the political ad wars: navigating a turbulant airscape

45
© Kantar Media The Political Ad Wars Navigating a Turbulent Airscape With CRO Jon Swallen & SVP of Political Advertising Elizabeth Wilner

Upload: kantar-media

Post on 16-Jan-2017

613 views

Category:

News & Politics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

© Kantar Media

The Political Ad WarsNavigating a Turbulent Airscape

With CRO Jon Swallen & SVP of Political Advertising Elizabeth Wilner

Huge overlap between competitive presidential and statewide markets

2016 Market Madness

8 of 10 presidential battlegrounds have a competitive Senate race, governor’s race, or both:

• Colorado

• Florida

• Nevada

• New Hampshire

• North Carolina

• Ohio

• Pennsylvania

• Wisconsin

Trifecta States

Trifecta States

New Hampshire (Boston) Toss-Up Senate race + open, Toss-

Up governor’s race (Sept primary)

North Carolina Lean R Senate race +

Toss-Up governor’s race

Ohio Lean R Senate race + open, Toss-Up

WV governor’s race (southern Ohio)

Twofer States

Twofer States

Colorado (+ Albuquerque) Lean D Senate race

Florida Toss-Up Senate race

(two open Aug 30 primaries)

Iowa Likely R Senate race

(SCOTUS)

Nevada Toss-Up Senate Race

Pennsylvania Lean R Senate race

(contested D April 26 primary)

Wisconsin Toss-Up Senate race

Virginia (DC) Likely D but open Senate Race

in MD

Hot Downballot Markets

Hot Markets

Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacto Senate race + ballot measures

St. Louis Likely R Senate race +

Toss-Up governor’s race

Indianapolis Likely R but open Senate race

(contested R May 3 primary)

A Trump Ticket Could…

Nudge several

battleground/historically

Dem states to GOP due to

white male populations in

Iowa, Michigan, New

Hampshire, Ohio,

Pennsylvania, Wisconsin

Nudge some

battleground/historically

GOP states to

Democrats due to

minority populations in

Arizona, Colorado,

Georgia, Nevada

Bolster GOP efforts to

keep the Senate,

ratcheting up advertising

in competitive Senate

races

Summer/Fall 2016 Outlook

By the week of November 30, 2015 Political’s

share of ad time is approaching 10%

November 30, 2015

Case study: Ramp-up to Iowa and New Hampshire

Political share of ad time averages 6% during summer

months in IOWA broadcast markets

And starts growing rapidly the start of the new year

January 4, 2016: nearly 20%

January 11, 2016: 17% to 25%

January 18, 2016: 25% to 37%

January 25, 2016

With political shares reaching 53% in CEDAR RAPIDS

the week before the Iowa caucuses

Across these IOWA markets, Political’s share of total ad

time was 45% leading up to the caucuses

A 38 percentage-point

increase in just 8 weeks

September 14, 2015

By mid-September 2015, political share of total ad time in

MANCHESTER, NH is already at 20%

November 30, 2015

And by the end of November, political share of total ad

time in MANCHESTER, NH is approaching 30%

January 4, 2016

With political activity on Boston, MA

stations growing at a slower pace

Going into the new year, political share of total ad time

continues to grow in MANCHESTER, NH

February 1, 2016

Political share of total ad time in MANCHESTER, NH

reaches 56% in the week leading up to the state primary

Boston broadcast stations follow a

similar pattern, though activity is lower

Political’s share of total ad time on WMUR, Boston

stations peaks at 56% and 15%

Promos &

PSAs

Medical Svcs.

& Supplies

Automotive

All other paid ads

Telecom

Retail

IOWA: As political’s share increases, key non-political

categories see share plunge

Promos &

PSAs

Medical Svcs.

& Supplies

Automotive

All other paid ads

Telecom

Retail

NEW HAMPSHIRE: As political’s share increases, key

non-political categories see share plunge

Messaging Muddle

Top messages in advertising, by spend:

Presidential:

1. Foreign policy/terrorism

2. Healthcare

3. Social issues (women's issues,

abortion, civil rights, gay marriage,

drugs)

4. Taxes (corporate loopholes)

US Senate:

1. Energy/environment

2. Jobs/unemployment

3. Budget/government spending

4. Environment: Global warming

Harsh Climate for Companies

“Wall Street, drug companies,

insurance companies, big oil

companies”“I’ll never eat Oreos again”

Brand Bashing

Unprecedented attacks on individual brands for being on the wrong side of

regular people:

• Goldman Sachs

• Johnson Controls (getting help from

auto bailout, then offshoring)

• McDermott (offshoring)

• Medtronic (offshoring)

• Tyco (offshoring)

• Valeant (predatory pricing)

• Weatherford (offshoring)

A Busy Political Calendar Ahead

24 states w/primaries or caucuses during Q2

November elections

• President

• 33 US Senate seats

• 435 US House seats

• 12 state governors

• Down ballot races

Supreme Court Justice nomination

A Busy Political Calendar Ahead

24 states w/primaries or caucuses during Q2

November elections

• President

• 33 US Senate seats

• 435 US House seats

• 12 state governors

• Down ballot races

Supreme Court Justice nomination

House Senate Governor

Toss Up 22 5 4

Leaning 18 4 --

Ratings As of 3/18/16

Source: The cook Political Report

The Effect of Political Ad Volume On Other Categories & Advertisers

A Disruptive Force

Political advertising disrupts spot TV marketplaces

Finite inventory – a zero sum game

Impact on other ad categories? Who gets displaced? Timing?

Adaptive strategies

Spot TV Markets Analyzed

WK M T W TH F SA SU WK M T W TH F SA SU

26 25 26 27 28 29 30 1

J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 J 27 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

A 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 U 28 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

N 3 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 L 29 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

4 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

F 5 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 A 31 30 31 1 2 3 4 5

E 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 U 32 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

B 7 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 G 33 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

8 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 34 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

M 9 27 28 29 1 2 3 4 35 27 28 29 30 31 1 2

A 10 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S 36 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

R 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 E 37 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

12 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 P 38 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

13 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 39 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

A 14 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 O 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

P 15 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 C 41 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

R 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 T 42 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

17 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 43 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

M 18 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 N 44 29 30 31 1 2 3 4

A 19 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 O

Y 20 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 V

21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

J 22 28 29 30 31 1 2 3

U 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

N 24 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

25 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

2012 2012

WK M T W TH F SA SU WK M T W TH F SA SU

J 1 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 J 27 30 1 2 3 4 5 6

A 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 U 28 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

N 3 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 L 29 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

4 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

F 5 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 A 31 28 29 30 31 1 2 3

E 6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 U 32 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

B 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 G 33 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

8 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 34 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

9 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 35 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

M 10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 S 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

A 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 E 37 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

R 12 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 P 38 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

13 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 39 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

A 14 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 O 40 29 30 1 2 3 4 5

P 15 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 C 41 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

R 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 T 42 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 43 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

M 18 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 N 44 27 28 29 30 31 1 2

A 19 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 O

Y 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 V

21 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

22 26 27 28 29 30 31 1

J 23 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

U 24 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

N 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

26 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

2014 2014

20%

10%

6%

8%

23%

21%

19%

15%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

Wash DC

Raleigh

Philadelphia

Miami

Las Vegas

Gr Rapids

Denver

Cincinnatti

Political Share Of Ad Time: 2012

Wks 1-30 Wks 31-44

5%

10%

5%

7%

8%

23%

21%

9%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

Wash DC

Raleigh

Philadelphia

Miami

Las Vegas

Gr Rapids

Denver

Cincinnatti

Political Share Of Ad Time: 2014

Wks 1-30 Wks 31-44

Note: Weeks 31-44 cover the period from August 1 to Election Day

Major Spot TV Ad Categories

Politics Auto Retail Telecom

Medical Services Restaurants All Other Paid Promos/PSAs

Category Share of Market Ad Time

Politics

Share

Pol-

itics

Auto Retail Tele-

com

Medical

Svcs

Restaur-

ants

All Other

Paid Ads

Promo

/PSAs

Total

< 2% 0.5% 13.0% 10.4% 8.3% 4.4% 3.8% 39.7% 20.0% 100.0%

2-5% 4.2% 11.7% 9.7% 8.8% 3.8% 4.4% 38.1% 19.3% 100.0%

5-10%

10-15%

15-25%

>25%

Analytic Method – Category Share of Spot TV Ad Time

How To Read: In weeks when political share of total market ad time

is less than 2%, auto category share of ad time averages 13.0%

Promos &

PSAs

Medical Svcs.

& Supplies

Automotive

All other paid ads

TelecomRetail

Political

% Share Ratio of TV Ad Time: Political vs Other Categories

2012 & 2014, Weeks 1-44, All 8 Markets Combined

Category Share Ratio of Market Ad Time

Politics

Share

Auto Retail Tele-

com

Medical

Svcs

Restaur-

ants

All Other

Paid Ads

Promo/

PSAs

< 2% 13.0% 10.4% 8.3% 4.4% 3.8% 39.7% 20.0%

Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

2-5% .90 .93 1.06 .86 1.16 .96 .98

5-10%

10-15%

15-25%

>25%

Category Share Ratio Reveals The Rate of Erosion

How To Read: In weeks when political share of total

market ad time is between 2% and 5%, auto category

share of ad time falls to 90% of its baseline norm

Promos & PSAs

Medical Svcs.

& Supplies

Automotive

All other paid ads

Telecom

Retail

Share Ratio of TV Ad Time: Political vs Other Categories

2012 & 2014, Weeks 1-44, All 8 Markets Combined

Fewer Auto Ads….But Steady # of Auto Advertisers

Market: Las Vegas

Period: 4th week of each

month in 2014

Insights:

• Auto advertising is

cyclical and peaks at

end of each month

• As auto category

share begins to

decline, the # of auto

advertisers holds

steady

• Auto advertisers are

staying on air, but

buying less time0

15

30

45

60

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

3/24 4/21 5/26 6/23 7/21 8/25 9/22 10/20 10/27

# o

f Au

to A

dve

rtise

rs% S

ha

re o

f A

d T

ime

Political Share

Auto Share

# of Auto Advertisers

Telecom – Similar Pattern

Market: Denver

Period: 2014

Category: Telecom

July 28 – Labor Day

• Category share = 7%

• 21-23 advertisers/wk

• Avg advertiser runs 72 :30s per week

Sept 22 - Election Day

• Category share = 3%

• 16-20 advertisers/wk

• Avg advertiser runs 37 :30s per week

0

5

10

15

20

25

0%

8%

16%

24%

32%

40%

# o

f Te

lec

om

Ad

ve

rtise

rs

% S

ha

re o

f A

d T

ime

Political

Share

Telecom

Share

# of Telecom

Advertisers

Programming Preferences

Auto & Political Compete For Local News Avails

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

% Of Category Ad Time in Local News: 2014

POLITICAL

AUTO

• Cincinnati

• Denver

• Grand Rapids

• Las Vegas

• Miami

• Philadelphia

• Raleigh

• Washington, DC

The preference for news programming leads political

advertisers to network affiliate stations

Market

Total # of

Stations

Monitored

% of All Ad

Time on

A/C/F/N

% of Political

Ad Time on

A/C/F/N

Cincinnati 6 66% 93%

Denver 10 49% 73%

Grand Rapids 6 98% 100%

Las Vegas 8 58% 92%

Miami 13 41% 63%

Philadelphia 7 58% 90%

Raleigh 7 60% 90%

Washington DC 9 52% 92%

• Period: Jan-Oct ‘14

• Spanish-language

news programming

is also targeted by

political advertisers

ADPATIVE STRATEGIES

• Displaced TV advertisers can be a sales opportunity for other media

• Some TV advertisers shift weight to other media, some don’t

0

25

50

75

100

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

# :3

0 P

er W

k

Po

liti

ca

l T

V S

ha

re

Political TV Share # Spot TV :30s # Radio :30s

Papa John’s Pizza – Denver – Sept/Oct 2014

When TV weight is reduced, Local Radio support is increased

ADPATIVE STRATEGIES

• Displaced TV advertisers can be a sales opportunity for other media

• Some TV advertisers shift weight to other media, some don’t

Marshall’s– Las Vegas – Sept/Oct 2014

Marshall’s had no measured activity in Las Vegas in

either Radio, Newspaper or Digital during Sept/Oct 2014

0

5

10

15

20

25

0%

7%

14%

21%

28%

35%

# :3

0 P

er W

k

Po

lit

TV

Sh

are

Political TV Share # Spot TV :30s

Source of Business Analysis

The analytic approach that we’ve used can:

• Be applied to individual markets

and stations

• Compare periods of heavy vs.

light political activity

• Identify ‘at risk’ categories and

advertisers

• For non-TV media, assess

opportunities to gain business

from TV advertisers during peak

political periods

Questions?

Jon Swallen, Chief Research Officer

[email protected]

212.991.6110

Elizabeth Wilner, Senior Vice President for

Political Advertising

[email protected]

202.238.3730