행정용어 사용에 대한 정책적 개입 현황과...
TRANSCRIPT
-
57 2012.12.
*1)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
.
.1)
* / : [email protected]
2011
,
. .
1) (2011) .
-
.
.2)
.
.
.
.
.
2.
2.1.
.
.
.
,
.
,
, .
.3)
.
2) , , , , ,
.
-
2.2.
4)
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
2009 .
(2009:85~86) .
, ,
, .
(2010:392) (2009) , ,
, ,
.
(2010:392~393)
,
,
3)
.
4) (2010:119) ()
.
-
. ,
( 2009:254),
.
.
.
, ,
,
.
(2010)
.
(2009) (2009)
.
, ,
. (2010)
.5)
5) (2010)
,
. .
.
-
,
.
(2010:399) .6)
3.
.
.
.
3.1.
3.1.1.
1948
6 .
.
6)
.
,
.
.
. ()
. (2010:399)
-
. ,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
, 1968 .7)
.
.
.
. 1991 12 11
1992 .
8) ,
, .9)
7) 5338 (70. 9. 18) 1991 12 31
.
8)
.
9) 2000 10 19 .
-
. ,
.
.
.
.
3.1.2.
. .10)
4 ( )
.
10 ( )
.
14 ( )
10)
, 1 14 1
. , , ,
,
,
,
.(, 2010)
-
. ,
.
15 ( )
.
17 ( )
.
18 ( )
29
,
.
14
.
. 2009
8 . 2005
. (2011:32~34)
11)
11) (2010)
66.5% 1.85
170 .
114
.
((mom)
(entrepreneur) ) .
4,500 6
-
.
OSMU(One Source Multi Use) (Killer Contents)
(Indi Musicion) (Sin Tax)
(Micro Credit) (Micro Insurance)
(Bad Bank) (Privite Free workout)
(Fast Track) (Job Fair)
(Senior ) (Food Bank)
(Food Market) (Voucher)
(U-Care) (Day-Care Center)
( Incubating) (New Start Project)
(Job Sharing) WEE (WEE Project)
( Cashbag) (Licensing Fair)
2009 8 ,
,
.
. 150
.
12)
.
2011 4 6 , ,
, , , .
4,500 1 2,303,
2,046, 4,336 .(
2011:32~33 )
12) (2010) ,
. , , ,
.
-
: Happy , , (loan),
, C/S , 3 ,
, , ,
, ,
: Heli-EMS,
: Walking School Bus(), , Safe
,
: (MotherSafe) , , UHealth(),
, (Dream Start), e, e,
: nara,
: , , u-Health, u-medical, ,
, (Global Fashion Leading Brand,
GFLB) , , , ,
ICT , ICT (Outlook) , ,
, (uni-material), , qwl, ,
, , , SESE /
: Me First , , , ,
, PM(Project Manager), Eco-,
Top , Eco-Innovation, ,
/
. Happy, C/S, Heli-EMS, Walking School
Bus, Safe, UHealth, u-medical, qwl, SESE, Me First, PM, Eco, Top, Eco-Innovation .
( )
.
.
, ,
.
-
-nara .
. .
.
.
.
.
.
: (golden seed)13), FFK, 2011 ,
Rural-20 , , Green & Life Technology
: (Job world)
: STOP! , gogo , RESCUE
. (Job world)
.
.14)
.
,
.15)
13) (Golden seed)'
2020 2
.
14) 70%
. .
15)
-
3.2.
3.2.1.
,
. 1970
.
1976 8208
, , 11 9 . 1115
8279
. 1977 1980 . 5 1982 .
1981 , 1,035
. 1982 1,238 . 1984 4,909 .
1992 1981 1991 92 .
,
. 9,219,
( ) 8,673
1993 .
.16) .
. 2011
/
62.1%, 32.9%.
71.5%, 23.3%.
16) 1993 2 23.
.
-
()
()
()
()
() ()
() ()
() ()
()
()
,
,
,
.
-
,
1995 3 635
. .
-> ->
->
-> ->
-> ->
->,
1995 10 710 .
.
-
()
()
() ()
() ()
() ()
() ()
() ()
(LPG)
.
,
.17)
.
.
17)
(2003) .
.
-
3.2.2.
, , .
.
(2009)
.
.(2011:36)
,
.
.
2009
2010~2012 .
, .
,
.
.18)
, 2010se
.
, 320
.
. ,
, 680 .
18) 1996 .
-
,
,
,
, ,
, , ,
4.
.
.
.
.
19) .
19)
.
,
.
-
4.1.
. (2010)
.
1.
1.1
1.1.1 ?
1.1.2 ?
1.1.3 ?
1.2
1.2.1 ?
1.2.2 ?
1.2.3 ?
2.
2.1
2.1.1 ?
2.1.2 ?2.1.3 ?
2.2
2.2.1 ?
2.2.2 ?
2.2.3 ?
2.3
2.3.1 ?
2.3.2 ?
2.3.3 ?
.
.
-
.
.
2009
.
.
4.2.
.
.
.
.20) .
. (2011)
20) .
, ,
.
-
()
, , , ,
.21)
100 20 4 100*4 400
1101900 10
105 110*5 550
250 1000 1
25,000 250 1 250 250
100 (5/100) 5 100*5 500
100 20
80 3 300 300
660 2,000
4.3.
.
.
.
.
2011
21) () .
.
.
(2011) .
-
.
.
.
.
5.
,
.
.
() .
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
, , , ,
-
(2011). . : . (2010). . : . (1989). , .
. : (2009). , 24, 241-265.
: .
(2010). , 20 2, 117-131. : .
(2010). , 27, 379-405. : .
(2003). , :(2009), , ,
, 85-93. : . (2011). , 50, 342-374.
: .
(2011). , 50 ().
Spolsky, B.(2009). Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spolsky, B.(2010). , 20 , 20~51. : .
-
: 2012 11 10
: 2012 11 24 ~ 12 7
: 2012 12 12 ()
Policy intervention status and challenges for
administrative terms
Hwang, Yong-Ju
In this paper were classified as direct intervention and indirect
intervention on the administrative terminology use. And in this paper
discussed the enactment of pre-and post-intervention status that
Framework Act on the Korean language established a new turning point
in the Korean policy. Also a way to reduce the current administrative
term used for the problem was presented.
Not directly intervene in the administrative term used for primarily take
issue foreign language is the use of foreign characters (Roman) and difficult
to use. Policy makers, however, be taken seriously on this issue is.
Part of the Nation to intervene in the use of language is in the public
sphere. Administrative term public domain because it will be less side
effects, according to the Nation's use of language intervention. Rather a
term for an administrative policy interventions can help people's
understanding. Public language that can be easily and accurately
understand the rights of the citizens.
Key word:
Administrative terms, Korean language policy, Framework Act on the
Korean Language, Intervention, Public language