consumption, production, welfare b: monopoly and oligopoly (partial eq) univ. prof. dr. maarten...

17
Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

Upload: maude-norton

Post on 18-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

Consumption, Production, Welfare B:Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq)

Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten JanssenUniversity of Vienna

Winter semester 2013

Page 2: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

2

Profit maximisation MonopolistP

Q

ATCMC

D

MRQM

PM

Profit

ATC

MCPdQdP

PQ )1(Pricing rule

Profit π = P(Q)Q – C(Q)

)1

1/(

MCP

When is monopoly outcome Pareto inefficient?

Page 3: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

3

On which part of demand curve is the monopolist’s price?

P

Q

Q

Demand

Elastic

Inelastic

MRTotal

Revenue(€)

Total revenue=PQ

Marginal revenue =

dQdPQP

Demand curve is elastic where or elasticity is larger than 1.

Page 4: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

Oligopoly: between monopoly and perfect competition

• On demand side always many consumers who take prices as given

• On supply side– Under perfect competition, firms take prices as given (problems

with increasing returns to scale)– Under monopoly, one firm takes effect on price into account (look

at previous formulaes)– Middle ground: what if there are some firms (more than one, not

many)• Have to take actions, reactions into account (game theory)• Subtleties important, for example, what are the decision variables (price or

quantity) of the firms• Here, two basic models: Cournot (quantity) and Bertrand (price)

Page 5: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

5

Cournot Model• 2 (or more) firms

• Market demand is P(Q)• Firm i cost is C(q)• Firm i acts in the belief that all other firms will put some amount

Q-i in the market. • Then firm i maximizes profits obtained from serving residual

demand: P’ = P(Q) - Q-i • For each output produced by the others, firm is the monopolist

for the residual demand

Page 6: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

6

Demand and Residual Demand

Market demand P(Q)=P(q1,Q-1=0)

q1

P(q1)

P(q1, Q-1 =10)

P(q1, Q–1 =20)

Page 7: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

7

Cournot Reaction Functions

• Firm 1’s reaction (or best-response) function is a schedule summarizing the quantity q1 firm 1 should produce in order to maximize its profits for each quantity Q-1 produced by all other firms.

• Since the products are (perfect) substitutes, an increase in competitors’ output leads to a decrease in the profit-maximizing amount of firm 1’s product ( reaction functions are downward sloping).

• Check for monopoly

Page 8: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

8

Profit maximisation Monopolist for different demands

P

Q

ATCMC

D

MRQM

PM

Profit

ATC

MCPdQdP

PQ )1(Pricing rule

Profit π = P(Q)Q – C(Q)

)1

1/(

MCP

When is monopoly outcome Pareto inefficient?

D‘MR’

Page 9: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

9

Cournot Model• A firm can only decide bout what it will produce. It has to take as given what others produce. What others produce is, however, relevant.• The problem

Max{(P(qi+Q-i) qi – C(qi)}

defines the best-response (or reaction) function of firm i to a conjecture Q-i as follows:

P’(qi+Q-i)qi + P(qi+Q-i) – C’(qi) = 0

Linear case on blackboard

Q-i

qiqiM

qj

r1

qi*(qj)

Firm i’s reaction Function

Q-i=0

Page 10: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

10

Cournot Equilibrium

• Situation where each firm produces the output that maximizes its profits, given a conjecture about the output of rival firms

• Conjectures about what the others produce are correct

• No firm can gain by unilaterally changing its own output

Page 11: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

11

Cournot Equilibriumq2

q1q1

M

r1

r2

q2M Cournot equilibrium

• q1* maximizes firm 1’s

profits, given that firm 2 produces q2

*

• q2* maximizes firm 2’s

profits, given firm 1’s output q1

*

• No firm wants to change its output, given the rival’s

• Beliefs are consistent: each firm “thinks” rivals will stick to their current output, and they do so!

Page 12: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

Rewriting optimal decision rule

• Can we detect monopoly pricing rule as a special case?

• Is perfect competition another special case?

Page 13: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

13

Properties of Cournot equilibrium• The pricing rule of a Cournot oligopolist satisifes:

• Cournot oligopolists exercise market power:– Cournot mark-ups are lower than monopoly markups– Market power is limited by the elasticity of demand

• More efficient firms will have a larger market share.• The more firms, the lower will be each firm’s individual

market share and market power.

i

ij ji

iiij ji s

qqP

qMCqqP

)(

)()(

Page 14: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

Symmetric Cournot competition with N firms; linear case

• Demand is given by ; marginal cost equals c.• Optimal rule under symmetry gives or or

market output

• Increasing or decreasing in N? Can we recognize monopoly and perfect competition (P=c) as extremes?

• Competitive model is really the limit of oligopoly model.

Page 15: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

15

Bertrand Model• 2 (or more) firms

– Firms produce identical products at constant marginal cost.– Each firm independently sets its price in order to maximize

profits

• Consumers enjoy– Perfect information – Zero transaction costs

Page 16: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

16

Bertrand Equilibrium• Firms set P1 = P2 = MC! Why?

• Suppose MC < P1 < P2

• Firm 1 earns (P1 - MC) on each unit sold, while firm 2 earns nothing

• Firm 2 has an incentive to slightly undercut firm 1’s price to capture the entire market

• Firm 1 then has an incentive to undercut firm 2’s price. This undercutting reasoning continues...

• Equilibrium: Each firm charges P1 = P2 = MC

Page 17: Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Monopoly and Oligopoly (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

17

Bertrand Paradox• Two firms are enough to eliminate market power

– If firms are symmetric, market power is eliminated entirely– If firms are asymmetric (MC1 < MC2), market power is

substantially reduced

• Solutions (in course on Industrial Organization):– Capacity constraints– Repeated interaction– Product differentiation– Imperfect information