人力資源管理研究所 碩士論文 -...

92
人力資源管理研究所 碩士論文 體驗式教學訓練成效之因素探討 研究生:徐正芳 指導教授:林文政博士 中華民國九十四年六月

Upload: others

Post on 31-Aug-2019

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • (93 5 )

    /()

    ( V ) ()

    ( ) ()

    ( ) ()

    ( )

    :

    :

    90427025

    94 6 10

    1.

    2.

    3.

  • 86

    100 (50)(50 )TT

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    7

    ()

    () Kirkpatrick

    I

  • C.P. DianaS.H.

    -

    -

    II

  • .....................................................1

    ................................................1

    ..........................................3

    ................................................5

    ..............................................5

    ...........................................24

    ...........................................28

    ...............................30

    .................................32

    .....................35

    ...............................38

    ...............................................40

    .........................................40

    .....................................41

    .......43

    .....................................47

    .........................................48

    ...........................................50

    .....................................52

    .........................................52

    T T .........................55

    ...............................................57

    ...........................................61

    ...........................................65

    .............................................67

    ...............................................67

    ...............................................68

    ...............................................71

    ...........................................72

    ...................................................... 73

    ...................................................... 79

    III

  • 2-1 .......................................... 27

    3-1 .....................................................40

    3-2 .......................................45

    2-1 .......................................14

    2-2 .................................................22

    2-3 ...........................................25

    2-4 ...............................................29

    3-1 ............................................44

    3-2 ............................46

    3-3 .............................................46

    3-4 .................................47

    3-5 .................................................49

    4-1 .................................52

    4-2 .................................53

    4-3 .............................53

    4-4 .................................54

    4-5 ............................54

    4-6 t............................. 55 4-7 t.................... 55 4-8 t... .................56 4-9 t........................... 56 4-10 ....................................57

    4-11 ............................................58

    4-12 ............................................59

    4-13 ....................61

    4-14 ................62

    4-15 ......................63

    4-16

    .................................................. 64

    4-17 ............................65

    5-1 .....................................67

    IV

  • Scoot, 1988Wagner, Baldwin, Roland, 1991

    ASTD, American Society

    for Training and Development 1996

    1999

    McKenzie2000

    2004

    1

  • Andragogy

    2003marginal

    utility

    1999The

    Wisdom of Teams

    Belbi

    2001

    2

  • Donald L. Kirkpatrick

    reaction levellearning levelbehavior level

    result level

    3

  • 4

  • :

    AEE, 1995John Dewey

    learning by doing

    Direct Experience

    Dewey, 1938

    2004

    5

  • Kraft & Sakofs1985

    2004

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4. Reflection

    5.

    2004

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6

  • 84b

    Outward Bound1913

    Kurt Hahn

    AEE1977 John Dewey

    The National Outdoor Leadership School

    WEA

    Project Adventure

    John Dewey

    1938

    Experience and Education

    2004Experiential

    LearningAdventure Education 1970

    North Carolina

    7

  • experiential forms

    Outward Bound

    Project Adventure,

    P.A.

    peak experience P.A.

    Adventure Education

    John Dewey learning by doingKurt Lewin

    experiential learning cycle

    experiential learning cycle

    Gass, 1993

    Dewey, 1938

    Kolb1984experiential

    8

  • reflectinggeneralizingapplying

    Concrete experience

    Observation & reflection

    Forming abstract concepts

    Testing in new situations

    Transfer of Learning

    9

  • Bruner, 1960

    Gass, 1990

    specific transfer

    non-specific transfer

    metaphoric transfer

    similaranalogous

    metaphorical

    Gass1990

    10

  • /

    internalize

    significant others

    processing

    debriefingfacilitating

    follow-up

    11

  • Outward Bound Project Adventure

    Outward BoundBank1985

    risk-taking2001

    Adventure Educahonadventure

    2001

    1980

    Clements, Wagner & Roland, 1995

    1.

    2.

    3. 40

    12

  • Clements,

    Wagner & Roland, 1995

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4. 1960

    13

  • 2-1

    2-1

    14

  • 2-1

    15

  • 2-1

    16

  • 2-1

    17

  • V

    18

  • 2-1

    2002

    1970

    Clements, Wagner, & Roland,

    1995

    1.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    19

  • 2.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    1.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    2.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    /

    1.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    20

  • 2.

    1.

    2.

    Wendy Yeadon, 1994

    Wendy Yeadon, 1994

    Gall, 1987;

    Wagel, 1986

    21

  • 2-2

    Bank1985 AMIAmerican Medical International

    AMI

    Bank1985

    GECGeneral Electric Company

    WagnerWeigand

    1991

    St. Lukes hospital

    WagnerRoland

    1992

    1200

    2001

    22

    http://datas.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=64405&i=146768&t=290&o=i%B0%EA%A5%DF%A4%A4%A5%BF%A4j%BE%C7.sc#1http://datas.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=64405&i=146768&t=290&o=i%B0%EA%A5%DF%A4%A4%A5%BF%A4j%BE%C7.sc#1http://datas.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=64405&i=146768&t=290&o=i%B3%D2%A4u%AC%E3%A8s%A9%D2.dp#1
  • soft-skill

    23

  • Grove & Ostroff,

    1991 Goldstein, 1986; Hinrichs, 1976

    Laurie. Bassi and Daniel P. Mcmurrer

    1998 1996 ASTD 93%

    ROI

    ASTD

    1999

    Goldstein, 1986 2-3

    24

  • 2-3

    Hamblin 1974

    Snyder

    Raben& Farr

    1980

    1983

    Tracy 1983

    1983

    Clegg 1987

    1995

    1997

    25

  • 1994

    Easterby Smith1994

    -

    -

    -

    -

    26

  • 2-1 : D.A. Grove, & C. Ostroff, 1991. Program Evaluation . In K.N. Wexley Ed. Developing Human Resources PP. 5-158 to 5-220. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

    27

  • Kirkpatrick

    Techniques for Evaluation Training

    Programs

    Kirkpatrick :

    : Reaction level

    : Learning level

    : Behavior level

    : Result level

    28

  • 2-4

    Korb 1956

    1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

    Trskiel 1982

    1. 2. 3.

    1.

    Dopyera 1983

    1. 2.

    3.

    Phillips 1983

    1. 2.

    Gel Gaizo 1984

    1. ? 2. ? 3. ?4. :?

    : 1997,

    29

  • Noe & Schmitt1986

    2004

    1996

    Bruner

    Bruner

    2003

    2003

    1. Thorndike

    2. Pavlov and Watson

    3. Skinner

    4. Brunner

    5. Ausubel

    6. Rogers

    7. Maslow

    30

  • 2003

    31

  • McKenzie2000

    2004

    2004

    Priest Leadership Skills

    Priest 19901.

    Technical Activity Skills 2.Safety Skills 3.

    Organizational Skills 4.Environmental Skills

    5.Instructional Skills 6.Group Management

    Skills 7.Problem Solving and Decision-Making

    Skills

    2001 Balgopal & Vassil1983Trotzer

    1989Corey1990 Corey & Corey1992 Trotzer

    32

  • . 1.active listening

    2.restating

    3.

    4. 5.reflecting

    feelings 6.

    initiating 7.empathizing

    . 1.interpreting 2.supporting 3.

    emphasizing 4.facilitating 5.evaluating 6.

    giving feedback 7.protecting 8. 9.

    blocking 10.linking 11.limiting 12.

    13.timing

    C. 1. 2.confronting 3.goal

    setting 4. 5.self-disclosing 6.modeling

    7.probing 8.tone setting 9.cognitive

    restructuring 10.role-playing 11.sequencing

    12.partializing 13.universalizing

    2004

    Corey & Corey

    Corey & Corey1992

    personal characteristics20011.

    2. 3. 4. 5.

    33

  • 6. 7. 8. 9.

    10. 11. 12. 13.

    Priest Leadership Attributes

    Priest19901.

    Motivational Philosophy and Interest 2.

    Physical Fitness 3.Healthy Self-Concept and Ego

    4.Awareness and Empathy for Others 5.

    Personable Traits and Behavior 6.Flexible

    Leadership Style 7.Judgment Based on Experience

    34

  • marginal utility

    2004

    BrundageMackeracher1980

    BrundageMackeracher

    Knowles

    2004

    1

    35

  • 2

    3

    4

    5

    McKenzie2000

    group

    Walsh & Golins19767 - 1 5

    20041999The Wisdom of Teams

    Belbin

    2001

    cooperative learningBrandt, 1984

    Johnson & Johnson, 1984 ; Woolry etal, 1991

    Johnson & Johnson,

    1984 ; 1987

    Johnson & Johnson, 1994

    1996

    Johnson and Johnson1994

    36

  • :

    ,

    37

  • Latham1988

    Decker & Nathan1985

    Bandura 1986Self-Efficacy

    Bandura,

    1986

    Gist, Schwoerer, & Rosen 1989

    Tannenbaum & Mathieu 1991

    Ford1992

    38

  • 1995

    Mitchell, 1981Motivation

    1993

    Steer & Porter, 1975

    Training Motivation

    Vroom 1964 Expectancy Theory

    value

    :

    1.

    2.

    Raynor, 1970

    39

  • 3-1

    &

    3-1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    40

  • 12

    15

    Bandura, 1986

    1999 Sherer &

    Maddux 19821997

    10

    10

    2004

    41

  • 2004

    Priest1990

    Corey & Corey1992

    Rohnke & Butler1995

    hsb.baylor.edu 2001

    4

    15 30

    ,

    2003

    8

    4

    3

    42

  • 60

    IC

    Cluster Sampling

    50 50

    43

  • Team Building Workshop 16

    3-1

    3-1

    GPS

    44

  • 3-2

    3-2

    1989p.337

    45

  • 3-2

    1.

    20

    2.

    15

    1.

    12

    2.

    30

    3.

    15

    4.

    15

    3-3

    46

  • quasi-experiment

    3-4

    &

    59 59 59 57 57 57 74 69

    51 51 51 49 49 49 61 55

    8 4 8 6 6 6 12 7

    44 47 44 43 43 43 49 48

    75% 80% 75% 75% 75% 75% 66% 70%

    47

  • Validity Analysis

    content

    validity

    Reliability Analysis

    alpha if item deleted Cronbachs 0.70

    recode

    48

  • 3-5

    Cronbachs

    1 - 10 --- 0.80

    1 - 10 --- 0.84

    1-5 --- 0.96

    6-10 --- 0.92

    11-12 --- 0.87 91215 --- 0.79

    1-3 --- 0.78 101113 --- 0.84

    4-6 --- 0.85

    7814 7814 0.59

    91112 --- 0.74

    4-6 --- 0.87 13-15 --- 0.77

    7810 --- 0.90

    1-3 --- 0.76

    1 - 8 4 0.89

    Cronbachs 0.70

    Cronbachs 0.707814

    49

  • Chi-square test of homogeneity of proportions

    T Independent-sample t-test

    T paired-sample t-test

    Correlation analysis

    Pearson

    Multiple regression analysis

    Hierarchical analysis

    50

  • 51

  • test of homogeneity of proportions

    4-14-24-34-44-5

    4-1

    6 3 1 4

    6 - 12 5 6 11

    1 3 3 11 14

    3 5 14 17 31

    5 10 15 10 25

    10 3 3 6

    43 48 91

    2 6.70

    p 0.24

    ***p

  • 4-2

    5 6 11

    38 42 80

    43 48 91

    2 0.02

    p 0.90

    ***p

  • 4-4

    20-25 1 1 2

    26-30 12 14 26

    31-35 16 22 38

    36-40 14 10 24

    40 0 1 1

    43 48 91

    2 2.50

    p 0.65

    ***p

  • T T

    4-6 t

    T

    57.91 10.81

    66.98 10.01 4.04***

    12-tailed test 2***p

  • 4-8 T

    4-8 t

    T

    57.91 10.81

    58.13 10.65 0.10

    12-tailed test 2***p

  • Pearson

    two-tailed test

    0.90 0.70~0.90 0.50~0.70

    0.30~0.50 0.00~0.30

    4-10

    4-10

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    1. 1.00

    2. .04 1.00

    3.

    -.11 .64*** 1.00

    4.

    -.04 .51*** .66*** 1.00

    5. .26 -.31* -.16 -.12 1.00

    6. .09 .50** .37* .38* -.10 1.00

    7.

    -.08 .42* .37* .30 -.16 .53*** 1.00

    8. -.17 -.04 -.15 -.02 .16 .35* .25 1.00

    ***p

  • 4-10

    r=0.04 4

    4-1143

    1033

    1. 10100%

    2. 10100%

    3. 8

    80%

    4-11

    1 33 77 2 8 19 3 1 2 4 0 0

    N=43

    5 1 2 10 100

    N=10 0 0 10 100

    N=10 0 0 8 80

    N=10 2 20

    58

  • 4-10

    r=0.50, p

  • 6

    4-1243 79%

    598%

    2030

    61%72%

    70%51%

    60

  • 4-13

    B Beta T

    1.59 1.28

    0.12 0.12 0.54

    0.39 0.32 2.03*

    0.27 0.26 1.29

    -0.05 -0.07 -0.38

    N 43

    F 3.85**

    R2 0.29

    Adjusted R2 0.21 ***p

  • 4-14

    B Beta T

    1.23 1.06

    -0.21 -0.22 -0.83

    -0.13 -0.17 -0.90

    0.60 0.55 2.79**

    0.30 0.30 1.17

    0.22 0.18 1.15

    N 43

    F 4.74***

    R2 0.39

    Adjusted R2 0.31 ***p

  • 4-15

    B Beta T

    27.35 1.65

    5.01 .30 1.71

    1.24 .09 .53

    N 43

    F 2.89

    R2 0.13

    Adjusted R2 0.08

    ***p

  • 4-16

    B Beta T

    58.09 0.36

    2.36 0.14 0.10

    11.16 0.78 0.50

    -18.83 -1.41 -0.83

    -2.21 -1.16 -0.62

    3.35 1.89 0.92

    N 43

    F 1.58

    R2 0.07

    Adjusted R2 -0.07 ***p

  • hierarchical regression analysis

    4-17

    4-17

    .51*** .39* .40*

    .09 .09

    .13 .13

    .01

    R2 .26 .29 .29

    R2 .26 .03 .00

    F 14.59*** 5.22** 3.82*

    ***p

  • F

    66

  • Kirkpatrick

    5-1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    67

  • Kirkpatrick

    Alliger & Janak1989 Kirkpatrick

    meta-analysis

    Alliger & Janak

    1989 Kirkpatrick

    68

  • 579%203098%

    29%p

  • 5 20 30

    70

  • Kirkpatrick

    71

  • Kirkpatrick

    72

  • 1.1995

    2.2001

    3.1999

    4.200320033

    5.2003

    6.2001

    7.1999-

    8.2003

    9.1997

    10.1997-

    11.2001

    12.2004~

    http://www.cyc.org.tw/se/Documents/HTM/Experiential.htm

    73

  • 13.2004

    http://www.ccyl.org.cn/dcyjwz/files/06.htm

    14.1996

    15.2004

    16.1999

    17.2001

    18.2004 Experiential Learning

    http://www.cef.org.tw/magazine/fly/fly030304.html

    19.2004

    20.1989

    p.337

    21.1999

    22.1996

    23.2004

    24.1996

    25.1993

    26.2004

    http://www.colors.idv.tw/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?

    topic_id=26&forum=1 & post_id=35#forumpost35

    27.1994

    28.2002

    74

  • 29.1992

    114-120

    30.2003

    1. AEE, 1995. Association for Experiential Education.AEE definition of experiential

    education. The AEE Horizen. 151.21.

    2. Bandura, A., 1986. Social foundations of thought and Action: A Social Cognitive

    theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall. Building successful teams in the

    midst of transition.

    3. Bank, J. , 1985. Outdoor development for managers. Brookfield, VT: Gower.

    4. Bruner, J.S., 1960. The process of education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    MA.

    5. Brundage & Mackeracher, 1980. Adult learning principles and theirapplication

    to program planning. Ontario Ministry of Education.

    6. Clements, C., Wagner, R. J. Roland C.C., 1995. The Ins and Outs of

    Experimental Training. TrainingDevelopment, 492, 52-57.

    7. Corey, G.., 1990. Theory and Practice of Group Counseling. Pacific Grove,

    California : Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

    8. Corey, M. S., & Corey, G.., 1992. Groups-Process and Practice4th ed.. Pacific

    Grove, California : Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

    9. D.A.Grove,&C.Ostroff., 1991. Program Evaluation .In K.N. Wexley Ed.,

    Developing Human Resources :5-220 Washington,DC:Bureau of National Affairs.

    10. Decker, P.J.,& Nathan, B.R.,1985. Bahavior modeling training:Principles and

    applications, New York: Praeger.

    75

  • 11. Dewey, J., 1938. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

    12. Ford, J. K., Quinones, M. A., Sego, D.J., & Sorra, J. S., 1992. Factors Affecting

    the Opportunity to Perform Trained Tasks on the Job , Personnel Psychology,

    45, pp.511-527.

    13. Hinrichs JR., 1976. Personnel training. In Dunnette MD Ed., Handbook of

    Industrial/Organizational Psychology pp.829-860. New York: Rand

    McNally.

    14. Gall, A. L., 1987. You Can Take the Manager Out of the Woods, but---. Training

    Development, 413, 54-58.

    15. Gass, M. A., 1990.Transfer of Learning in Adventure Education. In Miles, J. &

    Priest, S. Eds..Adventure Education pp.199-207. State College, PA:

    Venture Publishing, Inc.

    16. Gass, M. A., 1993. Adventure Therapy: Therapeutic Applications of Adventure

    Programming. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    17. Gist, M.E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B., 1989. Effect of alternative training

    methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training ,

    Journal of Applied Psychology, 74:884-891.

    18. Goldstein, L. L., 1986. Training in Organization: Needs Assessment, Development,

    and Evaluation 2nded. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    19. Johnson.D.W. & Johnson,R.T., 1994;1987;1990. Circles of learning: cooperation

    in the classroom. Alexandria,VA: 1Association for supervision and

    curriculum development. 2Learning together and alone : Cooperative,

    competitive, and individualistic learning 4th ed..Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    20. Kirkpatrick, D.L., 1959-1960. Techniques for evaluating training programs.

    Journal of American Society of Training Directors.13:3-9,21-26;14,13-18,28-32.

    21. Kolb, D.A., 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning

    76

  • and development, Englewood Gliff, NJ.

    22. Kraft, R. J. & Sakofs, M., 1985. The theory of experiential education. Boulder,

    CO: Association for Experiential Education.

    23. Latham, G.P., 1988. Human resource training and development .In M. R.

    Rosenzweig & L.W.PortersEds., Annual review of Psychology, 60:550-555.

    24. Mark Easterby-smith, 1994. Evaluating Management Development, Training and

    Education by: January.

    25. Mitchell, F.G.., 1981. Developing an international marketing training approach.

    Training and Development Journal, 35:48-51.

    26. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N., 1986. The influence of trainees, attitudes on raining

    effectiveness: test of a model , Personnel Psychology, 39:497-523.

    27. PriestEds., Adventure Education. State College, PA : Venture Publishing, Inc.

    28. Raynor, J.O., 1970. Relationships brtween achievement-related motives, future

    orientation, and academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social

    Psychology, 15:28-33.

    29. Rohnke, K., & Butler, S., 1995. QuickSilver : Adventure games,initiative

    problems, trust activities and a guide to effective leadership. Dubuque, IA:

    Kendall/Hunt.

    30. Scoot, A., 1988. Outward Appearances. Accountancy, 1021140, 109-110.

    31. Steers, R.M., & Porter, L. M., 1975. Motivation and Work Behavior. New York

    McGraw-Hill.

    32. Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J., 1991.

    Meeting trainees expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the

    development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation , Journal of Applied

    Psychology, 76:759-769.

    33. Trotzer, J. P., 1989. The Counselor and the Group2nd ed.. Indiana : Indiana Co.

    77

  • Accelerated Development, Inc.

    34. Vroom, V.H., 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.Research,22May.

    35. Wagel, W. H., 1986. An Unorthodox Approach to Leadership Development.

    Personnel, 637, 4-6.

    36. Wagner, R. J., Baldwin, T. T., Roland, C. C., 1991. Outdoor Training:

    Revolution or Fad. TrainingDevelopment, 453, 50-56.

    37. Wagner, R. J., Roland, C. C., 1992. How Effective Is Outdoor Training.

    TrainingDevelopment, 467, 61-64.

    38. Woolry, S.F. ,et .al., 1991. The BSCS Elementary Science Program :A Cooperative

    Approach .Cooperative Learning ,113,32-33

    39. Yeadon, Wendy, 1994. Management Development Review. Bradford: Why use

    the outdoors:7, Iss. 3: 3-27

    78

  • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

    1. .

    2.

    3. .

    4. .

    5.

    6.

    7.

    79

  • 8.

    9.

    10.

    1. 6 7-12 1-3 4-6 7-9 10 2. 3. 4. 20-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 40 5. / / /

    80

  • ___1.

    1Forming 2Storming 3Naming

    4growing 5Performing

    ___2.

    (1) 2

    (3) 4 5

    ___3. Belbin1991

    1 2 3 4 5

    ___4.

    (1) 2 3 4

    5

    ___5. Robert B. Maddux1993

    (1)2 3 4 5

    O X

    ___ 1.

    ___ 2.

    ___ 3. -

    ___ 4.

    ___ 5.

    ___ 6. -

    ___ 7.

    ___ 8.

    ___ 9.

    ___ 10.

    81

  • 1.

    2. 3. 4. 5.

    6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

    11.

    12..

    82

  • 1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    10.

    11.

    12.

    13.

    14.

    15.

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    10.

    11.

    12.

    13.

    14.

    15.

    83

  • 1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    1

    1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

    2

    3

    4

    1 _____ _____

    2 _____ _____

    3

    84

  • X O2 XO2

    O1 X O2 O1XO2

    O1 X O2

    O1 O2 O1XO2

    85

  • O1O2O3O4 X O5O6O7O8

    O1-4XO5-8

    O1 X O2

    O1 O2

    X O2

    O2 O1XO2

    pretest sensitization

    Wexley & Latham1991

    86

    NNNN