ce 632 soil mechanics review.pps
TRANSCRIPT
-
1CE-632Foundation Analysis and Design
Instructor:Dr. Amit Prashant, FB 304, PH# 6054. E-mail: [email protected]
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
2
Reference Books
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
3
Grading Policy
Two 60-min Mid Semester Exams . 30% End Semester Exam ........... 40% Assignment 10% Projects/ Term Paper - 20%
TOTAL 100%
Course Website: http://home.iitk.ac.in/~aprashan/ce632/
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
4
Soil Mechanics Review
Soil behavour is complex: Anisotropic Non-homogeneous Non-linear Stress and stress history dependant
Complexity gives rise to importance of: Theory Lab tests Field tests Empirical relations Computer applications Experience, Judgement, FOS
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
5
Soil Texture
Particle size, shape and size distribution Coarse-textured (Gravel, Sand) Fine-textured (Silt, Clay) Visibility by the naked eye (0.05mm is the approx
limit) Particle size distribution
Sieve/Mechanical analysis or Gradation Test Hydrometer analysis for smaller than .05 to .075 mm
(#200 US Standard sieve) Particle size distribution curves
Well graded Poorly graded
60
10u
DCD
230
60 10c
DCD D
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
6
Effect of Particle size
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
7
Basic Volume/Mass Relationships
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
8
Additional Phase Relationships
Typical Values of Parameters:
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
9
Atterberg Limits
Liquid limit (LL): the water content, in percent, at which the soil changes from a liquid to a plastic state.
Plastic limit (PL): the water content, in percent, at which the soil changes from a plastic to a semisolid state.
Shrinkage limit (SL): the water content, in percent, at which the soil changes from a semisolid to a solid state.
Plasticity index (PI): the difference between the liquid limit and plastic limit of a soil, PI = LL PL.
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
10
Clay Mineralogy Clay fraction, clay size particles
Particle size < 2 m (.002 mm)Clay minerals
Kaolinite, Illite, Montmorillonite (Smectite)- negatively charged, large surface areas
Non-clay minerals- e.g. finely ground quartz, feldspar or mica of "clay" size
Implication of the clay particle surface being negatively charged double layerExchangeable ions
- Li+
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
11
Clay Mineralogy
Soils containing clay minerals tend to be cohesive and plastic.
Given the existence of a double layer, clay minerals have an affinity for water and hence has a potential for swelling (e.g. during wet season) and shrinking (e.g. during dry season). Smectites such as Montmorillonite have the highest potential, Kaolinite has the lowest.
Generally, a flocculated soil has higher strength, lower compressibility and higher permeability compared to a non-flocculated soil.
Sands and gravels (cohesionless ) : Relative density can be used to compare the same soil. However, the fabric may be different for a given relative density and hence the behaviour.
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
12
Soil Classification SystemsClassification may be based on grain size, genesis, Atterberg Limits, behaviour, etc. In Engineering, descriptive or behaviour based classification is more useful than genetic classification.
American Assoc of State Highway & Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Originally proposed in 1945 Classification system based on eight major groups (A-1 to A-8)
and a group index Based on grain size distribution, liquid limit and plasticity indices Mainly used for highway subgrades in USA
Unified Soil Classification System (UCS) Originally proposed in 1942 by A. Casagrande Classification system pursuant to ASTM Designation D-2487 Classification system based on group symbols and group names The USCS is used in most geotechnical work in Canada
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
13
Soil Classification Systems Group symbols:
G - gravel S - sand M - silt C - clay O - organic silts and clay Pt - peat and highly
organic soils H - high plasticity L - low plasticity W - well graded P - poorly graded
Group names: several descriptions
Plasticity Chart
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
14
Grain Size Distribution Curve
Gravel: Sand:
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
15
Permeability Flow through soils affect several material properties such as shear strength
and compressibility If there were no water in soil, there would be no geotechnical engineering
Darcys Law
Developed in 1856
Unit flow,
Where: K = hydraulic conductivity h =difference in piezometric or total head L = length along the drainage path
hq kL
Definition of Darcys Law
Darcys law is valid for laminar flowReynolds Number: Re < 1 for ground water flow
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
16
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
17
Permeability of Stratified Soil
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
18
Seepage
1-D Seepage: Q = k i A
where, i = hydraulic gradient =h /Lh = change in TOTAL head
Downward seepage increases effective stressUpward seepage decreases effective stress
2-D Seepage (flow nets)
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
19
Effective Stress Effective stress is defined as the effective pressure that occurs at a
specific point within a soil profile The total stress is carried partially by the pore water and partially by
the soil solids, the effective stress, , is defined as the total stress, t, minus the pore water pressure, u, ' = u
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
20
Effective Stress
Changes in effective stress is responsible for volume change The effective stress is responsible for producing frictional resistance between
the soil solids
Therefore, effective stress is an important concept in geotechnical engineering
Overconsolidation ratio,
Where: c = preconsolidation pressure Critical hydraulic gradient = 0 when i = (b-w) /w = 0
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
21
Effective Stress Profile in Soil Deposit
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
22
ExampleDetermine the effective stress distribution with depth if the head in the gravel layer is a) 2 m below ground surface b) 4 m below ground surface; and c) at the ground surface.
set a datum evaluate distribution of
total head with depth subtract elevation head
from total head to yield pressure head
calculate distribution with depth of vertical total stress
subtract pore pressure (=pressure head x w) from total stress
Steps in solving seepage and effective stress problems:
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
23
Vertical Stress Increase with Depth Allowable settlement, usually set by building codes, may control the
allowable bearing capacity The vertical stress increase with depth must be determined to calculate
the amount of settlement that a foundation may undergoStress due to a Point Load In 1885, Boussinesq developed a mathematical relationship for
vertical stress increase with depth inside a homogenous, elastic and isotropic material from point loads as follows:
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
24
Vertical Stress Increase with Depth For the previous solution, material properties such as Poissons
ratio and modulus of elasticity do not influence the stress increase with depth, i.e. stress increase with depth is a function of geometry only.
Boussinesqs Solution for point load-
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
25
Stress due to a Circular Load
The Boussinesq Equation as stated above may be used to derive a relationship for stress increase below the center of the footing from a flexible circular loaded area:
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
26
Stress due to a Circular Load
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
27
Stress due to Rectangular Load The Boussinesq Equation may also
be used to derive a relationship for stress increase below the corner of the footing from a flexible rectangular loaded area:
Concept of superposition may also be employed to find the stresses at various locations.
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
28
Newmarks Influence Chart The Newmarks Influence Chart method
consists of concentric circles drawn to scale, each square contributes a fraction of the stress
In most charts each square contributes 1/200 (or 0.005) units of stress (influence value, IV)
Follow the 5 steps to determine the stress increase:
1. Determine the depth, z, where you wish to calculate the stress increase
2. Adopt a scale of z=AB3. Draw the footing to scale and place
the point of interest over the center of the chart
4. Count the number of elements that fall inside the footing, N
5. Calculate the stress increase as:
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
29
Simplified Methods The 2:1 method is an approximate method of calculating the
apparent dissipation of stress with depth by averaging the stress increment onto an increasingly bigger loaded area based on 2V:1H.
This method assumes that the stress increment is constant across the area (B+z)(L+z) and equals zero outside this area.
The method employs simple geometry of an increase in stress proportional to a slope of 2 vertical to 1 horizontal
According to the method, the increase in stress is calculated as follows:
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
30
Consolidation Settlement total amount of settlement Consolidation time dependent settlement Consolidation occurs during the drainage of pore water
caused by excess pore water pressure
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
31
Settlement Calculations Settlement is calculated using the change in void ratio
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
32
Settlement Calculations
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
33
Example
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
34
Consolidation Calculations Consolidation is calculated using Terzaghis one dimensional
consolidation theory Need to determine the rate of dissipation of excess pore water
pressures
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
35
Consolidation Calculations
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
36
Example
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
37
Shear Strength Soil strength is measured in terms of shear resistance Shear resistance is developed on the soil particle
contacts Failure occurs in a material when the normal stress and
the shear stress reach some limiting combination
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
38
Direct shear test
Simple, inexpensive, limited configurations
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
39
Triaxial Testmay be complex, expensive, several configurations
Consolidated Drained Test
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
40
Triaxial TestUndrained Loading ( = 0 Concept) Total stress change is the same as the pore water pressure increase
in undrained loading, i.e. no change in effective stress Changes in total stress do not change the shear strength in
undrained loading
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
41
Stress-Strain Relationships
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
42
Failure Envelope for Clays
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
43
Unconfined Compression Test A special type of unconsolidated-undrained triaxial test in
which the confining pressure, 3, is set to zero The axial stress at failure is referred to the unconfined
compressive strength, qu (not to be confused with qu) The unconfined shear strength, cu, may be defined as,
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
44
Stress Path
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
45
Elastic Properties of Soil
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
46
Elastic Properties of Soil
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
47
Hyperbolic Model
Empirical Correlations for cohesive soils
-
Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant
48
Anisotropic Soil MassesGeneralized Hooks Law for cross-anisotropic material
Five elastic parameters
CE-632 Foundation Analysis and DesignReference BooksGrading PolicySoil Mechanics ReviewSoil TextureEffect of Particle sizeBasic Volume/Mass RelationshipsAdditional Phase RelationshipsAtterberg LimitsClay MineralogySlide 11Soil Classification SystemsSlide 13Grain Size Distribution CurvePermeabilitySlide 16Permeability of Stratified SoilSeepageEffective StressSlide 20Effective Stress Profile in Soil DepositExampleVertical Stress Increase with DepthSlide 24Stress due to a Circular LoadSlide 26Stress due to Rectangular LoadNewmarks Influence ChartSimplified MethodsConsolidationSettlement CalculationsSlide 32Slide 33Consolidation CalculationsSlide 35Slide 36Shear StrengthDirect shear testTriaxial TestSlide 40Stress-Strain RelationshipsFailure Envelope for ClaysUnconfined Compression TestStress PathElastic Properties of SoilSlide 46Hyperbolic ModelAnisotropic Soil Masses