consumer theory 2

91
Chapter 4 Individual and Market Demand

Upload: vivekshaw

Post on 12-Nov-2014

489 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Consumer theory 2

Chapter 4

Individual and Market Demand

Page 2: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

CONSUMER CHOICE

Page 3: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 3

Consumer Choice

Given preferences and budget constraints, how do consumers choose what to buy?

Consumers choose a combination of goods that will maximize their satisfaction, given the limited budget available to them

Page 4: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 4

C

F

P

P

F

C Slope -

2

1-

The Budget Line

10

20

A

B

D

E

G

(I/PC) = 40

Food40 60 80 = (I/PF)20

10

20

30

0

Clothing

Page 5: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 5

U2

U3

Indifference Map

Food

Clothing

U1

ABD

Market basket Ais preferred to B.Market basket B ispreferred to D.

Page 6: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

HOW DO CONSUMERS CONSUME?

6

Page 7: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 7

Consumer Choice

U3

D

U2

C

Food (units per week)40 8020

Clothing(units per

week)

20

30

40

0

U1

A

B

Page 8: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 8

Consumer Choice

Graphically, we can see different indifference curves of a consumer choosing between clothing and food

Remember that U3 > U2 > U1 for our indifference curves

Consumer wants to choose highest utility within their budget

Page 9: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 9

Consumer Choice

U3

D

U2

C

Food (units per week)40 8020

Clothing(units per

week)

20

30

40

0

U1

A

B

•A, B, C on budget line•D highest utility but not affordable

Page 10: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 10

Consumer Choice

The maximizing market basket must satisfy two conditions:

1. It must be located on the budget line They spend all their income – more is better

2. It must give the consumer the most preferred combination of goods and services

Page 11: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 11

Consumer Choice

U3

D

U2

C

Food (units per week)40 8020

Clothing(units per

week)

20

30

40

0

U1

A

B

•A, B, C on budget line•D highest utility but not affordable•C highest affordable utility•Consumer chooses C

Page 12: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 12

Consumer Choice

Consumer will choose highest indifference curve on budget line

In previous graph, point C is where the indifference curve is just tangent to the budget line

Slope of the budget line equals the slope of the indifference curve at this point

Page 13: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 13

Consumer Choice

Recall, the slope of an indifference curve is:

F

CMRS

C

F

P

PSlope

Further, the slope of the budget line is:

Page 14: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 14

Consumer Choice

Therefore, it can be said at consumer’s optimal consumption point,

C

F

P

PMRS

Page 15: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 15

Marginal Utility and Consumer Choice

When consumers maximize satisfaction:

CF /P PMRS

CF CF /P P /MUMU

Since the MRS is also equal to the ratio of the marginal utility of consuming F and C

Page 16: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 16

Marginal Utility and Consumer Choice

Rearranging, gives the equation for utility maximization:

CCFF PMUPMU //

Page 17: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 17

Consumer Choice

It can be said that satisfaction is maximized when marginal rate of substitution (of F and C) is equal to the ratio of the prices (of F and C)

Note this is ONLY true at the optimal consumption point

Page 18: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 18

Marginal Utility and Consumer Choice

Total utility is maximized when the budget is allocated so that the marginal utility per dollar of expenditure is the same for each good.

This is referred to as the equal marginal principle.

Page 19: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 19

Consumer Choice

If MRS ≠ PF/PC then individuals can reallocate basket to increase utility

If MRS > PF/PC

Will increase food and decrease clothing until MRS = PF/PC

If MRS < PF/PC

Will increase clothing and decrease food until MRS = PF/PC

Page 20: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 20

Consumer Choice

Food (units per week)

Clothing(units per

week)

40 8020

20

30

40

0

Point B does not maximize satisfaction

because theMRS = -10/10 = 1

is greater than the price ratio = 1/2

+10F U1

-10C

B

Page 21: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 21

Consumer Choice: An Application Revisited

Consider two groups of consumers, each wishing to spend $10,000 on the styling and performance of a car

Each group has different preferences

Page 22: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 22

Consumer Choice: An Application Revisited

By finding the point of tangency between a group’s indifference curve and the budget constraint, auto companies can see how much consumers value each attribute

Page 23: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 23

Consumer Choice: An Application Revisited

Styling

Performance$10,000

$10,000 These consumerswant performance worth $7000 and

styling worth $3000

$3,000

$7,000

Page 24: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 24

Consumer Choice: An Application Revisited

These consumers want

styling worth $7000 and

performance worth $3000

$3,000

$7,000

Styling

$10,000

$10,000

Performance

Page 25: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 25

Consumer Choice: An Application Revisited

Once a company knows preferences, it can design a production and marketing plan

Company can then make a sensible strategic business decision on how to allocate performance and styling on new cars

Page 26: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

CORNER SOLUTION

Chapter 4 26

Page 27: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 27

Consumer Choice

A corner solution exists if a consumer buys in extremes, and buys all of one category of good and none of another

MRS is not necessarily equal to PA/PB

Page 28: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 28

A Corner Solution

Ice Cream (cup/month)

FrozenYogurt

(cupsmonthly)

B

A

U2 U3U1

A corner solutionexists at point B.

Page 29: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3

A Corner Solution

At point B, the MRS of ice cream for frozen yogurt is greater than the slope of the budget line

If the consumer could give up more frozen yogurt for ice cream, he would do so

However, there is no more frozen yogurt to give up

Opposite is true if corner solution was at point A

Page 30: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 30

A Corner Solution

When a corner solution arises, the consumer’s MRS does not necessarily equal the price ratio

In this instance it can be said that:

YogurtFrozen

IceCream

P

PMRS

Page 31: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 31

A Corner Solution

If the MRS is, in fact, significantly greater than the price ratio, then a small decrease in the price of frozen yogurt will not alter the consumer’s market basket

Page 32: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 32

A Corner Solution - Example

Suppose Jane Doe’s parents set up a trust fund for her college education

The money must be used only for education

Although a welcome gift, an unrestricted gift might be better

Page 33: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 33

A Corner Solution - Example

Original budget line, PQ, with a market basket, A, of education and other goods

Trust fund shifts out the budget line as long as trust fund, PB, is spent on education

Jane increases satisfaction, moving to higher indifference curve, U2

Page 34: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 34

A Corner Solution - Example

P

Q Education ($)

OtherConsumption

($)

U2A

U1

B

•Jane better off on U2

•B is corner solution•MRS ≠ PE/POG

Page 35: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 35

A Corner Solution - Example

P

Q Education ($)

OtherConsumption

($)

U2A

U1

B

•If gift is unrestricted, Jane can be at point C on U3

•Better off than with restricted gift

CU3

Page 36: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 36

Individual Demand

Price Changes Using the figures developed in the previous

chapter, the impact of a change in the price of food can be illustrated using indifference curves

For each price change, we can determine how much of the good the individual would purchase given their budget lines and indifference curves

Page 37: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

DERIVING DEMAND FROM CONSUMER CHOICE

Chapter 4 37

Page 38: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 38

Effect of a Price Change

Each price leads to different amounts of

food purchased5

U3

D

4

U2

B

12 20

Assume: • I = $20• PC = $2• PF = $2, $1, $0.50

Food (units per month)

Clothing

6 A

U1

4

10

Page 39: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 39

Effect of a Price Change

The Price-Consumption Curve traces out the utility maximizing market

basket for each price of food

4

U2

B

12 20

5

U3

D

Food (units per month)

Clothing

6 A

U1

4

10

Page 40: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 40

Effect of a Price Change

By changing prices and showing what the consumer will purchase, we can create a demand schedule and demand curve for the individual

From the previous example:

Demand Schedule

P Q

$2.00 4

$1.00 12

$0.50 20

Page 41: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 41

Effect of a Price Change

Demand Curve

Individual Demand relatesthe quantity of a good thata consumer will buy to theprice of that good.

Food (units per month)

Priceof Food

H

E

G

$2.00

4 12 20

$1.00

$.50

Page 42: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 42

Demand Curves – Important Properties

The level of utility that can be attained changes as we move along the curve

At every point on the demand curve, the consumer is maximizing utility by satisfying the condition that the MRS of food for clothing equals the ratio of the prices of food and clothing

Page 43: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 43

Effect of a Price Change

Food (units per month)

Priceof Food

H

E

G

$2.00

4 12 20

$1.00

$.50Demand Curve

• E: Pf /Pc = 2/2 = 1 = MRS• G: Pf /Pc = 1/2 = .5 = MRS• H:Pf /Pc = .5/2 = .25 = MRS

When the price falls, Pf /Pc & MRS also fall

Page 44: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 44

Substitutes & Complements

If the price consumption curve is downward-sloping, the two goods are considered substitutes

If the price consumption curve is upward-sloping, the two goods are considered complements

They could be both

Page 45: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

CONSUMER CHOICE AND INCOME CHANGES

Chapter 4 45

Page 46: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 46

Individual Demand

Income ChangesUsing the figures developed in the previous

chapter, the impact of a change in the income can be illustrated using indifference curves

Changing income, with prices fixed, causes consumers to change their market baskets

Page 47: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 47

Effects of Income Changes

Food (units per month)

Clothing(units per

month)

An increase in income,with the prices fixed,

causes consumers to altertheir choice ofmarket basket.

3

4

A U1

5

10

B

U2

D7

16

U3

Assume: Pf = $1, Pc = $2 I = $10, $20, $30

Page 48: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 48

Individual Demand

Income ChangesThe income-consumption curve traces out

the utility-maximizing combinations of food and clothing associated with every income level

Page 49: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 49

Individual Demand

Income Changes An increase in income shifts the budget line

to the right, increasing consumption along the income-consumption curve

Simultaneously, the increase in income shifts the demand curve to the right

Page 50: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 50

Effects of Income Changes

Food (units per month)

Clothing(units per

month)

The Income Consumption Curve traces out the utility maximizing market basket for each income level

3

4

A U1

5

10

B

U2

D7

16

U3

Income Consumption Curve

Page 51: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 51

Effects of Income Changes

Food (units per month)

Priceof

food

An increase in income, from $10 to $20 to $30, with the prices fixed, shifts the consumer’s demand curve to the right as well.

$1.00

4

D1

E

10

D2

G

16

D3

H

Page 52: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 52

Individual Demand

Income ChangesWhen the income-consumption curve has a

positive slope:The quantity demanded increases with incomeThe income elasticity of demand is positiveThe good is a normal good

Page 53: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 53

Individual Demand

Income ChangesWhen the income-consumption curve has a

negative slope:The quantity demanded decreases with incomeThe income elasticity of demand is negativeThe good is an inferior good

Page 54: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 54

An Inferior Good

Hamburger (units per month)

Steak(units per

month)

30

U3

C

Income-ConsumptionCurve

…but hamburgerbecomes an inferior

good when the incomeconsumption curvebends backward between B and C.

105

AU1

5

20

10

B

U2

Both hamburgerand steak behaveas a normal good, between A and B...

Page 55: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 55

Individual Demand

Engel Curves Engel curves relate the quantity of good

consumed to income If the good is a normal good, the Engel curve

is upward sloping If the good is an inferior good, the Engel

curve is downward sloping

Page 56: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 56

Engel Curves

Food (unitsper month)

30

10

Income($ per

month)

20

4 8 12 16

Engel curves slopeupward for

normal goods.

Page 57: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 57

Engel Curves

Engel curves arebackward bending for inferior goods.

Inferior

Normal

Food (unitsper month)

30

10

Income($ per

month)

20

4 8 12 16

Page 58: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 58

Annual US Household Consumer Expenditures

Page 59: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

INCOME AND SUBSTITUTION EFFECT

Chapter 4 59

Page 60: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 60

Income and Substitution Effects

A change in the price of a good has two effects: Substitution EffectIncome Effect

Page 61: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 61

Income and Substitution Effects

Substitution EffectRelative price of a good changes when price

changesConsumers will tend to buy more of the good

that has become relatively cheaper, and less of the good that is relatively more expensive

Page 62: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 62

Income and Substitution Effects

Income EffectConsumers experience an increase in real

purchasing power when the price of one good falls

Page 63: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 63

Income and Substitution Effects

Substitution EffectThe substitution effect is the change in an

item’s consumption associated with a change in the price of the item, with the level of utility held constant

When the price of an item declines, the substitution effect always leads to an increase in the quantity demanded of the good

Page 64: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 64

Income and Substitution Effects

Income EffectThe income effect is the change in an item’s

consumption brought about by the increase in purchasing power, with the price of the item held constant

When a person’s income increases, the quantity demanded for the product may increase or decrease

Page 65: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 65

Income and Substitution Effects

Income EffectEven with inferior goods, the income effect is

rarely large enough to outweigh the substitution effect

Page 66: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 66

Income and SubstitutionEffects: Normal Good

Food (units per month)O

Clothing(units per

month) R

F1 S

C1 A

U1

The income effect, EF2, (from D to B) keeps relativeprices constant but increases purchasing power.

Income Effect

C2

F2 T

U2

B

When the price of food falls, consumption increases by F1F2 as the consumer moves from A to B.

ETotal Effect

SubstitutionEffect

D

The substitution effect, F1E, (from point A to D), changes the relative prices but keeps real income(satisfaction) constant.

Page 67: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 67

Food (units per month)O

R

Clothing(units per

month)

F1 S F2 T

A

U1

E

SubstitutionEffect

D

Total Effect

Since food is an inferior good, theincome effect is

negative. However,the substitution effect

is larger than the income effect.

B

Income Effect

U2

Income and SubstitutionEffects: Inferior Good

Page 68: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 68

Income and Substitution Effects

A Special Case: The Giffen GoodThe income effect may theoretically be large

enough to cause the demand curve for a good to slope upward

This rarely occurs and is of little practical interest

Page 69: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 69

Market Demand

Market Demand CurvesA curve that relates the quantity of a good

that all consumers in a market buy to the price of that good

The sum of all the individual demand curves in the market

Page 70: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

MARKET DEMAND

Chapter 4 70

Page 71: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 71

Determining the Market Demand Curve

Price A B CMarket

Demand

1 6 10 16 32

2 4 8 13 25

3 2 6 10 18

4 0 4 7 11

5 0 2 4 6

Page 72: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 72

Summing to Obtain aMarket Demand Curve

Quantity

1

2

3

4

Price

0

5

5 10 15 20 25 30

DB DC

Market Demand

DA

The market demandcurve is obtained by

summing the consumer’s demand curves

Page 73: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 73

Market Demand

From this analysis one can see two important points:The market demand will shift to the right as

more consumers enter the marketFactors that influence the demands of many

consumers will also affect the market demand

Page 74: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 74

Market Demand

Aggregation is important to be able to discuss regarding demand for different groupsHouseholds with childrenConsumers aged 20 – 30, etc.

Page 75: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 75

The Aggregate Demand for Wheat

The demand for US wheat is comprised of two components:Domestic demand Export demand

Total demand for wheat can be obtained by aggregating these two demands

Page 76: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 76

The Aggregate Demand for Wheat

The domestic demand for wheat is given by the equation:QDD = 1465 - 88P

The export demand for wheat is given by the equation:QDE = 1344 - 138P

Page 77: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 77

The Aggregate Demand for Wheat

Domestic demand is relatively price inelastic (Ed = -0.2)

Export demand is more price elastic (Ed = -0.4)Poorer countries that import US wheat turn to

other grains and food if wheat prices increase

Page 78: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 78

C

D

ExportDemand

Total world demand is the horizontal sum of the domestic demand AB and

export demand CD.

F

Total Demand

A

B

DomesticDemand

E

The Aggregate Demand for Wheat

Wheat

Price

0

10

16

18

Above C, export demand is zero, so domestic demand = total demand = AE segment

Page 79: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

CONSUMER SURPLUS

Chapter 4 79

Page 80: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 80

Consumer Surplus

Consumers buy goods because it makes them better off

Consumer Surplus measures how much better off they are

Page 81: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 81

Consumer Surplus

Consumer Surplus The difference between the maximum

amount a consumer is willing to pay for a good and the amount actually paid

Can calculate consumer surplus from the demand curve

Page 82: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 82

Consumer Surplus - Example

Student wants to buy concert ticketsDemand curve tells us willingness to pay

for each concert ticket1st ticket worth $20 but price is $14 so

student generates $6 worth of surplusCan measure this for each ticketTotal surplus is addition of surplus for each

ticket purchased

Page 83: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 83

The consumer surplusof purchasing 6 concerttickets is the sum of the

surplus derived from each one individually.

Consumer Surplus 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 21

Consumer Surplus - Example

Rock Concert Tickets

Price ($ perticket)

2 3 4 5 6

13

0 1

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Market Price

Will not buy more than 7 because surplus is negative

Page 84: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 84

Consumer Surplus

The stepladder demand curve can be converted into a straight-line demand curve by making the units of the good smaller

Consumer surplus is the area under the demand curve and above the price

Page 85: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 85

Demand Curve

ConsumerSurplus

Consumer Surplusfor the Market Demand

Consumer Surplus

Rock Concert Tickets

Price ($ perticket)

2 3 4 5 6

13

0 1

ActualExpenditure

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Market Price

CS = ½ ($20 - $14)*(1600) = $19,500

Page 86: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 86

Applying Consumer Surplus

Combining consumer surplus with the aggregate profits that producers obtain, we can evaluate:

1. Costs and benefits of different market structures

2. Public policies that alter the behavior of consumers and firms

Page 87: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 87

Applying Consumer Surplus – An Example

The Value of Clean AirAir is free in the sense that we don’t pay to

breathe itThe Clean Air Act was amended in 1970Question: Were the benefits of cleaning up

the air worth the costs?

Page 88: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 88

The Value of Clean Air

Empirical data determined estimates for the demand for clean air

No market exists for clean air, but can see people are willing to pay for itEx: People pay more to buy houses where

the air is clean

Page 89: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 89

The Value of Cleaner Air

Using these empirical estimates, we can measure people’s consumer surplus for pollution reduction from the demand curve

Page 90: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 90

The shaded area represents theconsumer surplus generated

when air pollution is reduced by 5 parts per 100million of nitrous oxide at

a cost of $1000 per part reduced.

Valuing Cleaner Air

2000

100

1000

5

A

NOX (pphm)Pollution Reduction

Value

Page 91: Consumer theory 2

©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 91

Value of Cleaner Air

A full cost-benefit analysis would include total benefit of cleanup

Total benefits would be compared to total costs to determine if the clean up was worthwhile