chapter 21 performance of heat exchangers
TRANSCRIPT
Ch t 21Chapter 21 Performance Curves for
Individual Unit Operations(H E h E i )(Heat Exchange Equipment)
Department of Chemical Engineering
West Virginia University
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 1
OutlineOutline
• Heat Exchanger Design ReviewHeat Exchanger Design Review
• T‐Q Diagrams
f C ffi i• Heat Transfer Coefficients
• Heat Exchanger Regulation
• Heat Exchanger Performance
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 2
OutlineOutline
• Heat Exchanger Design ReviewHeat Exchanger Design Review
• T‐Q Diagrams
f C ffi i• Heat Transfer Coefficients
• Heat Exchanger Regulation
• Heat Exchanger Performance
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 3
Heat Exchanger DesignHeat Exchanger Design
TT
( ) QTTCQ && λ
Tc,out
TT
Tc,in
( )( )or
or
,,,
,,,
hhouthinhhph
ccincoutccpc
FTUAQ
mQTTCmQ
mQTTCmQ&&
&&
Δ
=−=
=−=
λ
λ Th,inTh,out
( ) ( )( )
,,,,
ith
outcinhincouthlm
lm
TTTTTT
T
FTUAQ
−−−−
=Δ
Δ=
( )( )
),,,,,(
ln,,
,,
hphcpcincoutcinhouth
outcinh
incouth
CmCmTTTTfF
TTTT
&&=
−
),,,,,( ,,,,,, hphcpcincoutcinhouthf
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 4
Log‐mean Correction FactorLog mean Correction Factor
• F is log‐mean correction factorF is log mean correction factor
• Correction for not pure countercurrent flow in multiple pass exchangersmultiple‐pass exchangers
• “Default” exchanger is 1 shell, 2 tube pass
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 5
Log‐mean Correction FactorLog mean Correction Factor
T T T
Q Q Q
F > 0.9 F < 0.9 F < 0.7
As temperatures approach, F decreases. When F gets too small, must addadditional shell passes to increase F.
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 6
Additional Shell PassesAdditional Shell Passes
one shell passone shell passtwo tube passes two shell passes
four tube passes
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 7
OutlineOutline
• Heat Exchanger Design ReviewHeat Exchanger Design Review
• T‐Q Diagrams
f C ffi i• Heat Transfer Coefficients
• Heat Exchanger Regulation
• Heat Exchanger Performance
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 8
T‐Q DiagramsT Q Diagrams
T T T
Q Q Q
no phase change hot fluid condensing hot fluid desuperheating,phase change condensing, subcooling
Always sketch T-Q diagram to make sure there is no temperature cross.
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 9
T‐Q DiagramsT Q Diagrams
T T
Q Q
incorrect – caused by just correct
Always sketch T Q diagram to make sure there is no temperature cross
y jlooking at end points (red line)and not sketching T-Q diagram.
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012
Always sketch T-Q diagram to make sure there is no temperature cross.
10
OutlineOutline
• Heat Exchanger Design ReviewHeat Exchanger Design Review
• T‐Q Diagrams
f C ffi i• Heat Transfer Coefficients
• Heat Exchanger Regulation
• Heat Exchanger Performance
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 11
Heat Transfer CoefficientsHeat Transfer Coefficients
ooi
oRRR
R11
ln111
++⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
++=iiifiofoo hRhRkhhU ,,
++++=
For class problems assume no fouling thin walls and negligible wall resistance
111
For class problems, assume no fouling, thin walls, and negligible wall resistance.If given detailed data (like in major), then use all terms.
ioo hhU+≈
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 12
Heat Transfer CoefficientsHeat Transfer Coefficients
change phase no annulus,in or in tubes fluid - )or toequivalent(
606060
8.08.08.0 mvvhi ∝ &&
function)very weak (actually changes phasefor )(
changephasenoflow,crossin shellin fluid-)or toequivalent( 6.06.06.0
vfh
mvvho
≠
∝ &&
F50F10if4to3 F10 if 25.0 where)( boiling,for Tn
TnTfh n
°≤Δ≤°≈°≤Δ≈Δ=
surfacecoldandfluidcondensingbetweendifferenceis 25.0 where)( ,condensingfor
fluid boiling and surfacehot between difference is
TnTfh
Tn
Δ−≈Δ=
Δ
surface coldandfluidcondensingbetween difference is TΔ
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 13
OutlineOutline
• Heat Exchanger Design ReviewHeat Exchanger Design Review
• T‐Q Diagrams
f C ffi i• Heat Transfer Coefficients
• Heat Exchanger Regulation
• Heat Exchanger Performance
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 14
Heat Exchanger RegulationNo phase change
UNREGULATED REGULATEDUNREGULATEDif process fluid flowrate increases
h increases, get increased heat transfersomewhat self-regulating
REGULATEDcontrol utility rate in response to
measured outlet temperature
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012
however, h does not increase linearly with flowrate
15
Heat Exchanger RegulationPhase change
Stream b is two phase mixtureCV-1 lowers steam pressurechanges driving forceflowrate not regulatedsteam trap removes condensate as it accumulates
Stream b is two-phase mixturebfw rate adjusted by measuring temperatureof outlet and changing rate of steam removalif level of liquid in accumulator drum changes,condensate recycle rate is adjusted
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012
steam trap removes condensate as it accumulates condensate recycle rate is adjusted
16
OutlineOutline
• Heat Exchanger Design ReviewHeat Exchanger Design Review
• T‐Q Diagrams
f C ffi i• Heat Transfer Coefficients
• Heat Exchanger Regulation
• Heat Exchanger Performance
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 17
Heat Exchanger PerformanceHeat Exchanger Performance
150°C – shell – condensation150°C
C93.114 °=Δ lmT40°C30°C – tubes – cooling water
problem must scale down by 50%problem – must scale down by 50%
case 1: all resistance on tube side
MUST USE ENERGY BALANCES AND DESIGN EQUATION
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 18
Heat Exchanger PerformanceHeat Exchanger Performance
150°C
C93.114 °=Δ lmT150°C – shell – condensation
150°C
40°C30°C – tubes – cooling water
problem – must scale down by 50%
case 1: all resistance on tube side
11
22
1
2mm
=&&λλ
40 C
2 = new1 = old
( )( )1,,1,,1,1,
2,,2,,2,2,
1
2
111
TTCmTTCm
mQ
incwoutcwpcw
incwoutcwpcw
−
−=
&
&
&λ
( )
11,11
22,22
1
2
1,,1,,1,1,1
FTAUFTAU
Q
lm
lm
incwoutcwpcw
Δ
Δ=
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 19
Heat Exchanger PerformanceHeat Exchanger Performance
150°C
C93.114 °=Δ lmT150°C – shell – condensation
150°C
40°C30°C – tubes – cooling water
problem – must scale down by 50%
case 1: all resistance on tube side
( )305.0
TMQ ==
define
40 C2 = new1 = old
( )( )3040
30
22
2,,
TU
TMQ
lm
outcwcw
Δ−
−=
2,
1
2
cwmM
QQQ
&=
=
( )93.1141
2,2
UTU
Q lmΔ=
1,
2,
1,
stm
stm
cwcw
mm
M
mM
&
&
&
=
=
,
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 20
Heat Exchanger PerformanceHeat Exchanger Performance
150°C
C93.114 °=Δ lmT
150°C – shell – condensation150°C
40°C30°C – tubes – cooling water
problem – must scale down by 50%
case 1: all resistance on tube side
111211
11
1
1oi hhU
UU
+≈=define
40 C2 = new1 = old
all resistance on tube side
222
1 111oi hhU
U +
2
1
2
define
mQQQ
&
=
11
2,
1,
2,
stm
cw
cwcw
mM
mm
M
&
&
&
&
=
= 8.0
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
211 cw
i
i
i
i Mhh
h
h
U
UUU
==≈=
1,stmm&
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 21
Heat Exchanger PerformanceHeat Exchanger Performance
150°C
C93.114 °=Δ lmT150°C – shell – condensation
150°C
40°C30°C – tubes – cooling water
problem – must scale down by 50%
case 1: all resistance on tube side
( )−=
outcwTQ
2 305.0
define
40 C2 = new1 = old
( )( )
( )( ) ( )
( ) ( )( )
( ) ⎤⎡
−=
⎤⎡
−−−=
−=
outcwcwoutcwcw
outcwcw
TMTM
TM
,2,8.0
,2,8.0
2,,
30150
309311430150
1503015093114
5.0
304030
5.0
2
1
2
define
mQQQ
&
=
( ) ( )( )
( ) ( )( )⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−−
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−−
outcwoutcw TT ,2,,2, 15030150ln
93.114150
30150ln93.114
2,
1,
2,
stm
cw
cwcw
mM
mm
M
&
&
&
&
=
=
1,stmm&
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 22
Heat Exchanger PerformanceHeat Exchanger Performance
150°C
C93.114 °=Δ lmT150°C – shell – condensation
150°C
40°C30°C – tubes – cooling water
problem – must scale down by 50%
case 1: all resistance on tube side
2 new
( )( )
( ) ( )−
−=
=
outcwcw
TM
Q
2,,
304030
5.0
5.0
1
2
define
QQQ =
40 C2 = new1 = old
( )( ) ( )
( )( )
( )( )
( )⎥⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−
−=
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−−
−−−=
outcw
outcwcw
outcw
outcwcw
T
TM
T
TM
,2,
,2,8.0
,2,
,2,8.0
150120ln
3093.114
15030150ln
1503015093.114
5.0
2,
1,
2,
1
stm
cw
cwcw
mM
mm
M
Q
&
&
&
=
=
1,stmm&
CTM
outcw
cw
°==
77.41425.0
,2,solve second and third equations:
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 23
Heat Exchanger PerformanceHeat Exchanger Performance
150°C
C93.114 °=Δ lmT150°C – shell – condensation
150°C
40°C30°C – tubes – cooling water
problem – must scale down by 50%
case 1: all resistance on tube side
CTM
outcw
cw
°==
77.41425.0
,2,
40 C
solve second and third equations:
T 150°CT 150°C
41.77°C40°C
30°C
40 C
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012
Q
24
Class ExamplesClass Examples
1. Re‐do previous problem if all resistance on shell1. Re do previous problem if all resistance on shell side.
2. Re‐do previous problem if equal resistances in base p p qcase on shell and tube sides.
3. Re‐do previous problem if 150°C stream is utility p p yand 30°C stream is process stream that must be scaled down by 50%. All resistance is on the tube dside
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 25
Reboiler PerformanceReboiler Performance
222 mQ stmstm λ&254°C
condensing steam
want to scale up 20%
11
22
1
2
11
22
1
2
mm
mQQ
orgorg
stmstm
stmstm
=
=
λλλ
&
&&T
234°Cboiling organic
11
22
111
222
1
2
111
TUTU
TAUTAU
mQ
lm
lm
orgorg
ΔΔ
=ΔΔ
=
λ&Q
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 26
Reboiler PerformanceReboiler Performance
22 mQ stm=& 22.1 mstm=
&&254°C
condensing steam
want to scale up reboiling organic by 20%
1
2
1
2
11
2.1mm
mQ
org
org
stm
==&
&&
1
2
1
2.1mmm
org
stm
=&
&&T 234°C
boiling organic
11
22
1
2
11
TUTU
Q org
ΔΔ
=
11
22
1
2.1TUTU
morg
ΔΔ
=
&Q
h not strong function of flow for phase change
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 27
Reboiler PerformanceReboiler Performance
TΔ22.1 mstm=
&254°Ccondensing steam
want to scale up reboiling organic by 20%
T
T
=Δ
Δ=
2420
2.1
2
2
2
1
2.1
2.1
mmm
org
stm
=&
&&T 234°C
boiling organic
CTCT
org
stm
°=°=⇒
230or258
2
1
2
1
2.1TT
morg
ΔΔ
=
&Q
1TΔ
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 28
DesuperheaterDesuperheater
reduces steam pressure, which lowers temperaturespray in bfw to resaturate at lower pressurep y phence, get saturated steam at lower pressure
can get any saturated steam between available steam levels
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 29
More Complicated ExampleMore Complicated Example
• Must scale up or downMust scale up or down
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 30
More Complicated ExampleMore Complicated Example
222
reactor
rxnHQ Δξ( )( )
2,,2,,2,,2,2
exchangerheat
incwoutcwcwpcw TTCmQ −=
&
( )( )
2,42,32,22
1,1
2,2
1
2
DpD
rxn
rxn
TTCTTCm
HQQ
−=
Δ=
&
&
ξξ
sameequation
( )( )( )141311
2,42,32,2
1
2
1,,1,,1,11
DD
DpD
incwoutcwcwpcw
TTCmTTCm
TTCmQ
−
−=
−
&
&
&
( )
1,,1,1,
2,,2,2,
1
2
1,41,31,11
rxrlmrxrrxr
rxrlmrxrrxr
DpD
TAUTAU
TTCmQ
Δ
Δ=
−& ( )
1,,1,1,
2,,2,2,
1
2
1,41,31,11
hxlmhxhx
hxlmhxhx
DpD
TAUTAU
TTCmQ
Δ
Δ=
&
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 31
More Complicated ExampleMore Complicated Example
• Result is 5 equationsResult is 5 equations
• Must be 5 unknowns
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 32
More Complicated ExampleMore Complicated Example
• 6 Unknowns: T3 T4 T Q M MD6 Unknowns: T3 T4 Tcw,out Q Mcw MD
ratios
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 33
More Complicated ExampleMore Complicated Example
• Have control of one variable– required to maintain
control– otherwise, only one
ibl f ipossible set of operating conditions
• Usually coolant flowrate• Determined by pump
curves
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 34
OutlineOutline
• Heat Exchanger Design ReviewHeat Exchanger Design Review
• T‐Q Diagrams
f C ffi i• Heat Transfer Coefficients
• Heat Exchanger Regulation
• Heat Exchanger Performance
Copyright J.A. Shaeiwitz and R. Turton - 2012 35