yu-min zhao [ 赵玉民 ] ( in collaboration with a. arima[ 有马朗人 ] and n. yoshinaga[...
DESCRIPTION
Regular structure of atomic nuclei in the presence of random interactions. Yu-Min ZHAO [ 赵玉民 ] ( in collaboration with A. Arima[ 有马朗人 ] and N. Yoshinaga[ 吉永尚孝 ]). 1 Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China; 2 Center of Theoretical Nuclear physics, IMP, CAS, Lanzhou, China; - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Regular structure of atomic nuclei in thepresence of random interactions
Outline• A brief introduction of spin zero ground state (0 g.
s.) dominance• Present status along this line 1. Main results on studies of the 0 g.s. dominance 2. Positive parity ground state dominance 3. Collectivity of low-lying states by using the TBRE 4. Energy centroids of given spin states• Perspectives * Some simpler quantities (e.g., parity positive g.s.
dominance, energy centroids) can be studied first * Searching for other regularities (e.g., collectivity)
1958 Wigner introduced Gaussian orthogonal ensemble of random matrices (GOE) in understanding the spacings of energy levels observed in resonances of slow neutron scattering on heavy nuclei. Ref: Ann. Math. 67, 325 (1958)
1970’s French, Wong, Bohigas, Flores introduced two-body random ensemble (TBRE) Ref: Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 385 (1981); Phys. Rep. 299, (1998); Phys. Rep. 347, 223 (2001).Original References: J. B. French and S.S.M.Wong, Phys. Lett. B33, 449(1970); O. Bohigas and J. Flores, Phys. Lett. B34, 261 (1970).
Other applications: complicated systems (e.g., quantum chaos)
Two-body Random ensemble (TBRE)
21 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
( )
2
1( ) exp( )
21,
1/ 2,
JTj j j jGJT
j j j j xGx
x
1 2 3 4if | | ;
otherwise.
j j JT j j JT
One usually choose Gaussian distribution for two-body random interactions
There are some people who use other distributions, for example, A uniform distribution between -1 and 1. For our study, it is found that these different distribution present similar statistics.
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4| |JTj j j jG j j JT V j j JT
Two-body random ensemble (TBRE)
1.What does 0 g.s. dominance mean ?
In 1998, Johnson, Bertsch, and Dean discovered that spin parity =0+ ground state dominance can be obtained by using random two-body interactions (Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2749) .
This result is called the 0 g.s. dominance.
Similar phenomenon was found in other systems, say, sd-boson systems.
C. W. Johnson et al., PRL80, 2749 (1998); R. Bijker et al., PRL84, 420 (2000); L. Kaplan et al., PRB65, 235120 (2002).
† (0)
2 2
† † † ( )
2
A single- shell Hamiltonian:
2 1( ) ,
| | , 0,2, ,2 1
1( ) ,
21 1
( ) exp( )22
J JJ
J
J
J Jj j
J J
j
H J A A G
G j J V j J J j
A a a
G G
(1) (1) (1) (1) (1)0 2 4 6 8
(2) (2) (2) (2) (2)0 2 4 6 8
(3) (3) (3)0 2 4
9 For , 0,2,4,6,8.
2There are five independent two-body matrices.
Set 1: , , , , output (1);
Set 2: , , , , output (2);
Set 3: , ,
j J
G G G G G
G G G G G
G G G
(3) (3)
6 8
(1000) (1000) (1000) (1000) (1000)0 2 4 6 8
, , output (3);
Set 1000: , , , , output (1000);
G G
G G G G G
References after Johnson, Bertsch and Dean
R. Bijker, A. Frank, and S. Pittel, Phys. Rev. C60, 021302(1999); D. Mulhall, A. Volya, and V. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4016(2000); Nucl. Phys. A682, 229c(2001); V. Zelevinsky, D. Mulhall, and A. Volya, Yad. Fiz. 64, 579(2001); D. Kusnezov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3773(2000); ibid. 87, 029202 (2001); L. Kaplan and T. Papenbrock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4553(2000); R.Bijker and A.Frank, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 029201(2001); S. Drozdz and M. Wojcik, Physica A301, 291(2001); L. Kaplan, T. Papenbrock, and C. W. Johnson, Phys. Rev. C63, 014307(2001); R. Bijker and A. Frank, Phys. Rev. C64, (R)061303(2001); R. Bijker and A. Frank, Phys. Rev. C65, 044316(2002); P.H-T.Chau, A. Frank, N.A.Smirnova, and P.V.Isacker, Phys. Rev. C66, 061301 (2002); L. Kaplan, T.Papenbrock, and G.F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. B65, 235120(2002); L. F. Santos, D. Kusnezov, and P. Jacquod, Phys. Lett. B537, 62(2002); T. Papenbrock and H. A. Weidenmueller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 132503 (2004); T. Papenbrock and H. A. Weidenmueller, Phys. Rev. C 73 014311 (2006); Y.M. Zhao and A. Arima, Phys. Rev.C64, (R)041301(2001); A. Arima, N. Yoshinaga, and Y.M. Zhao, Eur.J.Phys. A13, 105(2002); N. Yoshinaga, A. Arima, and Y.M. Zhao, J. Phys. A35, 8575(2002); Y. M. Zhao, A. Arima, and N. Yoshinaga, Phys. Rev.C66, 034302(2002); Y. M. Zhao, A. Arima, and N. Yoshinaga, Phys. Rev. C66, 064322(2002); Y.M.Zhao, A. Arima, N. Yoshinaga, Phys.Rev.C66, 064323 (2002); Y. M. Zhao, S. Pittel, R. Bijker, A. Frank, and A. Arima, Phys. Rev. C66, R41301 (2002); Y. M. Zhao, A. Arima, G. J. Ginocchio, and N. Yoshinaga, Phys. Rev. C66,034320(2003); Y. M. Zhao, A. Arima, N. Yoshinga, Phys. Rev. C68, 14322 (2003); Y. M. Zhao, A. Arima, N. Shimizu, K. Ogawa, N. Yoshinaga, O. Scholten, Phys. Rev. C70, 054322 (2004); Y.M.Zhao, A. Arima, K. Ogawa, Phys. Rev. C71, 017304 (2005); Y. M. Zhao, A. Arima, N. Yoshida, K. Ogawa, N. Yoshinaga, and V.K.B.Kota , Phys. Rev. C72, 064314 (2005); N. Yoshinaga, A. Arima, and Y. M. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C73, 017303 (2006); Y. M. Zhao, J. L. Ping, A. Arima, Preprint; etc.
Review papers : YMZ, AA, and N. Yoshinaga, Phys. Rep. 400, 1(2004); V. Zelevinsky and A. Volya, Phys. Rep. 391, 311 (2004).
1. Present status of understanding
the 0 g.s. dominance problem
Present status of this subjectPresent status of this subject
• Phenomenological method by our group (Zhao, Arima and Yoshinaga): reasonably applicable to all systems
• Mean field method by Bijker and Frank group: sd, sp boson systems (Kusnezov also considered sp bosons in a similar way)
• Geometric method suggested by Chau, Frank, Smirnova, and Isacker goes along the same line of our method (provided a foundation of our method for simple systems in which eigenvalues are in linear combinations of two-body interactions).
Our phenomenological method
( ) ( )
0(0) 0 2 4 6
7, 4 ( ) by TBRE exact ( ) pred(1) Pred(2)
25 3 13
19.9% 18.19% 14.3% 25% 6 2 6
32
I v I vE j n P I P I g
E G G G G
f or
2(2) 0 2 4 6
2(4) 2 4 6
3.14
1 11 3 13 1.2% 0.89% 0 0 3.25
2 6 2 642 13
31.7% 33.25% 11 11
E G G G G
E G G G
4(2) 0 2 4 6
4(4) 2 4 6
28.6% 25% 4.12
1 5 5 13 0 0 0 0 3.45
2 6 2 67 13
25.3 11
E G G G G
E G G G
5(4) 2 4 6
6(2) 0 2
0% 22.96% 28.6% 25% 3.68
8 192 26 0 0 0 0 3.62
7 77 111 5
2 6
E G G G
E G G
4 6
8(4) 2 4 6
3 19 0 0.02% 0 0 3.64
2 610 129 127
22.2% 24.15% 28.6% 25% 21 77 33
G G
E G G G
4.22
Our phenomenological method
Let find the lowest eigenvalue;
Repeat this process for all .'1, 0J J JG G
JG
( ) = g.s. probability
Number of time that
=
1 for a single-j shell)
2
I
P I I
N I
N
N j
appears i n the above process
Number of two-body matri x el ements
(
empirical ( ) /IP I N N
Four fermions in a single-j shell
2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
7 0 4 2 8
j J
9 0 4 0 0 12
11 0 4 0 4 8 16
13 0 4 0 2 2 12 20
15 0 4 0 2 0 0 16 24
17 0 4 6 0 4 2 0 20 28
19 0 4 8 0 2 8 2 16 24 32
21 0 4 8 0 2 0 0 0 20 28 36
23 0 4 8 0 2 0 10 2 0 24 32 40
25 0 4 8 0 2 4 8 10 6 0 28 36 44
27 0 4 8 0 2 4 2 0 0 4 20 32 40 48
29 0 4 8 0 0 2 6 8 12 8 0 24 36 44 52
31 0 4 8 0 0 2 0 8 14 16 6 0 32 40 48 56
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
20
40
60
80
0 5 10 15 20 25
0
20
40
60
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
20
40
60
80
0 5 10 15 20
0
20
40
60
80
a)
TBRE, pred.j=9/2 shell with 4 fermions
I g
.s. p
rob
ab
ilitie
s (
%)
TBRE, pred.j=9/2 shell with 5 fermions
c)
b)
TBRE, pred.7 fermions in the j1=7/2,j
2=5/2 orbits
angular momenta I
d)
TBRE, pred.10 sd bosons system
Applications of our method to realistic systems
• By using our phenomenological method, one can trace back what interactions, not only monopole pairing interaction but also some other terms with specific features, are responsible for 0 g.s. dominance. We understand that the Imax g.s. probability comes from the Jmax pairing interaction for single-j shell (also for bosons). The phenomenology also predicts spin I g.s. probabilities well. On the other hand, the reason of success of this method is not fully understood at a deep level, i.e., starting from a fundamental symmetry.
• Bijker-Frank mean field applies very well to sp bosons and reasonably well to sd bosons.
• Geometry method Chau, Frank, Sminova and Isacker is applicable to simple systems.
Summary of understandingof the 0 g.s. dominance
Time reversal invariance Zuker et al. (2002);
Time reversal invariance? Bijker&Frank&Pittel (1999);
Width ? Bijker&Frank (2000);
off-diagonal matrix elements for I=0 states Drozdz et al. (2001),
Highest symmetry hypothesis Otsuka&Shimizu(~2004),
Spectral Radius by Papenbrock & Weidenmueller (2004-2006)
Semi-empirical formula by Yoshinaga, Arima and Zhao(2006).
Other works
2. Parity distribution in the ground
States under random interactions
Present status of this subjectPresent status of this subject
• (A) Both protons and neutrons are in the shell which corresponds to nuclei with both proton number Z and neutron number N ~40;
• (B) Protons in the shell and neutrons in the shell which correspond to nuclei with Z~40 and N~50;
• (C) Both protons and neutrons are in the shell which correspond to nuclei with Z and N~82;
• (D) Protons in the shell and neutrons in the shell which correspond to nuclei with Z~50 and N~82.
7 / 2 5/ 2g d
5/ 2 1/ 2 9 / 2f p g
11/ 2 1/ 2 3/ 2h s d
5/ 2 1/ 2 9 / 2f p g
11/ 2 1/ 2 3/ 2h s d
7 / 2 5/ 2g d
(unit
Basis ( )
(0,4) (0,6) (2,2) (2,4) (2,6)
86.6 86.2 93.1 81.8 88.8
(2,3) (1,4) (0,5) (6,1) (2,1) (1,3) (1,5)
42.8 38.6 45.0
A
: %)
38.4 31.2 77.1 69.8
Basis ( )
(2,2) (2,4) (4, 2)
72.7 80.5 81.0
(3,4) (2,3) (3,2) (4,1) (1,4) (5,0) (3,3) (5,1)
42.5 72.4 39.1 75.1 26.4 4
B
4.1 79.4 42.9
Basis ( )
(2,2) (2,4) (4,0) (6,0)
92.2 81.1 80.9 82.4
(2,3) (5,0) (4,1) (1,5) (1,3)
52.0 42.6 56.5 64.4 73.0
Basis ( )
(2,2) (4,2
C
D
) (2, 4) (0,6)
67.2 76.1 74.6 83.0
(3,2) (2,3) (0,5) (3,3)
54.2 54.0 45.9 54.5
3. Collective motion in the presence
of random interactions
Present status of this subjectPresent status of this subject
Shell model: Horoi, Zelevinsky, Volya, PRC, PRL; Velazquez, Zuker, Frank, PRC; Dean et al., PRC; IBM:Kusnezov, Casten, et al., PRL; Geometric model: Zhang, Casten, PRC;
Other works
YMZ, Pittel, Bijker, Frank, and AA, PRC66, 041301 (2002). (By using usual SD pairs)
YMZ, J. L. Ping, and AA, preprint.(By using symmetry dictated pairs)
Our works by using SD pairs
4. Energy centroids of spin I states
under random interactions
Present status of this subjectPresent status of this subject
,
22 2
2 2
proportional to
1 ,
1( 1) |} ( ) ( ) .
2
Suppose that |} ( ) ( ) 's are random.
multiplicity number of ( , )
J J JI I J I I
J I
J n nI
K
n n
J JI I
JI
J
E G
n n j I j K j J
j I j K j J
d K
Note that ( 1)
,2
( 1),
2
JI
J
JJ JII I I
JI
n n
d n nd
Other works on energy centroids
• Mulhall, Volya, and Zelevinsky, PRL(2000)
• Kota, PRC(2005)
• YMZ, AA, Yoshida, Ogawa, Yoshinaga, and Kota, PRC(2005)
• YMZ, AA, and Ogawa PRC(2005)
• Regularities of many-body systems under random interactions, including spin zero ground state dominance, parity distribution,
collectivity, energy centroids with various quantum numbers.
• Suggestions and Questions: Study of simpler quantities: parity distribution in ground states, energy centroids, constraints of Hamiltonian in order to obtain correct collectivity, and spin 0 g.s. dominance