107 40 2 25-56

- 25 -

1.

2.

/

may6371500@nhu.edu.tw

- 26 -

(Barnard & McHeganey, 2004; Dawe, Harnett, & Frye, 2008; Forrester, Holland, Williams, & Copello, 2016)Kelley (2010)

44-85%

37-57%

Hanson (2006)

2017103-105

6 2015

20-50

2013

34

21.6%

2008

2016201320092008

(individuation)

Mahler

(Mahler, Pine, & Bergman, 2008)Josselson(1980)

Mahler

Bowen(1978)

Grotevant Cooper(1986)

(individuality) (connectedness)

- 27 -

(self)1990 Colarusso(2000)

19851986 Grotevant Cooper 2008

2005 Grotevant Cooper

Grotevant Cooper(1986)

(Forrester, Holland, Williams, & Copello, 2016; Forrester & Harwin, 2006; Marsh, Smith, & Bruni, 2011; Walsh, MacMillan, & Jamieson, 2003)

20132014201320082010

2013

(Gurguis, Gurguis, Just, & Paskos, 2011)

2009

20

- 28 -

2017

2009-2016

2009-2012 1672 2977 2008

2013

2013

- 29 -

DSM-5

2011DSM-5

12

(American Psychiatric Association, 2013, 2014)

DSM-5

200920

Grotevant

Cooper(1986)

(Gergen & Gergen, 1988)

- 30 -

1

1. A

26

A ~A

A A

~

40 A

3

3 12

1. 2.

1.

/

2.

- 31 -

3.

4.

(semi-structured interview)

1.(1)

(2)

(3)

2.

1. (1)

- 32 -

(2) (3)

(4)

2.

(1)

(2) A .9

.95

1.

2.

1.

(1)

A A

.. ..(A0101)A (2)

(A0274) A .. ..

(A0569)A

A

,

2-32

- 33 -

A

..(A0950-54)A (3)

A

A A .... .. .. .. (A0520-525)

. .(A0758-61)A (4)

..

(A0224) (5)

A A

.. ..

(A0496-497) ..

(A0501) .. .. .. .. ...

(A0646) 2. (1)

.. .. ..(A0699)A .. .. 2-9....(A1148) (2)

A

(A0718) A A .. .. ....(A0741) .. ..(A0742) A

.. .. .. 2-10A (3)

- 34 -

A

A

.. ..(A0152-54)

2

1.

(1)

2.

/ /

- 35 -

a.

a1.

a1-1.A

..

(A1136-37)A

a1-2.A A

(A0727)

a1-3.A AA

.. ..A:!)(A0511)A

b.

b1.A

? .. .. .. .. ..

2-28A A

b2.A

..(A1144) (2)

a.

/

a1.

a1-1. A

.. .. .. 2-25

a1-2.A A A

?..

2-24 a2.A

......

(A0742) A

a3.A

- 36 -

)..

....

(A1089)A a4. /

A )

..)

2-7 a5. /

A A /....

.. A )..

(A0740)A

a6. A A

..

2-14A

b.A A ..

)

2-12A 2.

(1)

a.

a1.A A

A ..

(A1083) A A

AA A A A A A

a2.A

A A

(A1083)A A

b.

A

A

- 37 -

..

2-39A ..(

2-39 A

A (2)

a.

a1.

A

(A0793)A

a2. A

(A0699)

2-6A

3 1. (1)

a.

a1. a1-1.

A A AA

A ..

(A1175)

a1-2.

a1-2-1.A A (A0477) ..(A0483)

a1-2-2.A

..

.. (A1201-05)

- 38 -

3.

/

a2.

A

A

A

?(A1055) A

b. A

A

A

....

....(A1106)A

A A A A A (A1057)A ..

- 39 -

..

..(A1060-62)A

A A

A ..

A A 2-16A A

A A

(A0647) A A

(2)

a.

/

a1.

a1-1.

A ....

..

...

(A100798-801)A A

A A A A A

A A

..

)..

(A206-207) a1-2.

A ..

..

.. (A100905-09)A

a2. .. ..

(A0478)A A

a3.A A A A A

?.. ..

.. (A1050-51)

- 40 -

a4.

A A

..

2-32A

a5. A .. ..

(A00603-11)A

b. A

..

..

(A0918-20) 2.

(1)

a1.

AA

(A0951)

A A

a2.A A

..

..

(A0680)A

a3.A A

A

(A1039) A

A

3 A

A A A A

- 41 -

A A

..

..

(A1293)A A (2)

a1.

A

(A0793)A

a2.A .. ..(A0573-75)A A

Bowen

Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2012, 2013

2008

2010

A

- 42 -

2008

A

A

A A A

201320132010

(Barnard & McHeganey, 2004; Dawe et al., 2008; Forrester et al., 2016; Kelley et al, 2010)

A

1.

A A

2014200820132013Lopez, Katsulis, & Robillard, 2009; Schroeder, Kelley, & Fals-Stewart, 2006; Rahgozar, 2012; Taylor, Coall, Marquis, & Batten, 20162005

1997

A

A A

- 43 -

2013

McGoldrick Carter

Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2012, 2013

2008

A

A A

2.

A

Rahgozar(2012)

201020132008Lewis et al., 2015

A A A

2010AkinBrook Lloyd(2015)Akin

A A

A A A A Jurkovic

- 44 -

2010

201420102006

2013

A

A

2013

3.

A A A A A A A A A A

Bowen(1978)

/2009

- 45 -

/1.

2.A

3.

1

2008

23

A A A ALeahy Shirk

20082017

2007

2006

- 46 -

2009

A

A A A A A A

A A

A A

--

2005

A

A

A AA A

A

2008 A

- 47 -

2008 A A A

2005

2009

20092005

2006

2006

2007

2002

2010/

/

4.

A A A

A A

A A A A

- 48 -

20062001

A

BursteinStangerKamon Dumenci(2006)

(Famularo, Kjnscherff, & Fenton, 1992; Rahgozar, 2012)

A A

2010

Foroughe Muller(2014)

Colarusso(2000)

- 49 -

2005

2012

Schroeder (2006)

1.

2.

- 50 -

107.01.23 107.04.16

20172018 3 18 https://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/ctItem=78260&ctNode=12873&mp=3

2010

2014DSM-V

American Psychiatric Association. (2013) DSM-V(1st ed.).

2007

2017

2008

11 189-209

2009

427357-361

2010

27115-160

2013

Goldenberg, H. & Goldenberg, I.(2012). Family Therapy: An Over-view(7th ed.).

- 51 -

2013

11145-188 2015

2018 3 18 https://antidrug.moj.gov.tw/dl-2298-15d467ac-5dd1-43da-8329-f37cfe4a8e71.html

2006103339-342

2010432113-116

20073166-168

2011DSM-5 Part II DSM-5 (substance and addictive dis-orders)

www.sop.org.tw/Dsm5/Folder/2011_04/20111203.pdf

2006:

2012

2013

2009

--

513295-317 2014

204 5-16 2014

2009

56471-76

2009

2013

451 103-120 doi:10.6251/BEP. 20130121

2010

3359-106 2016

4833-51

- 52 -

2001

153-62 2008

2009

32101-148 2006

25141-195 2008

1997

83169-225

2006

2005

18455-92 2008

2002

20172018 3 18 https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/ DOPS/lp-1303-105-xCat-cat04.html

2013

2014

112141-184 2010

Akin, B. A., Brook, J., & Lloyd, M. H. (2015). Co-Occurrence of parental substance abuse and child serious emotional disturbance: understand-ing multiple pathways to improve child and family outcomes. Child Welfare, 94(4), 71-96.

Bowen (1978). Family Therapy in Clini-cal Practice, NY and London, Jason Aronson.

Barnard, M., & McHeganey, N. (2004). The impact of parental problem drug use on children: what is the problem and what can be done to help? Ad-diction, 99, 552-559.

- 53 -

Burstein, M., Stanger, C., Kamon, J., & Dumenci, L. (2006). Parent psycho-pathology, parenting, and child in-ternalizing problems in sub-stance-abusing families. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(2), 97106.

Colarusso, C. A. (2000) .Separation-individuation phenome-na in adulthood: general concepts and the fifth individuation. J Am Psychoanalytic Association, 48(4), 1467-89.

Dawe, S., Harnett, P., & Frye, S. (2008). Improving outcomes for children living in families with parental sub-stance misuse: What do we know and what should we do? Australian Institute of Family Studies, 29, 1-14.

Famularo, R., Kjnscherff, R., & Fenton, T. (1992). Parental substance abuse and the nature of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 475-483.

Foroughe, M. F., & Muller, R. T. (2014).Attachment-based interven-tion strategies in family therapy with survivors of intra-familial trauma: a case study. Journal of Family Vio-lence, 29, 539548.

Forrester, D., & Harwin, J. (2006). Pa-rental substance misuse and child care social work: findings from the first stage of a study of 100 families. Child & Family Social Work, 11(4), 325-335.

Forrester, D., Holland, S., Williams, A., & Copello, A. (2016). Helping fami-lies where parents misuse drugs or alcohol?A mixed methods compara-tive evaluation of an intensive fam-ily preservation service. Child and Family Social Work, 21(1), 65-75.

Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1988). Narrative and the self as relation-ship. Advances in experimental so-cial psychology, 21, 17-53.

Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1986). Individuation in family rela-tionships. Human Development, 29(1), 82-100.

Gurguis, K., Gurguis, G., Just, H.D., & Paskos, D. K. (2011). The relation-ship between childhood abuse and mood disorders: The effect of gen-der, family psychiatric history and substance abuse. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(12), 253-263.

Hanson, R. F., Self-Brown, S., Frick-er-Elhai, A., Kilpatrick, D. G., Saunders, B. E., & Resnick, H. (2006). Relations among parental substance use, violence exposure and mental health: the national sur-vey of adolescents. Addict Behav, 31(11), 1988-2001.

Josselson, R. (1980). Ego development in adolescence. In J. Adelson(Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 188209). New York: Wiley.

- 54 -

Kelley, M. L., Klostermann, K., Doane, A. N., Mignone, T., Lam ,W. K.K., Fals-Stewart, W., & Padilla, M. A.(2010). The Case for examining and treating the combined effects of parental drug use and interparental violence on children in their homes. Aggress Violent Behavior, 15(1), 7682.

Lewis, A. J., Holemes, N. M.,Watkins, B., & Mathers, D. (2015). Children I mpacted by Parental substance abuse : an evaluation of supporting kids and their environment program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(8), 23982406.

Lopez, V., Katsulis, Y., & Robillard, A. (2009). Drug use with parents as a relational strategy for incarcerated female adolescents. Family Rela-tions, 58(2), 135-147.

Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (2008). The psychological birth of the human infant: Symbiosis and in-dividuation. Basic Books.

Marsh, J. C., Smith, B. D., & Bruni, M. (2011). Integrated substance abuse and child welfare services for women: A progress review. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(3), 466-472.

Rahgozar, H. (2012). The impact of fa-ther's addiction on his supportive and economic role in the family and social relations and socialization of the family members: the case of Shiraz, Iran. Asian Social Science, 8(2), 27-33.

Schroeder, V., Kelley, M. L., & Fals-Stewart, W. (2006). Effects of parental substance abuse on youth in their homes. The Prevention Re-searcher, 13(4), 10-13

Taylor, M., Coall, D., Marquis, R., & Batten, R. (2016). Drug addiction is a scourge on the earth and my grandchildren are its victims: the tough love and resilient growth ex-hibited by grandparents raising the children of drug-dependent mothers. International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, 14(6), 937-951.

Walsh, C., MacMillan, H.L., Jamieson, E. (2003). The relationship between parental substance abuse and child maltreatment: findings from the Ontario Health Supplement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(12), 1409-1425.

- 55 -

The Influence of Parental Drug Addiction and Child Abuse

on the Individuation of OffspringA Case Study of a

Woman of Early Adulthood

Cheng Ching Mei

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand how the individuation of a female is affected by drug-addicted parents and child abuse. Narrative interview approach is used in this study. The findings are as follows: 1.There are two development routes of child abuse:

i.Imbalance of authority and responsibility in the marital relationship derived from the offspring witnessing marital violence, drug-addicted fathers absent from the duty of parenting, and offspring becoming emotional spouse for their parents. In addition, the offspring became scapegoats of child abuse after refusing mothers invitation to an alliance. Worse yet, the offspring witnessed the grandparents abused when grandparent attempted to stop mothers abused child.

ii.Parental drug abuse directly led to different kinds of child abuses which include child care negligence and child abuse taken place in period of drug use relapse. Also, offspring got abused after suspecting parents using drug again. The structure of child abuse is deeply rooted in Chinese culture filial piety.

2.Parental drug addiction is in conflict with internalization schema of a normal parent of offspring. The sense of helpless, abnormality and shame of offspring have a negative impact on the individuation process.

3.For the victims of child abuse, their first reaction to child abuse was being afraid and to shun the perpetrators. Afterward, hatred, anger, and resistance started to grow over time. As a result of filial piety, the offspring, during the process, felt stuck and experienced the emotional vicissitude. As the process of individuation never stops, the offspring had built up more resilience when they reached to the early stage of adulthood. The offspring will continue to cope with the contradiction and conflict with her parents.

- 56 -

According to the findings, suggestions are made to serve as future researches regarding drug addiction family, the child abuse practice, and the training of practi-tioners.

Keywords: parental drug addiction, child abuse, individuation Cheng Ching Mei Department of Life and Death, Nanhua University Full-time Assistant Professor

(may6371500@nhu.edu.tw)

02-()