1 writing a research paper 2 연구 개발의 의미 연구 – 硏 : 갈고 닦는다는 뜻 究 :...
TRANSCRIPT
1
WWriting a riting a research research
paperpaper
2
연구개발의의미 연구개발의의미• 연구
– 硏 : 갈고닦는다는뜻 究 : 궁리한다는뜻– 어떤일에대하여깊이생각하고사리를따지어보는일
• Research– Search again– Scientific investigation
• 개발– 開 : 새로운길 , 방법을연다 發 : 꽃을피운다– 새로운것을고안해내어실용화함 ( 교학사국어사전 )
• Development– To bring, grow, or evolve to a more complete,
complex, or desirable state (American Heritage Dictionary)
3
연구개발이란무엇인가 연구개발이란무엇인가 ??• “When you steal ideas from many
people, it is called research. When you steal ideas from one person, it is called plagiarism.”
• Research = re-search– 즉다른사람이해놓은일을다시조사하는
데서또는새로운각도에서조명하는데서 연구개발이시작된다 => 硏究員은곧調査
員 !!
4
R&D R&D 분야의세계적추세 분야의세계적추세
• Outsourcing•Licensing•Strategic alliance ( 적과의동침 )•Grand alliance ( 세계적표준전략 )•Contract research•M&A
• Concurrent Engineering vs Sequential Engineering
•R&D 초기단계부터여러부서 ( 특히마키팅부서 ) 가공동참여
5
Matrix Management & Matrix Management & Dual LadderDual Ladder
• Matrix management– 기본조직과프로젝트조직의 2 원화
•기본조직 : 수직적구조 ( 계장 , 과장 , 부장 , 이사… )• 프로젝트조직 : 수평적구조 (project manager,
project leader, team leader….)• Dual ladder
– Scientist 나 engineer 가기본조직을통하지않고 연구에만전념하여도직급승진과보수를많이받을수있는
제도• Research and Engineering Fellow: 미국•연구위원 : 한국의대기업연구소에서채택한제도
6
R&D skill vs. People skillR&D skill vs. People skill• 연구원은연구를함으로과학 , 공학적인지식을
얼만큼갖고있느냐하는것만중요하다 .
• 과학공학적지식만큼 , people skill, leadership skill, speaking and writing skills 도아주중요하다 . 특히 writing, speaking skill 은 project 에아주중요한
역할을한다 .
7
How to write a How to write a research paper research paper
Simon Peyton JonesSimon Peyton Jones
Microsoft Research, CambridgeMicrosoft Research, Cambridge
8
• “The best way to understand something really big, is to reduce it to something meaningful.” Alex Beam, Boston Globe
9
Writing papersWriting papers
Idea Write paper Do research
• Crystallises what we don’t understand
• Opens the way to dialogue with others: reality check, critique, and collaboration
10
Do not be intimidatedDo not be intimidated
Write a paper, and give a talk, about
any idea, no matter how weedy and
insignificant it may seem to you
Fallacy You need to have a fantastic idea before you can write a paper. (Everyone else seems to.)
11
Papers communicate ideasPapers communicate ideas
Writing the paper is how you develop the idea in the first place
It usually turns out to be more interesting and challenging that it seemed at first
12
Your narrative flowYour narrative flow• Here is a problem• It’s an interesting problem• It’s an unsolved problem• Here is my idea• My idea works (details, data)• Here’s how my idea compares to
other people’s approaches
13
Structure Structure (conference paper)(conference paper)
• Title (1000 readers)• Abstract (4 sentences, 100 readers)• Introduction (1 page, 100 readers)• The problem (1 page, 10 readers)• My idea (2 pages, 10 readers)• The details (5 pages, 3 readers)• Related work (1-2 pages, 10 readers)• Conclusions and further work (0.5
pages)
14
The abstractThe abstract• I usually write the abstract last• Used by program committee
members to decide which papers to read
• Four sentences [Kent Beck]1. State the problem2. Say why it’s an interesting problem3. Say what your solution achieves4. Say what follows from your solution
15
StructureStructure• Abstract (4 sentences)• Introduction (1 page)• The problem (1 page)• My idea (2 pages)• The details (5 pages)• Related work (1-2 pages)• Conclusions and further work (0.5
pages)
16
The introduction The introduction (1 page)(1 page)
1. Describe the problem2. State your contributions...and that is all
17
Describe the problemDescribe the problem
Use an example
to introduce
the problem
18
State your State your contributionscontributions
• Write the list of contributions first• The list of contributions drives the
entire paper: the paper substantiates the claims you have made
• Reader thinks “gosh, if they can really deliver this, that’s be exciting; I’d better read on”
19
State your contributionsState your contributions
Bulleted list of
contributions
Do not leave the reader to guess what
your contributions are!
20
Contributions should be Contributions should be refutablerefutable
NO! YES!We describe the WizWoz system. It is really cool.
We give the syntax and semantics of a language that supports concurrent processes (Section 3). Its innovative features are...
We study its properties We prove that the type system is sound, and that type checking is decidable (Section 4)
We have used WizWoz in practice
We have built a GUI toolkit in WizWoz, and used it to implement a text editor (Section 5). The result is half the length of the Java version.
21
StructureStructure• Abstract (4 sentences)• Introduction (1 page)
•Related work• The problem (1 page)• My idea (2 pages)• The details (5 pages)• Related work (1-2 pages)• Conclusions and further work (0.5
pages)
22
No related work yet!No related work yet!We adopt the notion of transaction from Brown [1], as modified for distributed systems by White [2], using the four-phase interpolation algorithm of Green [3]. Our work differs from White in our advanced revocation protocol, which deals with the case of priority inversion as described by Yellow [4].
The reader knows nothing about the problem yet; so your (carefully trimmed) description of various technical tradeoffs is absolutely incomprehensible
23
StructureStructure• Abstract (4 sentences)• Introduction (1 page)• The problem (1 page)• My idea (2 pages)• The details (5 pages)• Related work (1-2 pages)• Conclusions and further work (0.5
pages)
24
Presenting the ideaPresenting the idea3. The idea
Consider a bifircuated semi-lattice D, over a hyper-modulated signature S. Suppose pi
is an element of D. Then we know for every such pi there is an epi-modulus j, such that pj < pi. Sounds impressive...but
Sends readers to sleep
In a paper you MUST provide the details, but FIRST convey the idea
25
Presenting the ideaPresenting the idea• Explain it as if you were speaking to
someone using a whiteboard• Conveying the intuition is
primary, not secondary• Once your reader has the intuition,
she can follow the details (but not vice versa)
• Even if she skips the details, she still takes away something valuable
26
Using examplesUsing examples
Introduce the problem, and your idea, using
EXAMPLESand only then present the
general case
27
Using examplesUsing examples
Example right away
28
The details: evidenceThe details: evidence• Your introduction makes claims
• The body of the paper provides evidence to support each claim
• Check each claim in the introduction, identify the evidence
• Evidence can be: analysis and comparison, theorems, measurements, case studies
29
StructureStructure• Abstract (4 sentences)• Introduction (1 page)• The problem (1 page)• My idea (2 pages)• The details (5 pages)• Related work (1-2 pages)• Conclusions and further work (0.5
pages)
30
Related workRelated workGiving credit to others does not diminish
the credit you get from your paper
Warmly acknowledge people who have helped you
Be generous to the competition. “In his inspiring paper [Foo98] Foogle shows.... We develop his foundation in the following ways...”
Acknowledge weaknesses in your approach
31
StructureStructure• Abstract (4 sentences)• Introduction (1 page)• The problem (1 page)• My idea (2 pages)• The details (5 pages)• Related work (1-2 pages)• Conclusions and further work (0.5
pages)
32
Conclusions and further Conclusions and further workwork
• Be brief.
33
The processThe process• Start early. Very early.
– Hastily-written papers get rejected.
– Papers are like wine: they need time to mature
• Collaborate
34
Getting helpGetting help
• Experts are good• Non-experts are also very good• Each reader can only read your paper for
the first time once! So use them carefully• Explain carefully what you want (“I got lost
here” is much more important than “Jarva is mis-spelt”.)
35
Getting expert helpGetting expert help• A good plan: when you think you are
done, send the draft to the competition saying “could you help me ensure that I describe your work fairly?”.
• Often they will respond with helpful critique (they are interested in the area)
• They are likely to be your referees anyway, so getting their comments or criticism up front is Jolly Good.
36
Listening to your reviewersListening to your reviewersTreat every review like gold
dustBe (truly) grateful for criticism
as well as praiseThis is really, really, really hard
But it’s really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really
important
37
Listening to your reviewersListening to your reviewers
• Read every criticism as a positive suggestion for something you could explain more clearly
• DO NOT respond “you stupid person, I meant X”. Fix the paper so that X is apparent even to the stupidest reader.
• Thank them warmly. They have given up their time for you.
38
Basic stuffBasic stuff• Submit by the deadline• Keep to the length restrictions
– Do not narrow the margins– Do not use 6pt font
– On occasion, supply supporting evidence (e.g. experimental data, or a written-out proof) in an appendix
• Always use a spell checker
39
Visual structureVisual structure• Give strong visual structure to
your paper using – sections and sub-sections– bullets– italics– laid-out code
• Find out how to draw pictures, and use them
40
Visual structureVisual structure
41
Use the active voiceUse the active voice
NO YESIt can be seen that... We can see that...
34 tests were run We ran 34 tests
These properties were thought desirable
We wanted to retain these properties
It might be thought that this would be a type error
You might think this would be a type error
The passive voice is “respectable” but it DEADENS your paper. Avoid it at all costs.
“We” = you and
the reader
“We” = the
authors
“You” = the
reader
42
Use simple, direct languageUse simple, direct language
NO YESThe object under study was
displaced horizontallyThe ball moved sideways
On an annual basis Yearly
Endeavour to ascertain Find out
It could be considered that the speed of storage reclamation left something to be desired
The garbage collector was really slow
43
Figures• Graphs
– not more than two curves on a diagram• up to four if well separated
– show points only if scatter is important• points should be visible
– abstractions with respect to text
44
Figures• Numerical tables are difficult to
read– – use a diagram, istogram, pie
chart, …– if you need to use a table, no more
than 6-8 rows and 3-4 colums
45
Dave Patterson's Writing Dave Patterson's Writing Advice Advice
46
Active voiceActive voice• For example, use "Figure X
shows ..." rather than "... as shown in Figure X." Also, it is much better to mention a Figure that summarizes a lot of information early in a paragraph rather than go into details and mention the figure at the end, as early mention gives the reader a framework to refer to while reading the text.
47
Ambiguous use of pronounAmbiguous use of pronoun
• Put a noun after "This" to make it clear what you are referring to.
48
"While" instead of "and", "but", "While" instead of "and", "but", "although"."although".
• In general while should be used only in the strict sense of "during the time
49
A single numbered subsectionA single numbered subsection
• Why do you need to number it if there is only one? Either eliminate the single subsection, or change the part that precedes the subsection into a second subsection
50
Refering to Chapters, FiguresRefering to Chapters, Figures
•Capitalized when used to refer to a specifuc number. So its Chapter 1, Table 3.1, Figure 1.2.
51
Numbers spelled out vs. Numbers spelled out vs. numericalnumerical
. The general rule of thumb is to spell out one to ten and use numbers for numbers for 11 and up.
For example, " The eight-processor case (model 370) needs only four computers to hold 32 processors.
(8*4=32) instead of words (eight*four=32).
52
ReferencesReferences
• Frederick Crews and Sandra Schor, "The Borzoi Handbook for Writers (2nd edition)", Alfred A. Knopf Inc., 1989.
• Linda Flower, "Problem Solving Strategies for Writing (3rd edition)", Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1989.
• “Advice on Research and Writing”
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/mleone/web/how-to.html