vfvl vlP . Case 1 Signal Signal Signal vf vl vlP . Case 2 Accelerate Trains to Reduce Inner Distance until Reaching Minimum Secure Dynamic Headway Examples Switch to Brick-wall Policy Switch to Dynamic Policy Find the Minimum Headway between two trains such that the Following Train front should not run across the Leading Train rear until the Following Train comes to a fully stop Two trains in a straight track line If an emergency occurs, the Leading Train starts to decelerate and send event report to the Following Train The Following Train will start to brake when receiving event report from the Leading Train

Upload: others

Post on 13-Nov-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Yanbo Zhao Petros Ioannou

Dynamic Train Headway Selection

and Its Effect on Capacity Yanbo Zhao Petros Ioannou

Email: [email protected], [email protected].

Evaluation & Results

Motivation & Introduction

Proposed Method

Headway Policy Switch

Location

Velocity

Brake Characteristics

Driver Response

Track

Track Grade

Track Curvature

Track Occupy

Status

Comm

Obtain Inputs

Define and

Start

( )fa t( )la t

Set Time Step Interval T

(0) (0) 0l fS S

min lH L

0k

Add safe margin and

output ( ) 0fV kT

minH

( 1)

(( 1) ) ( ) ( ) ( )k T

l l lkT

V k T V kT a d

( 1)

(( 1) ) ( ) ( ) ( )k T

f f fkT

V k T V kT a d

( 1)

(( 1) ) ( ) ( ) ( )k T

l l lkT

S k T S kT V d

( 1)

(( 1) ) ( ) ( ) ( )k T

f f fkT

S k T S kT V d

max (( 1) ) (( 1) ), 0f lS S k T S k T

minlS L H

min lH S L

1k k

No

No

Yes

Yes

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Time (second)

Positio

n (

feet)

Following Train

Leading Train

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Time (second)

Positio

n (

feet)

Following Train

Leading Train

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 226400

6420

6440

6460

6480

6500

6520

Inner

Dis

tance (

feet)

Time (second)

Input Factors

Signal Signal Signal

Fixed Block System

Moving Block System

Brick-wall Headway PolicyBrick-wall Headway Policy

Communication

Network

Train Dispatch

Center

Communication Based Train

Control System

Leading

Train

Following

Train

Braking distance

Dynamic Headway Policy

•Communication Based

•Continuous Updating

•Reducing Headway

•Improving Capacity

Train

Communication

Interval Time

Communication

Delay

H = max {Hmin, Following Train Emergency Stopping Distance + Leading Train Length}

Numeric Headway Calculation Algorithm

Failure Tolerance Headway Selection

•Decelerate Trains to New

Operation Velocity

•Check The Received Signal

If Green, Switch Successfully

If Not, Continue Deceleration

Dynamic Headway Policy to Brick-wall Policy when Communication Network Fails

Brick-wall Policy to Dynamic Headway Policy when Communication Network Recovers

Passenger Train Freight Train

Length, feet 250 3000

Maximum Service

Brake Rate

(feet/min2)

5280 1950

Maximum

Emergency Brake

Rate (feet/min2)

10560 3900

Brake System

Response Time (sec)0.5 0.5

Brake System

Build-up

Time (sec)

2.0 2.0

Velocity (mph) 60 40

Driver Reaction

Time

(sec)

0.5 0.5

Communication

Delay

(sec)

1

Track Grade 0

Track Curvature

Radius (feet)0

Safe Margin

Distance (feet)200

Time Interval in

Timetable Headway

Policy (min)

5

Timetable

Policy (5 min)

Brick-wall

Policy

Dynamic

Policy

Case 1 P-P 26550 ft 3286 ft 1858 ft

Case 2 P-F 20600 ft 3758 ft 3410 ft

Case 3 F-P 29300 ft 6036 ft 4376 ft

Case 4 F-F 23600 ft 6508 ft 4847 ft

Factor ValueHeadway

(ft)

Line

Capacity

(trains/hour)

Initial

Velocity

(mph)

20 3627 29.1

30 4138 38.3

40 4847 43.6

50 5755 45.0

60 6862 46.2

Service/Eme

rgency

Brake

Capability

(feet/min2)

975/1950 6436 32.8

1560/3120 5244 40.2

1950/3900 4847 43.6

2340/4680 4583 46.1

2925/5850 4318 48.9

Driver

Reaction

Time

Difference

(sec)

-2 4730 44.7

-1 4788 44.1

0 4847 43.6

1 4906 43.1

2 4965 42.5

Track

Grade

-3‰ 5403 39.1

-2‰ 5189 40.7

-1‰ 5005 42.1

0 4847 43.6

+1‰ 4710 44.8

+2‰ 4589 46.0

+3‰ 4482 47.1

Communica

tion Delay

(sec)

0 4789 44.1

0.4 4800 43.9

0.8 4824 43.7

1.0 4847 43.6

1.2 4859 43.4

1.6 4870 43.2

2.0 4905 43.0

Input Parameters Sensitivity Analysis (Case F-F)

Headways of Different Policies

Signal Signal Signal

vf

vf’

vl

vl’P.

Case 1

Signal Signal Signal

vf vl

vl’P.

Case 2

•Accelerate Trains to Reduce Inner Distance

until Reaching Minimum Secure Dynamic Headway

Examples

Switch to Brick-wall Policy Switch to Dynamic Policy

•Find the Minimum Headway

between two trains such that the

Following Train front should not

run across the Leading Train rear

until the Following Train comes to

a fully stop

•Two trains in a straight track line

•If an emergency occurs, the

Leading Train starts to decelerate

and send event report to the

Following Train

•The Following Train will start to

brake when receiving event report

from the Leading Train