kellogg's latin america - · pdf file · 2012-05-23supply demand s & op a...
TRANSCRIPT
End to End Supply Chain
Performance Improvement &
Transformation Best Practices
Roddy Martin
SVP Supply Chain Transformation
CCI
&
Industry SC Leaders Panel
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Roddy Martin
Roddy Martin
• End to End SC Transformation Thought Leader
• Executive South African Breweries ( SABMiller) – Engineering Leadership
– Manufacturing Strategy
– IT Leadership
– Change Management Leadership
• AMR Research SC leadership – Distinguished Analyst
• CCI SVP SC – Integrative Improvement Thought
Leader
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
“Linear” Supply Chains Lack Scale Process &
Visibility ……….P&G Chief Supply Chain Officer
.Disconnects… Silo’d & Functional Focus Vs End to End Demand –driven Processes
Materials
Mgmt Manufacturing Distribution
Suppliers
New Product or Service
Merges to the Base
Supply Process
Customers
Patients
Consumers
Suppliers
Partners
Manufacturers
Assemblers
Distributors
Wholesalers Customers Consumers
Users; Buyers
Risk
Risk
Risk Risk
Risk Risk
Risk
Projects and Programs
5 day demand change 90 day response time
Manufacturer
•Agility and responsiveness •Sustainable performance improvement
•End to end process capabilities •Managed complexity & risk
•Structure for “global operations” •End to end talent & skills, people development •Enabling end to end process "information”
X
“Change”
Risk
“Agility to Change”
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
The Challenge ……Bringing It All Together!
Product
Supply Demand People Process
Technology
IIS
5 Stage Maturity Journey
Performance Culture
Organizational Effectiveness
Codified Ways of Working
Adapted from Gartner- AMR Research
End to End Process Capabilities
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
The Challenge ……The Devil Is In The Details !
Act
ual
Mar
ket
Dem
and
Mo
men
ts o
f Tr
uth
Adapted from AMR Research
Product
Supply Demand
? “How”
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Consumers, Shoppers & Buyers
Make Choices
Point of Purchase
Stock Outs
Product Quality On The Shelf
Costs to Serve Account Profitability
Winning in New Markets
Complexity Costs or
Differentiates
Demand Supply
Product
“Supply Chain” Starts with the Buyer Choice ;Is Outside-In; End to End & An Interdependent Network
Risk
Embedded
Risk Management
“Integrative Improvement
Actions & Trade Offs”
…& Impacts Capabilities Here Starts here …..
Open Innovation
9
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
The Demand-driven Value Network Framework
Product & Service Innovation
Segmented Pull
Cu
sto
me
rs ,
Bu
yers
, Use
rs,
&
Co
nsu
me
rs
Channel Demand
& Demand
Management
Demand Visibility
User/
Consumer/ Demand Insights
Sup
pliers &
Partn
ers
Segmented Push
Reliable, Profitable Response
from Supply Network Based
on Demand
Supply Visibility
decoupling
Demand Translation
& Trade Offs
Integrated Strategy, Business Sufficiency &
Value Network Planning
Adapted from AMR Research
Customer Consumer back design
10
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
12
FOCUS
ON THE
FUNDAMENTALS
Reliability Program
CREATE
END TO END
SUPPLY CHAIN
Build a Competitive advantage through a reliable and sustainable customer/consumer
driven supply chain
Demand Driven Excellence Supply Chain Excellence
FOOD SAFETY PEOPLE SAFETY REGULATORY PRODUCT QUALITY
2009-2011
PRODUCT NETWORK PRODUCT AVAILABILITY HOLISTIC GROSS MARGIN OPERATING SYSTEM ELEVATE CS/L ROLE
2012-2013
END TO END SUPPLY CHAIN MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE CS/L AS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
2014-2016+
BUILD
STABLE
SUPPLY CHAIN
Industry Leader Example – LATAM Strategic Statement
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
The Demand-driven Value Network Framework
Product & Service Innovation
Segmented Pull
Cu
sto
me
rs ,
Bu
yers
, Use
rs,
&
Co
nsu
me
rs
Channel Demand
& Demand
Management
Demand Visibility
User/
Consumer/ Demand Insights
Sup
pliers &
Partn
ers
Segmented Push
Reliable, Profitable Response
from Supply Network Based
on Demand
Supply Visibility
decoupling
Demand Translation
& Trade Offs
Integrated Strategy, Business Sufficiency &
Value Network Planning
Adapted from AMR Research
Customer Consumer back design
14
Win
Play Lead
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Executing the Business Operating Strategy
Vision
Strategic Intent
Cu
sto
me
rs
Inn
ova
tio
n
Sup
ply
Net
wo
rk
Re
liab
le S
up
ply
Tale
nt
& S
kills
Sup
plie
rs
Prioritized Work
15
Strategic Focus Areas
Sup
ply
Ch
ain
Executing the “Integrative Challenge”
Leading and Managing The Change Transformation COE
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
No Systemic Continuous
Improvement Plans or structure.
Fire Fighting
The 5 Stages Performance-Improvement Maturity Im
pact
Expert Led /Based
Projects
Implementation of
Improvement Projects led by
Experts
(Ad Hoc - Projects)
Integrated Functional Excellence
Structured Integration Within
Core Functions
(Systemic – Limited Integrated of Functions )
End-to-end Integrative
Improvement System
Codified
Integrative
Improvement
(Situational and Systemic)
Learning Network
Culture of Innovation and
Sharing
(Situational, Systemic and
Strategic) Reactive
Fixes
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 5
Stage 4
Average
Leaders
”The Promise Of IT”
16
Stages Of Performance Improvement Maturity
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Transformation - Two Core Thrusts of Work; Today and Tomorrow! ………..Aligned Through a Transformation “Office”
Business Management
Role
Control & Manage the Business
& Compliance
Compliant &
Controlled Business
Performance
Leadership Role Business Strategy,
Intent, & Focus Areas
Prioritized Work
Build Sustainable Improvement & Compliance
Capabilities
Sustained &
Compliant Agility
Capabilities
Future-ize The Business
Vision
Strategic Intent
Managing The Change
Sustainable & Compliant Performance Improvement Culture
Change Management & Alignment COE
Vision
Strategic Intent
Managing The Change
Im
pact
1950 2010
Expert based
Functional
Excellence
Integrative
Improvement
System
Learning
Network
N
o
C
on
tin
uo
us
I
m
pr
ov
e
m
en
t
Pl
an
s
or
str
uc
tu
re
.
I
m
pl
e
m
en
ta
tio
n
ap
pr
oa
ch
ba
se
d
on
th
e
ca
pa
bil
ity
of
th
e
lo
ca
l
ex
pe
rt
(A
d
H
oc
)
St
ru
ct
ur
ed
im
pl
e
m
en
ta
tio
n
ap
pr
oa
ch
wi
thi
n
th
e
fu
nc
tio
ns
(S
ys
te
mi
c)
C
od
ifi
ed
an
d
int
eg
ra
te
d
im
pl
e
m
en
ta
tio
n
(S
itu
ati
on
al
an
d
Sy
st
e
mi
c)
Culture of Innovation
and Sharing of
Production Know How
(Situational, Systemic
and Strategic)
No Cont. Imp.
2013
Stage 1 Stage 2
Stage 3 Stage 4
Stage 5
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
The Integrative Performance Improvement System (IIS) Connects the Dots in Supply Chain Transformation from Traditional to Demand -driven
The Execution Challenge !
“Evolving READINESS”
1 2 3 4 5
Projects Processes Demand-driven Value Network > >
GOAL ALIGNMENT
Strategy
Metrics
Organization
IT
INTEGRATED PROCESSES
Supply
Demand
S & OP
A Strategic Enterprise
Initiative to Lead Alignment & Develop
Capabilities Using IIS Platform
Transformation COE
Process –based Performance Analytics
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Integrative Improvement…Business Goal ; Eliminate Stock Outs
19
Pra
ctic
e b
ase
d P
erf
orm
ance
Dev
elo
pm
en
t
Team
wo
rk &
C
han
ge M
anag
em
en
t
Info
rmat
ion
an
d T
ech
no
logy
De
man
d F
ore
cast
Acc
ura
cy
Ass
et
Rel
iab
ility
& p
erfo
rman
ce
New
Pro
du
ct L
aun
ch a
nd
Intr
od
uct
ion
-
Inve
nto
ry L
eve
l Op
tim
izat
ion
Kn
ow
led
ge m
anag
eme
nt
and
Sta
nd
ard
s
S &
OP
20%
10%
5%
Stock O
ut P
erform
an
ce
1.9
2
.3
3.1
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g G
ate
Qu
alit
y
Pe
rfe
ct O
rder
per
form
ance
Sou
rcin
g an
d P
rocu
rem
en
t C
ost
s
+ + + + + + + + + + +
“When you get this right , it rains money”
“Difficult” in Project –driven Silo Mentality
p. 20
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Supply Chain Pain Points: All vs. Largest
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
67%
62%
62%
51%
33%
33%
28%
26%
28%
18%
13%
25%
16%
2%
2%
3%
5%
16%
Dirty data
Product proliferation
Rising commodity prices
Talent shortage
Changing market preferences
Cost of IT
Compliance and legislation
Competition
Other
Supply Chain Pain Points
Any Pain Largest Pain
Top Supply
Chain Pain
Points
“Other” Pain Points
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
p. 21
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Supply Chain Excellence Definition
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
70%
57%
52%
38%
20%
Right product, right place, right time at the right cost.
A responsive supply chain that can adapt as markets change.
A resilient supply chain that can withstand the shocks of demand and supply volatility.
The Efficient Supply Chain. Lowest cost per unit.
Right product, right place, right time.
How Define Supply Chain “Excellence”
Most Mature
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
p. 22
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Examples of Supply Chain Excellence: Open-Ended
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
67%
33%
30%
26%
13%
13%
11%
8%
8%
5%
5%
5%
5%
ANY MENTION
P&G
Apple
Wal-Mart
Amazon
Dell
Unilever
Kraft
Pepsi
Coke
FedEx
General Mills
Nike
Top Examples of Supply Chain Excellence Other Examples
Bayer Chemicals L’Oreal
Best Buy McDonalds
Black and Decker Nestle
Campbell Soup Nokia
Cisco Novartis
Colgate-Palmolive Samsung
ConAgra Southwest Airlines
DuPont Stanley
Fashion Industry (gen) Starbucks
5 Guys Hamburgers Target
Ford Tesco
HP Toyota
IBM UPS
Intel Walt Disney
Johnson and Johnson Zappos
Kimberly Clark
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
2020
Growth
Today
Process capability to be
agile across end to end
Demand-driven Value Network
Journey to build agility
“Rea
l” M
on
ey
Requires “More” than Projects & “Integration”…………
An Integrative Transformation Journey to Build
Agility
Today, Tomorrow, 2020 Capabilities Challenge… Future Proofing
$1.10
$1.08
$1.06
$1.04
$1.02
$1.00
$0.98
$0.96
$0.94
$0.92
$0.90
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
86/87 88/89 90/91 92/93 94/95 96/97 98/99 00/01
No
rmal
ize
d c
ost
/cas
e
No
rmal
ize
d v
olu
me
Normalized $/Stat Normalized Volume
Flat Goal: 90/91 - 94/95
Reliability
Historical Trend + 2% per case per year
Stage 2-3
Stage 4-5
23
p. 24
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Supply Chain Focal Points
for Next 2 Years
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
74%
70%
66%
62%
48%
30%
26%
18%
23%
21%
21%
8%
10%
3%
7%
7%
Improving demand planning
Saving costs
Shortening cycles
Network design
New product launch effectiveness
Channel sensing
Revenue management
Other
Supply Chain Focal Points for Next 2 Years
Total Primary
Top Supply
Chain Focal
Points
“Other” Focal Points
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
The Ultimate Goal… Sustainable, Anchored Capabilities, Integrative Improvement
Exc
ell
en
ce i
n R
es
ult
s
Excellence in Work Practices
Sustainable Business Performance Improvement
Necessary but not Sufficient
“ lean and efficiency improvements”
“si
lo c
ost
fo
cus
”
•Balance •Capabilities •Processes
•Change Leadership
Unsustainable Performance
Integrative Improvement
Journey
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Bringing The Pieces Together Into A Demand-driven Value Network based Business Operating Strategy Is A Maturity-based Transformation Journey……….
A
ctu
al M
arke
t D
em
and
Product
Supply Demand
?
How !
Transformation COE
27
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
© 2006 AMR Research, Inc.
The Role of The Transformation COE …………. How ?
Evaluate Options & Estimate ROI
Leadership Sets vision & Goal for “One Company”
Reports -Budget & Schedule
-Achievement - Cumulative ROI
Designs Common Business Processes
Process Lead
Process Lead
CIO
Manages Portfolio
of Approved and Potential
Projects
Process Lead
Process Lead
BU Leader
Business Unit
Process Lead
Process Lead
BU Leader
Send CFO Savings Assumptions for Future Budgets
Process Owner
Process Owner - Victor
SC Strategy Program Director
Finance Director
Pro
jects
Processes
Business Goal Scope
Project
Lists
“K Lean”
Governance Victor
Process Owner - Victor
Project Management Office
Business Unit
Information Technology (IT)
Process Improvement Governance
ERP
Glo
bal
HQ
CPIO
S & OP
SC TRACC Mfg TRACC
Evaluate Options & Estimate ROI
Reports -Cumulative
-Business ROI
Executive Leadership Team
? HR / Change Management
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
The Transformation COE …. Benefits Realization & Capability Building
Leadership Sets vision & Goal for “One Company”
Designs Common Business Processes
Process Lead
Process Lead
CIO
Process Lead Process
Lead
BU Leader
Business Unit
Process Lead Process
Lead
BU Leader
SC Strategy Program Director
Finance Director
Pro
jects
Processes
Project
Lists
“Lean”
Execution Owner
Process Owner
Executive Leadership Team
Project Management Office
Business Unit
Information Technology (IT)
ERP
Glo
bal
HQ
CPIO S & OP
SC TRACC Mfg TRACC
Process Owner
Process Improvement & Governance
Governance Committee
C TxO Manages Portfolio
of Approved and Potential
Projects
HR / Change Management
Im
pact
1950 2010
Expert based
Functional
Excellence
Integrative
Improvement
System
Learning
Network
N
o
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
s
o
r
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
c
a
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
l
e
x
p
e
r
t
(
A
d
H
o
c
)
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
(
S
y
s
t
e
m
i
c
)
C
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
a
n
d
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
S
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
S
y
s
t
e
m
i
c
)
Culture
of
Innovati
on and
Sharing
of
Producti
on Know
How
(Situatio
nal,
Systemic
and
Strategic
)
No Cont. Imp.
2013
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
Stage 5
SCA IA’s
Transformation COE
Transformation Program Management Office
Sets & Aligns Priorities
SCA IA’s
SC TRACC
Reports -Cumulative Business ROI
SCA IA’s
29
p. 31
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
Examples of Supply Chain Excellence: Open-Ended
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
67%
33%
30%
26%
13%
13%
11%
8%
8%
5%
5%
5%
5%
ANY MENTION
P&G
Apple
Wal-Mart
Amazon
Dell
Unilever
Kraft
Pepsi
Coke
FedEx
General Mills
Nike
Top Examples of Supply Chain Excellence Other Examples
Bayer Chemicals L’Oreal
Best Buy McDonalds
Black and Decker Nestle
Campbell Soup Nokia
Cisco Novartis
Colgate-Palmolive Samsung
ConAgra Southwest Airlines
DuPont Stanley
Fashion Industry (gen) Starbucks
5 Guys Hamburgers Target
Ford Tesco
HP Toyota
IBM UPS
Intel Walt Disney
Johnson and Johnson Zappos
Kimberly Clark
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
p. 32
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Reven
ue/T
ho
usan
ds o
f E
mp
loyees
Comparison of Revenue/Employee: 2000-2011
P&G Colgate Unilever Kimberly-Clark Nestle Kraft
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
Today’s Presentation
Transformation Organization
35
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
Bringing The Pieces Together Into A Demand-driven Value Network based Business Operating Strategy Is A Maturity-based Transformation Journey……….
A
ctu
al M
arke
t D
em
and
Product
Supply Demand
?
How !
Transformation COE
36
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
Today’s Presentation
S& OP Transformation
40
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
The Demand-driven Value Network Framework
Product & Service Innovation
Segmented Pull
Cu
sto
me
rs ,
Bu
yers
, Use
rs,
&
Co
nsu
me
rs
Channel Demand
& Demand
Management
Demand Visibility
User/
Consumer/ Demand Insights
Sup
pliers &
Partn
ers
Segmented Push
Reliable, Profitable Response
from Supply Network Based
on Demand
Supply Visibility
decoupling
Demand Translation
& Trade Offs
Integrated Strategy, Business Sufficiency &
Value Network Planning
Adapted from AMR Research
Customer Consumer back design
41
Win
Play Lead
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Example …….. S&OP must Confront Conflicting Goals & Adapt with Increasing Business & Process Maturity
Demand-side Supply-side
Fin
ance
Goal: Make the financial budget. Tops-down Focus.
Desires control and wants predictability of operations.
Forecast definition: The budget
Goal: A feasible plan. Bottoms-up focus. Wants to minimize risk and disruption Forecast definition: The demand plan
Su
pp
ly
Ch
ain
Operations
Goal: Factory optimization,
improve costs and minimize demand
uncertainty
Forecast definition:
Manufacturing Plan
Sales and
Marketing
Goal: Maximize revenue & market
share, wants guaranteed
product availability
Forecast definition: Sales
plan Mold, color, ship-to at the customer
level
Mold, color, manufacturing
location
Adapted from AMR Research
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
The Challenge ……Bringing It All Together!
Product
Supply Demand People Process
Technology
5 Stage Maturity Integrative Improvement
Journey
IIS
Performance Culture
Organizational Effectiveness
Codified Ways of Working
Adapted from Gartner- AMR Research
End to End Process Capabilities
S&OP Evolution
Manufacturing- Driven
Deliver a Feasible Plan for Operations
Match Demand with Supply
Sales Driven
Match Demand with Supply
Business- planning Driven
Maximize Profitability
Demand Driven
Maximize Opportunity Sense and
Shape Demand
Market Driven
Maximize Opportunity and
Mitigate Risk. Orchestrate
Demand Market to Market
Greater Benefit
• Growth
• Resilience
• Efficiency
KLA Leading and Managing Supply
Chain Alignment through TRACC 45
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
Yes 87%
No 10%
Not sure 3%
Have a Sales & Operations Planning Process
S&OP Process Existence, Goals & Processes
Base: Total Sample (117)
Q17. Does your company have a Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) process? A S&OP process is a tactical
43%
32%
14%
8%
3%
Match demand with supply
Maximize opportunity and mitigate risk
Develop a feasible plan
Determine the most profitable plan
Other
S&OP Process Goal
27% 14% 20%
12% 9% 19%
1 2 3 4 5 More than 5
# Distinct S&OP Processes
5 S&OP
processes
on average
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Integrated Business Planning
Planning Integration Evolves Through Stages of Maturity…..
Demand Planning
Supply Planning
S&OP
Supply Chain Alignment
Demand Planning
Supply Planning
S&OP
Supply Chain Alignment
Integrated Business Planning
Supply Chain Alignment
Supply
Chain
Alignment
Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5
Risk, Complexity, Organization Design, Leading and Managing Change, Enabling IT
Projects Integrated Processes & IT End -End SC Improvement Demand-driven Value Network
p. 50
Supply Chain Insights, LLC © 2012
• The most effective supply chains are designed and created. Today, supply chain fundamentals are more important. Talent development essential.
• In 2012, we celebrate 30 years of supply chain management. There is still much to be done.
Summary
KLA Leading and Managing Supply Chain Alignment through TRACC
Lora Cecere Supply Chain Insights
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
52
High Performance Transaction Processing Application Architecture
High Performance Information Technology
Enabled Work Flow System & Business
Process Management
High Performance
Business Operating
System
Integrative Improvement System Deployment & Capability Development
ERP
CRM
SCM
PLM
S & OP
CPFR
1 2 3 4 5
VMI
RFID Traceability
Planning
Stages of Process-based Operating & Performance Improvement Maturity to Demand Driven Value Network Sufficiency
The end to end way the business actually operates
Technology modeled workflows and business processes using business &
transactional data
Technology based applications, data processing & data management
Systems of Record
System of Process
Business Operating System of Venture
and Sufficiency S & OP
Balancing Process &
Profitability Analyses
Business Sufficiency Planning
Demand Forecast Accuracy & Planning
Innovation & Value driven Business Tradeoffs
?
?
Technology Enabled Work Flow Processes & Data Management
Business Operating Strategy, Execution, & Culture
Improvement Goals & Projects
Functional Process Integration
Demand-driven end- end SC process integration
Value driven Business tradeoffs & network
“MES”
Supply Reliability & Supply Planning
Integrated Quality
& compliance
Performance Maturity – based context of data & information
Master data & process-based context of data
Systems of Process and
Control
Real time & Process Control Data
High Performance Automation Architecture Machines Controls Measurements
SRM
Sourcing &
Procurement
Logistics & Distribution
WHM
Layers of “Management Systems
Business Operating System Integrative Improvement System
Application, Data and IT Process Architecture
Flexible Decoupling Information & Analytics Model Layer
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Conclusions
1. Supply chain must move from functional outputs focus to business outcome driven – cultural transformation is required from leadership and strategy development levels
– more haste less speed
– REFRAME “Supply Chain”
– A change management journey
2. Basic foundational processes and capabilities for end to end demand driven supply chain operations:
– To be defined and mapped in stages of maturity ( end state clarity to “pull” vs “push”
– To be designed with roles and accountabilities appropriate for the stage
– To be deployed with change management
– To be synchronized and anchored through transformational COE
– To be assessed for governance and progress reporting
53
Contents
© Competitive Capabilities International
Recommendations
1. Actively address transforming “project to process” culture
2. Formally structure COE based Transformation Strategy actively and visibly led by ELT and inclusive of BU’s
3. IIS “plus” as basis of deployment strategy and COE priorities
4. Regularly review and reflect on evolving process developments and maturity in sync with business performance improvement
5. Establish business financial assessment capabilities to fund and fuel ongoing transformation from wins
6. IT and SC alignment – institute a decoupling layer !
7. Start working on “cost to serve” capabilities !
54