apicd presentation to visitors v 1.0.3 อยุธยาพอร์ต
DESCRIPTION
presentation of the ayutthaya port.TRANSCRIPT
1C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
Ayutthaya Port & ICDDate: 12 July 2012
2C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
Thailand’s Current Logistics Issues
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.3
7.6 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.6 8 7.8 7.3 6.6 6.7
8.98 7.4 7.1
7.9 8.2 7.7 8.27.1 7.2
Admin cost Inventory cost Transport cost
Logi
stics
cos
t per
GDP
18.1 16.716.1 15.8
17.1 17.8 17.1 17.1
15.1 15.2
Logistics Cost per GDP of Thailand
Logistics cost accounted for 15% of National GDP, and freight transport expenditure was the greatest cost component.
4C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
Thailand’s freight transport cost is high because it has relied heavily on road transport
In Terms of Ton-Kilometers
2006 2007 2008 2009 20100.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
AirCoastalIWTRailRoad
Mode %
Road 95.9
Rail 1.3
IWT 1.1
Coastal 1.8
Air 0.02
2010
5
Thailand’s Modal Split of Domestic Freight Transport 2006 – 2010 (in terms of ton-kilometers)
Domestic Freight Transport Volume (in million ton-kilometers)
Mode 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Road 95.53% 95.56% 95.66% 95.71% 95.88%Rail 1.40% 1.47% 1.34% 1.35% 1.27%IWT 1.06% 1.10% 1.08% 1.06% 1.05%
Coastal 1.99% 1.86% 1.91% 1.87% 1.81%Air 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02%
Mode 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Road 184,006
186,174
181,452
183,4
29
185,8
83
Rail 2,688
2,857
2,533
2,582
2,455
IWT 2,048
2,134
2,058
2,024
2,034
Coastal 3,834
3,631
3,615
3,586
3,504
Air 31
31
31
33
31
Total 192,606
194,827
189,689
191,6
54
193,8
76
6C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
Compared with selected developed countries, the modal share of road transport in Thailand is significantly larger.
Countries Rail Road Inland waterway
Austria 35 61 4Belgium 13 71 16France 15 81 3
Germany 22 66 12Netherlands 6 61 33
Thailand 1 97 1
Source: UNCTAD (2010), Review of Maritime Transport, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva. and from Calculation based on data collected by Thai Ministry of Transport
7C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
Thus, we are losing logistics competitiveness in the global arena.
Country LPI Rank 2010 LPI 2010 LPI Rank
2007 LPI 2007
Germany 1 4.11 3 4.10Taiwan 20 3.71 21 3.64Korea 23 3.64 25 3.52China 27 3.49 30 3.32
Thailand 35 3.29 31 3.31
The Logistics Performance Index of Thailand fell from 3.31 in 2007 to 3.29 in 2010, its rank also dropped from 31 to 35 while our
colleagues saw improvement.
Road Utilization Rail Utilization
To make the situation worse, Thailand’s Existing road and rail infrastructure is extremely overused
9
As a result, a viable solution is needed to sustain our
competitiveness!!!
10
Inland Waterway Transport is the most cost-efficient and sustainable mode of transport
11
…..and waterways are underutilized.
12
2 18 34 50 66 82 98 1141301461621781940
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Intermodal Competition in Freight Transport in Thailand
Road IWT
Kilometers
Tota
l Tra
nspo
rt C
ost (
THB)
IWT is the most cost-effective mode of transport
Because of the economies of scale
Break Even Point Road v IWT
109.43 KM
The longer the haulage distance, the lower the average transport cost per a unit of cargo.
13
Road Rail Inland waterway0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100100
33
23
% of Fuel Consumption Compared with Road Transport
77%Less
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
IWT Consumes Fuel Only 23% that of Road Transport
Inland towing Railroad Truck0.000
20.000
40.000
60.000
80.000
100.000
120.000
10.250 13.375
107.375
CO2 Emission in Grams per Ton-KM
88%
90%
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
IWT Emits CO2 90% Less Than Road Transport
15
Our solution is, to expand our logistics business to IWT to
reap the benefit.
16C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
The Importance of Port and Logistics Operations to Business Competitiveness
Create value-added to the product
Stages in a value chain
Valu
e-ad
ded/
Pro
fit
Concept/R&D
Branding
Design
Manufacturing
Distribution
Marketing
Sales and Customer Support
The Smile Curve
17C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
The Importance of Port and Logistics Operations to Business Competitiveness
Efficient port operations will result in
Enhance company’s competitive advantage
Market CoverageSales ProfitSales VolumeInvestment Opportunities
APICD is not just simply port business…but a crucial part of CP value chain and supply chain
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize) 18
Inbound Logistics Operations Outbound
LogisticsMarketing
& Sales Service
Quality Improve
ment Factories
APICD
General Cgo. Vsl.
Container Terminals
Domestic Coastal Ports
Distributors Customers
Barges
Barges
Barges
Ayutthaya Port & ICD
Bangkok Port
Laem ChabangPort
Destinations Distance (km.)
Time (hrs)
Bangkok 142 15
LCB 237 22
40-Meter-Wide Road
Quay Length 276 Meters, 4.5-Meter Depth,Reach Stackers, Tractors, Trailers, Emergency Electric Generator,
24/7 Security
1 RMG40-mt lifting capacity
55,000 m2 warehouses
ICD & Bonded Warehouses
M&R Facilities
Traffic Control Tower
1 Quay Crane40-mt Lifting Capacity
Speed : 35 Lifts/ Hr.
1. Inland Waterway Transport
2. Port & Terminal Operations
3. Land Transport4. International Freight
Forwarding
1. Bonded Warehouse2. Cargo Consolidation
and Distribution
Phase ITerminal & Transport
Phase IIInland Container Depot
Scope of Business and Operations
22
Our Contribution to National Economy and Environment
Economies of Scale in IWT
Source: Actual Carrying Capacity
65 =1> 600,000 Trips of Trucks
per annum
Reduction in Road Traffic
24
At the full design capacity
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize) 24
Road Rail Inland waterway0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100100
33
23
114 Million Liters or
3,409 Million Baht per annum
Fuel Saving
% of Fuel Consumption Compared with Road Transport
25
At the full design capacity
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize) 25
Inland towing Railroad Truck0.000
20.000
40.000
60.000
80.000
100.000
120.000
10.250 13.375
107.375
CO2 Emission in Grams per Ton-KM
> 200,000 mt. per annum
CO2 Reduction
> 200,00 mt. per annum
CO2 Reduction
4.6 km2
of Forest
Equivalent Sequestration
At The Full Design Capacity
Source: From Calculation
Thank YouFor Your Attention
28
BACK UP
29
Global LPI Rank
ASEAN LPI Rank Country LPI
(out of 5)2 1 Singapore 4.09
29 2 Malaysia 3.4435 3 Thailand 3.2944 4 Philippines 3.1453 5 Vietnam 2.9675 6 Indonesia 2.76
118 7 Lao PDR 2.46129 8 Cambodia 2.59133 9 Myanmar 2.33
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
World Bank’s Global Logistics Performance Index 2010
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.3
7.6 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.6 8 7.8 7.3 6.6 6.7
8.98 7.4 7.1
7.9 8.2 7.7 8.27.1 7.2
Admin cost Inventory cost Transport cost
Logi
stics
cos
t per
GDP
18.1 16.716.1 15.8
17.1 17.8 17.1 17.1
15.1 15.2
Total Logistics Cost in 20101.64 Trillion Baht (15.2 % of GDP)
Transport cost 140 billion baht 7.2%
Inventory Cost 723 billion baht 6.7%
Admin cost 778 billion baht 1.3%
Logistics Cost per GDP of Thailand
31
IWT is the most cost-effective mode of transport
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
Break-even points between different modes of transport
Mode
Break-even point (Fuel Price = THB 30/liter)
KMBT
= 0
KMBT
= 20
KMBT
= 30
KMBT
= 50
KMBT
= 100
Road/ Rail 61.24 91.03 105.93 135.73 210.23
Road/ Inland waterway
67.17 95.34 109.43 137.61 208.05
Rail/ Inland waterway
170.21 170.21 170.21 170.21 170.21
Ayutthaya Port & ICD
Bangkok Port
Laem ChabangPort
Service RouteFrom - To Route Distance Avg.Speed Time
Pasak RiverRiver Port - Ayutthaya 22 (Kms.) 3-4 (Kts.) 4 Hrs.
Chao PhrayaAyutthaya - BKK 120 (Kms.) 5-6 (Kts.) 11 Hrs.
Chao PhrayaBKK - Samutprakarn 20 (Kms.) 8 (Kts.) 2 Hrs.
Gulf of ThailandSamutprakarn – LCB 75 (Kms.) 8 (Kts.) 5 Hrs.
Total 237 (Kms.) 6 (Kts.) 22 Hrs.
33
2 15 28 41 54 67 80 93 1061191321451581711841970
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Intermodal Competition in Thai Freight Transport
Road Rail IWT
Kilometers
Tota
l Tra
nspo
rt C
ost (
THB)
IWT is the most cost-effective mode of transport
C.P. International Business Trading Group and Crop Integration Business (Maize)
Because of the economies of scale
Break Even Point Road v IWT
109.43 KM
Break Even KM
Road v Rail 105.93
Rail v IWT 170.21