ראותל )הזת( רמג תדובע doctor of philosophy ... · pdf file1 by arren bar-even...

110
1 By Arren Bar-Even Advisor: Ron Milo 21 March 2012 עקרונות עיצוב של חילוף חומרים תאיDesign Principles of Cellular Metabolism מאת ארן בר- אבן ז׳ שבט תשע״ב מנח ה: רון מילואThesis for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Submitted to the Scientific Council of the Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, Israel עבודת גמר( תזה) לתואר דוקטור לפילוסופיה מוגשת למועצה המדעית של מכון ויצמן למדע רחובות, ישראל

Upload: hoangthien

Post on 21-Mar-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    By

    Arren Bar-Even

    Advisor:

    Ron Milo

    21 March 2012

    Design Principles of Cellular Metabolism

    -

    :

    Thesis for the degree

    Doctor of Philosophy

    Submitted to the Scientific Council of the Weizmann Institute of Science

    Rehovot, Israel

    ( )

    ,

  • 2

    Table of contents

    Page

    Acknowledgments 3

    Abbreviations 4

    Summary of Findings 5

    Summary of Findings (Hebrew) 6

    Introduction 7

    Methods 16

    Results

    1. Evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters 24

    2. Hydrophobicity and charge shape cellular metabolite concentrations 31

    3. Quantitative pathway analysis applied to carbon fixation 36

    4. Thermodynamic constraints shape the structure of carbon fixation pathways 42

    5. The design of synthetic carbon fixation pathways 55

    6. Rethinking glycolysis: a perspective on the biochemical logic of metabolism 63

    Discussion 73

    Bibliography 89

    Declaration 110

  • 3

    Acknowledgments

    I would like to thank Ron Milo, my advisor, for giving me the freedom to pursue my

    research dreams and backing me for every scientific and personal decision. I could not

    ask for a more supportive advisor.

    I would like to thank Dan Tawfik for endless discussions and suggestions which

    pushed my research forward and made it much more fun. I really appreciate the time

    Dan invested in our interaction.

    I also thank Naama Barkai for very helpful discussions that improved the quality of

    my research.

    In addition, I would like to thank everyone in the Milo lab for creating a wonderful

    research environment. A special thanks to Elad Noor and Avi Flamholz, with whom I

    did much of the work presented here.

    Finally, I would like to thank my beautiful cat, Pakelet, who fills my days with

    tenderness and joy. I dedicate this work to her.

  • 4

    Abbreviations

    Fd Ferredoxin

    LP Lipoprotein

    MPT Methanopterin

    PEP Phosphoenolpyruvate

    Pi Inorganic phosphate

    PPi Pyrophosphate

    Rubisco Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

    THF Tetrahydrofolate

    EMP Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas

    TCA Tricarboxylic acids

    kcat Enzymatic turnover number

    KM Michaelis constant

    kcat/KM Enzyme efficiency

    KS Binding affinity

    LogP Octanol/water partition coefficient

    LogS Solubility in water

    MW Molecular weight

    Da Dalton

    PSA Polar surface area

    NPSA Non-polar surface area

    NCA Number of charged atoms

    HBI Hydrogen bond inventory

    NRB Number of rotatable bonds

    Q reaction quotient (mass-action ratio)

    K Equilibrium constant

    rG Transformed Gibbs energy of a reaction

    rGo Transformed Gibbs energy of a reaction under reactant concentrations of 1M

    rGm Transformed Gibbs energy of a reaction under reactant concentrations of 1mM

    fG Transformed Gobbs energy of formation

    Eo Transformed reduction potential

    Central-CE Central-carbohydrates-energy

    Central-ANF Central-amino-acids-fatty-acids-nucleotides

  • 5

    Summary of Findings

    I uncover several global trends that shape the global distribution of important

    metabolic parameters. Evolutionary pressures and physicochemical constraints that

    account for these trends are suggested. Analyzing the kinetic parameters of enzymes I

    find that the average enzyme exhibits kcat and kcat/KM values much below the

    characteristic textbook portrayal of kinetically superior enzymes. To account for these

    findings, I find strong indications that maximal rates may not evolve in cases where

    lower selection pressures are expected and that the physicochemical properties of

    substrates constrain the optimization of kinetic parameters. I also find a general trend

    in the concentrations of metabolites: in several organisms and growth conditions,

    living cells minimize the concentrations of non-polar, un-charged metabolites. I

    suggest that this can be attributed to an evolutionary pressure to avoid an unspecific

    hydrophobic effect. These findings shed light on the evolution of the internal makeup

    of living cells and can assist in establishing metabolic models that support synthetic

    biology and metabolic engineering efforts.

    I established quantitative frameworks for the analysis of metabolic pathways

    according to their kinetic and thermodynamic features. Specifically, using a novel

    estimation criterion of a pathways kinetics the pathway specific activity I

    evaluate and compare various alternative carbon fixation pathways, in spite of kinetic

    data scarcity. Using two thermodynamic frameworks, one treating metabolic

    pathways as black-boxes while the other addresses their structure directly, I uncover

    general constraints imposed on the environments in which pathways can operate, on

    their general structure and on the cellular resources they consume. Using this

    approach, I analyze and explain the structure of natural carbon fixation pathways as

    well as the structure of glycolysis.

    Finally, by exploring the space of carbon fixation pathways that can be

    assembled from all ~5000 metabolic enzymes known in nature, I suggest a new

    family of synthetic carbon fixation pathways that utilize the most effective

    carboxylating enzyme, PEP carboxylase. One such cycle, which is predicted to be 2-3

    times faster than the reductive pentose phosphate cycle, utilizes the core of the

    naturally evolved C4 cycle and offers an exciting avenue for exploration in the grand

    challenge of enhancing food and renewable fuel production via metabolic engineering

    and synthetic biology.

  • 6

    .

    kcat/KM- kcat " "

    .

    .

    , . -

    , :

    .

    . " " -

    .

    ,

    - .

    . -,

    " " ,

    , ,

    .

    .

    0555 -,

    .

    (. PEP carboxylase)

    . C4-

    .

  • 7

    Introduction

    The study of metabolism has been at the center of biological research for over one

    hundred years 1. Yet, with the advent of molecular biology and genetic research, some

    have misguidedly treated metabolism as a field to be mastered and then put aside 2.

    Recent years, however, have witnessed a renaissance in metabolic research 3-7

    .

    Recently emerging grand challenges in sustainable energy, green chemistry and

    pharmaceuticals have elevated the importance of metabolic engineering 8-11

    . Deep

    understanding of metabolic pathways is essential for such efforts; in order to redesign

    metabolism one must gain a solid grasp of the biochemical principles governing it.

    The research presented here focuses on several complementary aspects of

    metabolism: (1) Understanding the evolutionary and physicochemical factors shaping

    global metabolic networks; (2) Developing tools to analyze and compare metabolic

    pathways; (3) Explaining the structures of pathways from basic biochemical

    principles; (4) Designing novel synthetic pathways capable of achieving a giving

    metabolic aim while satisfying biochemical constraints.

    Of special importance are carbon fixation pathways. Many of the different

    metabolic aspects listed above were developed or demonstrated using carbon fixation

    pathways as model metabolic pathways.

    Enzymatic parameters

    A large body of literature discusses the complex interplay between the various

    parameters of enzymatic catalysis 12-18

    . Yet, the selective pressures that shaped these

    parameters remain largely unclear. While traditionally kcat/KM was thought to be an

    optimized quantity 13,17-19

    , other alternatives were proposed 20-22

    . For example, KM

    values may have evolved to match physiological substrate concentrations 23

    , whilst a

    substrate-saturated enzyme is expected to maximize kcat and to be insensitive to KM

    17,24.

    There are also several known physicochemical constraints that set boundaries

    to kinetic parameters 25,26

    . For example, theoretical limitations suggest that kcat is

    unlikely to be higher than 106-10

    7 s

    -1 15,27

    . Furthermore, the apparent second-order rate

    for a diffusion limited enzyme-catalyzed reaction with a single low molecular mass

    substrate (kcat/KM) cannot exceed ~108-10

    9 s

    -1M

    -1

    28,29. The activation energy of the

    reaction, as reflected in the un-catalyzed rate, also comprises a barrier: the enzymatic

  • 8

    acceleration of an extremely slow reaction, even by many orders of magnitude, may

    still result in a relatively slow catalyzed rate 14

    . The overall thermodynamics of a

    reaction puts further limits. The Haldane relationship 30

    states a dependency between

    the kcat/KM of the forward (F) and backward (B) reactions, such that Keq=(kcat/KM)F /

    (kcat/KM)B, where Keq is the reactions equilibrium constant. Therefore, even when

    kcat/KM in the favorable direction is diffusion