copd in 2008 · mdi 的缺點 效率差 傳統cfc推進劑造成臭氧層破壞 (ozone depletion)...
TRANSCRIPT
2014/3/25
1
簡榮彥 醫師
2014.3.29
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD
COPD的定義
• 慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)是可預防也可治療的疾病
• 其特徵為持續的呼氣氣流受阻(airflow
limitation), 常具漸進性且伴有肺臟及呼吸道對有害微粒或氣體的慢性發炎反應。
• 急性惡化(exacerbation)與共病症(comorbidity)與疾病的整體嚴重度有關。
COPD Patients
Loss appetite, Malnutrition
Exertional Dyspnea
2014/3/25
2
SYMPTOMS EXPOSURE TO RISK
FACTORS
肺功能檢查
COPD 之診斷
è
咳嗽
氣促
黏痰
吸菸
職業
空氣污染
COPD 的危險因子
COPD 的產生導因於累積數十年的危險因子暴露,其盛行率通常與吸菸的盛行率直接相關
職業性或室內(如燃燒木材與生物燃料)所造成的空氣汙染也被證實是COPD 的危險因子
老化本身亦是COPD的危險因子之一,呼吸道及實質組織老化後的情形也與COPD 造成的結構改變十分相似
Risk Factors for COPD
Genes
Infections
Socio-economic
status
Aging Populations
診斷
FEV1 PEFR 肺功能檢查
Volu
me, lit
ers
Time, seconds
5
4
3
2
1
1 2 3 4 5 6
FEV1 = 1.8L
FVC = 3.2L
FEV1/FVC = 0.56
Normal
Obstructive
2014/3/25
3
COPD 之鑑別診斷 COPD嚴重度評估 (GOLD 2011)
評估症狀嚴重度
評估氣道阻塞程度
評估惡化(急性發作)的風險
評估共病症(comorbidities)
1. 修改過的英國醫學研究會問卷(the modified British Medical Research Council;mMRC) • 只評估呼吸困難造成的失能
2. COPD 評估測試(COPD Assessment Test;CAT)
• 廣泛涵蓋病人的日常生活及身心健康受疾病影響的程度。
症狀評估 mMRC問卷
評估氣道阻塞程度 - 肺功能
2014/3/25
4
評估急性發作的風險
高風險
過去一年發作兩次以上
肺功能 FEV1 < 50 % of predicted value
綜合性的COPD 評估
Patient Characteristic 肺功能 急性發作次數(過去一年)
mMRC CAT
A Low Risk
Less Symptoms GOLD 1-2 ≤ 1 0-1 < 10
B Low Risk
More Symptoms GOLD 1-2 ≤ 1 > 2 ≥ 10
C High Risk
Less Symptoms GOLD 3-4 > 2 0-1 < 10
D High Risk
More Symptoms GOLD 3-4 > 2 > 2
≥ 10
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD
COPD嚴重度評估
When assessing risk, choose the highest risk
according to GOLD grade or exacerbation history
常見的COPD共病症(comorbidities)
COPD patients are at increased risk for:
• Cardiovascular diseases • Osteoporosis • Respiratory infections • Anxiety and Depression • Diabetes • Lung cancer
These comorbid conditions may influence mortality
and hospitalizations and should be looked for
routinely, and treated appropriately.
Systemic
Inflammation
Target organs
Respiratory system
Systemic Effects of COPD
Nutritional abnormality and weight loss
Increasing resting energy expenditure
Abnormal body composition
Abnormal amino acid metabolism
Skeletal muscle dysfunction
Loss of muscle mass
Abnormal structure/function
Others
Cardiovascular effects
Nervous system effect
Skeletal effect
Bone marrow effects
2014/3/25
5
Causes of Deaths in COPD
Mannino et al. Thorax 2003
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Severe COPD
Moderate COPD
Restricted lung
Normal Lung
COPD CVD Lung Ca Infection Other
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
109 % 96 % 88 % 80 % 63 %
FEV1
NHANES 1; N=1,861
RR
Relationship between COPD and CVD
27
Arterial Stiffness Is Independently Associated
With Emphysema Severity in Patients With
COPD
McAllister DA, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:1208-1214. Permission requested.
r = 0.476
Incre
ased A
rteri
al S
tiffness
12.00
Pu
lse W
ave V
elo
city (
m/s
)
10.00
8.00
6.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60
Worse Emphysema
Emphysema Severity (Pixel Index 910)
r = -0.243
Incre
ased A
rteri
al S
tiffness
12.00
Pu
lse W
ave V
elo
city (
m/s
)
10.00
8.00
6.00
25 50 75 100
FEV1 % Predicted
28
Systemic Inflammation Rises
With COPD Severity
CRP TNF-a
Severe
COPD
Moderate
COPD
Mild
COPD
Healthy
0
Serum C-Reactive Protein (mg/L)
20 30 40 50 60 70 10
Severe
COPD
Moderate
COPD
Mild
COPD
Healthy
0 40 100 60 80 20
Serum TNF-Alpha (pg/mL)
Reprinted from Pulm Pharmacol Ther, Vol 19, Franciosi LG, et al, Markers of disease severity in chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease, pp 189-199, Copyright 2006, with permission from Elsevier.
29
Airflow Obstruction and Osteoporosis in COPD
1.93.9
6.8
11
7.6
10.3
20.9
33
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
None Mild Moderate Severe
Perc
ent of
Subje
cts
with
Oste
oporo
sis
Severity of Airflow Obstruction
Men
Women
Sin DD, et al. Am J Med. 2003;114:10-14. 30
Increased Prevalence of Esophagitis,
Gastritis, or Gastric Ulcers in Patients With COPD
32
17
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
COPD Controls
Perc
ent
of
Patients
with G
astr
ic
Dis
ease
Mapel DW, et al. Chest. 2000;117:346-353.
*
*P<0.05 versus controls
2014/3/25
6
Many patients with COPD die from
causes other than COPD itself
1. Curkendall et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004. 2. Kiri et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 3. Rana et al. Diabetes Care 2004
4. Camilli et al. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 5. Hansell et al. Eur Respir J 2003.
COPD also puts patients at increased risk of
dying from other diseases
Patients with COPD are 2-5× more likely to die
from cardiovascular disease than those without
COPD1
COPD is also associated with reduced survival
in patients with lung cancer
The risk of type 2 diabetes is almost 2× for
women with COPD3
Many patients with COPD die from
causes other than COPD itself
Camilli et al. Am J Epidemiol 1991; Hansell et al. Eur Respir J 2003.
Where COPD is diagnosed, but is not the
underlying cause of death
25–55% of deaths are due to circulatory
diseases (e.g. heart disease and stroke)
4–11% of deaths are due to other respiratory
causes
7–15% of deaths are due to malignancies
33
Systemic Inflammation and
Comorbidities
COPD
OSTEOPOROSIS DIABETES
BODY
COMPOSITION
INFLAMMATION
Agusti AG, et al. Eur Respir J. 2003;21:347-360.
Agusti A. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007;4:522-525.
CARDIOVASCULAR
DISEASE
GASTROINTESTINAL
DISORDER
34
Assessing Comorbidities in COPD
Agusti A and Jardim J, personal communication.
Look for
Look for
COPD Comorbidities
If Smoker
穩定期患者之治療
1.支氣管擴張劑
2.類固醇
3.復健
4.氧氣治療
5.其他藥物:抗生素, 袪痰劑
6.外科手術: Bullectomy, LVRS, Transplantation
7.衛教
8.營養諮詢
減少危險因子暴露
Avoidance of noxious agents
smoking cessation
reduction of indoor pollution
reduction of occupational exposure
疫苗:
流感疫苗
肺炎球菌疫苗:在65歲以上COPD病人或不到65歲但FEV1 < 40%者建議接種。
(GOLD 2003)
2014/3/25
7
Exa
ce
rba
tio
ns p
er
ye
ar
> 2
1
0
mMRC 0-1
CAT < 10
GOLD 4
mMRC > 2
CAT > 10
GOLD 3
GOLD 2
GOLD 1
SAMA prn
or
SABA prn
LABA
or
LAMA
ICS + LABA
or
LAMA
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD
Manage Stable COPD: Pharmacologic Therapy
FIRST CHOICE
A B
D C
ICS + LABA
or
LAMA
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD
Manage Stable COPD: Pharmacologic Therapy (Medications in each box are mentioned in alphabetical order, and therefore not
necessarily in order of preference.)
Patient First choice Second choice Alternative Choices
A
SAMA prn
or
SABA prn
LAMA
or
LABA
or
SABA and SAMA
Theophylline
B
LAMA
or
LABA
LAMA and LABA SABA and/or SAMA
Theophylline
C
ICS + LABA
or
LAMA
LAMA and LABA
PDE4-inh.
SABA and/or SAMA
Theophylline
D
ICS + LABA
or
LAMA
ICS and LAMA or
ICS + LABA and LAMA or
ICS+LABA and PDE4-inh. or
LAMA and LABA or
LAMA and PDE4-inh.
Carbocysteine
SABA and/or SAMA
Theophylline
支氣管擴張劑
支氣管擴張劑是COPD症狀治療的主要
藥物。
常規使用長效型支氣管擴張劑較短效
型有效而方便
Nebulizer
Metered dose
inhaler
Dry powder inhaler
Devices for Aerosol Therapy
27%
9% 20%
12%
54% 80%
18% 10%
78%
66%
1%
2%
20% 1% 1% 1%
DPI MDI MDI/HC NEB
Exhaled
Apparatus
Oropharygeal
Lungs
Respirable Fr. in Different
Devices Metered dose inhaler (MDI)
體積小,易攜帶
經濟便宜
劑量穩定
2014/3/25
8
MDI 的缺點 效率差
傳統CFC推進劑造成臭氧層破壞(Ozone Depletion)
需良好技巧配合
冷媒效應
無計量器
需使用spacers
Ozone Depletion
HFA-134a
Spray plumes Speed
HFA-MDI
30 miles/hour
CFC-MDI
100 miles/hour
New
HFA-BDP CFC-BDP
Particle size and lung deposition
CFC vs. HFA
CFC HFA
MMAD
3.8 μm 1.2μm
Lung deposition 19.7 % 68.3 %
- peripheral 7.0 % 23.0 %
- intermediate 6.8 % 25.7 %
- central 5.9 % 19.6 %
(Jonathan Corren MD Clin Ther. 2003 Mar;25(3):776-98
Influence of temperature on MDI dose
CFC-Albuterol MDI
HFA Albuterol MDI
2014/3/25
9
Benefits from Novel HFA-MDIs
增加肺部藥物濃度(尤其是周邊small
airway)
衝力較小
減少冷媒效應
劑量更穩定
Dry power inhaler (DPI)
優點
呼吸啟動,不需複雜技巧
無推進劑、不會造成環境污染
體積小、方便隨身攜帶使用
不需spacer
包含計量計
Dry power inhaler 的缺點
需足夠吸氣能力,肺功能太差
之患者及小朋友 (< 5 歲) 不
適用
無法於呼吸衰竭及氣切患者使
用
Multi-dose易受潮,降低效果
較昂貴
肺部復健
COPD復建工作的目的主要有三:減少呼吸道症狀,提高病患生活品質,及增進日常之身心活動
肺部復健
肺部復健對COPD之助益 改善運動能力(A級證據力)。
減少呼吸短促之感覺(A級證據力)。
改善與健康相關的生活品質(A級證據力)。
減少住院次數及住院日數(A級證據力)。
減少COPD相關之焦慮及憂鬱(A級證據力)。
改善存活率(B級證據力)。
在訓練期間結束後優點仍可持續(B級證據力)。
心理支持是有助益(C級證據力)。
呼吸肌之訓練是有助益(C級證據力)。
腹式呼吸
噘嘴式呼吸
2014/3/25
10
早期治療 208
152
134
124
Scanlon PD et al: Lung Health Study AJRCCM 2000
MORE REVERSIBILITY EARLIER IN DISEASE
Mild COPD:
Reversibility
↓ inflammation 80
76
72
B/L 1 2 3 4 5
2682
2335
2059
1652
1818
Years in study
More severe COPD:
Less reversibility
No ↓ inflammation
FE
V1 (
% p
redic
ted)
Continuing smokers
p<0.001
55.6%
24% reduction
Placebo Tiotropium
p=0.06
42.4%
12% reduction
Placebo Tiotropium
Dusser et al. Eur Respir J 2006;27:547-555
MISTRAL: Proportion of patients
with ≥1 exacerbation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
63.5%
FEV1 ≥ 50% FEV1 < 50%
56%
N=209 N=217 N=296 N=277
39% reduction
32% reduction
Dusser et al. Eur Respir J 2006;27:547-555
MISTRAL: number of
exacerbations/years
P=0.03
Me
an
nu
mb
er
of
ex
ac
erb
ati
on
s/y
ea
r
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
FEV1 ≥ 50% FEV1 < 50%
Placebo
1.97
N=209
Tiotropium
1.21
N=217
Placebo
2.70
N=296
Tiotropium
1.83
N=277
P=0.007
Changes (Salmoterol/Fluticasone vs placebo) in
whole population and >50% subgroup
* p<0.05
Sutherland ER. NEJM 2004;350:2689-97.
2014/3/25
11
Chest Hospital Department
of Health Excutive Yuan
R.O.C
Thanks for your attention!