dlr's airborne f-sar system - uni-stuttgart.de · dlr's airborne f-sar system andreas...
TRANSCRIPT
Slide 2
Why Airborne SAR?
Advantages of airborne SAR:• Higher SNR & resolution than spaceborne sensors
• Flexible operation of the sensor• Experimental platform for new technology
For the Institute:• Defining the „state‐of‐the‐art“ in SAR sensor technology
• Prepare future satellite missions• Test and develop new signal processing algorithms
• Development and demonstration of new products and imaging techniques
• Execution of scientific flight campaigns
development & demonstration of new technology
demonstration of new techniques with existing spaceborne systems
concepts for future spaceborne systems
Airborne‐SAR
Slide 3
P-ban
d
C-b
and
X-b
and
L-ban
d
The Advanced Airborne Sensor F‐SAR
F-SAR technical characteristics
X C S L P
RF [GHz] 9.6 5.3 3.2 1.3 0.35BW [MHz] 800 400 300 150 100PRF [kHz] up to 12Rg res. [m] 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.5Az res. [m] 0.2 0.3 0.35 0.4 1.5PolSAR ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓Rg cov [km] 12.5 (at max.bandwith) Sampling 8 Bit real; 1000MHz; 4 channels.
Remarkable features:‐ Very high resolution and SNR‐Multispectral operation (up to 4 bands)‐ Polarimetry in all bands‐ Single‐pass interferometry at X and S‐band‐Modular sensor design
Main Goals:• Defining the „state‐of‐the‐art“ in SAR sensor technology
• Scientific flight campaigns, preparation of new satellite missions
• New approaches by multispectral & high resolution PolSAR imaging
Slide 4
DLR’s New F‐SAR Sensor
F‐SAR core modules X‐bandrack
C/S‐bandrack
L‐bandrack
P‐bandrack
R1 R21 2
XCS-BandUPCE4
XCSChirp
E4
X-BandAntenna Switch
E2a
1H 1V 2H 2V 3H 3V 1H 1V 2H 2V
S-BandAntenna Switch
D3u, D3o
C-BandAntenna Sw.
D4
1H 1V
ADCADC1
C5
ADCADC2
C5
L-BandAntenna Sw.
F3
1H 1V
P-BandAntenna Sw.
A3
1H 1V
ADCADC5
C5
ADCADC6
C5
Disk Array 1B2
Disk Array 2B2
System Control
B4
OnboardProcessor
C7
STC/AGCProcessor
C5
Timing UnitC6
DC/AC Power Supply
C1
Navigation & Flight Guidance
System C2
S1,2
S1 S2
X1H X1V X2H X2V X3H X3V S1H S1V S2H S2V C1H C1V L1H L1V P1H P1V
R1X R2X R1S R2S R1C R2C
R5 R6
R1L R2L R1P R2P
L-Band UPCF5
LChirp
F5
S1
S2
S1
PChirp
A5
X-BandTWTA
E1
SCTWTA
D1
XCSDown Converter
E3
L-BandHPAF1
P-BandHPA A1
F5 L-Band Down Conv.
A5 P-Band Down Conv.
2 of 4 Switch C6
MDRMDR1
C3
MDRMDR2
C3
MDRMDR5
C3
MDRMDR6
C3
3 4 5 6
7
8
SC Ant. Sw.
D2
Mon
itor B
us
F-SAR Basic Configuration (Rack B and Rack C)
X-Band Rack E
SC-BandRack D
P-Band UPCA5
P-BandRack A
L-BandRack F
modularcabin layout
F‐SARsystem layout
The Advanced Airborne Sensor F‐SAR
Slide 6
Kaufbeuren (Germany)TerraSAR‐X, X‐band VV, HRS mode1.0m x 2.0m resolution
Kaufbeuren (Germany)F‐SAR, X‐band, VV polarisation0.25m x 0.25m resolution
Kaufbeuren (Germany)F‐SAR, X‐band quadpol (HH, VV, HV)0.25m x 0.25m resolution
Simulation of Future Spaceborne Products
Slide 7
Oensingen (Switzerland)F‐SAR, S‐Band quadpol (HH, HV, VV)0.5m x 0.65m resolution, 5 looks
Simulation of Future Spaceborne Products
Slide 8
Real‐time Situation Monitoring
F‐SAR (DLR‐HR)
data downlink: 1.25 GBit/sec (DLR‐KN) laser / microwave
Data distribution toend‐users (BOS, THW,red cross) throughcentral platform
real‐time onboard processingweather independentday & night capability
Slide 10
InSAR: Generation of digital elevation models
Kaufbeuren (Germany)Tandem‐X Digital Surface ModelKaufbeuren (Germany)F‐SAR Digital Surface Model
Muriel
InSAR: Generation of digital elevation models
INSARDEM XS (Scale around: 41m)
ALS 26032013 (Scale around: 41m)
Difference [-1m,1m]
InSAR DEM
Laser DEM
Difference
Easting
Northing
4
‐4
4
Laser DEM
InSARDEM (Scale around: 41m)
-2
0
2Laser (Scale around: 41m)
-2
0
2InSAR DEM Laser DEM 2
‐2
2
‐2
µ = ‐0.15m σ = 0.11mDifference
Easting
Northing
INSARDEM XS (Scale around: 41m)
-4
0
4ALS 26032013 (Scale around: 41m)
-4
0
4InSAR DEM Laser DEM4
‐4
4
‐4µ = 0.21m σ = 0.22m
Testsite: Jade BightF‐SAR Digital Surface Modelvs. ALS Reference Heights
Slide 12
DInSAR: Measurement of Ground Deformation / Motion
SWISAR campaign (2006 & 2007)
Hamm (Germany)deformation within 6 months
DINSAR campaign (2009)
Aletsch glacier (Switzerland)1‐day ice motion
85 cm / day
20-40 cm / year
RGB = L/X/P-Band
Estimated Forest Height
Polarimetric Interferometry: Estimation of Forest Height and Biomass
Azim
ut
L-band HH
Courtesy of K. Papathanssiou
y
z
x
n
r
bl
h
VVVH
HVHH
SSSS
S ][ 1
VVVH
HVHH
SSSS
S ][ 2
12
PolInSAR
Fichtelgebirge / GermanyCorridor / SpainBayrischer Wald / GermanyTraunstein / GermanyOberpfaffenhofen / Germany
Courtesy of
Polarimetric Interferometry: Estimation of Forest Height and Biomass
Slide 15
3D SAR Tomography• Innovative method for3D‐imaging• Possible applications:
• Vegetation structure, biomass• 3D City models• Archeology
y
z
x
N parallel tracks(ca. 5‐20)
n
r
L
Hn
Slide 16
Circular SAR Imaging
360°illumination
r ≈ 6km
antenna illumination
xy
z
• Possibility of extremly high resolution (up to λ/4, i.e. about 6cm at L‐band)
• Possibility of “holographic” 3D imaging
• Possibility of continous imaging (“video SAR”)
Circular SAR
Stripmap SAR
Polarimetric P-band Sounding
• Dedicated imaging mode for deep sounding of ice / bedrock structure • Long wavelength can penetrate very deep in dry (i.e. cold) ice.• Identical antennas as in SAR mode, but nadir‐looking by modified feed network.
clutterclutter?
bedrock
HV polarisation (single acquisition, low altitude)
32 km
~ 570m
Spitzbergen (Nordaustlandet)Sounder Image, P‐Band 350MHz
Holographic Ice Sounding / Multi-circular SAR
L‐Band P‐Band
Kangerlussuaq / K‐TransectFully polarimetric HoloSAR images. Pauli decomposition R,G,B = HH‐VV, HV, HH+VV.
ARCTIC15F‐SAR CAMPAIGN April ‐May 2015
Slide 20
space-/airborne bistatic geometry
v=7km/s
v=85m/s
Bistatic SAR Imaging & Processing
TerraSAR-X (Tx) F-SAR (Rx)
bistatic image azimuth resolution 0.5m
• Development of synchronisation techniquesin preparation of TanDEM‐X
• Development of new processing concepts(BFFB ‐ bistatic fast factorised back‐projection)
v=7000m/s
v=85m/s
monostatic bistatic
monostatic bistatic
Slide 21
Agriculture (crop parameters, soil moisture)
Airborne‐SAR Campaigns (since 2001)
Forestry (forest heights and biomass)Surveys over sea and land iceSea topography and oceanography
?
Mission Proposal for Environment and Climate:
Advanced high‐performance SAR‐Technology:• Formation flight with two SAR‐satellites • Polarimetric interferometry and tomography• Digital Beamforming with large reflector antenna
• 11 test‐sites in Greenland• Analysis of several novel methods
for the estimation of snow and iceparameters
• Evaluation of high‐resolution SAR forsecurity applications in Arctic environments
• Study of the stongly varying penetrationcapabilities of the different bands intosnow and ice
• Demonstration of multi‐spectral SARdata recording in 4 frequency bands
• Acquisition of unique data setsfor further research
F‐SAR Campaign ARCTIC/DALOX (May 2015)
Campaign test sites
ARCTIC15 Helheim Glacier, differences in L‐, S‐ and X‐ band.Fully polarimetric images. Pauli decomposition R,G,B = HH‐VV, HV, HH+VV.
F‐SAR CAMPAIGN April ‐May 2015
X‐Band
L‐Band
S‐Band
ARCTIC15 Helheim Glacier, differences in L‐, S‐ and X‐ band.Fully polarimetric images. Pauli decomposition R,G,B = HH‐VV, HV, HH+VV.
F‐SAR CAMPAIGN April ‐May 2015
X‐Band
L‐Band
S‐Band
Increasin
g pen
etratio
n de
pth
X‐Band
C‐Band
L‐Band
P‐Band (non‐simultaneous)
ARCTIC15 K‐Transect ‐ Percolation zoneFully polarimetric images. Pauli decomposition R,G,B = HH‐VV, HV, HH+VV.
F‐SAR CAMPAIGN April ‐May 2015
ARCTIC15 Sea Ice between Greenland and North AmericaFully polarimetric images. Pauli decomposition R,G,B = HH‐VV, HV, HH+VV.
F‐SAR CAMPAIGN April ‐May 2015
L‐Band
S‐Band
X‐Band
ARCTIC15 Godhavn, X‐band detail image, 25cm resolutionFully polarimetric images. Pauli decomposition R,G,B = HH‐VV, HV, HH+VV.
F‐SAR CAMPAIGN April ‐May 2015
BIOMASS: ESA Earth Explorer Mission
System: Fully-polarimetric P-band SAR 12 m reflector antenna Strip-map acquisition mode with 6 MHz
bandwidth Spatial resolution: 60 x 50 m with 6 ENL Launch planned for 2021
ESA EE-7 to map forest above-ground biomass and its changes
PolSAR Pol-InSAR Combined TomoSAR
AfriSAR Campaign 2016
Goals:• Preparation of ESA‘s BIOMASS mission • Algorithm development for Tandem‐L• Various test‐sites in Gabun (tropical rain forest)• Cooperation with ESA, NASA/JPL, NASA/Goddard, Onera• Extensive ground‐truthing
Execution:• Flight campaign by Onera in July 2015• F‐SAR campaign in February / March 2016• Parallele flights by UAVSAR and LVIS in March 2016
Results:• SAR acquisitions in L‐ and P‐band quadpol• Reflectivity, PolInSAR, Tomography• Simulation of BIOMASS products• Estimation of forest heights and biomass• Evalutation and development of BIOMASS and Tandem‐L algorithms
AfriSAR Kampagne: Kalibrierung
L-Band P-BandNkok calibration test site
(0°22'43.34"N, 9°36'30.80"E)
surface
double
volume
AfriSAR Campaign: Results
Pongara test site: mangroves(0° 9'15.29"N, 9°28'46.56"E)
L‐Band
P‐Bandsurface
double
volume
AfriSAR Campaign: P-Band Mosaic (7 tracks)
P-Bandsurface
double
volume Lopé test site: rain forest / savannah(0°12'41.06"S, 11°33'11.58"E)
Current Developments: Digital Beamforming (DBF) Extension
FutureRequirements
imaging mode (quad pol)Mode X Mode Y Mode Z
Resolution 5 m 1 m << 1 mSwath 400 km 100 km 30 kmOrbit Duty Cycle 30 Minutes per Orbit
Modus Y
Modus Z
ModusX
AD
Digital Beam Forming
AD
AD
AD
AD
SAR Processing
x x x x x
AD
1 2
a1
3 4 5
a2 a3 a4 a5
SAR Processing
x Mixing
radar withphased array
radar with DBF
Possibilities:• Better radiometric accuracy• Moving target detection• Ambiguity suppression• RFI suppression• Adaptive & hybrid SAR imaging modes
• …