電気的に励起された 岩田順敬 ( 東大理 ) cedric simenel (cea/saclay)...
TRANSCRIPT
電気的に励起された
岩田順敬 ( 東大理 )
Cedric Simenel (CEA/Saclay)
原子核の時間発展
Thanks toThanks to::
大塚孝治 ( 東大理、東大 CNS 、理研 )
Michael Bender (CEA/Saclay)
Electric excitation for fissions
target
E1 excitation
E2 excitation
Electric excitation
Induced fission
Real time evolution
Photo-induced fission
Let us break 16O !Ideas for“The way of giving some energies for the ground state”Induced fission (electrical excited initial state)
TDHFTDHF (with excitation)
Full Diabatic
E2 excitation
E1 excitation
Deformed initial state
Constraint HF + TDHFConstraint HF + TDHF
+ Adiabatic
J. W. Negele et al., Phys. Rev. C. J. W. Negele et al., Phys. Rev. C. 1717, 3 (1978), 3 (1978)
Initial state on the saddle point
InteractionInteraction
0)()( tHitdt tTDHF LagrangianTDHF Lagrangian
'),'(),',(2
22
drtrtrrVm
i iij
it
j
jj drdrtrtrrrrrVtrrV '''''),'''(),''()''',','',(~
),',( *
→ → One body evolutionOne body evolution
Antisymmetrized potential
TDHF equationTDHF equation (←Time dependent variational principle)(←Time dependent variational principle)
SkyrmeVV ExtV
TDHF Equation with Excitations
Electric Electric excitationexcitation
SLy4d
SLy4d : SLy4d : Chabanat - Bonche - Hansel, (1995)
)(ˆˆ0ttQkVExt
Amplitude Time t0
Instantaneous
)0()(ˆexp)( 0 0 i
t
ExtidVh
iTt
Time-ordering
Excitation part
””One body time evolution” (final One body time evolution” (final form)form)
Electric Excitations ( E1 & Electric Excitations ( E1 & E2 Excitation )E2 Excitation )
0h : Hamiltonian with nuclear force
Nfor
N
Pfor
PD N
x
Z
x
A
ZNQ̂
2222 ˆˆˆ2
16
5ˆiii zyxQ
The initial state we calculate the HF ground stateHF ground state of Oxygen 16
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
E2 excitation
E1 excitation
time
“The boundary condition” is chosen to be Dirichlet zero on the edge of 3D box
The initial and the boundary value problem for TDHF equation
Ev8 :Ev8 :
P. Bonche et al., Comp. Phys. Com. 171, 49 (2005)P. Bonche et al., Comp. Phys. Com. 171, 49 (2005)
space
E2 excitation
HF|
GQR|
The most dominant transition in each case is considered to be as follows:
Energy
E2 excitation causes <Q2> deformation
HFe Qik || 2ˆ
0
Excited initial state Excited initial state ((small amp. & GQR dominancesmall amp. & GQR dominance))
GQRikqHFHFQik |||)ˆ1( 22
GQReikqHFt tQik ||)(| /ˆ
2
2 Time evolutionTime evolution
)/sin(2)(|ˆ|)( 2
22tkqtQt
q
QQ22 oscillation oscillation
E2 excitation
Excitation energy: 16MeV
The lower and the upper energy estimate for the induced fission energy of quadrupole type
E2 excitation
Nonlinearity existsNonlinearity exists::a small difference in excitation leads a large difference !a small difference in excitation leads a large difference !
Gap
262MeV
288MeV
86MeV
22MeV
16O1 time step = 0.45 fm/c
-20-15-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-20-15-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-20-15-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
E2 excitation
-20-15-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
192MeV
fission
oscillation
-20-15-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-20-15-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-20-15-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
288MeV
time = 180.0 fm/c
16O 8Be + 8Be
HF|
GDR|
GQRGDR|
E1 excitation
Two mode coupling state
We will measure the deformation by <Q2>
The most dominant transition in each case is considered to be as follows:
Energy
E1 excitation also causes <Q2> deformation
HFt |)(|
Time evolutionTime evolution
1)/cos(2)(|ˆ|)( 22
2 tqqktQt
qqd
QQ22 oscillation oscillation
GQRGDReGDReikq tiktik
d
qd || //
Important state of this case
C. Simenel and Ph. Chomaz. Phys. Review C, C. Simenel and Ph. Chomaz. Phys. Review C, 6868. (2003). (2003) ..
E1 excitation
The exchange of the dominant excitation for <Q2>
<Q2> [fm2]
E* [MeV]
q0
2* kE
02* qQaE
2
02* qQbE
E1 excitation:
E2 excitation: )0,(*,02
qEQ Initial state
)/,/(),0,(*, 2
002ababqqEQ
trivial
)0(),0( ba RR
b/a 2
16O
15MeV
E1
E2
Small amp.
b/a
TDHF Results of Electric Oscillation caused by E1 excitation
16OE1 Excitation (18MeV) is given
<QD> evolution <Q2> evolution
Existence of a singular point
16O 157MeV
274MeV
71MeV
18MeV
423MeV
~800MeV
E1 excitation
Singular point
0*/)(ˆ EtQfixedD
is observed in TDHF calculation
There exists a singular point
around here
More precisely,
242MeV –309MeV
TDHF Results of Electric Oscillations
Center of oscillation
Damping oscillation
0)()(.
tf-tfcrit
)( t def
E1 excitation
criticalcritical
16O
274MeV424MeV
157MeV71MeV
605MeV
Converging to excited oxygen
Separating into fragments
At the criticalAt the critical, “Dominant transition exchange” is switched on !?
Above the critical, damped oscillationdamped oscillation can be seen in <Q2> motion.
E1 excitation
274MeV
Broken
Excited state
605MeV
time = 270.0 fm/c
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CHF calculation for 16O
~35MeV
QQ22 Constraint Constraint
is given is given
CHF result for the initial state of TDHF calculation
Real time evolutionTDHF
How about the dynamics of the fission fragment ?
-40-30-20-10 0 10 20 30 40
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
-40-30-20-10 0 10 20 30 40
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
-40-30-20-10 0 10 20 30 40
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
-40-30-20-10 0 10 20 30 40
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
Excited state with 35MeV35MeV
from the ground state
CHF
time = 540.0 fm/c
time = 0.0 fm/s
SummarySummaryE1 excitationE1 excitation
PerspectivePerspective Based on this result, we will go for “unstable nuclei”“unstable nuclei”
E2 excitationE2 excitation
CHF + TDHF calculationCHF + TDHF calculation
280MeV ( 17.5 MeV/A )280MeV ( 17.5 MeV/A )
35MeV35MeV + adiabatic (initial state)+ adiabatic (initial state)
full diabaticfull diabatic
Excitation energy [MeV]280~3003515
16O
Exchange Exchange of E1 & E2 of E1 & E2 CHFCHF
Induced Induced fission(TDHF)fission(TDHF)
Diff.profile for E1 & E2
gap oscillation or not