table of contents - gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/dpr/2010-11/bharuch/bha_iwmp-9.pdf · pia-...

PIA- District Watershed Development Unit Bharuch

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Project Background

1.1Project Background……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………....…................................................................... .. 09

Table no: 1 Basic Project Information ……………………………………………….……………………………..……………………................................................................. .. 10

Figure, 1 Geographic location of Kondh Project.................................................................................................................................................................................... ... ..10

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme. ………………………………………………………………………………................................................................. …. 11

Table no. 2: Weightage of the project. …………………………………………………………………….……...…….................................................................................…….… 11

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ……………………………………………………………………............………….................. ............. 12

Table no.3: Watershed information …….………………………………………………………………………………………………........................................……………… .…… 13

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Kondh Project …………….……………………….............................................. ……………..…….. 14

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: .............................................................................................................................................. 15

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ..................................................................................................................................................... 15

Chapter 2 Project Implementing Agency

2.1. Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................... 16

2.2 About Project implementing Agency West Forest Division - Rajpipla........................................................................................................................................ 16

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: .................................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 16

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17

Table no. 6: PIA: .......................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. 18

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ....................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................... 18


Chapter 3 Basic Information of the Project Area

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology .................. ....................................................................... .............................................................................................. ......................... 19

3.1.1 Land use pattern: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...... 19

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 19

Figure,2 Geographical Condition of Valia project........................................................................................................................................................ ............................... 20

3.1.2 Soil and topography: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................. 21

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ........................................................................................................................... ................................................................................ 21

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion ........................................................................................................................................................................................ .................... ........................ 22

Table no. 11.1:Water logging condition ......................................................................................................................... ............................................................................... 23

Table no.12: Climatic conditions .................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................... 23

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 14: Land ownership details......................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... 24

Figure 3 Photographs of Bio-Physical Survey. ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 25

Table no. 15: Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 16: Irrigation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 17: Crop details: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

3.1.4 Livestock: .................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................... 27

Table no. 18: Livestock .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

3.1.5 Drinking water ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ ................................... 28


Table no. 19 : Drinking water...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......... 28

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ....................... ...................................................................................................................................................... 29

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31

3.2.1 Demographic Status: ................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................... 31

Table no. 21: Demographic information ................................................................................................................................ ............................................ ........................... 31

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ...................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................. 32

3.2.2 Migration Pattern: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................... 32

Table no. 23: Migration details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32

Table no. 24: Poverty................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 33

3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities: ................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................ 33

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................... ................................................................... 33

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34

3.3. Livelihood pattern: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............... 34

Table no. 27: Per capita Income .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34

3.4 Dependence on Common Property Resource.............................................................. ..................................................................................................................... ... 35

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ........................................................................................................... .................................................................................... ..... 35

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)................................................................................................................................................................ 35

3.5 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country: ..................................................................... 36

Figure, 4 Comparative Productivity of tur and Cotton in the project area Valiya, Bharuch dist., State and India Level.............................. ............... 37

Chapter 4 Watershed Activities

4.1. Scientific Planning: .............................................................................................. ........................................................... ............................................................................. 39


Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ........................... ......................................................................................................... 41

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area..................................................................................................................... 43

Figure 5 Photographs of Focussed Group Discussion......................................................................................... ................................................................................... 46

Figure 6 Photographs of PRA.................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................ 47

4.2. Institution building .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................. 48

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 48

Table no. 33: SHG details.............................................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................... 53

4.2.3 User Group: .................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................. 54

Table no. 34: UG detail................................................................................................................................................................................ ............................. ............................. 54

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-9, Kondh.................................................................................................................................................... 56

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. ........... 56

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs. )...................................................................................................................... ............ 56

35.1 Estimation of Hawada.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 57

35.2 Estimation of Drinking Water Pipe Line.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

Figure 7 Photographs of EPA in Kondh Project........................................................................................................................................................................................... 59

4.3.2.Watershed Development Works............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 59

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*.............................................................................. ....... 62

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.).......................................... ............... 64

Table no. 38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.).............................. 64

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises......................................................................... 66

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas............................................................................... ............ 72


Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level.................................................................................................................................................... 83

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ....................................................................................... 83

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas..................................................... ................................................................................................ 87

4.4. Capacity Building: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 90

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:.......................................................................................................................... ...................................................................... 91

Figure,8 Photographs of Capacity Building : ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 91

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 92

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities................................................................................................................................................. 92

Chapter 5 Budgeting

Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget....................................................................................................................................................................................... 93

Table no. 48: Budget at a glance ........................................................................................................ .......................... ................................................................................. 94

Table no.49: Village wise gap in fund Requirement................................................................................................................................................................................ 94

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes cost in lakh........................................................................................................................ 95

Chapter 6 Expected Outcome

6.1 Expected Outcomes ......................................... ............................................................................................................................................... 98

6.1.1 Employment .......................................................................... ..................................................... ................................................................................... ......................... 98

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects...................................................................................................................... .............................. 99

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area .................................................. ............................................................................................................ .............................. 99

6.1.2.Migration ................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................... 100


Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ......................................................... ............................................................................................. 100

Table no. 6.1.3: Ground water Table .................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... 100

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)............................................................................................. 100

6.1.4 Drinking water ........................................................................................................ .......................................................................................... ....................................... 101

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 101

6.1.5 Crops .............................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................... 101

Table no. 56 : Details of crop area and yield in the project area .................................................................................................................................................... 102

6.1.6 Horticulture ......................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................... 102

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102

6.1.7 Vegetative cover ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 103

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover ............................................................................... ....................................................................... ............................................. 103

6.1.8 Livestock ....................................................................... ........................................................ .................................................................................................................... 103

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas ................................................................................................................................ ...................................... 104

6.1.9 Linckages..................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................ 104

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages .................................................................................................... ........................................................................................ 104

6.2 Logical Framework Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 105

Chapter 7 Quality and Sustainability Issue

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 110

7.2 Plans For Project management: .................................................. ..................................................................................................................... .................................. 111

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 111


7.4 User Charges: ................................................................................................................................................................................ .............................................................. 111

Chapter 8 Mapping

Figure.8.1: Map of Ground water ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 112

Figure.8.2: Land use map ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 113

Figure.8.3: River waterbody map................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 114

Figure.8.4: Slope map ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 115

Figure.8.5: Soil map ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116


CHAPTER-1

PROJECT BACKGROUND

1.1 Project Background

Bharuch district comes under South Gujarat zone. It is situated between the parellels of latitude 72 28 and longitude 21 26 and 22

16’. Total geographical area of Bharuch district is 5,24,683 ha. There are 543 village panchayats and 663 villages in the district. District is

drained by Narmada, Dhadhar and Kim rivers. It covers total area is 20,686.90 ha. Community of the Bharuch district is mainly Tribal. The

climate of this district is characterised by a hot summer and dryness in the noon rainy season. The soil of two types viz black cotton and

yellowish. Main agriculture crops in the district are cotton, paddy, sorghum, wheat, tur and sugarcane. In 2010-11 there are 5 projects in

Bharuch district namely Kochbar, Dharoli, Pathar, Kondh and Kava.

Kondh (IWMP-9) project is located in Valia taluka, Bharuch district of

Gujarat. This project is a cluster approach of 12 micro-watershed and 6

villages. Total geographical area of 6 villages is 4898.10 ha, out of which

4585.10 ha. has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed

Management Program in the 2010-2011. Project Implementing Agency of

this project is District Watershed Development Unit Bharuch.

The nearest town of the project is Valia which is about 0 to 20 km

away from the villages. The major community of the villages are Schedule

Tribe, Choudhary, Vasava and Gamit. Only schedule Tribe covers 47.38 % of


the total community. The livelihood of the project area is based on Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and wage labour.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr. No.

Name of the project

Villages

Gram Panchayats Taluka District

Area of the

project

Area Proposed

to be treated

Total project

cost PIA Name C2K code

1

IWMP-9 Kondh

Kondh 210080161270000 Kondh

Valiya Bharuch

1931.50 1795.50 215.46

DWDU-BHARUCH

2 Vatariya 210080161260000 Vatariya 908.10 908.10 108.97

3 Kanerav 210080161480000 Kanerav 247.30 174.30 20.92

4 Desad 210080161470000 Desad 754.40 754.40 90.53

5 Karsad 210080161540000 Karsad 402.80 402.80 48.34

6 Valiya 210080161300000 Valiya 654.00 550.00 66.00

TOTAL:- 4898.10 4585.10 550.21

Figure1, Geographic location of Kondh project

Bharuch District Kondh Project


1.2 Need of watershed development program

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST,

Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking

water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has

already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain and Cluster approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a

composite ranking was given to Kondh Watershed project as given in table no. 2.

Total number of BPL families in this project are about 47%, hence the score is allotted 5. The percentage of ST population in the area

is about 47.38 % and others are mostly OBC and general category; hence the score is allotted 10. The wage labour is 33.2% in the project

area; hence the score is 5 resectively.

Primary occupation of the project area is agriculture, based on rainfall. But due to the undulating land, water is not available for

cultivation purpose. So the production of the area is very low; hence the score is 10.

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 88 to the watershed. (Reference Table 2.1 below).

Area proposed to be treated

Table no. 2: Weightage of the project

Project Name

Project type Weightage

i ii iii iv v Vi Vii viii ix X xi xii xiii

Kondh IWMP-9 5 10 5 5 3 10 10 5 5 10 5 15 0


Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S. No.

Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5)

Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the microwatersheds in


watershed (5) the project (0) xii Cluster approach in the

plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Project type: Hilly/desert/Other Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project Name of the Village No. Of watersheds to

be treated Watershed code

Watershed regime/type/order

IWMP-9, Kondh

Kondh 1 5D1A3b1d

Mini Watershed

Vatariya 3 5d1a3b1e,5d1a3b1d,5d1a3b1c

Kanerav 1 5C1B3d1a

Desad 2 5c1b3d1b,5c1b3d2a

Karsad 2 5C1B3d1a,5C1B3d2a

Valiya 3 5c1b3d1a,5C1B3d2a,5c1b3d1b

Total 12


1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Kondh project

Valiya taluka is very back ward area, has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programmes are namely

Indira Awas Yojana (IAY), Social Forestry Development Committee (S.F.D.C), Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), Mahatma Gandhi National

Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Tribal Area sub Plan (TASP), Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY) and Water

and sanitation management organisation (WASMO).

i. MGNREGS: Construction of check dams, deepening of village pond, farm bunding, stone bunding and some Afforestation activity has

been taken-up under NREGA.

ii. S.F.D.C: About two villages have covered by S.F.D.C. This works for CPR development in the village, provides employment to the

people and conduct capacity building programs for villagers.

iii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): Toilets are constructed under TSC programme in every village at each household level.

iv. Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) – Provide 50% subsidy linkage with bank for Animal Husbandry and some other

livelihood activities like cattering in the project area.

v. TASP: This scheme works in only tribal area. This provides lift irrigation system, fisheries, Horticulture and others activities in the

project area.

vi. Indira Awas Yojana: This scheme provides home with toilet to the BPL families.

vii. WASMO: All villages have covered by this scheme for drinking water facility.


Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

Sr. no

Name of the programme/

scheme Sponsoring agency Objectives of the programme/scheme

Year of commencement

Villages covered

Estimated number of

beneficiaries 1 IAY D.R.D.A Housing 2005-06 6 410

2 S.F.D.C FOREST CPR Devlopment,Employment,Capacity building 2009-2010 2 45

3 TSC DRDA Total sanitation Campaign 2005-06 6 1639

4 MGNREGA DRDA Employment Generation 2007-08 6 9113

5 TASP TASP Help trible people 2000-01 6 201

6 SGSY DRDA Livelihood Promotion 2006 6 405

7 WASMO IRRIGATION Drinking water 2007-08 6 3250

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

Sr.no

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. of micro

watershed Watershed

codes

Area under

treatment Funding source

Nodal agency PIA

Total cost

Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completion

1

IWMP-9

Kondh

0 Kondh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 0 Vatariya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 0 Kanerav 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 0 Desad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 0 Karsad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 0 Valiya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


CHAPTER-2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

2.1. Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency

(GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under

State/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA

for Kondh watershed Project is District Watershed Development Unit Bharuch.

2.2 About Project Implementing Agency, DWDU Bharuch

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:

PIA of the Kondh watershed Project is District Watershed Development Unit Bharuch. Project Director is the head of PIA. PIA has

dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Nodal officer and a watershed development team of civil engineer, agriculture expert and

community mobilizer, Data Entry Operator, surveyor, and accountant. The objective of the PIA is supervising, planning, implementing,

documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities at project level as per guidelines. This

also submits all documents at the district level.


2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA:

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff with Multi Disipilinary team.

(2) State level Govt department.

(3) Strong linkages with national, state and district level institutions, agricultural universities, KVKs and NGOs for capacity building and

technical guidance.

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar.

(5) Project level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee.

Opportunities:

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and

convergence of programmes.

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP.

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS.

Threats:

(1) Low productive land in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact


Table no. 6: PIA:

Sl. No.

Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP 9 Kondh

(i) Type of organization DWDU-BHARUCH

(ii) Name of organization DWDU-BHARUCH

(iii) Designation & Address Nodal Officer A-9 Jalaram Society,Near petrol pump,Valiya

(iv) Telephone 02643-270511

(v) Fax -

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sr. No.

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience (in years) Job assigned Monthly

remuneration (Rs.)

1

Patel Kishorkumar

dahyabhai M MDT (Engg.) Diploma civil engg. 7 years in watershed Nodel officer 15000

2

Survaiya Nileshbhai

Kishorbhai M WDT (Engg.) Diploma civil engg. WDT (Engg.) 12000

3

Prajapati Keyulbhai

Ganpatbhai M WDT (Agri.) BRS, MRS WDT (Agri.) 9000

4 Vasava Santuben D. M WDT ( Com.) BRS WDT ( Com.) 9000

5 Patel Jagdishbhai M WDT ( DEO ) BA WDT ( DEP ) 5000

mailto:[email protected]


CHAPTER-3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology

3.1.1 Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Kondh project is 4898.10 ha and proposed project area is 4585.10 ha. Out of which 55% is rainfed area.

About 69% of land is under agriculture which is almost rain-fed; mainly Kharif crops are taken in the Project area. Somehow extent farmers

take Rabi crops in their field. But they don’t cultivate Zaid crops in their fields. About 31% of the total land is classified under wasteland out

of which 21 percent land is cultivable and rest is uncultivable. About 21% land is also comes under permanent pasture land.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Sr. No. Names of villages

Geographical Area of the

village Forest Area

Land under agricultural

use Irrigated Rainfed

area

Perm-anent

pastu-res

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable

1 KONDH 1931.50 0.00 1164.30 28.50 1135.80 767.30 767.20 0.00

2 VATARIYA 908.10 0.00 725.70 50.40 675.30 56.70 56.60 125.80

3 KANERAV 247.30 2.10 209.60 9.60 200.00 0.00 0.00 35.60

4 DESAD 754.40 0.00 634.10 415.00 219.10 46.10 46.00 74.30

5 KARSAD 402.80 0.00 312.70 12.70 300.00 0.00 0.00 90.10

6 VALIYA 654.00 0.00 317.10 149.00 168.10 177.60 177.60 159.30

TOTAL 4898.10 2.10 3363.50 665.20 2698.30 1047.70 1047.40 485.10


Figure-2: Geographical condition of the project


3.1.2 Soil and topography:

Kondh watershed project falls under south Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly yellowish black in surface colour. Depth of

the soil is moderate to deep about 15 to 20cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low

Nitrogen and Phosphorus. The topography of the area is flat - Moderate to undulating ranging from 0-3% slope. Soil pH in the project area is

about 8-8.5. Maximum temperature in the project area is 45 C0 in summer season and minimum is 22 C0 in winter season.

The average rainfall of this area is about 988.20 mm (from past five year data). This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil

every year to the streams and rivulets.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

S. No.

Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers

project area Area in

ha Names of the

villages

Major soil types

Topo-graphy a)Type b) Area in

ha

# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope

1

South Gujarat

1931.50 Kondh Yellowish 1931.50 Flat - Moderate to undulating

2 908.10 Vatariya Yellowish 908.10 Flat - Moderate to undulating

3 247.30 Kanerav Yellowish 247.30 Flat - Moderate to undulating

4 754.40 Desad Yellowish 754.40 Flat - Moderate to undulating

5 402.80 Karsad Yellowish 402.80 Flat - Moderate to undulating

6 654.00 Valiya Yellowish 654.00 Flat - Moderate to undulating

4898.10 4898.10 Flat - Moderate to undulating


Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr.No Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 1 Kondh NA 4to5 year

2 Vatariya NA 4to5 year

3 Kanerav NA 4to5 year 4 Desad NA 4to5 year

5 Karsad NA 4to5 year

6 Valiya NA 4to5 year

11. Edaphic Factors Table no. 11: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha)

Run off

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year) (mm/ year)

Water erosion

a Sheet 3450.5

988.20

Yet not measured

b Rill 825

c Gully 622.6

Sub-Total 4898.1

Wind erosion 4898.1 NA

Total 4898.10


Table no. 11.1: Waterlogging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Kondh

NA Undual condition

Vatariya

Kanerav

Desad

Karsad

Valiya

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Project Type Name of project Average rainfall- last 5

years

Average temperature ( C0 ) Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min IWMP Kondh 988.20 45 35 37 22

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project Type Name of project Elevation (MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams

IWMP Kondh 53.00M 0-3% Amravati,Kim


3.1.3 Land and Agriculture:

In the project area people use their own land. They don’t use leased land. Due to undulating soil and lack of surface water sources,

ground water has sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose in every village. The average land holding of the project is

about 2.03 ha ranging from 1 to 3 ha village to village. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to migrate to ensure their

livelihood or work as a wage labour in another farmer’s field. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops in

the project area cultivated by the farmers are Tur, Cotton, Sorghum and Sugercane in kharif season. Some of the farmers take sorghum crop

in Rabi Season if irrigation facility is good. The land conservation measures such as River and open well in the villages help them to take up a

Rabi crop of wheat in the residual moisture. But other soil and water conservation structures like farm bunding, nala plug, checkdam, gully

plug, gabion structure and new pond will also help the farmers to taken up other crops like sugarcane, irrigated wheat, vegetables and Zaid

crops also

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sr. no Village

Total owned land

HHs giving land on lease HHs taking land on lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Kondh 378 0 34 132 0 0

2 Vatariya 98 0 27 97 0 0

3 Kanerav 28 0 4 57 0 0

4 Desad 383 0 0 53 0 0

5 Karsad 164 0 2 28 0 0

6 Valiya 127 0 6 37 0 0


Figure-3: Biophysical survey


Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sr.no Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 KONDH 617.00 97

2 VATARIYA 485.00 28

3 KANERAV 187.00 12

4 DESAD 245.00 91

5 KARSAD 275.00 39

6 VALIYA 152.00 38

Total 1961.00 305.00

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sr.no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well/bore/river

Availability months Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area Total

1 Kondh 0 0 0 3 9.50 9.50 8 19.00 19.00 28.50

2 Vatariya 0 0 0 3 12.40 12.40 8 38.00 38.00 50.40

3 Kanerav 0 0 0 3 2.50 2.50 9 7.10 7.10 9.60

4 Desad 5 215.00 215.00 3 56.00 56.00 9 144.00 144.00 415.00

5 Karsad 0 0 0 3 2.70 2.70 9 10.00 10.00 12.70

6 Valiya 0 0 0 3 28.00 28.00 9 121.00 121.00 149.00

TOTAl:- 215.00 111.10 339.10 665.20


Table no. 17: Crop details:

Sr.no

Village

Kharif (Monsoon) Rabi (Winter)

Tur Cotton Sorghum Sorghum Sugarcane

Area Producti

on Product

ivity Area

Production

Productivity Area

Production

Productivity

Area

Production

Productivity Area

Production

Productivity

1 Kondh 135 50625 375 95 29925 315 72.5 45312.5 625 58 40890 705 24.5 704375 28750

2 Vatariya 109 35425 325 83 29465 355 62 37510 605 39 30810 790 35 1142750 32650

3 Kanerav 59 22420 380 35 12075 345 17 10795 635 28 25900 925 5 175000 35000

4 Desad 86 36550 425 65 22620 348 38 23750 625 76 55860 735 326 8313000 25500

5 Karsad 38 13300 350 48 16896 352 21 13041 621 49 35035 715 9 238500 26500

6 Valiya 120 39000 325 52 18044 347 32 20416 638 55 40425 735 89 2536500 28500

547 197320 360.7313 378 129025 341.336 242.5 150824.5 621.9567 305 228920 750.5574 488.5 13110125 26837.51

3.1.4 Livestock:

In the Kondh project, there are 876 cows, 454 buffaloes, 1039 goats, 87 bullocks and 4961 hens. In majority of the, villages poultry is

the main source of livelihood and remaining villages cows and buffaloes are the source of income. Mainly animal breeds are local so

productivity is very low. Lack of surface water, the fodder and pasture availability for the animals has reduced their numbers in the area.

This leads to heavy migration of the villagers to other parts of the state. Average milk production of the buffalo’s is 2 lit. and cow’s is 1.6 lit.

that is very low. In some villages, there is no dairy cooperative also.


Table no. 18: Livestock

Sr.no Village Buffalo ( Lit/Annum ) Cow Total Milk

(Buffalo+Cow) Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk No Milk No Milk

1 Kondh 196 141120 125 75000 216120 498 767 290

2 Vatariya 54 38880 76 45600 84480 179 248 75

3 Kanerav 28 20160 35 21000 41160 65 467 43

4 Desad 65 46800 145 87000 133800 23 288 530 113

5 Karsad 35 25200 45 27000 52200 110 107 95

6 Valiya 76 54720 450 270000 324720 164 87 2842 229

TOTAL:- 454 326880 876 525600 852480 1039 0 288 87 4961 845

3.1.5 Drinking water:

Sources of drinking water in the project area are handpump and Tap. These provide drinking water facilites to the villagers up to 9-

10 month. But the remaining months they face a lot of problem. The quality of the water is contaminated also. Ground water table is also

very low in the project area.

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sr.no Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

1 Kondh 40-45 mt Handpump,bore well 9to10

Contaminated

2 Vatariya 40-45 mt Handpump,bore well 9to10

3 Kanerav 40-45 mt Handpump,bore well 9to10

4 Desad 40-45 mt Handpump,bore well 9to10

5 Karsad 40-45 mt Handpump,bore well,River 9to10

6 Valiya 40-45 mt Handpump,bore well 9to10


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

Sr. No. Names of

project

CPR Total Area (ha)

Area available for treatment (ha)

Particulars

Area owned/ In possession of

Pvt. persons

Govt.

PRI

Any other (Pl. Specify)

Pvt. persons

Govt.

PRI

Any other (Pl. Specify)

(specify deptt.)

(specify deptt.)

1

Kondh

Wasteland/ degraded land 17.17 4.00

Pastures 119.36 12.00

Orchards

Village Woodlot 19.57

Forest

Village Ponds/ Tanks 24.31 1.00

Community Buildings

Samshan 2.93

Permanent markets

Temples/ Places of worship

Others (Pl. specify)

2

Vatariya

Wasteland/ degraded land 32.29 4.00

Pastures 19.93 11.00

Orchards


Forest


Community Buildings

Samshan 1.09

Permanent markets



3 Kanerav Wasteland/ degraded land 3.1

Pastures 9.28 1.00


Orchards

Village Woodlot 3.1

Forest

Village Ponds/ Tanks 5.65

Community Buildings

Weekly Markets

Permanent markets


Others (Pl. specify) Canal 5.93

4

Desad

Wasteland/ degraded land 15.76

Pastures 54.63 13.00

Orchards


Forest


Community Buildings

Weekly Markets

Permanent markets



5

Karsad


Pastures 20.05 6.00

Orchards

Village Woodlot 4.1

Forest


Community Buildings

Samshan 1.13

Permanent markets




6

Valiya


Pastures 52.47 6.00

Orchards


Forest


Community Buildings

Weekly Markets

Permanent markets



3.2. Socio-Economic Profile 3.2.1 Demographic Status:

Kondh project covers 6 villages in Valia taluka. It has a total of 3530 household with 16762 populations (as per base-line survey) out

of which 8821 are male and 7941 are female. Sex ratio of the area is 900 female to 1000 male. This ratio varies from village to village. Area

covers maximum ST population about 47.38%, which also varies from 43% to 65%. The average family size is 5. The literacy rate of the area

is 62.47%, out of which male literacy rate is 70.28% and female literacy rate is 53.79%. Majority of population is involved as a wage labour

in agriculture and animal husbandry.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr. no Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Kondh 4233 2231 2002 131 61 70 3.09 1908 955 953 45.07

2 Vatariya 2505 1400 1105 59 33 26 2.36 1362 681 681 54.37

3 Kanerav 800 432 368 0.00 800 432 368 100.00

4 Desad 2101 1048 1053 19 9 10 0.90 1376 693 683 65.49

5 Karsad 931 477 454 0 0 0 0.00 576 302 274 61.87

6 Valiya 6192 3233 2959 201 112 89 3.25 2719 1416 1303 43.91

16762 8821 7941 410 215 195 2.45 7941 4047 3894 47.38


Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr.no Village

Literacy

Total population Total % Male % Female %

1 Kondh 4233 2660 62.840 1614 38.129 1046 24.7106

2 Vatariya 2505 1489 59.441 977 39.002 512 20.4391

3 Kanerav 800 515 64.375 320 40 195 24.375

4 Desad 2101 1065 50.690 591 28.1295 474 22.5607

5 Karsad 931 415 44.576 230 24.7046 185 19.8711

6 Valiya 6192 4328 69.897 2468 39.8579 1860 30.0388

TOTAL:- 16762 10472 62.47 6200 34.97 4272 23.666

3.2.2 Migration Pattern:

Migration percentage of the project area is 0.46% to 4.5%. People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like

Surat and Ankleshwar as daily wage labours, agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of landholding, Lack of fodder availability

and grazing land for smaller ruminant force these people to migrate to other places. There are 1649 BPL families in the project area. About

48-50% BPL families are landless families.

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sr.no Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months

Main reason for migration

Income during migration / month Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6

months

1 Kondh 4233 111 67 44 3 Months Lack of employment 6000-7000

2 Vatariya 2505 98 58 40 3 Months Lack of employment 6000-7000

3 Kanerav 800 36 24 12 3 Months Lack of employment 6000-7000

4 Desad 2101 62 42 20 3 Months Lack of employment 6000-7000

5 Karsad 931 32 22 10 3 Months Lack of employment 6000-7000

6 Valiya 6192 29 21 8 3 Months Lack of employment 6000-7000

TOTAL :- 16762 368 234 134


Table no. 24: Poverty

Sr.no Village Total Household

BPL

0-16 17-20 Total

1 Kondh 831 126 122 248

2 Vatariya 544 27 71 98

3 Kanerav 181 34 33 67

4 Desad 467 257 113 370

5 Karsad 199 107 45 152

6 Valiya 1308 557 157 714

TOTAL:- 3530 1108 541 1649

3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities:

Each village of the project is connected with pucca road. There are Lower primary and upper primary schools are in every village but

there is only 2 villages have high school. People go to the Valia taluka for their higher education which is 10 km away from the villages.

Villages do not have any Primary Health Centre and bank except Valia for which villagers have to go to Valia. In some villages post office is

there but remaining villages don’t have and they go to the nearest village for this. People go the nearest taluka place for selling and buying of

the products. Majority of villagers have electric facility in their home and some have latrine facility also. Villagers have mobile phones in

their home but don’t have landline. Some extent of the villagers has two whellers and TV set at their home.

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sr. no Village

Pucca road

to the village (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (Number)

Post Office (Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from

nearest market

yard

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperatives

/ CBIs (Number)

Any other institution LP UP HS

1 Kondh Y 1 1 1 0 1 0 10 km 1 0 1 Aganwadi,Madresa 2 Vatariya Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 5 km 1 0 1 Aganwadi 3 Kanerav Y 1 0 0 0 3.00 km Valiya 0 3 km 1 0 0 Aganwadi 4 Desad Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 5 km 1 0 0 Aganwadi 5 Karsad Y 1 1 0 0 3.00 km Desad 0 5 km 1 0 0 Aganwadi 6 Valiya Y 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 0 1 Aganwadi,College


Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets

Sl no Village HHs with electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs

with TV set

HHs with

cooking gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with

freedge Land line/Mobile 2-

wheeler 4-

wheeler

1 Kondh 650 245 342 108 12 298 655 173

2 Vatariya 218 87 80 30 1 74 218 21

3 Kanerav 119 45 43 24 2 43 0 13

4 Desad 371 140 161 67 3 144 366 60

5 Karsad 185 72 63 29 11 53 189 34

6 Valiya 1388 1050 1127 505 111 945 1406 598

3.3. Livelihood pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from agriculture and animal husbandry and during summer seasons they migrate for daily wage

labourers in Surat and Ankleshwar. They earn some money from other works like forest things and handicrafts.

Table no. 27: Per capita Income

Sr. no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total

1 Kondh 5529.84 2200 8577 4755 21061.84

2 Vatariya 10582.6 1570 4500 4188 20840.6

3 Kanerav 16519.2 2300 3500 1155 23474.2

4 Desad 11994.61 1100 5700 3300 22094.61

5 Karsad 13780.53 798.165 6600 1677 22855.7

6 Valiya 5663.3 3355 3095.31 5600 17713.61


3.4 Dependence on forest/Common Property Resource

People use the CPR and forest resources as fodder purpose, fuel purpose. They use all these things for self consumption. Only few

people earn income from fuel and other forest products like bamboo, Mahua oil and timbaru pan.

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr.no Village

Fodder Fuil Wood other product Total

income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Kondh - Self consumption - Self consumption - - -

2 Vatariya - Self consumption - Self consumption - - -

3 Kanerav - Self consumption - Self consumption - - -

4 Desad - Self consumption - Self consumption - - -

5 Karsad - Self consumption - Self consumption - - -

6 Valiya - Self consumption - Self consumption - - -

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr.no Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH) Agriculture + AH Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Kondh 1132 525 135 102 308 20 4 38

2 Vatariya 1025 322 127 151 325 45 0 55

3 Kanerav 490 75 112 115 154 12 0 22

4 Desad 984 224 85 170 405 38 0 62

5 Karsad 494 105 45 95 217 21 0 11

6 Valiya 2315 325 28 85 900 655 12 310


3.5. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per

hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under

that crop.”

Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for all six villages), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006 (For Gujarat and

India), and Final district action plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Bharuch). The results indicate that Kondh project has very low

productivity compared to world, India, Gujarat and Bharuch district. The productivity is low not only because of the land is unproductive or

the farmer’s lack the skill to manage their crops but also due lack of source of irrigation.

In Kondh project people grow crops like Tur, Cotton, Sorghum and Sugercane in Kharif season. And if irrigation facility is available,

they take Rabi crops like Rabi sorghum.

The main crop of the project area is Tur. The productivity of Tur in India is 678 kg/ha. In Gujarat state the productivity of this is 989

kg/ ha. In Bharuch district this is 725 kg/ha. In the project area out of 1656 ha, Tur is grown in only 547 ha area with the production of 197.3

tonne. So the productivity of the area is 360.73 kg/ha. This is very low with respective to district, state as well as national level.

The productivity of Paddy in India is 2278 kg/ha. In Gujarat state the productivity of this is 1699 kg/ ha. In Bharuch district this is

1897 kg/ha. In the project area out of 4457.9 ha, Paddy is grown in only 1525 ha area with the production of 724.37 tonne. So the

productivity of the area is 350 kg/ha. This is also very low with respective to district, state as well as national level.


Figure-4 Comparative productivity of Tur crop and Cotton crops in project area, Bharuch district, state and India level

Kondh project has low productivity because of following reason:

1 Traditional Farming Method:

In Kondh project farmers use traditional farming system. They don’t use new technology or we can say systematic method of cultivation

and high yield varieties of crops in their farms. Farmers don’t use proper FYM, Vermi-compost in their farms. That leads to low yield in

their farm.

2 Small land holding:

Average landholding of the project area is very low so farmers are unable to adopting new cultivation practices in their farms.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

India Gujarat Bharuch Kondh Project

678 700743

341.36

Tur Productivity (Kg/Ha)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

India Gujarat Bharuch Kondh Project

678 700743

341.36

Cotton Productivity (Kg/Ha)


3 Soil erosion:

Due to the undulating topography soil erosion is very high in the project area. So top layer of the soil/ fertile soil is just replaced by new

one and fertility of the land is degraded.

4 Soil fertility very low:

In Kondh project fertility of the soil is very low because of Soil is less nutritive in nitrogen and phosphorus.

5 No irrigation facilities:

Water conservation structures are very less in Kondh project. So rain water is not conserve in the project area. Irrigation facility is also

very less. Farmers use only rainfed farming in their field.

6 Lack of finance for farmer:

In Kondh project above 46.71% of the villagers are BPL. So they can’t purchase high yielding varieties seeds and other machineries for

their farm. They are also unable to adopting new farming technologies in the field also.

7 Lack of storage, marketing and transport facility:

Farmers use their products for domestic purpose and remaining they sell in the nearest market and get less amount of money. They have

no storage facility and transport facility so that they can’t sell their products in good market and get good return.


CHAPTER-4

WATERSHED ACTIVITY

Watershed Activities Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics.

These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high

incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with

watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.1. Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Kondh

project consists of 12 microwatersheds. Further this watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely

Kochbar, Dharoli, Pathar, Kava Projects this gives an element of continuation of the programme.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a

benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was

undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri.

Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village.

This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, acerage of land, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of


BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes

running and their benefits.

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology,

well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards

the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous

Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning,

implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA

techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation

of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various

tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations, Fodders crops, various institutions and their

significance in the life of the farmers. Daily routine activity helps the daily chart or life span of the villagers.

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-

morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all

given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning


An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent,

soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was

used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour

Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation

structures.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes


6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models# No Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides No

2. Organic manures No

3. Vermicompost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer

5. Water saving devices Yes

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

7. Bio-fencing Yes

8. Nutrient budgeting No

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify)

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum


Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr. No.

Name of the PRA Activity / FGD Date

Number of people present Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

1 Resource Mapping:

July to November

62

Resource of income- Agriculture, Animal Husbandry Drinking water sources, i.e. Hand pumps and open well are available for 9 months regularly and remaining months they face water problem

Small land holding

2 Social Mapping: 75 90% ST population

scattered hamlets (falias)

3 Transect walk: 72

Water source for irrigation- pond

Majors crops grown- tur and cotton

Cropping on undulating topography

Bamboo, mahua and teak plantation

4 Focused group

discussion: 85

Women were mostly interested in vermi compost, animal husbandry & vegetable nursery and other micro enterprises Agriculture productivity was low & men were interested in HYV and horticulture

Land holding-1.25 ha

5 Seasonal Calendar: 36

Cropping pattern: mono cropping, mainly Tur and Cotton

Period of availability of water for agriculture: 3-4 months

Migration period- November to may

6 Daily Routine chart 30

Availability of leisure time for women is afternoon during Winter and Summer

Women is only house wife

7 Venn Diagram: 48

Primary schools are there,

No facility for upper education,

No Banking facility,

Dairy Co-operative society is very far from the villages,


Problem Analysis for low agriculture production

Low agriculture Production

Less of water

conservation measures

Small land holding

Soil erosion

Low land productivity

Lack of Irrigation

Traditional farming

Low water table

Less Capital

Lack of awareness

Less irrigation


Figure-5 Focussed Group Dissucussion


Figure-6 PRA


4.2 Institution Building

i) Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village.

This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed

committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in each village of the Kondh

project. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT as well as PIA. The watershed committee has a pivotal role

to play during and after the project implementation period. In the watershed committee one members should be female, one member is

SHG member, one is landless and other members detail are given below.

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details

Sl. No.

Names of

WCs

Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/

yyyy) Designation Name

M F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any other

1

Wat

ers

hed

Co

mm

itte

e K

on

dh

Un

der

pro

gres

s

President Vasava Budhabhai Chaniyabhai √ - √

2 Secretary

Vasava Maheshbhai Deepsangbhai √

- √

3 Member Vasava Ramilaben Sanjaybhai √ - √ √

4 Member Vasava Jasangbhai Chaganbhai √ - √ √

5 Member Vasava Rameshbhai Ambubhai √ - √ √

6 Member Vasava Geetaben Sanjaybhai √ - √ √

7 Member Vasava Sikhajibhai Ramanbhai √ - √ √

8 Nodal Officer

Patel kishorkumar Dahyabhai √

√

9 Member Bobat Mehboobbhai Salejibhai √ - √ √


10 Member Vasava Manjilaben Rajeshbhai √ - √ √

11 Member Vasava Rajeshbhai Danjibhai √ √ √

12 WDT

(Engg) Sarvaiya Nilesh Kishorbhai

√

√

1 W

ate

rsh

ed

Co

mm

itte

e V

ata

riya

Un

de

r p

rogr

ess

President Vasava Virambhai jinabhai √ √

2 Secretary Vasava Mukeshbhai Maljibhai √ √

3 Member Vasava Puspaben Natvarbhai √ √ √

4 Member

Vasava Bhimsangbhai Laxmanbhai √ √ √

5 Member Vasava Pravinbhai Badharbhai √ √ √

6 Member Prasad Manjuben Fulenabhai √ √ √

7 Member Vasava Ishwarbhai Kikabhai √ √ √

8 Nodal Officer


√

9 Member Patel Manishaben Kishorbhai √ √

10 Member Vasava Chandubhai Ganpatbhai √ √ √

11 Member Zaveri Dixitkumar Bharatbhai √ √

12 WDT

(Engg) Sarvaiya Nilesh Kishorbhai

√

1

Wat

ers

he

d C

om

mit

tee

Kan

erav

Un

der

pro

gres

s

President Vasava Shivrambhai Ramsingbhai √

- √

2 Secretary

Vasava Pravinbhai Mariyabhai √

- √

3 Member Vasava Amarsing Chotiyabhai √ -

√

4 Member Vasava Devanbhai Virambhai √ -

√ √

5 Member Vasava Ambubhai Ichhubhai √ -

√ √

6 Member

Vasava Bhanuben Virendrabhai

√

- √

√

7 Member Vasava Rajubhai Budhiyabhai √ -

√ √


8

Nodal Officer


√

9 Member

Vasava Ramubhai Parsottambhai

√ -

√ √

10 Member Vasava Vinodbhai Vajirbhai √ -

√ √

11 Member Vasava Jasuben Raysingbhai √ -

√ √

12

WDT (Engg)

Sarvaiya Nilesh Kishorbhai √

1

Wat

ers

hed

Co

mm

itte

e D

esa

d

Un

der

pro

gre

ss

President Vasava Ambubhai D. √ -

√

2 Secretary

Mangrola Balvantsinh Nathusinh

√ -

3 Member

Vashi Prabhavatiben Bhavsinh

√

-

√

4 Member

Karmariya Hetalkumar Umangsinh √

-

√

5 Member Vasava Sukvantiben Tinubhai √ -

√

6 Member Vasava Laxmiben Vinodbhai √ -

√ √

7 Member

Vasava Laxmanbhai Maganbhai √

- √

√

8

Nodal Officer


√

9 Member Panchal Nathubhai Chitubhai

√ -

√

10

Member Bharthaniya Rajendrasinh Hamirsnh

√

-

√

11 Member

Mahida Bharatsinh Mohansinh √

- √

√

12 WDT(Agri)

Prajapati Keyulkumar Ganpatbhai

√


1

Wat

ers

he

d C

om

mit

tee

Kar

sad

Un

de

r p

rogr

ess

President Rana Jaydeepsinh Vinaysinh √ - -

2 Secretary

Bharthaniya Devendrasinh mahendrasinh √

-

3 Member Niporiya Kalaben Vikramsinh √ - -

√

4 Member

Sunva Sanjaykumar Narendrasinh √

- -

√

5 Member

Vasava Shivrambhai Vineshbhai √

- √

¡

6 Member

Bharthaniya Lalitaben Sukhdevsinh

√

- √

7 Member

Vasadiya Deepaksinh Chhatrasinh √

- √

8

Nodal Officer


√

9 Member Vasiya Ishwarsinh Nathusinh √ -

√

10 Member Vasava Ravjibhai Ratiyabhai √ -

√

11 Member Rana Manojkumar Rupsinh √ -

√

12 WDT(Agri)

Prajapati Keyulkumar Ganpatbhai

√

1

Wat

ers

hed

Co

mm

itte

e V

aliy

a

Un

der

pro

gres

s

President Vasava Jagdishbhai √ -

√

2 Secretary Vasava Vinaybhai ivanbhai √ -

√

3 Member Vasava Kusumben Kantilal √ -

√ √

4 Member Modi Kanchanlal Manilal √ - -

√

5 Member Vasava Mukeshbhai Devabhai √ -

√ √

6 Member

Vasava Padmaben Chhatrasinh

√

- √

7 Member

Vasava Ishwarbhai Babarbhai √

- √

√


8

Nodal Officer


√

9 Member

Vasava Jayantibhai Chandubhai √

- √

10 Member

Piludariya Rajendrasinh Raysinh √

- - √

11 Member

Vasava Vechanbhai Ramlabhai √

- √

√

12 WDT(Agri)

Prajapati Keyulkumar Ganpatbhai √

√

ii) Self help Groups:

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group

initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up

with the following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

e) Lack of contribution of female in any activities.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like AKRSP, it was planned to have some capacity building

training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment.


Table no. 33: SHG detail

S. No.

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category

With only Men

With only

Women With both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Kondh

0 8 0 8

(i) Landless 45 45 35 35 45 45

(ii) SF 25 25 13 13 12 12

(iii) MF 10 10 0 6 6

(iv) LF

Total 0 8 0 8 0 80 80 0 48 48 0 63 63

2 Vatariya

4 4

(i) Landless 22 22 13 13 3 3

(ii) SF 12 12 7 7 0

(iii) MF 10 10 5 5 0

(iv) LF

Total 0 4 0 4 0 44 44 0 25 25 0 3 3

3 Kanerav

0 4 0 4

(i) Landless 16 16 16 16 16 16

(ii) SF 11 11 11 11 7 7

(iii) MF 13 13 13 13 4 4

(iv) LF

Total 0 4 0 4 0 40 40 0 40 40 0 27 27

4 Desad

0 6 0 6

(i) Landless 22 22 20 20 15 15

(ii) SF 25 25 13 13 8 8

(iii) MF 19 19 11 11 0

(iv) LF


Total 0 6 0 6 0 66 66 0 44 44 0 23 23

5 Karsad

0 4 0 4

(i) Landless 22 22 16 16 10 10

(ii) SF 12 12 7 7 0

(iii) MF 14 14 0 0

(iv) LF

Total 0 4 0 4 0 48 48 0 23 23 0 10 10

6 Valiya

0 5 0 5

(i) Landless 22 22 22 22 18 18

(ii) SF 14 14 15 15 9 9

(iii) MF 17 17 2 2 0

(iv) LF

Total 0 5 0 5 0 53 53 0 39 39 0 27 27

G.TOTAL 0 31.00 0.00 31.00 0.00 0.00 331.00 331.00 0.00 219.00 219.00 0.00 153.00 153.00

4.2.3 User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group

collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 34: UG detail

S. No. Village

Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1

Kondh 9 9

(i)Landless 30 30 30 30 17

(ii) SF 22 22 5 5 5

(iii) MF 24 24 9 9 9

(iv) LF 6 6 2 2


Total 9 0 0 9 82 0 82 46 0 46 31 0 0

2

Vatariya 8 8

(i)Landless 22 22 22 22 9

(ii) SF 32 32 15 15 2

(iii) MF 19 19 12 12 2

(iv) LF 2 2 0

Total 8 0 0 8 75 0 75 49 0 49 13 0 0

3

Kanerav 2 2

(i)Landless 10 10 10 10 8

(ii) SF 5 5 5 5 3

(iii) MF 5 5 5 5 3

(iv) LF 0 0

Total 2 0 0 2 20 0 20 20 0 20 14 0 0

4

Desad 7 7

(i)Landless 22 22 18 18 15

(ii) SF 17 17 12 12 8

(iii) MF 15 15 8 8 4

(iv) LF 2 2 0

Total 7 0 0 7 56 0 56 38 0 38 27 0 0

5

Karsad 3 3

(i)Landless 12 12 5 5 5

(ii) SF 15 15 8 8 6

(iii) MF 15 15 7 7 5

(iv) LF 0 0

Total 3 0 0 3 42 0 42 20 0 20 16 0 0

6

Valiya 4 4

(i)Landless 18 18 14 14 7

(ii) SF 10 10 8 8 5

(iii) MF 14 14 9 9 6

(iv) LF 0 0

Total 4 0 0 4 42 0 42 31 0 31 18 0 0

Grant Total 33 0 0 33 0 317 0 317 204 0 204 119 0 0


4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP, Kondh

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project;

generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted

with village people in Gram Sabha regarding the EPA activity. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important, which

revive the common natural resources. EPA was selected on the basis of Drinking water problem, repairing of structures for irrigation water

facilities and for animal drinking problem. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result

in sustainability of activities. In EPA some activities like pipeline, sintax tank, bore well, electrical motor have taken for drinking water

facility and other activities like check dam repairing and Desilting, Hawada etc. have taken for irrigation purpose in the villages. In some

villages Protection and cause way has taken in EPA activity.

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No.

Names of Villages

Amount earmark

ed for EPA

Entry Point Activities planned

No.of work

s Net exp. In IWMP

convergence

Total estima

ted cost Expected outcome

1 KONDH 8.62

Drinking waterPipe line 1 2.85 2.85 Solution of drinking water problems Hawada Repairing 1 0.45 0.45 Solution of Animal drinking water problems Causeway Repairig 1 3.00 3.00 Solution of two villages connectivity Protection wall 1 2.32 2.32 To protect demage causeway

2 VATARIYA 4.36 Pond deepening 1 3.00 3.00 recharging & Irrigation Facilities Checkdam Repairing 1 1.36 1.36 recharging & Irrigation Facilities

3 KANERAV 0.84

Borewell with single face(School) 1 0.84 0.84 Solution of drinking water problems

4 DESAD 3.62

Causeway 1 3.62 3.62 Solution of villages to farm field connectivity

5 KARSAD 1.93 Pond deepening 1 1.93 1.93 recharging & Irrigation Facilities

6 VALIYA 2.64 Causeway 1 1.94 1.94 Solution of school connectivity Animal Water through (hawada) Bharvadvas 1 0.70 0.70 Solution of Animal drinking water problems

TOTAL :- 22.01 11 22.01 22.01


Table No. 35.1 Estimation of Hawada At village Valiya

NO DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY Rate per Amount

1 Excavation for foundation

* Foundation 1 8.30 5.00 0.20 8.30 8.30 87.00 Cu.m 722.10

2 Cement concrete in 1:4:8

1 8.30 5.00 0.20 8.30 8.30 2838.6 Cu.m 23560.38

3 Cement concrete in 1:2:4

* Bottom Layer 1 8.30 5.00 0.10 4.15

* Long Vertical wall O/o 2 5.30 0.15 0.50 0.80

* Short vertical wall I/I 2 1.20 0.15 0.50 0.18 5.13 4018.10 Cu.m 20592.76

4 Providing cement plaster in 20mm tk

* Bottom 1 8.30 5.00 41.50

* Long vertical wall O/o 2 5.30 0.50 5.30

* Short vertical wall O/o 2 1.50 0.50 1.50

* Long vertical wall I/I 2 5.00 0.50 5.00

* Short vertical wall I/I 2 1.20 0.50 1.20

* Long wall top 2 5.30 0.15 1.59

* Short wall top 2 1.20 0.15 0.36 56.45 141.60 Sq.m 7993.32

5 Mild Steel bars

( S.O.R.P.No. 62 Sr.No. 5 )

* Bottom base steel ( both side )

* 8 mm dia. 0.15m c/c

Nos=8.30/0.15+1=56.33 say 56 nos 56 X 5.00 X 0.395 110.60

* 8 mm dia. 0.15m c/c

Nos=5.00/0.15+1=34.33 say 34 nos 34 X 8.30 X 0.395 111.47

* Vertical Bars

* long wall- 10mm dia. Bars o.15 m c/c


Nos=5.15/0.15+1=35.33 say 35 nos 2 X 35 X 0.75 X 0.62 32.55

* Short wall

Nos=1.35/0.15+1=10 nos 2 X 10 X 0.75 X 0.62 9.30

* Distribution bars 8mm dia

* L=5.15+5.15+1.35+1.35=13.00m

Nos=0.55/0.15+1=4.667say 5 nos 2 X 5.00 X 13.00 X 0.75 X 0.395 38.51 302.43 54.88 Kg 16597.30

6 Name Plate 1 Nos.

1 nos 1 nos 1200 Nos 1200.00

TOTAL AMOUNT :- 70665.87

SAY :- 70000.00

ESTIMATION OF DRINKING WATER PIPELINE AT:- KONDH NO DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY RATE AMOUNT

1 Excavation for pipe line 1 760 0.45 0.75 256.50 256.50 87.00 22315.5

2 Sand filling in bed 1 760 0.45 0.10 34.20 34.20 650.00 22230.00

3 110mm P.V.C Pipe line 6 kg/Sq.cm 1 760 760 ( S.O.R.P.NO. 68. SR.NO. 170/7 )

760.00 275.00 209000.00

4 10 % of cost for bend ,t,Valve etc.

20900.00

5 Labour Charges of P.V.C pipe fitting 1 760 760 760.00 15.00 11400.00 TOTAL AMOUNT:- 285845.50 SAY:- 285000.00


Figure-7, EPA acitivity in Kondh project

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence

approach should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56 percent is allotted for this

work.


Ridge Area Treatment Plans:

It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. For the ridge area treatment of Kondh watershed

following structure are been Proposed after interaction among Gram sabha, watershed committee, Technical Experts, Project Manager and

other field staff of project.after preparing DPR all these activities list was approved in again Gram Sabha.

1. Check dam 2. Gully plug 3. Stone bunding 4. Gabion structure 5. Farm pond 6. Outlet 7. Farm weist weir 8. Farm bunding

1. Check dams

Check Dam is a structure constructed using cement and concrete across the river of comparatively wider water channel. This

structure is preferred where the height of both the banks of river is considerably high and the width of river channel or stream is less.

Advantages of check dams

The advantages of check dams are that they store surface water for use both during and after the monsoon. They help in ground water

recharge of the area. Recharge of water helps in raising the water table in the area. Avaiability of water ensures the increase of agricultural

yield by multi-cropping.

2. Gully plug

A small gully bund like this one Prevents a new Gully being formed in the middle of the farm, thus preventing erosion from the beginning

itself. Such bunds would make two parts of one field, thus making it difficult to plough, but some farmers are ready to do it.


3. Gabion structure

Gabions are used to stabilize shorelines or slopes against erosion. Other uses include retaining walls, temporary floodwalls, to filter silt

from runoff, for small or temporary/permanent dams, river training, channel lining. They may be used to direct the force of a flow of flood

water around a vulnerable structure. Gabions are also used as fish barriers on small streams.

4. Farm pond

Farm pond provides a unique water management runoff facility that could feed pond with seasonal fresh water. This water will be useful

for feeding your livestock in the summer or it could serve as a very effective backup source of freshwater to meet the needs of farm in case

there is a drought like condition in the area.

5. Stone bunding:

After filling the Staggered Trenches, the excess water flows out in the form of little streams. To stop these streams, the obstruction walls

of the length equal to the width of the streams are made with the help of stones. Such walls are created at an interval of 200 to 300 meters

along the channels of the streams. These walls are known as Stone bunding.

6. Percolation tank

Percolation Tank is the arrangement in which the retaining walls of clay are made and a dam (waste weir) is constructed using cement

concrete. This tank is preferred at the site where two to three rain water streams meet. The outlet is also planned so that excess water

overflows out of it. The Storage Tank is a good basin for water storage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shore

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erosion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floodwall

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silt

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_barrier

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stream


Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*

Sr. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (iii) (i)

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG

No. of units (No./

Cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) (D)

Land dev. (L)

Private (ii)SHG

(iii) Others

(pl. specify) M W O T

1 Kondh

Gully plug R L P P 75 15.0038154 Land Levelling L P P 70 20.07745

Farmbunding L P P 17420

rmt 14.549184

Farm outlet L P P 70 1.05 Stone bunding R L P P

275 rmt 1.655775

Nala plug L P P 73 38.8755

TOTAL:- 91.21172

2 Vatariya


Farmbunding L P P 10600

rmt 8.85312


430 rmt 2.58903


TOTAL:- 34.43105


3 Kanerav


Farmbunding L P P 2475 rmt 2.06712

Farm outlet L P P 11 0.165 Stone bunding R L P P 45 rmt 0.270945


TOTAL:- 6.45701

4 Desad





TOTAL:- 22.05425

5 karsad




110 rmt 0.66231


TOTAL:- 24.04761


6 Valiya





18.21788

G.TOTAL:- 196.419527

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakhs .)

S. No.

Village name Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

(cum) Estimated cost No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage

capacity

(cum) Estimated cost

1 Kondh

New Pond 6 21 29000 10.8879 6 21 29000 10.8879

Pond depning 1 5 8000 1.52 1 5 8000 1.52

Weist weir 1 2.5 2500 0.6 1 2.5 2500 0.6

Check dam 5 9 17000 3.6 5 9 17000 3.6

Recharge channel 1 2 2000 0.3752 1 2 2000 0.3752 Farm Pond Depning 2 4.5 7500 1.25 2 4.5 7500 1.25

Outlet 5 19 27000 10.5 5 19 27000 10.5

Drainage Line 6 6.5 11500 2.85621 6 6.5 11500 2.85621


Total :- 1 5 8000 1.52 26 64.5 96500 30.0693 27 69.5 10450

0 31.5893

2 Vatari

ya

New Pond 1 8.5 16500 3 1 8.5 16500 3

Check dam 4 23 31500 11.5 4 23 31500 11.5

Recharge channel 1 8 16500 3 1 8 16500 3 Farm Pond Depning 1 3.75 6500 0.85 1 3.75 6500 0.85

Outlet 2 8.5 16500 3.5 2 8.5 16500 3.5

Drainage Line 1 3.25 6000 0.75 1 3.25 6000 0.75 Disilting of checkdam 1 5.5 10500 2.7364 1 5.5 10500 2.7364 Checkdam Repairing 1 4.75 7800 1.5 1 4.75 7800 1.5

Total :- 2 8.5 14300 2.35 10 56.75 97500 24.4864 12 65.25 11180

0 26.8364

3 Kanera

v

Checkdam 1 5 10000 2.74 1 5 10000 2.74

Farm Pond 1 4.5 5500 0.5 1 4.5 5500 0.504

Drainage Line 3 4 7500 1.26 3 4 7500 1.26

Total :- 0 0 0 0 5 13.5 23000 4.5 5 13.5 23000 4.504

4 Desad

New pond 3 19 27500 8.157 3 19 27500 8.157

Pond deepening 1 5.75 9000 2 1 5.75 9000 2

Outlet 3 14.5 25500 7.5 3 14.5 25500 7.5 Checkdam Repairing 3 9.25 18000 5 3 9.25 18000 5

Farm Pond 1 5.75 9000 2 1 5.75 9000 2

Drainage Line 3 9.25 17000 3.75 3 9.25 17000 3.75

Total :- 4 15 27000 7 10 48.5 79000 21.407 14 63.5 10600

0 28.407

5 Karsad

Checkdam Repairing 2 6.5 12000 2.986 2 6.5 12000 2.986 Disilting of checkdam 1 3 6500 0.9 1 3 6500 0.9

Total :- 3 9.5 18500 3.886 0 0 0 0 3 9.5 18500 3.886


6 Valiya

Pond deepening 3 13 24500 7.29 3 13 24500 7.29 Pondbund pitching work 1 6.5 14500 2.5 1 6.5 14500 2.5

Outlet 2 9 18575 6 2 9 18575 6 Checkdam Repairing 1 5.75 9000 2 1 5.75 9000 2

Drainage Line 1 0.75 1 0 0 0.75

Total :- 4 18.75 33500 9.29 4 15.5 33075 9.25 8 34.25 66575 18.54

G.TOTAl:-

14.00 56.75

101300.00 24.05

55.00 198.75

329075.00

89.71271 69 255.5

430375

113.76271

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

S. No.

Name of

village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Commu

nity (iii) Others (pl. specify)

(i) UG Estimated cost

(ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

1 Kondh Nursery Raising P C Shg 2.80

Vegetable Nursery (Chilli, Tomato, Brinjal and Onion)

P C Shg 2.10

Vermi compost unit P C Shg 0.50

Low cost green house P Shg 2.00

Poultry unit ( Small) P C Shg 6.00

Fishries C Ugs 1.00


Paper dish making P Shg 2.00

Utensils Services Shg 2.99

TOTAL:- 19.39

Horticulture plantation P Individual 1.20

Floriculture demo plot(Rose) P Individual 2.50

Floriculture demo plot(Merigold) P Individual 1.20

Horticulture demo. plot P Individual 1.50

Crop demonstration plot P Individual 1.50

Crop demonstration plot with sprinkler P Individual

Fruit demo.plot (Ha.) P Individual

Vegetable crop. demo. Plot P Individual 2.00

High yielding varieties seeds bank P Individual 0.50

Drip irrigation P Individual 2.40

Lift irrigation System C Ugs 6.00

Farm implements Individual 0.80

Irrigation pump set P Individual 0.75

Dal processing unit P Shg

Mini oil mill unit P Shg

Fodder development C Ugs 0.60

Cattle camp O Community 0.90

Mineral Mixture O Individual 0.63

Sewing machine P Individual 0.80

Sugarcane Juicer Machine P Individual 0.50

fall stiching machine P Individual 0.10

TOTAL:- 23.88


2 Vatariya Nursery raising P C Shg 1.25


P C Shg 1.50




Fishries C Ugs 1.86

Paper dish making P Shg 1.00

TOTAL:- 9.81


Floriculture demo plot P Individual 0.60



Crop demonstration plot with sprinkler P Individual 0.60

Fruit demo.plot (Ha.) P Individual 0.50




Lift irrigation System C Ugs 2.65



Dal processing unit P Shg 1.00

Mini oil mill unit P Shg 0.00

Fodder development P Ugs 0.40



Sewing machine Individual 0.80




TOTAL:- 12.80

3 Kanerav Nursery raising P C Shg 0.25


P C Shg 0.25

Low cost green house P C Shg 0.38

Poultry unit ( Small) P Shg 0.50

Fishries C Ugs 0.50

Utensils Services Shg 2.00

TOTAL:- 3.88








Cattle camp P Community 0.30


TOTAL:- 2.79

4 Desad Nursery raising P C Shg 1.50


P C Shg 1.00




Fishries C Ugs 1.45

TOTAL:- 8.15









Lift irrigation System Ugs 1.50

Farm implements P Individual 0.90








TOTAL:- 11.48

5 Karsad Nursery raising P C Shg 0.50


P C Shg 0.50




Fishries C Ugs 1.00

TOTAL:- 5.35

















TOTAL:- 7.18

6 Valiya Nursery raising P C Shg 0.75


P C Shg 0.75




Fishries C Ugs 0.59

Leaf plate & cup making machine Shg 0.00

Paper dish making Shg 1.00

TOTAL:- Individual 5.94





Fruit demo.plot (Ha.) P Individual 0.50




Lift irrigation System P Ugs 1.00









TOTAL:- 9.83


Table no. 40 : Activities related to livelihood by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

Sr. No. Names of Major activities of the SHGs

Project Name of activity No. of SHGs

involved Average annual income from activity per SHG

1

IWMP -9 Kondh

Nursery Raising 12 35000

2 Vermicomost unit 8 30000

3 Fishries 7 75000

4 Gaucher dev.& Fruit tree Plantation 2 90000

5 Poltry unit 5 78000

6 Dalmill Unit 1 36000

7 Floriculture 6 70000

8 Vegetable Nursery 6 3500

9 Paper dish Making 3 45000


Table No. 40.1 ESTIMATION OF GULLY PLUG

SR.NO DESCRIPTION No L B H Qty Rate Amount

1 Excavation 1 1.00 2.25 0.35 0.79 87.00 68.73

2 Below G.L Stone 1 1.00 2.25 0.35 0.79 1003.50 792.50

3 Above G.l 1 1.00 2.25+1.25/2 1.30

4 1 1.00 1.7500 1.30 2.28 1003.50 2282.96

5 Per 1 mt cost 3149.21

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION GULLY PLUG SR.No PARTICULARS VALUE UNITS

1 Top width of bund 1.25 M

2 Bottom width of bund 2.25 M

3 Depth above G.L 1.25 M

4 Depth of foundation 0.35 M

5 Cross section of bund 1.75 SQ.M


Table no. 40.2 ESTIMATION OF STONE BUNDING

SR.NO DESCRIPTION No L B H Qty Rate Amount

1 Above G.l stone bund 1 1.00 1.00+0.60/2 0.75

2 1 1.00 0.80 0.75 0.60 1003.50 602.10

3 Per 1 mt cost 602.10

SR.No PARTICULARS VALUE UNITS

1 Top width of bund 0.60 M


3 Depth above G.L 0.75 M

5 Cross section of bund 0.60 Sq.m

1.00 M

0.60 M

0.75 M


Table no. 40.3 Estimation of Farm Bunding

SR.NO DESCRIPTION No L B H Qty Rate Amount (Rs)

1 Farm Bund 1 1.00 2.2+1.00/2 0.6

1 1.00 1.60 0.6 0.96 87 83.5

SR. No PARTICULARS VALUE UNITS

1 Top width of bund 1 M


3 Hight of bund 0.6 M

4 Cross section of bund 0.96 Sq.m


Table No. 40.4 Estimation of Nala plug 7.00 m Long DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY Rate Per Amount

1

Excavation for foundation ….

14.80

Body wall 1 3.00 1.20 1.20 4.32

Apron 1 2.70 1.20 0.60 1.94

End wall 1 2.70 0.60 0.60 0.97

Wing wall 2 1.80 0.90 0.90 2.92

Key wall - L & R side 2 2.15 1.20 0.90 4.64 87.00 Cu.m 1287.252

2

Cement concrete in 1:4:8

2.244

Body wall 1 3.00 1.20 0.10 0.36

Apron 1 3.00 2.85 0.10 0.86

End wall 1 2.70 0.60 0.10 0.16

Wing wall 2 1.95 0.90 0.10 0.35


3

coarse rubble masonary in c.m 1:6

16.00

Body wall up to g.l 1 3.00 0.90 1.10 2.97

Body wall up to g.l to top( B= 0.9+0.6/2=.75) 1 3.00 0.75 1.00 2.25

Apron 1 3.00 1.50 0.30 1.35

End wall up to top 1 3.00 0.30 0.50 0.45

Wing wall up to g.l. 2 1.80 0.60 0.80 1.73

Wing wall up to g.l to top. ( h = 1.30+0.30/2 ) 2 1.80 0.60 0.80 1.73

Key wall - L & R side up to g.l. 2 2.00 0.60 1.10 2.64

Key wall - L g.l to top 2 2.00 0.60 1.20 2.88 2368 Cu.m 37878.528

4 concrete ( 1 : 2 : 4 ) with black stone

1.65

Body wall 1 3.00 0.60 0.10 0.18


Apron 1 3.00 1.50 0.20 0.90

End wall 1 3.00 0.30 0.10 0.09

Wing wall 2 2.00 0.60 0.10 0.24


5

cement plastering in cm 1:3 ( 20mm tk )

27.18

Body wall 2 3.00 1.10 6.60

Apron 1 3.00 1.50 4.50

End wall 2 3.00 0.45 2.70

End wall top 1 3.00 0.30 0.90

Wing wall top 2 2.00 0.60 2.40

Fair side of wing wall 2 1.80 0.80 2.88

Key wall - L & R side top 2 2.00 0.60 2.40

Key wall - L & R both side 4 2.00 0.60 4.80 141.6 Sq.m 3848.688

6 Name plate. 1 nos 1200 Nos 1200

TOTAL :- 57214.1514

SAY :- 57000.00


Table No. 40.5 Quantity & cost Estimation of checkdam

NO DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY RATE PER AMOUNT

1

Excavation for foundation …

47.94 87.00 Cu.m 4170.78

Body wall...... 1 5.00 2.00 1.50 15.00

Key wall (L) side........ 1 2.25 2.00 1.50 6.75

Key wall (R) side........ 1 2.25 2.00 1.50 6.75

Side wall......... 2 1.80 2.00 1.50 10.80

End wall....... 1 9.00 0.60 0.60 3.24

Apron..... 1 5.00 1.80 0.60 5.40

2

C.C 1:4:8 …..

13.23

Cu.m

Body wall...... 1 5.00 2.00 0.30 3.00

Key wall (L) side........ 1 2.25 2.00 0.30 1.35

Key wall (R) side........ 1 2.25 2.00 0.30 1.35

Side wall......... 2 1.80 2.00 0.30 2.16

End wall....... 1 9.00 0.60 0.30 1.62

Apron..... 1 5.00 2.50 0.30 3.75

2838.60 37554.68

3

C.C 1:2:4 …..

23.64

Cu.m

Body wall up to G.L....... 1 5.00 1.50 1.20 9.00

Body wall up to G.L to top… 1 5.50 1.125 1.50 9.28

(B=.75+1.5/2=1.125)


Key wall top 2 2.25 0.75 0.15 0.51

End wall top..... 1 5.50 0.30 0.15 0.25

Side wall top..... 2 2.50 0.75 0.15 0.56

Apron.... 1 5.50 2.45 0.30 4.04

4018.10 94987.88

4

C.C 1:3:6

41.45

Cu.m

Key wall up to G.L........ 2 2.25 1.50 1.20 8.10

Key wall up to G.L to top...... 2 2.25 1.125 2.00 10.13

.(B=.75+1.5/2=1.125)

Side wall up to G.L...... 2 2.75 1.50 1.20 9.90

Side wall up to G.L to top… 2 2.75 1.125 2.00 12.38

(B.=.75+1.5/2=1.125) 0.00

End wall up to G.L... 1 5.00 0.30 0.30 0.45

End wall up to G.L to top..... 1 5.50 0.30 0.30 0.50

3136.60 129996.4

5

Cement plaster in 20 mm tk

45.29

Sq.m

Body wall top.. 1 5.50 0.75 4.13

Body wall D/S side... 1 5.50 1.50 8.25

Body wall u/S side... 1 5.50 1.50 8.25

Side wall top... 2 2.75 0.75 4.13

Side wall inner side.. 2 2.50 2.15 10.75

Side wall front side.. 2 1.125 2.15 4.84


Endwall side…. 2 5.50 0.30 3.30

End wall top… 1 5.50 0.30 1.65

141.60 6412.71

6 Name plate 1 1 Nos 1200 1200

TOTAL AMOUNT :- 274322.44

SAY :- 274000.00

Cross section of check dam


Table No. 40.6 Quantity & cost Estimation of New pond

NO DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY RATE PER AMOUNT

1 Exacavation work of pond 1 65+40/2 58+40/2 1.50

55.00 49.00 1.50 4042.50 4042.50 50.40 203742.00

SAY :- 200000.00


Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

Sr. No. Project Name of activity Forward linkage Backward linkage

1 IWMP-9 Kondh

Vermi compost unit Local area Local area

Nursery raising Local market Local area

Net house (vegitable and fruit seedling). Local area Local market and Jhagadiya

Leaf plate & cup Making Machine Local area Local market

Paper dish Making Local area Local market

Oil mill (mahuda,ground nut) Local area Local market

Fodder development Local area Local market

Fishries Local area Local market Valiya ,

Ankleshwar and Bharuch

Dal mill Local area Local market Valiya and

Ankleshwar Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover inwatershed works

No. Name of village Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line (

D )

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Communi

ty

(iii) Others (pl. specify

)

(i) UG

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

Expected

month & year

of completion (mm/ yyyy)

(ii)SHG (Rs. in lakhs)

(iii) Others

1 Kondh

Farm Forestry L P Private 45.0045 50000 5.00 Teackwood Plantation with Staggered trench ( 1.hac) R C UGS 1 1111 0.70 Teackwood Plantation with Staggered trench ( 1.hac) R C UGS 1 1111 0.70


Teackwood Plantation with Staggered trench ( 1.hac) R C UGS 1 1111 0.70 Afforestation with Staggered trench ( 2.hac) R C UGS 2 2222 1.00 Afforestation with Staggered trench ( 2.hac) R C UGS 2 2222 1.00 Afforestation with Staggered trench ( 2.hac) R C UGS 2 2222 1.00 Afforestation with Staggered trench ( 2.hac) R C UGS 2 2222 1.00

TOTAL:- 56.0045 62221 11.10

2 Vatariya

Farm Forestry L P Private 13.5014 15000 1.50

Staggered trench ( 2.hac) R C UGS 2 0.40

Staggered trench ( 2.hac) R C UGS 2 0.40

Gaucher dev. With horticulture plantation(2.00) R C SHG 2 5000 3.00

Afforestation with trench(Teak wood) R C UGS 2 5000 2.00

Afforestation with trench R C UGS 2 2222 1.00

Afforestation with trench R C UGS 0.8 888 0.40

TOTAL:- 24.3014 28110 8.70

3 Kanerav Farm Forestry L P Private 4.50045 5000 0.5

Afforestation with trench R C 1.5 1666 0.75

TOTAL:- 6.00045 6666 1.25

4 Desad


Afforestationwith trench R C UGS 1.5 1111 0.75



Gaucher dev. With horticulture plantation(1.00)

C

SHG 1 933 1.80


TOTAL:- 14.5009 14266 5.05

5 Karsad


Afforestation(1.00) R C UGS 1 1111 0.50

Gaucher dev. With horticulture plantation(2.00) C SHG 1 933 1.00


TOTAL:- 9.30063 10155 3.20

6 Valiya

Farm Forestry L P Private 13.5014 15000 1.50 Afforestation with staggered trench R C UGS 1 1111 0.50



TOTAL:- 17.5014 19444 3.50

Table No. 42.1 Estimation of Fruit tree plantation

SR.No DESCRIPTION No L B H QTY T.QTY RATE T.AMOUNT No

1 excavation of plant pit 533 0.45 0.45 0.45 48.57 48.57 87 4225.56

2 Excavation for trenches 1 400 1 0.6 240 240 87 20880.00

3 No.of Horticulture plants ( Mango) 400 400 85 34000.00

4 No.of Drum stick plants 133 133 15 1995.00

5 Three times of weeding &soil work,with transportationcharges 533 533 8.5 4530.50

6 400 mt fencing work 400 Per Rmt 400 273 109200.00

7 TOTAL :- 180331.06


SAY :- 180000.00

Table 42.2 Estimation of Vermi compost unit No Description No L B H Qty T.Qty Rate Per Amount

1 Excavtion for pole foundation 6 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.296

Excavation Long wall 2 6 0.45 0.45 2.43

2 3 0.45 0.45 1.215 4.941 87 Cu.m 429.867

2 c.c. 1:2:4 6 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.296

2 6 0.45 0.1 0.54

2 3 0.45 0.1 0.27 2.106 4018.1 Cu.m 8462.1186

3

Outer side brick Masonary up to top

2 6 0.23 0.8 2.208

2 3 0.23 0.8 1.104 3.312 2639.1 Cu.m 8740.6992

4 Cement plaster Long side wall 4 6 0.35 8.4

short side wall 4 3 0.35 4.2

long wall top 2 6 0.23 2.76

short wall top 2 3 0.23 1.38 16.74 103.8 Sq.m. 1737.612

5 M.S.Pole 1.25 " 6 3 18

Vertical pole 4 3 12

Top horizontal long side 3 3 9

Top horizontal Short Side 39 129 kg 5031.00

6 90% Green net

Long side 2 7 3 21

short side 2 4 3 12

Top of green house 1 6 3 18

51 60 Sq.m. 3060.00

7 Esiana fortyda verm. 25 30 30 250 kg 7500.00

9 Nat bulots , labour charges Lump sump 500 500.00

T.AMOUNT:- 35031.4298

SAY :- 35000.00


Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No. Name(s) of the villages

CPR particulars

Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the

activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure

(Rs.)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

1 Khondh

Waist Land

New pond (3.52 h)-850 2.5 2.00 8

New pond (0.56 h)-577 2.5 2.00 8

New pond (0.78 h) ( 40 x 40 )-698 2 1.50 7

Pond Depning-850 2 1.52 7

Outlet-850 2.4 2.50 9

Outlet-850 2.4 2.00 8

Outlet-577 2 1.50 7

Gaucher

New pond (1.62 h)-1.90 2.4 1.90 8

Outlet-305 2.75 2.50 5

New pond (1.95 h)-2.00 2.5 2.00 8

New pond (0.92 h)-1.49 1.5 1.49 6

Outlet-200 2.4 2.00 7

Small Checkdam ( 6.00m)-682 0.75 0.60 4

Afforestation with Staggered trench ( 2.hac) 2 1.00 8




TOTAL:- 27.51

2

Vatariya Gaucher

Staggered trench ( 2.hac) 2 2.00 8

Staggered trench ( 2.hac) 2 2.00 8

Gaucher dev. With horticulture plantation(2.00) 2 2.00 8

Afforestation with trench(Teak wood) 2 2.00 11

Afforestation with trench 2 2.00 11


Checkdam 2.5 3.00 9


Recharge channel 2 3.00 5

Checkdam 2.4 3.00 7

Small Checkdam ( 8.00m) 2.25 2.50 5

Checkdam Repairing 1 1.50 6

Waist Land

New pond 3.25 3.00 8

Outlet 2.7 3.00 7

Disilting of checkdam 2.2 2.7364 6

Checkdam 2.75 3.00 9

TOTAL:- 35.5364

3 Kanerav Gaucher Afforestation with trench 1 0.750 8

TOTAL:- 0.750

4 Desad Gaucher

Gully plug 0.5 0.217 4

Farmbunding 0.25 0.167 2

Stone bunding 0.15 0.151 2

Stone bunding 0.23 0.120 2

Nala plug 0.5 0.571 3

Nala plug 0.5 0.571 3

Nala plug 0.6 0.571 3

Afforestationwith trench(1.00) 1 0.750 8




New pond 2.35 2.657 8

New pond 2.4 2.500 9

New pond 2.75 3.000 11

Pond deepening 1.85 2.000 7

Outlet 1.1 1.500 6

Outlet 2.4 3.000 9

Outlet 2.35 3.000 9

Checkdam Repairing 1.9 2.000 7


Farm Pond 1.75 2.000 3


Drainage Line 2 2.250 3

TOTAL:- 31.82

5 Karsad

Gaucher

Farmbunding 0.25 0.1670 1

Nala plug 0.45 0.0815 1

Nala plug 0.45 0.0815 1

Nala plug 0.45 0.0815 1

Afforestation(1.00) 0.75 0.5000 8

Gaucher dev. With horticulture plantation(2.00) 1.25 1.0000 11


Waste land Checkdam Repairing 1.65 2.0000 5


TOTAL:- 5.8974

6 Valiya Gaucher

Afforestation with staggered trench 0.75 0.5000 7


Afforestation with trench 0.5 0.5000 9


Outlet 2.25 3.0000 5


Pondbund pitching work 1.85 2.5000 5


Outlet 2.65 3.0000 5


TOTAL:- 19.83


4.4 Capacity building

Capacity building is a process to strengthen the abilities of people, organizations and systems to make effective and efficient use of

resources in order to make achieve their own goals on a sustainable basis” (German Technical Corporation). The definition pretty much

captures the essence of capacity building exercise in a holistic way by mentioning organization and system along with people. From a long

time, the focus has been on people only. This leads to a distorted and suboptimal outcome of the whole capacity building exercise. No

wonder, the realization has dawned upon the policymakers and they have started to emphasize upon the holistic approach rather than a

piecemeal one.

Scope of capacity building in Kondh project

Scientific technique for soil and water conservation

Improved technology (Integrated Farming and organic farming) of crop production

Vermi-compost

Micro propagation technology of Horticulture plantlets

Post Harvest Technology

Horticulture training, Floriculture

Organic farming

Nursery

Cropping pattern (Intercropping and Crop rotation)

Drip irrigation

Poultry

Fodder bank

Fisheries

Dairy maintenance


Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

S. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact

no., website & e-mail

Type of Institute# Area(s) of speciali-zation$

Accredita-tion details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees to be trained

1 KVK Chaswad Research institute

Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal husbundary GoI

2011-2016 3 550

2 AKRSP Netrang NGO Capacity building 2010-2013 3 450

3

Navsari Agriculture

uni. Navsari University Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal

husbundary GoI 2011-2014 2 125

4 BISAG Gandhinagar Space

Application Remote sensing & GIS GoG 2011-2016 3 12

Figure no. 8: Photographs of Capacity building


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. State Project

Project Stakeholders

Total no. of persons

No. of persons to be

trained No. of training programmes Estimated cost

1 Gujarat IWMP 9-

Kondh

PIA 5 5 5 0.43

WDTs 4 4 5 0.34

UGs 676 50 8 12.84

SHGs 420 45 5 10.08

WCs 150 36 2 2.40

Other 150 1.42

TOTAL :- 27.51

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure

(Rs.)

Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Video show Dwdu-Bharuch 8000

Awarness 2 Banners,Hordings Dwdu-Bharuch 8500

3 Pamplets and posters Dwdu-Bharuch

7200

4 Street plays Local drama group 14000


CHAPTER-5

BUDGETING

The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various components as detailed in the common guidelines and done

accordingly in table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds.

table 47. Budget at glance

No Village Project

area ( ha )

Total fund in lakhs

Administrative costs

Monitoring

Evaluation

Entry Point

activity

Institution and Capacity Building

Detailed Project Report

Watershed Development Works

Livelihood activities for asset less

Production systems and micro-enterprises

Consolidation phase Total

10% 1% 1% 4% 5% 1% 56% 9% 10% 3% 100%

1 Kondh 1795.50 215.46 21.55 2.15 2.15 8.62 10.77 2.15 120.66 19.39 21.55 6.46 215.46

2 Vatariya 908.10 108.97 10.90 1.09 1.09 4.36 5.45 1.09 61.02 9.81 10.90 3.27 108.97

3 Kanerav 174.30 20.92 2.09 0.21 0.21 0.84 1.05 0.21 11.71 1.88 2.09 0.63 20.92

4 Desad 754.40 90.53 9.05 0.91 0.91 3.62 4.53 0.91 50.70 8.15 9.05 2.72 90.53

5 Karsad 402.80 48.34 4.83 0.48 0.48 1.93 2.42 0.48 27.07 4.35 4.83 1.45 48.34

6 Valiya 550.00 66.00 6.60 0.66 0.66 2.64 3.30 0.66 36.96 5.94 6.60 1.98 66.00

4585.10 550.21 55.02 5.50 5.50 22.01 27.51 5.50 308.12 49.52 55.02 16.51 550.21

TOTAL :- 121.05 412.66 16.51 550.21


Table no. 48:Village wise budget available under IWMP-9

Sr. no

Village EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed developmen

t Work

Livelihood for asset less

Production system and

Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Kondh 8.62 36.63 2.15 120.66 19.39 21.55 6.46 215.46

2 Vatariya 4.36 18.53 1.09 61.02 9.81 10.90 3.27 108.97

3 Kanerav 0.84 3.56 0.21 11.71 1.88 2.09 0.63 20.92

4 Desad 3.62 15.39 0.91 50.70 8.15 9.05 2.72 90.53

5 Karsad 1.93 8.22 0.48 27.07 4.35 4.83 1.45 48.34

6 Valiya 2.64 11.22 0.66 36.96 5.94 6.60 1.98 66.00

TOTAL:- 22.01 93.54 5.50 308.12 49.52 55.02 16.51 550.21

Table -49 Village wise gap in fund Requirement

S.No Village Total cost requirement Total fund Available under iwmp Gap in fund Requirement

1 Kondh 177.171 161.60 15.571

2 Vatariya 92.57745 81.73245 10.845

3 Kanerav 18.88101 15.68101 3.200

4 Desad 75.1415 67.90 7.2415

5 Karsad 43.66361 36.25011 7.41350

6 Valiya 56.0299974 49.4999974 6.53000

TOTAL:- 463.4645674 412.6635674 50.801


Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Name of village

Names of Departments with

Schemes converging with IWMP

Fund made available to

IWMP due to convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Was this fund included in Rs.12,000/ 15,000 per

ha.

Name of activity/task/structure

undertaken with converged funds

Reference no. of activity/

task/ structure in DPR

Level at which

decision for convergence

was taken Yes No

(a) Structures

(b) livelihoods

(c ) Any other (pl. specify)

1

Kondh

Mgnrega 1.141

Yes

Nalaplug

District level

2 Forest 5.000 Farm Forestry

3 Mgnrega 2.000 Afforestation with Staggered trench

4 Mgnrega 4.500 Outlet

5 Mgnrega 0.600 Small Checkdam

6 A.H DEPT. 0.900 Cattle camp

7 A.H DEPT. 0.630 Mineral Mixture

8 DIC 0.800 Sewing machine

15.571 1

Vatariya

Mgnrega 2.445

Yes

Nalaplug

District level

2 Forest 2.500 Farm Forestry

3 Mgnrega 2.500 Small Checkdam

4 Mgnrega 1.500 Checkdam Repairing


6 A.H DEPT. 0.500 Minral mixer


10.845

1

Kanerav

Forest 0.50

Yes

Farm Forestry

District level 2 Sgsy 2.00 Utensils Services

3 A.H.dept 0.30 Cattle camp


3.20


1

Desad

Mgnrega 1.7115

Yes

Nalaplug

District level

2 Mgnrega 1.0000 Farm Forestry

3 Mgnrega 0.6000 Afforestationwith trench


5 Ggrc 1.2000 Drip irrigation


7 A.H DEPT. 0.6300 Mineral Mixture

7.2415

1

Karsad

Mgnrga 2.3635

Yes

Nala plug

District level

2 Foreat 0.7000 Farm Forestry

3 Foreat 1.0000 Afforestation with trench

4 Mgnrga 2.0000 Checkdam Repairing

5 Fish.Dept. 1.0000 Fishries


7.964

1

Valiya

Forest 1.500

Yes

Farm Forestry

District level

2 Mgnrega 0.200 Afforestation with staggered trench

3 Mgnrega 0.400 Afforestation with trench

4 Mgnrega 0.200 Afforestation with trench


6 Mgnrega 3.000 Outlet


8 A.D DEPT. 0.500 Mineral Mixture


9.500

54.321


Total village requirement is 464.69 lakh Rs. And total fund available under IWMP is 410.10 lakh. So gap in fund in this project is 54.32 lakh.

This fund is available with other schemes like MGNREGS, Forest, SGSY, TASP, WASMO, GEDA, Animal Husbandry and other like this.


CHAPTER-6

EXPECTED OUTCOME

6.1 Expected Outcomes

6.1.1 Employment

Employment is a big problem in the Kondh project. Main occupation of the villagers is agriculture, animal husbandry and wage

labour. However, due to lack of irrigation, farmers take only kharif crops. Only few farmers take Rabi crops. Lack of fodder, animal

husbandry is very difficult in the villages. So farmers mainly depend on wage labour whole over the year.

Project will provide wage employment as well as self employment to the villagers. Wage employment would be created by engaging

the people in watershed development work like construction of check dam, farm bunding, nala plug, staggered contour trenches, and

Afforestation work. Self employment would be created by providing different agriculture activities like nursery, vermin-compost, and fruit

tree plantation and in animal husbandry by improving animals and providing fodder directly to the farmers. Project would provide

indirectly self employment to the women through training activities of tailoring, poultry, fisheries, cattereing, mini oil mill, leaf plate and cup

making machine. So through this project we can decline the migration upto 80%.


Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No.

Name of Private Sector

Partner Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution

Partnership Interventions

Expected Outcomes Comments a)MoU b)Contract

c) Any other (pl. specify) IWMP

Private sector

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

Sr. NO.

Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 1 KONDH 131 1908 0 953 2039 14 18 0 14 32 30 80 0 22 110 2 VATARIYA 59 1362 0 681 1421 8 15 0 8 23 15 65 0 18 80 3 KANERAV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 DESAD 19 1376 0 683 1395 4 22 0 9 26 4 58 0 14 62 5 KARSAD 0 576 0 274 576 0 8 0 5 8 0 35 0 12 35 6 VALIYA 201 2719 0 1303 2920 22 32 0 20 54 45 96 0 30 141

TOTAL:- 410 7941 0 3894 8351 48 95 0 56 143 94 334 0 96 428


6.1.2. Migration

Now people go other place for employment for 3 month. But this Project would decrease up to 80 % migration by providing

employment to the villagers.

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Kondh 111 75 85 17

2 Vatariya 98 46 70 14

3 Kanerav 36 22 78 15

4 Desad 62 31 90 18

5 Karsad 32 19 85 17

6 Valiya 29 14 90 18

TOTAL:- 368 207 498 99

6.1.3. Ground water table

Due to the lack of recharge structure, ground water table is very low 40-45m. Proper soil and water conservation activities, ground

water table would increase upto 37-42 m.

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

Sr. No. Names of Villages

Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

1 Kondh Handpump,bore well 40m to 45m 37m to 42m

2 Vatariya Handpump,bore well 40m to 45m 37m to 42m

3 Kanerav Handpump,bore well 40m to 45m 37m to 42m

4 Desad Handpump,bore well 40m to 45m 37m to 42m

5 Karsad Handpump,bore well,River 40m to 45m 37m to 42m

6 Valiya Handpump,bore well 40m to 45m 37m to 42m


6.1.4 Drinking water

People use handpump, bore well and river for drinking purpose. These structures provide only 9-10 month water to the villagers. But

in the summer season, villagers face a lot of problem. Water quality is also not good.

After the project, villagers can get all over the year drinking water near by house with good quality.

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

Sr. No.

Names of Villages Availability of drinking water

Quality of drinking water (no. of months in a year)

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Kondh 9 Months 12 th month Average Portable water

2 Vatariya 9 Months 12 th month Average Portable water

3 Kanerav 9 Months 12 th month Average Portable water

4 Desad 9 Months 12 th month Average Portable water

5 Karsad 9 Months 12 th month Average Portable water

6 Valiya 9 Months 12 th month Average Portable water

6.1.5 Crops

All agriculture activities are specially based on monsoon. In the Kondh project, due to lack of irrigation agriculture productivity of the

crops is very less. Farmers don't use proper farming pattern in their field also. There is no irrigation facility for the cultivation of the crops

which is directly affected of the crop yield. Due to the erosion (gully and rill), fertility of the land is low.

Project would increase the productivity of the crops by proving proper irrigation facility to the farmers as well as the different

training programmes for new farming technology by crop demonstration and distributing High yielding varieties seeds to the farmers.

Fertility of the land would increase by using vermi-compost and proper cropping pattern in the land. Erosion would be decreased by

constructing different soil and water conservation measures.


Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project areas

Name of project Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area

Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Area

Average Yield per ha (qtl) (ha) (ha)

Iwmp-9 Kondh

Kharif

Tur 1 3.63 4.75

Cotton 1 3.43 4.5

Sorghum 1 6.24 8.25

Rabi

Sorghum 1 7.68 8.5

Sugarcane 1 2.94 3.75

6.1.6 Horticulture

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be

covered through IWMP ( ha )

1 Kondh 3.50 7.40

2 Vatariya 3.00 5.30

3 Kanerav 0.85 0.90

4 Desad 2.75 4.70

5 Karsad 2.25 3.05

6 Valiya 1.75 2.85

TOTAL:- 14.10 24.20


6.1.7 Vegetative cover

Project covers about 15-20% area under vegetative cover. In the project area nilgiri, bamboo, subabool, neem, tik and mahua can be

seen anywhere.

Project would cover 120.61 ha area through farm forestry, fuel and timber plantation and fruit tree plantation.

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Kondh 22.00 56.00

2 Vatariya 11.40 18.30

3 Kanerav 2.20 6.00

4 Desad 12.25 13.50

5 Karsad 7.25 9.30

6 Valiya 7.00 17.50

Total 62.10 120.61

6.1.8 Livestock

Project area covers milch animal like cow and buffaloes, drought animals, small ruminents and hens. Different activities like

improving quality of indigenous cows and buffaloes, poultry farming, provide fodder by establishment of fodder bank, veterinary services

etc.

It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.


Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for liquid please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

Sr. No.

Name of

project Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 IWMP -

9 Kondh

Milch-animals

Cow 876 2 18 1122 4.5 22

Buffalows 454 3 22 625 6 27

Draught Purpose animals 87 225

Hen 4961 1.75 kg 130 13500 2.5 kg 150

Goat ( Meat Rs/Kg ) 1039 7 kg 180 2200 9.50 kg 200

6.1.9 Linkages

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to

deliver the desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility

Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

1

IWMP-9 Kondh

Backward linkages

2 Seed certification

3 Seed supply system 1 1

4 Fertilizer supply system 1 1

5 Pesticide supply system 1 1

6 Credit institutions Bank Bank

7 Water supply

8 Extension services

KVK Chaswad,Akrsp - Netrang

KVK Chaswad,Akrsp - Netrang

9 Nurseries 1 1

10 Tools/machinery suppliers 1 1


11 Price Support system

12 Labour

13 Any other (please specify)

14 Forward linkages

15 Harvesting/threshing machinery 1 1

16 Storage (including cold storage) Y

17 Road network Y

18 Transport facilities Y

19 Markets / Mandis Y

20 Agro and other Industries

21 Milk and other collection centres Y 1

22 Labour

23 Any other (please specify) Vermi compost unit Vermi compost unit

6.2 Logical Framework Analysis

Components Activities Outputs Effect

Village Institution Formation

Formation of Watershed Committee, User Group and SHGs

One Watershed Committee in each village

Number of User groups depending on

the coverage of particular intervention

Number of SHGs groups depending on

the different livelihood activities.

Project can be implemented and managed in a democratic and

participatory way ensuring equity.


Strengthening Village

Institutions

Organize training and awareness programme for Village institutions

Awareness workshop to be organized.

Trainings and exposure visits UGs and WCs to be held

IEC activities to be conducted at village

level

Quality management of common

resources will improve.

Improvement the knowledge of

watershed in village level.

Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group, SHGs

and Watershed Committee

Awareness will increase at village level

Quality product among people will be improved.

Facilitating and monitoring the functioning of UGs and WCs

Strengthen linkages between UGs and WCs and Panchayat

Institutions and village people.

Gender sensitization in WC, UGs, SHGs.

Increased awareness amongst women about village resources.

Women participation enhanced in

decision-making of GVCs.

Sensitise village communities to involve childern and youth in

development.

Involvement of youth and childern in village development work.

Fund Management

Improve management and utilisation of UGs, SHGs and WCs.

UGs, SHGs and WCs operating bank account and managing resources on

their own

Purpose, frequency and volume of use of the fund enhanced.

Prepare communities to explore other sources of income for UGs,

SHGs and others.

Volume of funds generated for UGs, SHGs and WCs from other sources of

income increased.


Ecological Restoration

Protection, treatment and regeneration of common and

private resources.

Common and private lands to be

brought under new plantations and agro-horti-forestry like Neem, Babool, Drum stick, Mahua, Mango and Sapota

etc.

Fodder availability from common and private lands increased.

Plantation of fruits and forest species

Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organized for

communities, village volunteers and staff

Money saving from purchasing of Domestic products.

Other micro-enterprise activities can

be used at domestic level.

Rainfed Area Development

Treatment of land through improved soil and moisture conservation practices on

watershed area basis

Land to be brought under improved soil moisture conservation practices

Improved productivity of treated land

Construct water harvesting structures for conserving water on

rainy season.

Water can be conserve for a long time.

Increased availability of water in wells, pond and checkdam and other structure. Water table will increase.

Promotion of good agricultural practices- horticulture, improved

crop and vegetable

Good agricultural practices to be promoted.

Increase in annual agriculture

production

Promotion of organic farming practices

Organic farming to be promoted

Farmers adopt organic farming practices.

Use of domestic product properly

Formation of Fodder banks to increase fodder security and promote dairy development

among communities

Fodder banks to be established Fodder security of farmers enhanced.

Identification and promotion of agri-produce based income

generation activities like grading, processing and packaging.

Agriculture based livelihood income generation activities to be promoted


Promotion of better Irrigation practices like drip irrigationand lift

irrigation

Water harvesting structures to be constructed.

Drip and Lift irrigation facilities to be

distributed among farmers

Increase availability of water for 12 months

Increased availability of water for

livestock

Availability of irrigation water

established

Farmers take two or three crops in a

year

Increase in agricultural productivity

of land

Availability of drinking water

enhanced

Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organise exposure visits of communities, village volunteers

and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organized for

communities, village volunteers and staff

Women’s Socio-political and

economic empowerment

Formation & Strengthening of

women’s SHG groups

Women’s SHG groups to be formed

Enhanced capacities of leaders of

women's group in taking initiatives to solve problems at different levels.

Training programmes for SHGs groups

Exposure visit for the groups for

awareness development

Federation of Women’s SHGs to be formed


Linking SHGs with external financial institutions like bank and

others Increased household income.

Increase saving of SHGs group Financial improvement of women Sustainable livelihood development

for women


CHAPTER -7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The

system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state

of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related

to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to

ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details

obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know

areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and

planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages.

This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system

would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground

staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up

official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system

works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment


areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment

areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a

project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.

7.2 Plans for Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and

the village level institutes. In Kondh project, watershed committee, various user groups and SHGs have been formulated for post project

operation and maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project

even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building

organisation. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will

comes mainly fund the following:

7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed

during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of

watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.


Chapter-8

Mapping

Figure.8.1: Map of Ground water


Figure.8.2: Land use map


Figure.8.3: River waterbody map


Figure.8.4: Slope map


Figure.8.5: Soil map

table of contents - gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/dpr/2010-11/bharuch/bha_iwmp-9.pdf · pia-...

Documents