人力資源管理研究所 碩士論文 -...
TRANSCRIPT
-
(93 5 )
/()
( V ) ()
( ) ()
( ) ()
( )
:
:
90427025
94 6 10
1.
2.
3.
-
86
100 (50)(50 )TT
1 2 3 4 5 6
7
()
() Kirkpatrick
I
-
C.P. DianaS.H.
-
-
II
-
.....................................................1
................................................1
..........................................3
................................................5
..............................................5
...........................................24
...........................................28
...............................30
.................................32
.....................35
...............................38
...............................................40
.........................................40
.....................................41
.......43
.....................................47
.........................................48
...........................................50
.....................................52
.........................................52
T T .........................55
...............................................57
...........................................61
...........................................65
.............................................67
...............................................67
...............................................68
...............................................71
...........................................72
...................................................... 73
...................................................... 79
III
-
2-1 .......................................... 27
3-1 .....................................................40
3-2 .......................................45
2-1 .......................................14
2-2 .................................................22
2-3 ...........................................25
2-4 ...............................................29
3-1 ............................................44
3-2 ............................46
3-3 .............................................46
3-4 .................................47
3-5 .................................................49
4-1 .................................52
4-2 .................................53
4-3 .............................53
4-4 .................................54
4-5 ............................54
4-6 t............................. 55 4-7 t.................... 55 4-8 t... .................56 4-9 t........................... 56 4-10 ....................................57
4-11 ............................................58
4-12 ............................................59
4-13 ....................61
4-14 ................62
4-15 ......................63
4-16
.................................................. 64
4-17 ............................65
5-1 .....................................67
IV
-
Scoot, 1988Wagner, Baldwin, Roland, 1991
ASTD, American Society
for Training and Development 1996
1999
McKenzie2000
2004
1
-
Andragogy
2003marginal
utility
1999The
Wisdom of Teams
Belbi
2001
2
-
Donald L. Kirkpatrick
reaction levellearning levelbehavior level
result level
3
-
4
-
:
AEE, 1995John Dewey
learning by doing
Direct Experience
Dewey, 1938
2004
5
-
Kraft & Sakofs1985
2004
1.
2.
3.
4. Reflection
5.
2004
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
-
84b
Outward Bound1913
Kurt Hahn
AEE1977 John Dewey
The National Outdoor Leadership School
WEA
Project Adventure
John Dewey
1938
Experience and Education
2004Experiential
LearningAdventure Education 1970
North Carolina
7
-
experiential forms
Outward Bound
Project Adventure,
P.A.
peak experience P.A.
Adventure Education
John Dewey learning by doingKurt Lewin
experiential learning cycle
experiential learning cycle
Gass, 1993
Dewey, 1938
Kolb1984experiential
8
-
reflectinggeneralizingapplying
Concrete experience
Observation & reflection
Forming abstract concepts
Testing in new situations
Transfer of Learning
9
-
Bruner, 1960
Gass, 1990
specific transfer
non-specific transfer
metaphoric transfer
similaranalogous
metaphorical
Gass1990
10
-
/
internalize
significant others
processing
debriefingfacilitating
follow-up
11
-
Outward Bound Project Adventure
Outward BoundBank1985
risk-taking2001
Adventure Educahonadventure
2001
1980
Clements, Wagner & Roland, 1995
1.
2.
3. 40
12
-
Clements,
Wagner & Roland, 1995
1.
2.
3.
4. 1960
13
-
2-1
2-1
14
-
2-1
15
-
2-1
16
-
2-1
17
-
V
18
-
2-1
2002
1970
Clements, Wagner, & Roland,
1995
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
19
-
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
/
1.
1.
2.
3.
20
-
2.
1.
2.
Wendy Yeadon, 1994
Wendy Yeadon, 1994
Gall, 1987;
Wagel, 1986
21
-
2-2
Bank1985 AMIAmerican Medical International
AMI
Bank1985
GECGeneral Electric Company
WagnerWeigand
1991
St. Lukes hospital
WagnerRoland
1992
1200
2001
22
http://datas.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=64405&i=146768&t=290&o=i%B0%EA%A5%DF%A4%A4%A5%BF%A4j%BE%C7.sc#1http://datas.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=64405&i=146768&t=290&o=i%B0%EA%A5%DF%A4%A4%A5%BF%A4j%BE%C7.sc#1http://datas.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=64405&i=146768&t=290&o=i%B3%D2%A4u%AC%E3%A8s%A9%D2.dp#1 -
soft-skill
23
-
Grove & Ostroff,
1991 Goldstein, 1986; Hinrichs, 1976
Laurie. Bassi and Daniel P. Mcmurrer
1998 1996 ASTD 93%
ROI
ASTD
1999
Goldstein, 1986 2-3
24
-
2-3
Hamblin 1974
Snyder
Raben& Farr
1980
1983
Tracy 1983
1983
Clegg 1987
1995
1997
25
-
1994
Easterby Smith1994
-
-
-
-
26
-
2-1 : D.A. Grove, & C. Ostroff, 1991. Program Evaluation . In K.N. Wexley Ed. Developing Human Resources PP. 5-158 to 5-220. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
27
-
Kirkpatrick
Techniques for Evaluation Training
Programs
Kirkpatrick :
: Reaction level
: Learning level
: Behavior level
: Result level
28
-
2-4
Korb 1956
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Trskiel 1982
1. 2. 3.
1.
Dopyera 1983
1. 2.
3.
Phillips 1983
1. 2.
Gel Gaizo 1984
1. ? 2. ? 3. ?4. :?
: 1997,
29
-
Noe & Schmitt1986
2004
1996
Bruner
Bruner
2003
2003
1. Thorndike
2. Pavlov and Watson
3. Skinner
4. Brunner
5. Ausubel
6. Rogers
7. Maslow
30
-
2003
31
-
McKenzie2000
2004
2004
Priest Leadership Skills
Priest 19901.
Technical Activity Skills 2.Safety Skills 3.
Organizational Skills 4.Environmental Skills
5.Instructional Skills 6.Group Management
Skills 7.Problem Solving and Decision-Making
Skills
2001 Balgopal & Vassil1983Trotzer
1989Corey1990 Corey & Corey1992 Trotzer
32
-
. 1.active listening
2.restating
3.
4. 5.reflecting
feelings 6.
initiating 7.empathizing
. 1.interpreting 2.supporting 3.
emphasizing 4.facilitating 5.evaluating 6.
giving feedback 7.protecting 8. 9.
blocking 10.linking 11.limiting 12.
13.timing
C. 1. 2.confronting 3.goal
setting 4. 5.self-disclosing 6.modeling
7.probing 8.tone setting 9.cognitive
restructuring 10.role-playing 11.sequencing
12.partializing 13.universalizing
2004
Corey & Corey
Corey & Corey1992
personal characteristics20011.
2. 3. 4. 5.
33
-
6. 7. 8. 9.
10. 11. 12. 13.
Priest Leadership Attributes
Priest19901.
Motivational Philosophy and Interest 2.
Physical Fitness 3.Healthy Self-Concept and Ego
4.Awareness and Empathy for Others 5.
Personable Traits and Behavior 6.Flexible
Leadership Style 7.Judgment Based on Experience
34
-
marginal utility
2004
BrundageMackeracher1980
BrundageMackeracher
Knowles
2004
1
35
-
2
3
4
5
McKenzie2000
group
Walsh & Golins19767 - 1 5
20041999The Wisdom of Teams
Belbin
2001
cooperative learningBrandt, 1984
Johnson & Johnson, 1984 ; Woolry etal, 1991
Johnson & Johnson,
1984 ; 1987
Johnson & Johnson, 1994
1996
Johnson and Johnson1994
36
-
:
,
37
-
Latham1988
Decker & Nathan1985
Bandura 1986Self-Efficacy
Bandura,
1986
Gist, Schwoerer, & Rosen 1989
Tannenbaum & Mathieu 1991
Ford1992
38
-
1995
Mitchell, 1981Motivation
1993
Steer & Porter, 1975
Training Motivation
Vroom 1964 Expectancy Theory
value
:
1.
2.
Raynor, 1970
39
-
3-1
&
3-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40
-
12
15
Bandura, 1986
1999 Sherer &
Maddux 19821997
10
10
2004
41
-
2004
Priest1990
Corey & Corey1992
Rohnke & Butler1995
hsb.baylor.edu 2001
4
15 30
,
2003
8
4
3
42
-
60
IC
Cluster Sampling
50 50
43
-
Team Building Workshop 16
3-1
3-1
GPS
44
-
3-2
3-2
1989p.337
45
-
3-2
1.
20
2.
15
1.
12
2.
30
3.
15
4.
15
3-3
46
-
quasi-experiment
3-4
&
59 59 59 57 57 57 74 69
51 51 51 49 49 49 61 55
8 4 8 6 6 6 12 7
44 47 44 43 43 43 49 48
75% 80% 75% 75% 75% 75% 66% 70%
47
-
Validity Analysis
content
validity
Reliability Analysis
alpha if item deleted Cronbachs 0.70
recode
48
-
3-5
Cronbachs
1 - 10 --- 0.80
1 - 10 --- 0.84
1-5 --- 0.96
6-10 --- 0.92
11-12 --- 0.87 91215 --- 0.79
1-3 --- 0.78 101113 --- 0.84
4-6 --- 0.85
7814 7814 0.59
91112 --- 0.74
4-6 --- 0.87 13-15 --- 0.77
7810 --- 0.90
1-3 --- 0.76
1 - 8 4 0.89
Cronbachs 0.70
Cronbachs 0.707814
49
-
Chi-square test of homogeneity of proportions
T Independent-sample t-test
T paired-sample t-test
Correlation analysis
Pearson
Multiple regression analysis
Hierarchical analysis
50
-
51
-
test of homogeneity of proportions
4-14-24-34-44-5
4-1
6 3 1 4
6 - 12 5 6 11
1 3 3 11 14
3 5 14 17 31
5 10 15 10 25
10 3 3 6
43 48 91
2 6.70
p 0.24
***p
-
4-2
5 6 11
38 42 80
43 48 91
2 0.02
p 0.90
***p
-
4-4
20-25 1 1 2
26-30 12 14 26
31-35 16 22 38
36-40 14 10 24
40 0 1 1
43 48 91
2 2.50
p 0.65
***p
-
T T
4-6 t
T
57.91 10.81
66.98 10.01 4.04***
12-tailed test 2***p
-
4-8 T
4-8 t
T
57.91 10.81
58.13 10.65 0.10
12-tailed test 2***p
-
Pearson
two-tailed test
0.90 0.70~0.90 0.50~0.70
0.30~0.50 0.00~0.30
4-10
4-10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. 1.00
2. .04 1.00
3.
-.11 .64*** 1.00
4.
-.04 .51*** .66*** 1.00
5. .26 -.31* -.16 -.12 1.00
6. .09 .50** .37* .38* -.10 1.00
7.
-.08 .42* .37* .30 -.16 .53*** 1.00
8. -.17 -.04 -.15 -.02 .16 .35* .25 1.00
***p
-
4-10
r=0.04 4
4-1143
1033
1. 10100%
2. 10100%
3. 8
80%
4-11
1 33 77 2 8 19 3 1 2 4 0 0
N=43
5 1 2 10 100
N=10 0 0 10 100
N=10 0 0 8 80
N=10 2 20
58
-
4-10
r=0.50, p
-
6
4-1243 79%
598%
2030
61%72%
70%51%
60
-
4-13
B Beta T
1.59 1.28
0.12 0.12 0.54
0.39 0.32 2.03*
0.27 0.26 1.29
-0.05 -0.07 -0.38
N 43
F 3.85**
R2 0.29
Adjusted R2 0.21 ***p
-
4-14
B Beta T
1.23 1.06
-0.21 -0.22 -0.83
-0.13 -0.17 -0.90
0.60 0.55 2.79**
0.30 0.30 1.17
0.22 0.18 1.15
N 43
F 4.74***
R2 0.39
Adjusted R2 0.31 ***p
-
4-15
B Beta T
27.35 1.65
5.01 .30 1.71
1.24 .09 .53
N 43
F 2.89
R2 0.13
Adjusted R2 0.08
***p
-
4-16
B Beta T
58.09 0.36
2.36 0.14 0.10
11.16 0.78 0.50
-18.83 -1.41 -0.83
-2.21 -1.16 -0.62
3.35 1.89 0.92
N 43
F 1.58
R2 0.07
Adjusted R2 -0.07 ***p
-
hierarchical regression analysis
4-17
4-17
.51*** .39* .40*
.09 .09
.13 .13
.01
R2 .26 .29 .29
R2 .26 .03 .00
F 14.59*** 5.22** 3.82*
***p
-
F
66
-
Kirkpatrick
5-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
67
-
Kirkpatrick
Alliger & Janak1989 Kirkpatrick
meta-analysis
Alliger & Janak
1989 Kirkpatrick
68
-
579%203098%
29%p
-
5 20 30
70
-
Kirkpatrick
71
-
Kirkpatrick
72
-
1.1995
2.2001
3.1999
4.200320033
5.2003
6.2001
7.1999-
8.2003
9.1997
10.1997-
11.2001
12.2004~
http://www.cyc.org.tw/se/Documents/HTM/Experiential.htm
73
-
13.2004
http://www.ccyl.org.cn/dcyjwz/files/06.htm
14.1996
15.2004
16.1999
17.2001
18.2004 Experiential Learning
http://www.cef.org.tw/magazine/fly/fly030304.html
19.2004
20.1989
p.337
21.1999
22.1996
23.2004
24.1996
25.1993
26.2004
http://www.colors.idv.tw/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?
topic_id=26&forum=1 & post_id=35#forumpost35
27.1994
28.2002
74
-
29.1992
114-120
30.2003
1. AEE, 1995. Association for Experiential Education.AEE definition of experiential
education. The AEE Horizen. 151.21.
2. Bandura, A., 1986. Social foundations of thought and Action: A Social Cognitive
theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall. Building successful teams in the
midst of transition.
3. Bank, J. , 1985. Outdoor development for managers. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
4. Bruner, J.S., 1960. The process of education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
MA.
5. Brundage & Mackeracher, 1980. Adult learning principles and theirapplication
to program planning. Ontario Ministry of Education.
6. Clements, C., Wagner, R. J. Roland C.C., 1995. The Ins and Outs of
Experimental Training. TrainingDevelopment, 492, 52-57.
7. Corey, G.., 1990. Theory and Practice of Group Counseling. Pacific Grove,
California : Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
8. Corey, M. S., & Corey, G.., 1992. Groups-Process and Practice4th ed.. Pacific
Grove, California : Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
9. D.A.Grove,&C.Ostroff., 1991. Program Evaluation .In K.N. Wexley Ed.,
Developing Human Resources :5-220 Washington,DC:Bureau of National Affairs.
10. Decker, P.J.,& Nathan, B.R.,1985. Bahavior modeling training:Principles and
applications, New York: Praeger.
75
-
11. Dewey, J., 1938. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
12. Ford, J. K., Quinones, M. A., Sego, D.J., & Sorra, J. S., 1992. Factors Affecting
the Opportunity to Perform Trained Tasks on the Job , Personnel Psychology,
45, pp.511-527.
13. Hinrichs JR., 1976. Personnel training. In Dunnette MD Ed., Handbook of
Industrial/Organizational Psychology pp.829-860. New York: Rand
McNally.
14. Gall, A. L., 1987. You Can Take the Manager Out of the Woods, but---. Training
Development, 413, 54-58.
15. Gass, M. A., 1990.Transfer of Learning in Adventure Education. In Miles, J. &
Priest, S. Eds..Adventure Education pp.199-207. State College, PA:
Venture Publishing, Inc.
16. Gass, M. A., 1993. Adventure Therapy: Therapeutic Applications of Adventure
Programming. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
17. Gist, M.E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B., 1989. Effect of alternative training
methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training ,
Journal of Applied Psychology, 74:884-891.
18. Goldstein, L. L., 1986. Training in Organization: Needs Assessment, Development,
and Evaluation 2nded. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19. Johnson.D.W. & Johnson,R.T., 1994;1987;1990. Circles of learning: cooperation
in the classroom. Alexandria,VA: 1Association for supervision and
curriculum development. 2Learning together and alone : Cooperative,
competitive, and individualistic learning 4th ed..Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Kirkpatrick, D.L., 1959-1960. Techniques for evaluating training programs.
Journal of American Society of Training Directors.13:3-9,21-26;14,13-18,28-32.
21. Kolb, D.A., 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning
76
-
and development, Englewood Gliff, NJ.
22. Kraft, R. J. & Sakofs, M., 1985. The theory of experiential education. Boulder,
CO: Association for Experiential Education.
23. Latham, G.P., 1988. Human resource training and development .In M. R.
Rosenzweig & L.W.PortersEds., Annual review of Psychology, 60:550-555.
24. Mark Easterby-smith, 1994. Evaluating Management Development, Training and
Education by: January.
25. Mitchell, F.G.., 1981. Developing an international marketing training approach.
Training and Development Journal, 35:48-51.
26. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N., 1986. The influence of trainees, attitudes on raining
effectiveness: test of a model , Personnel Psychology, 39:497-523.
27. PriestEds., Adventure Education. State College, PA : Venture Publishing, Inc.
28. Raynor, J.O., 1970. Relationships brtween achievement-related motives, future
orientation, and academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 15:28-33.
29. Rohnke, K., & Butler, S., 1995. QuickSilver : Adventure games,initiative
problems, trust activities and a guide to effective leadership. Dubuque, IA:
Kendall/Hunt.
30. Scoot, A., 1988. Outward Appearances. Accountancy, 1021140, 109-110.
31. Steers, R.M., & Porter, L. M., 1975. Motivation and Work Behavior. New York
McGraw-Hill.
32. Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J., 1991.
Meeting trainees expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the
development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation , Journal of Applied
Psychology, 76:759-769.
33. Trotzer, J. P., 1989. The Counselor and the Group2nd ed.. Indiana : Indiana Co.
77
-
Accelerated Development, Inc.
34. Vroom, V.H., 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.Research,22May.
35. Wagel, W. H., 1986. An Unorthodox Approach to Leadership Development.
Personnel, 637, 4-6.
36. Wagner, R. J., Baldwin, T. T., Roland, C. C., 1991. Outdoor Training:
Revolution or Fad. TrainingDevelopment, 453, 50-56.
37. Wagner, R. J., Roland, C. C., 1992. How Effective Is Outdoor Training.
TrainingDevelopment, 467, 61-64.
38. Woolry, S.F. ,et .al., 1991. The BSCS Elementary Science Program :A Cooperative
Approach .Cooperative Learning ,113,32-33
39. Yeadon, Wendy, 1994. Management Development Review. Bradford: Why use
the outdoors:7, Iss. 3: 3-27
78
-
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
1. .
2.
3. .
4. .
5.
6.
7.
79
-
8.
9.
10.
1. 6 7-12 1-3 4-6 7-9 10 2. 3. 4. 20-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 40 5. / / /
80
-
___1.
1Forming 2Storming 3Naming
4growing 5Performing
___2.
(1) 2
(3) 4 5
___3. Belbin1991
1 2 3 4 5
___4.
(1) 2 3 4
5
___5. Robert B. Maddux1993
(1)2 3 4 5
O X
___ 1.
___ 2.
___ 3. -
___ 4.
___ 5.
___ 6. -
___ 7.
___ 8.
___ 9.
___ 10.
81
-
1.
2. 3. 4. 5.
6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
11.
12..
82
-
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
83
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
2
3
4
1 _____ _____
2 _____ _____
3
84
-
X O2 XO2
O1 X O2 O1XO2
O1 X O2
O1 O2 O1XO2
85
-
O1O2O3O4 X O5O6O7O8
O1-4XO5-8
O1 X O2
O1 O2
X O2
O2 O1XO2
pretest sensitization
Wexley & Latham1991
86
NNNN