중등 영어 교사의 직무만족도 -...

22
145 영어교육 722, 2017여름 DOI: 10.15858/engtea.72.2.201706.145 중등 영어 교사의 직무만족도 * 1. 서론 박에스더 ** (중앙대학교) 이진화 (중앙대학교) Park, Esther & Lee, Jin-Hwa. (2017). A study on secondary school English teachers' general and subject-related job satisfaction. English Teaching, 72(2), 145-166. Teachers’ job satisfaction is a crucial factor to determine the quality of education in that it affects their dedication and participation. While teachers’ job satisfaction in general has been widely investigated, subject-related job satisfaction has been sparsely explored. Thus, this study investiaged both general and subject-related job satisfaction and compared them. A total of 117 secondary English teachers in Seoul participated in a survey which measures job satisfaction in terms of seven factors: relationship with people, job duties, work environments, opportunities for professional development, compensations, administration systems, and recognitions. Overall, the participants showed a modest level of satisfaction in both general and subjet-related jobs. Yet, subject-related job satisfaction was higher than general job satisfaction. They were particularly satisfied with their relationship with students and teachers. They also showed high satisfaction with recognition they receive as a teacher as well as an English teacher. In contrast, they were dissatisfied with compensations and workloads in general, and the number of students in charge and administrative support in teaching English. Finally, their job satisfaction was affected by gender, school type, position, and marriage. Based on the results, suggestions to enhance secondary English teachers’ job satisfaction were made. Key words: 일반 직무만족도(general job satisfaction), 교과 직무만족도 (subject-related job satisfaction), 중등 영어교사(secondary English teachers) 교사는 교육의 주요 주체 가운데 하나로서 시대와 사회의 변화에 따라 * 논문은 1저자의 석사논문 자료를 기반으로 하고 있음. ** 박에스더: 1저자; 이진화: 교신저자

Upload: doannhu

Post on 13-Mar-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 145

    72 2, 2017 DOI: 10.15858/engtea.72.2.201706.145

    *

    1.

    ** ()

    ()

    Park, Esther & Lee, Jin-Hwa. (2017). A study on secondary school English teachers' general and subject-related job satisfaction. English Teaching, 72(2), 145-166.

    Teachers job satisfaction is a crucial factor to determine the quality of education in that it affects their dedication and participation. While teachers job satisfaction in general has been widely investigated, subject-related job satisfaction has been sparsely explored. Thus, this study investiaged both general and subject-related job satisfaction and compared them. A total of 117 secondary English teachers in Seoul participated in a survey which measures job satisfaction in terms of seven factors: relationship with people, job duties, work environments, opportunities for professional development, compensations, administration systems, and recognitions. Overall, the participants showed a modest level of satisfaction in both general and subjet-related jobs. Yet, subject-related job satisfaction was higher than general job satisfaction. They were particularly satisfied with their relationship with students and teachers. They also showed high satisfaction with recognition they receive as a teacher as well as an English teacher. In contrast, they were dissatisfied with compensations and workloads in general, and the number of students in charge and administrative support in teaching English. Finally, their job satisfaction was affected by gender, school type, position, and marriage. Based on the results, suggestions to enhance secondary English teachers job satisfaction were made. Key words: (general job satisfaction), (subject-related job satisfaction), (secondary English teachers)

    * 1 . ** : 1; :

  • 146

    . , (, , 2013). . (2014) 628 , 51 39 2008 . (Teaching English Through English, TETE) . 4 2010 2012 , (2013) . 507 7.5% , 10 2,000 (2006) 1% . . . . , . . . , , , , , (, , 2002; , , 2008; , , 2010; , , 2008; , , , 2000; , , , , 2015). , . . 7 , 2000 (TETE),

  • 147

    (NEAT), 2018 . , . , . , . .

    1) ? 2) ?

    3) ?

    2.

    2.1. . Locke(1976) , Evans(1997) . , (2009) . , (2012) . (, , , , 2015, p. 55) . . . Weiss, Dawis,

  • 148

    England Lofquist(1967) MSQ(Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire) . MSQ , , , , , , 12 , , , , , 6, 2 20 . Bently Remple(1968) PTO(Purdue Teacher Opinionnaire) PTO , , , , , , , , , , , . Thompson Phua(2012) BIAJS(Brief Index of Affective Job Satisfaction) . . . (1982) KTO(Korea Teacher Opinionaire) . KTO , , , , , , 7 21 . (2001) (TJSQ, Teacher's Job Satisfaction Questionnaire) . , , , , , , 7 28 . 7 , , , , , , , . KTO 7 .

    2.2. . (, , 2002; , , 2008; , 2009; , , , 2000; , 2012). . (2009)

  • 149

    , , , (empowerment) . 2,910 , , . . . , (2008) , 197 6,405 (hierarchical linear model) . 1 , . , . , . , . , , , . , (, , , ) , , . . , . . . . . , , (, 2013) , . (, 2002), (, 2004), (, 2010) . , (, 2009; , 2007; , , 2010) .

  • 150

    1 (, , 2008, p. 60)

    (2014) . 40 120 , . 200 (2009) . , , . . . , , .

  • 151

    .

    3. 3.1. 177. (, , 2008) . (quota sampling) , 11 (, , , , , , , , , , ) , 10 . , 11, 23, 16 .

    1

    () (%)

    25 152

    14.1 85.9

    90 87

    50.8 49.2

    135 42

    76.3 23.7

    28 149

    15.8 84.2

    5 5~10 10~15 15~20 20

    29 26 24 19 79

    16.4 14.7 13.6 10.7 44.6

    131 44 2

    74.0 24.9 1.1

    110 67

    62.1 37.9

    91 9

    75 1 1

    51.4 5.1

    42.4 .6 .6

    1 . 86% 84% 76%

  • 152

    . 20 47% , 5 16% . 74% 62% . 51% 42% . 3.2.

    . . ( 9) , ( 11) . , . KTO(, 1982) , (2002), (2004), (2010) 2 . , KTO 7 6 , 19 . KTO , (: .). 5 , .894 . 6 , 25 . , , , . .2

    2 . , .

    , 2. . , 1. . . , . 5 , .867 .

  • 153

    2

    1. 2. 3. 4.

    1. 2. 3.

    5. 6.

    4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.

    7. 8. 9.

    15. 16. 1 17. , 18. 19.

    - 20. 21. 22.

    10. 11. 12. 13. , 14.

    -

    15. 16. 17.

    23.

    18. 19. 24. 25.

    3.3. 11 . . . 180 , 1, 1,

  • 154

    1 177 . SPSS(Statistical Package for the Social

    Science) 21 . . t ( Mann-Whitney U) . p < .05 .

    4. 4.1. , , , , , . 3 . , 78(44.1%) , , . , , . , .

    3

    (%)

    78 44.1 45 25.4 30 16.9 6 3.4 5 2.8 3 1.7 1 0.6 9 5.1 177 100

    5 , 4.43(SD = 0.63) . 4.05(SD = 0.77), 4.01(SD = 0.78), 3.93(SD = 0.75) , , ,

  • 155

    . , , , . 4 .

    4

    : , , ,

    M SD M SD 1.45 .56 1.06 .26 5.96 1.86 5.02 1.34 31.41 5.31 21.49 4.93 17.68 1.75 15.60 1.55 1.45 1 5.96, 31.41, 17.68. 1.06, 5.02, 21.49, 15.60, 1 , 10, 2 . , . 133(75.1%) , 166(93.8%) . 55(31.1%) , 51(28.8%), 37(20.9%), 26(14.7%), 8(4.5%) . 1 3 . 5 (1: 3, 2: 2, 3: 1) . , 1 14, 2 17, 3 22 , 1 3 42, 2 2 34, 3 1 22 . , , , . , . 73(41.7%) , 69(39.4%), 24(13.7%)

  • 156

    5 ( )

    1 2 3 42 34 22 98 51 48 31 130 27 38 29 94 5 6 8 19 5 3 16 24 1 4 6 11 () 0 2 10 12 26 21 26 73 1 1 2 4 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 5 5 12 5 1 3 9 () 166(11) 165(12) 160(17)

    . 9(5.1%) , .

    4.2 6 .

    6

    t p M SD M SD

    3.61 .59 3.58 .58 -.899 .370 2.99 .84 3.35 .44 6.099 .000 3.24 .69 2.90 .61 -7.190 .000 2.96 .65 2.73 .65 3.06 .73 2.87 .87 -3.161 .002 3.54 .70 3.65 .71 2.488 .014 3.16 .51 3.25 .41 -3.227 .001 3.16, 3.25 t . . , 3.61 , 3.54 . , 2.73 . ,

  • 157

    3.65 , 3.58 . , , , . , . , . . , 7 . , 3.77 . 3.36 . t , . .

    7

    :

    t p M SD M SD 3.36 .88 3.77 .63 3.89 .76 -2.322 .021 3.97 .67 3.88 .76 1.675 .096 3.34 .78 2.97 .80 6.127 .000 3.61 .59 3.58 .58 -.899 .370

    8 :

    M SD M SD 3.31 .92 3.23 .86 2.67 1.00 3.09 .89 3.75 .68 2.84 .90 3.28 .87 3.69 .77 3.49 .74 3.84 .75 3.56 .67 3.06 .96 2.99 .90 2.99 .84 3.35 .44

  • 158

    8 . 6 , 2.67 . . , (3.84) (3.75), (3.69), (3.56) , . , 2.84 . , 9 , , 3.41 . . / 3.31 3.17 . , 1 2.07 , .

    9 :

    M SD M SD

    3.41 .84 2.97 .98 3.20 .96 1 2.07 .86 3.11 .89 / 3.31 .91 2.99 .97 3.17 .88 3.24 .69 2.90 .61 10 . . 2.86 .

    10

    :

    M SD 3.07 .81 2.86 .91 2.95 .83 2.96 .65

  • 159

    , 2.73 . 11 .

    11 :

    M SD 2.64 .85 2.54 .86 2.71 .86 , 2.68 .85 3.07 .90 2.73 .65

    12 . . .

    12

    :

    M SD M SD 3.31 .83 2.87 .87 3.11 .93 2.76 .92 3.06 .73 2.87 .87

    13 . , (3.87 3.82) . , .

    13

    : t p M SD M SD

    3.87 .73 3.82 .81 .923 .357 3.20 .91 3.47 .83 -4.543 .000 3.54 .70 3.65 .71 2.488 .014

  • 160

    4.3. , , , , , , , , ( Mann-Whtney U) . 14 . (, ), , , . (p = .019). 2.94, 2.69 . (p = .046). 3.81, 3.60 .

    14

    > > > >

    > > > >

    , . (p = .023) (p = .008) , (3.34, 3.88) (3.13, 3.56) . (p = .016) (p = .008) (: 3.23, 3.21, : 2.92, 2.80) . (p = .008) (p = .015) , 3.77, 3.86 3.46, 3.57 .

  • 161

    5. , . 177 . , , , , , . , . , 4 , , , . 5 3.93 , . , (2009) 1, 2 , . , 1.45 , 5.96 17.68 , 1 , 5 , 15~16 . , , , . . , 50% , . . , . . (3.25, 3.16) . , , , . ,

  • 162

    , , , . , , . , 7 . (2010) (2002) . , . . 1, 2 . , 90% , , , , , , (2012) . , , . . , . , . . . , . . (2005) , . , 1 . 1

  • 163

    10 . . . , , , , . . , , . . . , . , , . , . . , , , , . , . , . . , (2008) , , . . , .

  • 164

    , , . . , 1 . . , . 1 . 1 . , , , . . , (2010) , , , . , , . , . . . .

    . (2013). : . , 17(1), 1-24.

    , (2009). . , , .

    , . (2002). . , 21(1), 157-168.

    . (2006). In-service Training Program . 5 SIG , 33-37.

    . (2010). .

  • 165

    , , . . (2009). .

    , , . . (2001). . ,

    19(2), 163-182. . (1982). . :

    . . (2010). . ,

    , . , . (2013). . , 68(2),

    153-177. . (2009).

    . , 27(3), 205-228. . (2005). . , 3(1), 55-77. . (2002). .

    , , . , . (2013). :

    . , 19(2), 243-268. . (2014). .

    , 20(1), 449-473. . (2004). . ,

    , . . (2007). .

    , , . , . (2008).

    . , 25(3), 51-71. , . (2010).

    . , 54(1), 193-217. , . (2010). , , ,

    . , 27(2), 25-52. , , . (2012). :

    . : . . (2014). .

    , , . , . (2008). , ,

    . , 39(2), 1-19. , , . (2000).

    . , 4(2), 155-176.

  • 166

    , , , . (2015). : . , 42(1), 51-80.

    . (2009). : , , . , 26(3), 289-310.

    . (2012). , , . , 30(2), 1-21.

    , . (2009). . , 51(2), 287-307.

    Bentley, R., & Rempel, A. (1968). Purdue teacher opinionaire. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.

    Evans, L. (1997). Addressing problems of conceptualization and construct validity in researching teachers' job satisfaction. Educational Research, 39(3), 319-331.

    Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1343). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Thompson, E. R., & Phua, F. T. T. (2012). A brief index of affective job satisfaction. Group and Organization Management, 37, 275307.

    Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    (Applicable levels): (Tertiary) 156-756 84 Phone: 02-820-5400 Email: [email protected] 156-756 84 Phone: 02-820-5400 Email: [email protected] Received on March 1, 2017 Reviewed on April 15, 2017 Revised version received on May 15, 2017

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False

    /CreateJDFFile false /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice