porter’s five forces analysis for nike inc

Post on 15-Jul-2015

676 Views

Category:

Business

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

JUST DO IT.

Porter ’s five forces | Group 05

About Nike

• Multinational American corporation

• Manufactures, designs, develops and markets footwear, clothing, equipment, accessories and related services

• World’s largest supplier of footwear and clothing

• Brand value of $19 billion in 2014

History and origin

• Nike, originally known as Blue Ribbon Sports (BRS), was founded by University of Oregon track athlete Philip Knight and his coach Bill Bowerman in January 1964

• The company initially operated as a distributor for Japanese shoe maker Onitsuka Tiger (now ASICS), making most sales at track meets out of Knight's automobile

Porter’s five forces

• Rivalry of competitors within its industry

• Threat of new entrants into an industry and its market

• Threat posed by substitute products which might capture market share

• Bargaining power of customers

• Bargaining power of suppliers

Rivalry of competitors within its industry

Threat of new entrants into an industry and its market• Significant capital resources are required for creating a new brand

• Nike enjoys a great degree of brand recognition and loyalty

• Having said that, we believe in more rising internet companies

• Rising competition from emerging players such as Under Armour and Lululemon Athletica

nike.comJust do it.

Threat posed by substitute products which might capture market share• The worldwide demand for athletic footwear, apparel and equipment

is expected to grow in the future as customers cannot substitute these products

• However, the problem of counterfeit products is an area to watch

• As the quality of counterfeit products has been improving over the recent past, we believe this could threaten the company’s sales in emerging markets and could also potentially dilute Nike’s brand value

nike.comJust do it.

counterfeit (fake) Nike products

Bargaining power of customers

• Nike caters to its customers through both the wholesale and direct-to-consumer channels

• Direct-to-consumer sales rose by 23%, as compared to 6% growth inthe wholesale channel

• Certain big wholesale customers hold bargaining power

• Bargaining power of end-customers is low

• Customers could also choose other brands

nike.comJust do it.

Bargaining power of suppliers

• Nike’s footwear and apparel products are manufactured by third-party contract manufacturers outside the U.S.

• Nike’s footwear production is largely conducted in Vietnam, Chinaand Indonesia as contract factories

• No single footwear factory or apparel factory accounted for morethan 6% of total Nike brand footwear production

• The switching costs in changing suppliers is significant

• Suppliers generally share the inflationary pressure with Nike throughmanufacturing service pricing

nike.comJust do it.

Recommendations• Nike should re-evaluate the monitoring services performed by Ernst and Young, and demand

more comprehensive reviews of Code of Conduct compliance, performed by trained industrial hygienists, in future audits

• Nike should hold regular meetings with workers and/or elected worker representatives to explain the findings and detail the steps being taken to remedy problems found by Ernst and Young auditors

• Nike should initiate the pooling of resources by the Apparel Industry Partnership to establish a fund for independent monitoring

• When enforcing its Code of Conduct, Nike should strive to minimize any detrimental effects to workers resulting from noncompliance

• Nike should seek to do business with suppliers who not only meet, but also exceed the stipulations of the Code of Conduct

thank you.

top related