2011-2012...v bbntms@ahkhsxÐ1donqs...

District Report Card

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

District

District Report Card

Report cards are an important source of information aboutperformance and accountability. They allow districts to compare data in a consistent way and highlight opportunities for improvement.

This report card will show not only the achievement of studentsoverall, but also the progress that disaggregated groups aremaking in closing achievement gaps. Report card data helpPennsylvania school districts and the Pennsylvania Department of Education focus on specific groups of students who are currently not meeting academic standards.

The report card is designed to ensure that the public is fully informed about performance, and to promote broader participation and better decision‑making by providing a shared source of performance data. This federal initiative is based on the idea that a well‑informed public plays an important part in school improvement.

Using Report Card DataReport cards should be used to share information. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is not measured by the strength of this report card. The data on this report card may not match AYP data published for this district.

For more information:Pennsylvania Department of EducationBureau of Assessment and Accountability333 Market StreetHarrisburg, PA 17126Voice (717) 705–2343ra‑[email protected]

This report contains:

• Attendance and Graduation data Attendance and graduation rates are displayed for the previous school year.

• TheAccountability Report This section shows the district’s performance compared with the goals set by No Child Left Behind. Student results from the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA), PSSA‑M, and PASA are listed by disaggregated group and by Performance Level.

• TheAssessment Report Here you can compare two years of PSSA, PSSA‑M, and PASA academic performance and participation data for this district. These results are displayed by grade, subject, and disaggregated group.

• Adequate Yearly Progress Status Here you can find the total number of schools in the district identified under each AYP status and the name of each school identified.

• Teacher Qualifications This section includes both numbers and percentages of teachers in the school who are highly qualified or hold emergency certification.

• National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Data NCLB regulations require NAEP results on state and district report cards. This section contains NAEP information.

2011-2012

RIDGWAY AREA SD

Attendance and Graduation Data

Attendance and Graduation Measures

Pennsylvania’s accountability system includes school assessment based on attendance and graduation rates. Attendance rates measure the number of daysthat a student was both enrolled and present in the school. Research shows that a strong relationship exists between regular attendance and academic performance. Graduates are the number of students graduating in four years with a regular diploma. Cohort is described as first time entering 9th graders four years earlier plus “transfers in” over four years minus “transfers out” over four years. The graduation rate for any year is the number of graduates divided by the cohort for that year multiplied by 100.

District

Attendance Measure1 Attendance Goal: 90%

All Student Groups3

All Students

— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protect the privacy of individual students, data are printed only when the total number of students in a group is greater than 10. 1 Attendance measure is a goal of 90%, or any improvement from last year. 2 Graduation measure is a goal of 85%, or a 10% reduction of the difference between the previous year and 85%. 3 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups.

State

Graduation Measure2 Graduation Goal: 85%

District State

Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP

English Language Learners

Migrant

Economically Disadvantaged

Attendance and Graduation Data

Attendance and Graduation Measures

Pennsylvania’s accountability system includes school assessment based on attendance and graduation rates. Attendance rates measure the number of daysthat a student was both enrolled and present in the school. Research shows that a strong relationship exists between regular attendance and academic performance. Graduates are the number of students graduating in four years with a regular diploma. Cohort is described as first time entering 9th graders four years earlier plus “transfers in” over four years minus “transfers out” over four years. The graduation rate for any year is the number of graduates divided by the cohort for that year multiplied by 100.

District

Attendance Measure1 Attendance Goal: 90%

All Student Groups3

All Students

— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protect the privacy of individual students, data are printed only when the total number of students in a group is greater than 10. 1 Attendance measure is a goal of 90%, or any improvement from last year. 2 Graduation measure is a goal of 85%, or a 10% reduction of the difference between the previous year and 85%. 3 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups.

State

Graduation Measure2 Graduation Goal: 85%

District State

Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant


✔

✔

✔

✔

✖

✔

———✔

——✔

95%95%95%95%89%95%

———

93%——

94%

✔

✔

✔

✔

——

——————✖

86%85%87%86%

——

——————

79%

94%94%94%95%91%92%

96%93%94%93%93%94%92%

83%81%85%88%65%65%

88%77%75%71%63%85%71%

District RIDGWAY AREA SD

Accountability Report

The purpose of this section of the report card is to show how students performed compared with the goals of No Child Left Behind. The participation tables in this report include students who were enrolled in this district for any part of the academic year. The performance tables in this report include students who were enrolled in this district for a full academic year. These numbers may not match the results in the Assessment section of the Report Card.

This table captures participation and performance results of students overall and by disaggregated group who took the PSSA, PSSA‑M, and PASA in

NOTE:Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protect the privacy of individual students, data are printed only when the total number of students in a group is greater than 10. 1 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups. 2 The performance of students scoring proficient and above includes those who took the PASA, although the number of proficient and advanced scores based on the PASA will not exceed 1% of all assessed students. The performance of students scoring proficient and above includes those who took the PSSA-M, although the number of proficient and advanced scores based on the PSSA-M will not exceed 2% of all assessed students.

Percentage of studentsProficient and above

All Student2

Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant


All Student Groups1Students Assessed # %

0 20 40 60 80 100

Percentage of students in each Performance Level

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

Participation Performance

2012 Goal 78%

District Overall Results in Mathematics


Grades 3-8 and 11.

518 100% 7% 11% 26% 56% 82%

269 100% 7% 11% 25% 56% 82%

249 100% 6% 11% 27% 55% 82%

496 100% 7% 11% 26% 57% 83%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

76 99% 27% 23% 33% 16% 49%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

211 99% 10% 16% 30% 44% 74%

Accountability Report

The purpose of this section of the report card is to show how students performed compared with the goals of No Child Left Behind. The participation tables in this report include students who were enrolled in this district for any part of the academic year. The performance tables in this report include students who were enrolled in this district for a full academic year. These numbers may not match the results in the Assessment section of the Report Card.

This table captures participation and performance results of students overall and by disaggregated group who took the PSSA, PSSA‑M, and PASA in

NOTE:Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protect the privacy of individual students, data are printed only when the total number of students in a group is greater than 10. 1 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups. 2 The performance of students scoring proficient and above includes those who took the PASA, although the number of proficient and advanced scores based on the PASA will not exceed 1% of all assessed students. The performance of students scoring proficient and above includes those who took the PSSA-M, although the number of proficient and advanced scores based on the PSSA-M will not exceed 2% of all assessed students.

All Student2

Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant


All Student Groups1

0 20 40 60 80 100Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced


Students Assessed # %


Participation Performance

2012 Goal 81%

District Overall Results in Reading


Grades 3-8 and 11.

517 100% 8% 13% 43% 36% 79%

268 100% 9% 13% 46% 32% 78%

249 100% 7% 13% 40% 40% 80%

495 100% 8% 13% 42% 36% 79%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

76 99% 37% 23% 33% 7% 40%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

211 99% 14% 14% 44% 28% 72%

NOTE:Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.This table reflects all students enrolled for any portion of the academic year, meaning that these numbers may not match the results reported for Accountability purposes.— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protect the privacy of individual students, data are printed only when the total number of students in a group is greater than 10. 1 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups.

Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant


Student Group1 AcademicYear

2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

Basic Proficient AdvancedBelow Basic

District State


The purpose of this section of the report card is to show how students performed on the PSSA over the past two years in Mathematics,Reading, and Science. This data table captures this district’s overall performance results and participation rates by disaggregated group andcompares it to this district’s results in the previous year. The table reflects all students taking the PSSA in Grades 3-8 and 11 who were in thisdistrict for any part of the academic year.

District PSSA Results in Grade 3 Mathematics

100% 2% 16% 36% 47% 80% 83%

100% 4% 9% 39% 48% 83% 87%

100% 0% 16% 38% 47% 79% 84%

100% 5% 5% 43% 48% 84% 90%

100% 3% 16% 34% 47% 80% 81%

100% 3% 14% 35% 49% 83% 84%

100% 2% 13% 36% 49% 87% 85%

100% 3% 7% 41% 49% 88% 90%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 3% 26% 32% 39% 66% 71%

100% 5% 14% 48% 33% 73% 81%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State


District PSSA Results in Grade 3 Reading

100% 9% 5% 58% 28% 74% 86%

100% 5% 8% 62% 25% 77% 87%

100% 6% 6% 56% 31% 70% 88%

100% 5% 10% 60% 26% 74% 86%

100% 13% 3% 59% 25% 77% 84%

100% 5% 5% 65% 24% 80% 89%

100% 7% 5% 59% 30% 81% 89%

100% 4% 7% 64% 25% 83% 89%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 13% 6% 55% 26% 59% 81%

100% 5% 14% 57% 24% 64% 81%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 10% 7% 28% 55% 82% 83%

100% 8% 6% 37% 48% 85% 86%

100% 8% 8% 37% 47% 83% 84%

100% 8% 5% 29% 58% 85% 87%

100% 12% 6% 18% 64% 82% 82%

100% 9% 7% 44% 40% 85% 84%

100% 10% 6% 27% 57% 89% 84%

100% 8% 6% 37% 49% 90% 86%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —100% 31% 8% 46% 15% 64% 62%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 12% 12% 32% 44% 70% 76%

100% 14% 8% 38% 41% 75% 78%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 11% 15% 55% 18% 72% 73%

100% 9% 28% 38% 26% 73% 63%

100% 11% 16% 63% 11% 69% 74%

100% 11% 30% 38% 22% 70% 59%

100% 12% 15% 45% 27% 74% 73%

100% 7% 27% 38% 29% 76% 67%

100% 12% 15% 55% 18% 80% 73%

100% 9% 27% 37% 27% 80% 64%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —100% 33% 42% 17% 8% 44% 25%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 12% 21% 50% 18% 55% 68%

100% 14% 31% 42% 14% 58% 56%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State


District PSSA Results in Grade 4 Science

100% 8% 7% 48% 37% 82% 85%

100% 0% 10% 45% 45% 83% 90%

100% 8% 8% 49% 36% 82% 85%

100% 0% 8% 35% 57% 83% 92%

100% 9% 6% 47% 38% 82% 85%

100% 0% 11% 53% 36% 83% 89%

100% 9% 7% 45% 39% 90% 84%

100% 0% 9% 46% 45% 90% 91%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 45% 27% 18% 9% 61% 27%

100% 0% 25% 42% 33% 62% 75%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 6% 9% 63% 23% 69% 86%

100% 0% 17% 46% 37% 71% 83%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 12% 26% 32% 30% 73% 62%

100% 9% 19% 33% 40% 76% 72%

100% 13% 21% 38% 28% 73% 67%

100% 6% 19% 39% 35% 76% 74%

100% 12% 30% 26% 33% 72% 58%

100% 11% 19% 26% 44% 75% 70%

100% 10% 26% 32% 31% 80% 64%

100% 7% 18% 34% 41% 82% 75%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 46% 23% 15% 15% 44% 31%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 14% 30% 41% 16% 57% 57%

100% 14% 27% 32% 27% 63% 59%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 14% 17% 47% 22% 65% 69%

100% 18% 19% 51% 12% 67% 63%

100% 21% 18% 39% 21% 61% 61%

100% 17% 20% 50% 13% 63% 63%

100% 7% 16% 53% 23% 68% 77%

100% 19% 19% 52% 11% 70% 63%

100% 14% 17% 46% 22% 73% 68%

100% 16% 18% 53% 13% 73% 65%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 58% 0% 33% 8% 31% 42%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 22% 11% 43% 24% 47% 68%

100% 27% 23% 45% 5% 51% 50%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 4% 2% 19% 75% 77% 95%

100% 7% 4% 21% 67% 78% 89%

100% 3% 3% 16% 77% 76% 94%

100% 11% 9% 14% 66% 77% 80%

100% 4% 0% 23% 73% 78% 96%

100% 3% 0% 29% 69% 79% 97%

100% 4% 2% 20% 75% 83% 95%

100% 6% 4% 22% 68% 84% 90%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 10% 0% 29% 62% 62% 90%

100% 7% 7% 33% 53% 65% 87%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 11% 16% 28% 46% 68% 74%

100% 7% 14% 43% 36% 70% 79%

100% 13% 16% 32% 39% 64% 71%

100% 6% 17% 46% 31% 67% 77%

100% 8% 15% 23% 54% 73% 77%

100% 9% 11% 40% 40% 73% 80%

100% 9% 16% 29% 46% 76% 75%

100% 7% 13% 43% 36% 77% 80%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 19% 19% 29% 33% 51% 62%

100% 13% 17% 37% 33% 52% 70%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



99% 1% 3% 18% 77% 80% 96%

100% 11% 1% 25% 63% 78% 88%

97% 3% 5% 14% 78% 78% 92%

100% 12% 2% 21% 65% 77% 86%

100% 0% 0% 24% 76% 81% 100%

100% 10% 0% 29% 60% 79% 90%

99% 1% 0% 19% 79% 86% 99%

100% 10% 1% 24% 65% 84% 89%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —100% 47% 6% 24% 24% 42% 47%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

97% 3% 3% 23% 71% 66% 94%

100% 16% 3% 35% 45% 65% 81%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



99% 4% 4% 44% 47% 76% 92%

100% 3% 13% 40% 44% 76% 84%

97% 5% 3% 39% 53% 72% 92%

100% 7% 14% 30% 49% 71% 79%

100% 3% 6% 50% 41% 80% 91%

100% 0% 13% 48% 40% 80% 88%

99% 4% 4% 42% 49% 82% 91%

100% 2% 13% 39% 45% 82% 85%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —100% 18% 59% 18% 6% 36% 24%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

97% 10% 6% 45% 39% 60% 84%

100% 6% 10% 48% 35% 60% 84%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 2% 3% 16% 79% 76% 94%

100% 3% 8% 26% 64% 76% 90%

100% 2% 7% 7% 83% 74% 90%

100% 2% 5% 23% 70% 76% 93%

100% 2% 0% 23% 75% 77% 98%

100% 3% 11% 29% 57% 77% 86%

100% 2% 4% 14% 80% 82% 94%

100% 3% 7% 26% 64% 83% 90%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 13% 20% 47% 20% 37% 67%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 3% 10% 19% 68% 61% 87%

100% 3% 11% 33% 53% 61% 86%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 1% 12% 28% 59% 79% 87%

100% 6% 4% 31% 59% 81% 90%

100% 2% 5% 48% 45% 75% 93%

100% 9% 5% 35% 51% 77% 86%

100% 0% 19% 10% 71% 84% 81%

100% 3% 3% 26% 69% 85% 94%

100% 1% 13% 28% 58% 85% 86%

100% 7% 4% 32% 58% 87% 89%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 7% 47% 33% 13% 40% 47%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 3% 19% 39% 39% 65% 77%

100% 8% 6% 42% 44% 67% 86%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 9% 18% 45% 27% 59% 73%

100% 16% 23% 29% 32% 58% 61%

100% 5% 13% 48% 35% 61% 83%

100% 14% 21% 31% 33% 59% 64%

100% 13% 23% 44% 21% 57% 65%

100% 17% 26% 26% 31% 57% 57%

100% 10% 17% 46% 28% 69% 73%

100% 14% 25% 29% 33% 67% 62%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 36% 29% 29% 7% 24% 36%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 13% 27% 43% 17% 38% 60%

100% 20% 40% 14% 26% 36% 40%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



99% 14% 18% 36% 32% 59% 68%

100% 18% 25% 43% 14% 60% 57%

100% 16% 16% 28% 40% 60% 67%

100% 19% 23% 40% 17% 60% 58%

97% 10% 21% 48% 21% 59% 69%

100% 16% 28% 46% 10% 60% 56%

99% 14% 18% 35% 32% 66% 68%

100% 18% 26% 43% 14% 66% 56%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —100% 60% 27% 13% 0% 19% 13%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

96% 23% 18% 36% 23% 40% 59%

100% 22% 29% 37% 12% 41% 49%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



99% 8% 15% 45% 31% 67% 76%

100% 19% 17% 39% 25% 69% 65%

100% 7% 19% 45% 29% 63% 74%

100% 19% 19% 37% 25% 65% 62%

97% 10% 10% 45% 34% 71% 79%

100% 18% 14% 42% 26% 73% 68%

99% 9% 16% 44% 31% 74% 76%

100% 19% 17% 39% 26% 75% 64%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —100% 80% 0% 13% 7% 26% 20%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

96% 18% 14% 45% 23% 48% 68%

100% 29% 7% 44% 20% 51% 63%


Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


District State



100% 6% 49% 36% 10% 42% 46%

100% 25% 48% 23% 4% 40% 26%

100% 2% 52% 31% 14% 45% 45%

100% 25% 44% 27% 4% 44% 31%

100% 11% 43% 43% 4% 38% 46%

100% 26% 52% 18% 4% 37% 22%

100% 6% 49% 35% 10% 48% 45%

100% 26% 49% 22% 4% 47% 26%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —100% 73% 27% 0% 0% 11% 0%

— — — — — —— — — — — —

— — — — — —— — — — — —

100% 9% 59% 23% 9% 21% 32%

100% 34% 41% 22% 2% 21% 24%

Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Adequate Yearly Progress Status

District AYP Status:

AYP Results in this District

The purpose of this section of the report card is to provide additional accountability information. This table lists the total number of schools identified under each AYP Status and the name of each school identified.


AYP Status

Number ofSchoolsIdentified

Percentageof Total School Names

Met AYP

Met AYP 3 100% FRANCIS S GRANDINETTI ESRIDGWAY AREA HSRIDGWAY AREA MS

Making Progress 0 0%

Warning 0 0%

School Improvement I 0 0%

School Improvement II 0 0%

Corrective Action I 0 0%

Corrective Action II – First Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Second Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Third Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Fourth Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Fifth Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Sixth Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Seventh Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Eighth Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Ninth Year 0 0%

Corrective Action II – Tenth Year 0 0%

Teacher Qualifications

Professional Qualifications of TeachersNo Child Left Behind requires that all public school teachers in core academic subjects be Highly Qualified. Teachers are generally required to be fully certified and to demonstrate their knowledge.

In Pennsylvania, a Highly Qualified teacher is one who: (1) holds full certification, (2) has at least a bachelor’s degree, (3) has completed a content area major, (4) has passed a content area test, and (5) has completed teacher education coursework.

NOTES: 1 Includes classroom teachers only. 2 Includes all professionals, not just classroom teachers.

Percentage

Course Assignments with Non‑Highly Qualified Teachers1

High Poverty

Low Poverty

Teachers with Emergency Certification2

High Poverty

Low Poverty

Number

12 5%

0 0%0 0%

2 1%

0 0%0 0%


National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

2009 NAEP Mathematics Pass Rate

The NAEP, also known as The Nation’s Report Card, is a national assessment of student achievement that is taken by samples of students representative of each state and of the nation. Tests in reading and mathematics are administered every two years and provide a means of comparing the progress of states in raising student achievement. The National Educational Assessment Program (NAEP) scores and the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) scores are not totally comparable. The NAEP scores are based on National Standards, and the PSSA measures standards that are unique to Pennsylvania. The data from the NAEP is based on a small sample, while the data from the PSSA is based on all students.

District:

Advanced

Grade 4

All Students

Proficient

6

Grade 8

Basic Below Basic

33 43 19

Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic

10 30 38 22

2009 NAEP Reading Pass Rate

Advanced

Grade 4

All Students

Proficient

10

Grade 8

Basic Below Basic

27 33 30

Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic

3 37 41 19

2009 NAEP Mathematics Participation RateGrade 4

Students with Disabilities 83.25

Grade 8

76.77

Limited English Proficient 94.44 91.94

2009 NAEP Reading Participation RateGrade 4

Students with Disabilities 70.3

Grade 8

70.39

Limited English Proficient 83.85 82.51

2011-2012...v bbntms@ahkhsxÐ1donqs...

Documents