facilities planning for new hospital construction – the technology perspective ceso conference,...
TRANSCRIPT
Facilities Planning for New Hospital Facilities Planning for New Hospital Construction –Construction –
The Technology PerspectiveThe Technology Perspective
CESO Conference, Thursday, October 30, 2003
Today’s PresentationToday’s Presentation9:30 – 10:00 Facilities Development – Planning, Design &
Construction – Nick Joosten
10:00 – 10:30 Planning Imaging Facilities – Murray Rice
10:30 – 10:50 Coffee Break
10:50 – 11:20 Cardiac Telemetry & Networking Issues – John Leung
11:20 – 11:50 TGH Operating Rooms
11:50 – 12:15 Roundtable Discussion
Project BackgroundProject Background
Toronto General Hospital – Project 2003• Initiated in 1998• Funded through $300M Bond Issue• New Imaging, OR and Patient Care Floors• Architectural showpiece• Flexibility for the future
Facilities DevelopmentFacilities DevelopmentPlanning, Design & ConstructionPlanning, Design & Construction
Nick Joosten, Project ManagerNick Joosten, Project Manager
Project Management ProspectiveProject Management Prospective
• Our ‘goals’
• Leadership
• Managing expectations
• Keeping the drive
• Key construction points
• Lessons Learned
• Schedule & Budget
Our GoalsOur Goals• Build something that never has been done before • Account for the future• Manage the multiple dynamics of the team• Acquire 13.5 million of advance technology
equipment & managing over 10 million in construction
• Help transition the Team from the 60’s to 2000’s
Managing to due all the above
ON TIME & ON BUDGET
LeadershipLeadership
• Understanding the Operating Teams (End User) Needs & Operation
• Working with multiple stake holders
• Deciphering the Construction language
• Deciphering the Operational language
• Instilling Confidence
Managing ExpectationsManaging Expectations
“Framework” of the Project• Consultants Design v.s Users Needs• Equipment Planning & Deliverables• Vendor demonstrations• Fast Track OR• Furniture & Move Plan• BUDGET
Keeping the DriveKeeping the Drive
• Construction site walks
• Open communications with staff
• Moving from the 60’s to 2000 & beyond
• Fundraising tours
• Fun facts…
Sample MotivationSample Motivation
Key Construction PointsKey Construction Points
Some of Many
• Vendor participation
• Micro infrastructure details
• Changes & “Change Orders”
Lessons Learned Lessons Learned
• Have Vendors Participate Early• Deciphering Architectural Elevations• Equipment Luxury v.s Practicality • Avoid the “budget juggle”
Planning Imaging FacilitiesPlanning Imaging Facilities
Murray Rice, Manager, Medical Engineering
Imaging Equipment FacilitiesImaging Equipment Facilities
• Planning Steps
• Team
• Key Milestones in Time Line
• Conflicts in Time Line
• Detail Design Examples
• Administrative Coordination Issues
• Key Points
Planning StepsPlanning Steps
• Functional Plan – Requirements of area with consideration of # of staff, # of patients, # of procedures, etc. Happens years in advance of actual building.
• Initial Design – Work flow, where the walls are• Detailed Design – Positioning of everything in the
room, power requirements, etc. This is what the contractors build from.
• Construction• Installation and Moving In
Team – Who, When, and the Right TimeTeam – Who, When, and the Right Time
• Functional Plan – Clinical Team and Planners, Medical Engineering confirms technical details
• Initial Design – Building Planners, Clinical Team, Medical Engineering, Infection Control, Hospital Support Groups
• Detail Design – Above and Equipment Vendors• Construction – Everyone should monitor
construction, involve vendors, clinical, and technical teams
• Installation – Above and Hospital IS• Commissioning
Key Milestones in TimelineKey Milestones in Timeline
• Functional Plan – Size and number of Rooms• Initial Design – Shape of rooms, Equipment
proximity (e.g. MRI)• Detail Design – Initially a generic design, but
before finally built need Equipment Selection, need Complete detailed equipment list– Detailed Technical Planning - Three Examples
(Radiography Room, Interventional Room, MRI)
• Construction – Need Ministry of Health X-Ray Inspection Service Site Plan Approval for X-ray systems before constructing x-ray rooms
Conflicts in Time LineConflicts in Time Line
• Technology Development/Changes (e.g. digital radiography) versus Construction Time Line
• Equipment Procurement Process versus Construction Time Line
Radiography RoomRadiography Room
• Drawing of Room
Interventional RoomInterventional Room
• Operating Room Environment• X-Ray System• Contrast Injector• Ultrasound Machine• Patient Monitoring
– Mounted on X-Ray table, or monitor on boom?
• Slave/Remote Monitors• Anaesthetic Equipment• CCTV
MRIMRI
• Weight and Access Route for Bore, Open Magnet (Slab on Grade)
• Magnetic Field – Effect on Surrounding Area (Magnetic Shielding?)
• EMI – Effect on MRI (RF Shielding), and effect of MRI on Surrounding area
• Noise and Vibration
Administrative IssuesAdministrative Issues
• Budgeting (Who pays for what)– Capital– Construction Changes– Information Systems
• Tracking Changes to Plans– Clinical Team, Technical Team, Project
Manager, Architect, Consulting Engineers, Construction Manager, Contractor
• Decision Makers
Key PointsKey Points
• Need thorough understanding of process• Take the time to capture as many details as
possible at the detailed design stage. Making changes later is possible, but hard.
• Challenge of thinking of Plan versus Reality• Vendor Involvement is key• Medical Engineering acts as conduit for
different groups as we are positioned to understand the whole process
Cardiac Telemetry & Networking IssuesCardiac Telemetry & Networking Issues
John Leung, Manager, Medical Engineering
Cardiac Telemetry ProjectCardiac Telemetry Project
• Two floors – West wing 4th and 5th
• Total 76 telemetry channels
• Philips WMTS band telemetry system
• Coverage Area – Patient rooms, hallways, Elevator lobby and Patient Court
• Project go-live June 19th and June 28th
Telemetry System Telemetry System
• 4th floor – 36 channels, central monitoring and 6 satellite nursing station, 6 telemon monitors
• 5th floor – 40 channels, central monitoring, 3 satellite nursing stations, 6 telemon monitors
• Future – stepdown unit with 6 Intellivue
• Future – HL7 inbound interface
Equipment Selection ProcessEquipment Selection Process
• Consult Clinical User on Wish list
• Conduct Work Flow Analysis
• Specification & RFP
• Vendor Fair
• Interface Assessment
• Negotiation
TimelineTimeline
• May-June 2002 Consultation, Setup Team
• July 2002 Develop Specification & Work Flow Analysis
• August 2002 Issue RFP
• September 2002 Vendor Fair
• Oct-Nov 2002 RFP Response Review & Interface Discussion, Negotiation
• Jan 2003 Finalize Equipment List
TimelineTimeline
• Feb-Mar 2003 Issue PO
• Apr-May 2003 SARS, Plan User Training
• Jun 2003 Delivery and Checkout
• July 2003 Go-Live
Networking IssuesNetworking Issues
• Ensure Adequate Network Drops
Oper. Room - 22 drops
Bed with Monitor - 3 drops
Bed w/o Monitor – 1 drop
• Network Topology
– Stand Alone vs. Integrated
Networking IssuesNetworking Issues
• Network Security
NT Based Central monitors
Switch Room
Equipment Room
Gateway/Web Server
• Network Support
Lessons LearnedLessons Learned
• Large projects with long lead-time
Equipment budget anomalies
User forgets what/why equip is needed
• Usability is important, should be part of selection process
• Plan extra network drops• Identify who does what
Blocking for Monitor mounts
Patient Court Antenna
TGH Operating RoomsTGH Operating RoomsOR Imaging and Communication SystemOR Imaging and Communication System
Tony Easty, Director, Medical Engineering
The The Bottom LineBottom Line for these technological advances for these technological advances in OR Imaging and Communication is ….in OR Imaging and Communication is ….
ClinicalClinical - better , safer, and more efficient care for patients at UHN (TGH,TWH,PMH) and from MSH, HSC, and all of Ontario and beyond - capture and storage of ALL records
EducationEducation - outstanding tools for undergraduate, postgrad, fellowship, CPD, allied, and public education
ResearchResearch - unprecedented opportunity for research in outcomes, innovation, educational models ...
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 ORThe 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 OR
- bigger box (550+ sq.ft.)
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 OR
- bigger box (550+ sq.ft.)- lights, table, wider doors
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 OR
- bigger box (550+ sq.ft.)- lights, table, wider doors- nursing station control centre
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 OR
- bigger box (550+ sq.ft.)- lights, table, wider doors- nursing station control centre- generous anesthesia space
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 OR
- bigger box (550+ sq.ft.)- lights, table, wider doors- nursing station control centre- generous anesthesia space- equipment on booms, compact
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 OR
- bigger box (550+ sq.ft.)- lights, table, wider doors- nursing station control centre- generous anesthesia space- equipment on booms, compact
- technology built in, intuitive
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 OR
- bigger box (550+ sq.ft.)- lights, table, wider doors- nursing station control centre- generous anesthesia space- equipment on booms, compact
- technology built in, intuitive- sterile configuration, corridors
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003TGH Operating Rooms - July 2003
The 2003 ORThe 2003 OR
- bigger box (550+ sq.ft.)- lights, table, wider doors- nursing station control centre- generous anesthesia space- equipment on booms, compact
- technology built in, intuitive- sterile configuration, corridors- image capture, communication
The 1950 ORThe 1950 OR
- a small box (~400sq.ft.)- lights, table, 3 doors- ergonomically poor for nurses- cramped space for anesthesia- equipment, additional technology on floor (clutter, hard to clean)- nothing built in- sterile environment compromised- no image capture, communication
Imaging Technology in ORs – Imaging Technology in ORs – A very recent innovation A very recent innovation
When our design process started in 1997, integrating this technology into ORs was unheard of.
We seized the opportunity to incorporate the very latest advances “on the fly” during our design and construction process, causing significant trauma to out design and construction team.
Because this wasn’t part of the original scope, it was outside the project budget. We had to fundraise directly for this system.
By opening day, we managed to fund and install 11 of 19 rooms.
WIRED – OCT 2002
Imaging Technology in ORs – Imaging Technology in ORs – What are the advantages? What are the advantages?
•Ability to select all video sources and display them on any flat panel screen.
•Ability to link ORs together, so that images from one OR can be viewed in another.
•Ability to capture and store still and moving images as part of the patient record.
•Ability to perform live teleconferences with remote sites.
The New ORs
MSICU
CVICU
CCU
Dialysis
Principles of OR designPrinciples of OR design
• Patient/worker access and flowPatient/worker access and flow• sterility protectionsterility protection• communication issuescommunication issues• ergonomic work spaces for nurses, anesthetists ergonomic work spaces for nurses, anesthetists
and surgeonsand surgeons• modern equipmentmodern equipment• a pleasing work environmenta pleasing work environment• FLEXIBILITY for the futureFLEXIBILITY for the future• Imaging, connecting to the WORLDImaging, connecting to the WORLD
corridor
corridor
corridor
Sterilecore
Sterilecore
CVICU
PACU
Light choiceand
placement
Boom choiceand
placement
Lightsand
Boomsand
LCD monitors
OR Imaging task forceOR Imaging task force
• SurgeonsSurgeons• Biomedical EngineersBiomedical Engineers• NursesNurses• RadiologistsRadiologists• IT StaffIT Staff• AnaesthetistsAnaesthetists• PlannersPlanners• Respiratory TherapistsRespiratory Therapists
Elevation toward sterile corridor
Elevation toward main corridor
Elevation toward main corridor
Elevation toward main corridor
OR Imaging/TelecommunicationsOR Imaging/Telecommunications• cameras for open surgery, MIS
OR Imaging/TelecommunicationsOR Imaging/Telecommunications• cameras for open surgery, MIS
• LCD monitors
OR Imaging/TelecommunicationsOR Imaging/Telecommunications• cameras for open surgery, MIS
• LCD monitors
• PACS system in each OR
OR Imaging/TelecommunicationsOR Imaging/Telecommunications• cameras for open surgery, MIS
• LCD monitors
• PACS system in each OR
• pathology, radiology, endoscopic images
OR Imaging/TelecommunicationsOR Imaging/Telecommunications• cameras for open surgery, MIS
• LCD monitors
• PACS system in each OR
• pathology, radiology, endoscopic images
• image capture/storage systems in each OR for records, teaching and research
OR Imaging/TelecommunicationsOR Imaging/Telecommunications• cameras for open surgery, MIS• LCD monitors• PACS system in each OR• pathology, radiology, endoscopic images• image capture/storage systems in each OR for
records, teaching and research• digitizing of images• distribution of images to OR, seminar rooms,
other hospitals, conferences
OR Imaging/TelecommunicationsOR Imaging/Telecommunications• cameras for open surgery, MIS• LCD monitors• PACS system in each OR• pathology, radiology, endoscopic images• image capture/storage systems in each OR for
records, teaching and research• digitizing of images• distribution of images to OR, seminar rooms,
other hospitals, conferences
Central controlCentral control
So what?So what?
The The Bottom LineBottom Line for these technological advances in OR for these technological advances in OR Imaging and Communication is ….Imaging and Communication is ….
ClinicalClinical - better , safer, and more efficient care for patients at UHN (TGH,TWH,PMH) and from MSH, HSC, and all of Ontario and beyond - capture and storage of ALL records
EducationEducation - outstanding tools for undergraduate, postgrad, fellowship, CPD, allied, and public education
ResearchResearch - unprecedented opportunity for research in outcomes, innovation, educational models ...