ce 632 soil mechanics review.pps

Upload: puneetkumarrajput

Post on 08-Mar-2016

227 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1CE-632Foundation Analysis and Design

    Instructor:Dr. Amit Prashant, FB 304, PH# 6054. E-mail: [email protected]

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    2

    Reference Books

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    3

    Grading Policy

    Two 60-min Mid Semester Exams . 30% End Semester Exam ........... 40% Assignment 10% Projects/ Term Paper - 20%

    TOTAL 100%

    Course Website: http://home.iitk.ac.in/~aprashan/ce632/

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    4

    Soil Mechanics Review

    Soil behavour is complex: Anisotropic Non-homogeneous Non-linear Stress and stress history dependant

    Complexity gives rise to importance of: Theory Lab tests Field tests Empirical relations Computer applications Experience, Judgement, FOS

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    5

    Soil Texture

    Particle size, shape and size distribution Coarse-textured (Gravel, Sand) Fine-textured (Silt, Clay) Visibility by the naked eye (0.05mm is the approx

    limit) Particle size distribution

    Sieve/Mechanical analysis or Gradation Test Hydrometer analysis for smaller than .05 to .075 mm

    (#200 US Standard sieve) Particle size distribution curves

    Well graded Poorly graded

    60

    10u

    DCD

    230

    60 10c

    DCD D

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    6

    Effect of Particle size

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    7

    Basic Volume/Mass Relationships

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    8

    Additional Phase Relationships

    Typical Values of Parameters:

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    9

    Atterberg Limits

    Liquid limit (LL): the water content, in percent, at which the soil changes from a liquid to a plastic state.

    Plastic limit (PL): the water content, in percent, at which the soil changes from a plastic to a semisolid state.

    Shrinkage limit (SL): the water content, in percent, at which the soil changes from a semisolid to a solid state.

    Plasticity index (PI): the difference between the liquid limit and plastic limit of a soil, PI = LL PL.

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    10

    Clay Mineralogy Clay fraction, clay size particles

    Particle size < 2 m (.002 mm)Clay minerals

    Kaolinite, Illite, Montmorillonite (Smectite)- negatively charged, large surface areas

    Non-clay minerals- e.g. finely ground quartz, feldspar or mica of "clay" size

    Implication of the clay particle surface being negatively charged double layerExchangeable ions

    - Li+

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    11

    Clay Mineralogy

    Soils containing clay minerals tend to be cohesive and plastic.

    Given the existence of a double layer, clay minerals have an affinity for water and hence has a potential for swelling (e.g. during wet season) and shrinking (e.g. during dry season). Smectites such as Montmorillonite have the highest potential, Kaolinite has the lowest.

    Generally, a flocculated soil has higher strength, lower compressibility and higher permeability compared to a non-flocculated soil.

    Sands and gravels (cohesionless ) : Relative density can be used to compare the same soil. However, the fabric may be different for a given relative density and hence the behaviour.

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    12

    Soil Classification SystemsClassification may be based on grain size, genesis, Atterberg Limits, behaviour, etc. In Engineering, descriptive or behaviour based classification is more useful than genetic classification.

    American Assoc of State Highway & Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Originally proposed in 1945 Classification system based on eight major groups (A-1 to A-8)

    and a group index Based on grain size distribution, liquid limit and plasticity indices Mainly used for highway subgrades in USA

    Unified Soil Classification System (UCS) Originally proposed in 1942 by A. Casagrande Classification system pursuant to ASTM Designation D-2487 Classification system based on group symbols and group names The USCS is used in most geotechnical work in Canada

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    13

    Soil Classification Systems Group symbols:

    G - gravel S - sand M - silt C - clay O - organic silts and clay Pt - peat and highly

    organic soils H - high plasticity L - low plasticity W - well graded P - poorly graded

    Group names: several descriptions

    Plasticity Chart

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    14

    Grain Size Distribution Curve

    Gravel: Sand:

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    15

    Permeability Flow through soils affect several material properties such as shear strength

    and compressibility If there were no water in soil, there would be no geotechnical engineering

    Darcys Law

    Developed in 1856

    Unit flow,

    Where: K = hydraulic conductivity h =difference in piezometric or total head L = length along the drainage path

    hq kL

    Definition of Darcys Law

    Darcys law is valid for laminar flowReynolds Number: Re < 1 for ground water flow

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    16

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    17

    Permeability of Stratified Soil

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    18

    Seepage

    1-D Seepage: Q = k i A

    where, i = hydraulic gradient =h /Lh = change in TOTAL head

    Downward seepage increases effective stressUpward seepage decreases effective stress

    2-D Seepage (flow nets)

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    19

    Effective Stress Effective stress is defined as the effective pressure that occurs at a

    specific point within a soil profile The total stress is carried partially by the pore water and partially by

    the soil solids, the effective stress, , is defined as the total stress, t, minus the pore water pressure, u, ' = u

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    20

    Effective Stress

    Changes in effective stress is responsible for volume change The effective stress is responsible for producing frictional resistance between

    the soil solids

    Therefore, effective stress is an important concept in geotechnical engineering

    Overconsolidation ratio,

    Where: c = preconsolidation pressure Critical hydraulic gradient = 0 when i = (b-w) /w = 0

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    21

    Effective Stress Profile in Soil Deposit

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    22

    ExampleDetermine the effective stress distribution with depth if the head in the gravel layer is a) 2 m below ground surface b) 4 m below ground surface; and c) at the ground surface.

    set a datum evaluate distribution of

    total head with depth subtract elevation head

    from total head to yield pressure head

    calculate distribution with depth of vertical total stress

    subtract pore pressure (=pressure head x w) from total stress

    Steps in solving seepage and effective stress problems:

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    23

    Vertical Stress Increase with Depth Allowable settlement, usually set by building codes, may control the

    allowable bearing capacity The vertical stress increase with depth must be determined to calculate

    the amount of settlement that a foundation may undergoStress due to a Point Load In 1885, Boussinesq developed a mathematical relationship for

    vertical stress increase with depth inside a homogenous, elastic and isotropic material from point loads as follows:

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    24

    Vertical Stress Increase with Depth For the previous solution, material properties such as Poissons

    ratio and modulus of elasticity do not influence the stress increase with depth, i.e. stress increase with depth is a function of geometry only.

    Boussinesqs Solution for point load-

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    25

    Stress due to a Circular Load

    The Boussinesq Equation as stated above may be used to derive a relationship for stress increase below the center of the footing from a flexible circular loaded area:

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    26

    Stress due to a Circular Load

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    27

    Stress due to Rectangular Load The Boussinesq Equation may also

    be used to derive a relationship for stress increase below the corner of the footing from a flexible rectangular loaded area:

    Concept of superposition may also be employed to find the stresses at various locations.

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    28

    Newmarks Influence Chart The Newmarks Influence Chart method

    consists of concentric circles drawn to scale, each square contributes a fraction of the stress

    In most charts each square contributes 1/200 (or 0.005) units of stress (influence value, IV)

    Follow the 5 steps to determine the stress increase:

    1. Determine the depth, z, where you wish to calculate the stress increase

    2. Adopt a scale of z=AB3. Draw the footing to scale and place

    the point of interest over the center of the chart

    4. Count the number of elements that fall inside the footing, N

    5. Calculate the stress increase as:

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    29

    Simplified Methods The 2:1 method is an approximate method of calculating the

    apparent dissipation of stress with depth by averaging the stress increment onto an increasingly bigger loaded area based on 2V:1H.

    This method assumes that the stress increment is constant across the area (B+z)(L+z) and equals zero outside this area.

    The method employs simple geometry of an increase in stress proportional to a slope of 2 vertical to 1 horizontal

    According to the method, the increase in stress is calculated as follows:

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    30

    Consolidation Settlement total amount of settlement Consolidation time dependent settlement Consolidation occurs during the drainage of pore water

    caused by excess pore water pressure

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    31

    Settlement Calculations Settlement is calculated using the change in void ratio

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    32

    Settlement Calculations

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    33

    Example

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    34

    Consolidation Calculations Consolidation is calculated using Terzaghis one dimensional

    consolidation theory Need to determine the rate of dissipation of excess pore water

    pressures

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    35

    Consolidation Calculations

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    36

    Example

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    37

    Shear Strength Soil strength is measured in terms of shear resistance Shear resistance is developed on the soil particle

    contacts Failure occurs in a material when the normal stress and

    the shear stress reach some limiting combination

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    38

    Direct shear test

    Simple, inexpensive, limited configurations

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    39

    Triaxial Testmay be complex, expensive, several configurations

    Consolidated Drained Test

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    40

    Triaxial TestUndrained Loading ( = 0 Concept) Total stress change is the same as the pore water pressure increase

    in undrained loading, i.e. no change in effective stress Changes in total stress do not change the shear strength in

    undrained loading

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    41

    Stress-Strain Relationships

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    42

    Failure Envelope for Clays

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    43

    Unconfined Compression Test A special type of unconsolidated-undrained triaxial test in

    which the confining pressure, 3, is set to zero The axial stress at failure is referred to the unconfined

    compressive strength, qu (not to be confused with qu) The unconfined shear strength, cu, may be defined as,

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    44

    Stress Path

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    45

    Elastic Properties of Soil

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    46

    Elastic Properties of Soil

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    47

    Hyperbolic Model

    Empirical Correlations for cohesive soils

  • Foundation Analysis and Design by: Dr. Amit Prashant

    48

    Anisotropic Soil MassesGeneralized Hooks Law for cross-anisotropic material

    Five elastic parameters

    CE-632 Foundation Analysis and DesignReference BooksGrading PolicySoil Mechanics ReviewSoil TextureEffect of Particle sizeBasic Volume/Mass RelationshipsAdditional Phase RelationshipsAtterberg LimitsClay MineralogySlide 11Soil Classification SystemsSlide 13Grain Size Distribution CurvePermeabilitySlide 16Permeability of Stratified SoilSeepageEffective StressSlide 20Effective Stress Profile in Soil DepositExampleVertical Stress Increase with DepthSlide 24Stress due to a Circular LoadSlide 26Stress due to Rectangular LoadNewmarks Influence ChartSimplified MethodsConsolidationSettlement CalculationsSlide 32Slide 33Consolidation CalculationsSlide 35Slide 36Shear StrengthDirect shear testTriaxial TestSlide 40Stress-Strain RelationshipsFailure Envelope for ClaysUnconfined Compression TestStress PathElastic Properties of SoilSlide 46Hyperbolic ModelAnisotropic Soil Masses