考績丙等制度設計評估： - exam.gov.t · pdf...

984 145-170

145

***

William N. Dunn

[]

98 3 19 98 4 17 * **

984

146

2005

09400055851

10235

2005

2009

2009

147

1

2

1

3

1

2 443 3

984

148

1

1. 2.

1. 2.

1. 2.

149

2000153

984

150

1992185

443

2007931.

2.

3.

4. 5.

151

Der Grundsatz der Bestimmtheit

200771

4

2002249-258

1.

2.

3.

4 623

984

152

5

1. 2

2. 2

3.

5 432

153

2

(91)

0342

(87)

0031

()(86) 0836

(96)

0770

0960101243

(92)

0289

0920127300

984

154

(91)

0323

89A000853

26

7

rules of natural justice

no man shall be a judge in his own causeboth

sides shall be heard20038

6 2358 3257

2437 1605 2758 7

2002257

155

1998114

200211-28 3

3

984

156

008393

1.

2.

3.

157

1

1

984

158

298

2

159

2

William N. Dunn1994: 282-289

policy recommendation

decision criteriaDunn

Effectiveness

984

160

200116

2004231

Efficiency

227,980 2009

161

4,560

Adequacy

desired

Equity

Responsiveness

984

162

8

Appropriateness

assumption

2000

401

2009

2009

9

Dunn

8

9

2002356

163

984

164

491

165

A E

984

166

C. H. Ule

187

167

10

2008 12 18

http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/ttsweb?@@884743891

2000

20092009 4

13 http://www.cpa.gov.tw/public/Attach-

ment/93913381495.xls

2008

2008 12 24 http://www.exam.gov.tw/

newshow.asp?1306

2001

10 295 312 323 338 378 382 430

459 462 483 491 563

984

168

138 11-24

2007

20092009 3

11 YAHOO http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/

ur1/d/a/090218/5/1/leo50.html

20092009 4 13

YAHOO http://tw.news.yahoo.com/marticle/url/d/a/090313/

110/1fzu9.html?type= new&pg=3

2000

20092009

3 11 YAHOO http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/

ur1/d/a/090210/17/le7xh.html

1998 40 114-

120

20092009

3 11 YAHOO http://tw.news.yahoo.com/

article/ur1/d/a/090210/17/le7xs.html

2002

88 249-258

1992

2002

2004

39 5 10-19

2003

Dunn, W. N. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.

169

Assessing the Design of the Performance-C Rating System for Civil

Servants in Taiwan

Jong Huang*, Chien-Hung Lin**

Abstract

The study tries to review the proposed amendments to the Civil Ser-vice Performance Evaluation Act and its enforcement rules which the Ex-amination Yuan has drafted, particularly those dealing with the Perform-ance-C Rating. From the design-evaluation perspective, the study aims to clarify if the new regulations meet the general principles of appropriate laws and correspond closely to the six selection criteria specified in the model of policy recommendation by William N. Dunn. The research results can be outlined as follows. First of all, the proposed provisions of performance-C-Rating run the risk of violating the legal reservation principle. Second, the conditions leading to a C-performance rating are not sufficiently specified. Third, due process of law and the grievance-redressing system to be invoked and executed when rendering performance evaluation are far from thorough or comprehensive. In addition, imposing a limit of two percent of the work-force as qualified for the C-performance rating will invite tough challenges and great difficulties, virtually making it impossible to implement. Accord-ing to the analysis above, the study puts forth a few suggestions for the Ex-

* Associate Professor, Department of Public Policy and Management, Shu-Hsin University. ** Section Assistant, Personnel Department, Ministry of Economic Affairs.

984

170

amination Yuan to consider as it continues to fine-tune the relevant provi-sions. For one thing, specific conditions and circumstances should replace the two-percent threshold rule, while the C-rating as part of the performance appraisal system should be explicitly regulated by law. Also, due process of law should be fulfilled in administering the evaluation process. A concluding point is that the right to commence a proceeding of Administrative Litigation by anyone unsatisfied with a C-rating disposition, be it the first or second time in sequence, should be respected and granted.

Keywords: design evaluation, policy recommendation, performance appraisal system, the principle of legal reservation, due process of law