a logic based foundation and analysis of relativity theory and logicpage: 1
TRANSCRIPT
A Logic Based Foundation and Analysis of
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 1
Special Relativity
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 2
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 3
Bodies (test particles), Inertial Observers, Photons, Quantities, usual operations on it, Worldview
B
IOb
Ph
0
Q = number-line
W
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 4
W(m, t x y z, b) body “b” is present at coordinates “t x y z” for observer “m”
BQIObW 4
t
x
y
b (worldline)
m
1. ( Q , + , ∙ ) is a field in the sense of abstract algebra (with 0 , −, 1 , / as derived operations)
2.
3. Ordering derived:
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 5
AxField Usual properties of addition and multiplication on
Q :Q is an ordered Euclidean field.
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 6
AxPhFor all inertial observers the speed of light is the same in all directions and is finite.In any direction it is possible to send out a photon.
t
x
y
ph1 ph
2ph
3
Formalization:
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 7
AxEvAll inertial observers coordinatize the same events.
Formalization:
t
x
y
Wm
b1
b2
mt
x
y
Wk
b1
b2
k
))(,( txyzIObkm
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 8
Formalization:
AxSelfAn inertial observer sees himself as standing still at the origin.t
x
y
t = worldline of the observer
m
Wm
))(( txyzIObm
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 9
AxSymdAny two observers agree on the spatial distance between two events, if these two events are simultaneous for both of them, and |vm(ph)|=1.
Formalization:
k t
x
y
m
x
y
t
e1
e2
ph
is the event occurring at p in m’s worldview
vm(b)
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 10
What is speed?m
b
ppt
ps
qs
qt q
1
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 11
SpecRel = {AxField, AxPh, AxEv, AxSelf, AxSymd}
SpecRel Theorems
Proofs
…
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 12
Thm2
Thm1
t
x
y
m
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 13
Proof of Thm2 (NoFTL):
e1
k
ph
- AxSelf
- AxPh
e2
ph1
e3
e2
ph1
- AxEv
t
x
y
k
e1
- AxField
ph
p
q
Tangent plane
k asks m : where did ph and ph1 meet?
Conceptual analysis Which axioms are needed and why
Project: Find out the limits of NoFTL How can we weaken the axioms to make
NoFTL go away
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 14
Igor D. Novikov, September 3 Budapest:
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 15
It is an important research today to study spacetimes with more than one time dimensions
Thm3 SpecRel is consistent
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 16
Thm4 No axioms of SpecRel is provable from the rest
Thm5 SpecRel is complete with respect to Minkowski
geometries (e.g. implies all the basic paradigmatic effects of Special Relativity - even quantitatively!)
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 17
Thm6 SpecRel generates an undecidable theory.
Moreover, it enjoys both of Gödel’s incompleteness properties
Thm7 SpecRel has a decidable extension, and it also has
a hereditarily undecidable extension. Both extensions are physically natural.
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 18
Moving clocks get out of synchronism. Captain claims that the two clocks show the same
time.
Thm8vk(m)
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 19
Thm8 (formalization of clock asynchronism)
(1) Assume e, e’ are separated in the direction of motion of m in k’s worldview,
m
yk
k
xk
1t
v
1x
xm
ee’
|v|
Assume SpecRel. Assume m,k ϵ IOb and events e, e’ are simultaneous for m,
m
xm
e’e
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 20
(2) e, e’ are simultaneous for k, too e, e’ are separated orthogonally to vk(m) in k’s
worldview
m
xm
yk
k
xk
ym
e
e’
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 21
Thought-experiment for proving relativity of simultaneity.
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 22
Thought-experiment for proving relativity of simultaneity.
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 23
The Vienna Circle and Hungary, Vienna, May 19-20, 2008
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 24
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 25
Moving clocks tick slowly Moving spaceships shrink
Thm9
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 26
Thm9 (formalization of time-dilation)Assume SpecRel. Let m,k ϵ IOb and events e, e’ are on k’s lifeline.
m
xm
e
e’
k
1
v
k
xk
e
e’
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 27
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 28
Thm10 (formalization of spaceship shrinking)Assume SpecRel. Let m,k,k’ ϵ IOb and assume
m
xm
k k’
e’e
k
x
k’
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 29
Experiment for measuring distance (for m) by radar:
m’
m’’m
e
e’
Distm(e,e’)
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 30
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 31
v = speed of spaceship
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 32
t
x
y
Wm
b1
b2
mt
x
y
Wk
b1
b2
kwmk
evm evk
p q
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 33
Thm11The worldview transformations wmk are
Lorentz transformations (composed perhaps with a translation).
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 34
Minkowskian Geometry: Top-down approach to SR, observer-free.
Robert Goldblatt: complete FOL axiom system MinkGeo
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 35
Interpretations
Definitional equivalence
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 36
Minkowskian GeometryJames Ax: SignalsAlfred Robb: causalityPatrick Suppes: worldview transformations…
Connections between theories. Dynamics of theories. Interpretations between them. Theory morphisms. Definitional equivalence.
Tamás Füzessy, Judit Madarász and Gergely Székely began joint work in this
Definability theory of logic! (Tarski, Makkai)
Contribution of relativity to logic: definability theory with new objects definable (and not only with new relations definable). J. Madarász’ dissertation.
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 37
SpecRel = {AxField, AxPh, AxEv, AxSelf, AxSymd}
SpecRel Theorems
Proofs
…
Conceptual analysis of SR goes on … on our homepage
Relativity Theory and Logic Page: 38
New theory is coming: