toxic mining waste in the pre-accession countries the ... · 1 toxic mining waste in the...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Toxic Mining Waste in the pre-AccessionCountries
the pecomines project
Marco D�Alessandro, Giovanni Bidoglio, Tamás Hámor,Győző Jordán, Erik Puura, Panos Panagos, Stefan Sommer, Marc
Van Liedekerke, Anca Marina Vijdea
European Commission, Joint Research CentreInstitute of Environment and Sustainability
Soil and Waste Unit
NATO/CCMS STUDY PILOT MEETINGBaia Mare, Romania, September 8 -11, 2003.
Concepts to Link Inventory, Impact Assessment and Legislation Development
2
Rationale: Why Mining?Rationale: Why Mining?Potential environmental risksPotential environmental risks
!!Safety of waste facilities (inSafety of waste facilities (inparticular dam stability)particular dam stability)!!Operational waste management Operational waste management
(acid mine drainage, possible (acid mine drainage, possible contamination of the environment)contamination of the environment)
Commitment of the European Commission Commitment of the European Commission for a Directive on Mining Wastefor a Directive on Mining Waste
3
A Research Project Focusing on Inventory, Regulations and Environmental Impacts ofToxic Mining Wastes
Objective 1: Contribute to the assessment of the consequences of mining accidents in a perspective of ecosystem protection, by comparing approaches to site monitoring and restoration
Objective 2: Develop a methodology for inventory of toxic waste sites from mineral mining in relation to �sensitive� catchment areas, by combining an indicator approach and an analysis of satellite remote sensing
Objective 3: Comparison of existing legislation on mining and mining waste to support the environmental approximation process
10 Candidate Countries
4
InventoryEuropean
Environment Agency
TC Wastes
DG Environment
New Initiative on
Mining Waste
Workshop
Regulations
Environmental
Impact
Collaboration
with National
and Regional
Authorities
National
Experts
Workshop
pecomines project structure
5
pecomines state-of-playGuidance through a
Steering Committee:� Reference in each country to assure
scientific quality and relevance of the project in the light of needs of Candidate Countries.
� Organisation of Meetings and Workshops (October 2001, May 2002, autumn 2003) involving also UNEP, Euromines, WWF, MS, DG ENV, EEA.
Spin-off Project:� Joint field campaign MAFI, VITUKI,
ITC, JRC-IES and DLR for data acquisition at two Hungarian mining areas in conjunction with HySenseflight (August 2002).
6
Work Packages in the DPSIR Framework
DRIVING FORCES
human demand for mineral resources
regulations
assessment
PRESSURES
emission sources as the result of exploitation of mineral resources and
abandoned mining areas
STATE
the quality of environment threatened by emissions originating from mining
activitiesIMPACTS
degradation of ecosystems, quality of life, including human health, cultural
resources, recreational value
RESPONSE
actions of communities and policy makers to reduce impacts and risks to an
acceptable level
inventory
7
THE INVENTORY APPROACHDevelop and test a methodology to gather data on potentially hazardous mining waste sites on a country basis. The approach combines site-specific information harmonised through a questionnaire and put into a relational database, with geo-referenced spatial information also derived from remote sensing data.
PRESSURESinventory
? Expert network, communication with national experts responsible for data supply which ensures efficiency and quality control.
? Digital interface, web application for data presentation, dissemination and inquiry through Internet was developed. All questionnaire data, spatial data (maps, etc.), other information e.g. text, graphs and photos.
? Detailed guide, glossary and Questionnaire.? Data need kept to the minimum necessary for site screening.? Hierarchical data structure from basic (location, status, commodity) to
more complex and uncertain information (waste quantities, emissions). In this way the Questionnaire is suitable for both regional screening and detailed local inventory of mine waste source characterisation.
8
N1N1N1
N4
N5 -A
N5-B
N9
P1
P1P1
P2
P2
R1
R1 1
R1 6
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6 R7
R8
R9
N2
25-226-1
26-227-1
27-2 28-1
25-325-4
26-326-4
27-327-4 28-3 28-4
34-235-1
35-236-1
36-237-1
37-2 38-1 38-2
34-435-3
35-436-3
36-437-3
37-4 38-3 38-4
44-245-1
45-246-1
46-247-1
44-445-3
45-446-3 25 0 25 50 Kilometers
Spracoval: Data Image s.r.o., 10/2001
P2 - Handlová, Cíge¾, Nováky
R3 - Kremnica
R6 - �pania Dolina
R2 - Hodru�a-HámreR1 - Banská �tiavnica
P1 - Baòa Dolina
R5 - Pezinok
R4 - Dúbrava-Magurka
N5 - Hnú��a-Mútnik
N2 - Lubeník
N1 - Jel�ava
R16 - Novoveská Huta R7 - Rudòany-Poráè
N9 - ZlatníkR11 - Smolník
N4 - Ko�ice-Bankov
R9 - Slovinky
S
R10 - Ro�òava
RO�ÒAVA
Ni�ná Slaná
Paèa
BetliarHenckovce
ova-plica
Slavec
Brzotín
Krásnohorská--Dlhá Lúka
RudnáRakovnica
Honce
Ro�òavské--Bystré
Hru�ov
Drnava
Lipovník
Jablonovn.T uròou
Gemerská Poloma
KrásnohorskéPodhradie
R8
R10 - Ro�òava
R8 - Ni�ná Slaná
Selected "hot spots"in the Slovak Republic
Pe rnek
Jablon ové
PEZIN OK
Sv ätý Jur
Modra
Vin ièn é
Vinos ad y �enk
R5
Lupoè
Praha
�u¾a
VE¼K Ý KRTÍ�
Sklabina
v Lom
e
Modr ý-Kameò
Vn.
¼ubor eèZávada
Suché--Brezovo
Ma�k
Potor
Dol. Strehová
Bu�inceNová Ves
Dolné Plachtince
Obeckov
Horné S trháre
Horná S trehová
Malé ZlievceVe¾ké Straciny
Ve¾ké Zlievce
Mu¾a
¼ubor ieèka
Trenè
Pravica
P1
P1P1
Baòa
ekovská-Breznica
�arnovica
BANSK Á�TIAV NICA
Hor. Hámre
Voznica
Rudno n. Hr onom
Uhliská Ilija
Deký�
Vysoká
Hodru�a-Hámre
Vyhne
Podho
Hrabièov
Ostrý Grúò
BzenicaHl iník
n.H ronom
Lehotka p.B rehmi
Sklené--Tepl ice
Dol .--Trnávka
o á daòa
Dol .--�daòa
Banky
POÈÚVADLIANSKEJAZERO
R1
R2
BANSKÁ�TIAVN ICA
�ib ritov
Anto lIlija
Deký �
sok á
u �a-Hámre
Vy hn e
Podhor ie
Ban. --Stu de nec
o o S e é-Teplice
Bank yBans ká Belá
POÈÚVADLI ANSKEJAZERO
R1
2VÁ
Kremnica
oèno
Kune�o v
Turèek
Kopern ica
oso rín
Slaská
Bart o�ova--Leho tka
Horná-
-VesDolná-
Nevo¾né
Ihráè
R3No vá ky
PRIEVIDZABo jn ic e
�u to vc e
Ko �
Ze mia ns ke --Ko st o¾an y
Lehotap. Vt áèn iko m
Po dh rad ie
Cige ¾
Se be dra �ie
Laz an y
Po rub a Ne do �e ry --Bre zan y
Ka men ec --p od Vt á èniko m
By st riè any
ò an y
O
Nit ra
HANDL OVÁ
Sk lené
M. Èa usa
Ve ¾. ÈausaCh ren ov ec
Rá zt oè no
K
Ko p
Janov a--L eh ot a
Ko so rín
Sl as ká
P2
P2
Kordíky
Rieèka
St. Hory
Har manec
Motyèky
R6
EROK Sliaèe
Lisková -
Ludr ová
Lipt.--�tiavnica
Partizánska--¼upèa
Malatiny
¼ube¾a
Liptovské--K¾aèany
Dúbrava
Galovany
Lazisko
Pavèina--Lehota
Vá h
De mä no v
Svätý K rí�
Gotovany Bod ice
Pl o� tí n
Palúdzka
And i ce
da
Lipt. Lú�na
R4
Hnú��a
Klenovec
ou
Kro
N5-A
N5-B
R5 - Pezinok P1 - baòa Dolina R2 - Hodru�a-Hámre R1 - Banská �tiavnica R3 - Kremnica P2 - Handlová, Cíge¾, Nováky R6 - �pania Dolina R4 - Dúbrava - Magurka N5 - Hnú��a - Mútnik
KO�ICE
Kaveèany
Beniako
Hr
Vajko
Ba�ka
ý-tový-
Lor inèík
N4
HaricSmi �any
Teplièk
SPI�SKÁN. VES
Mlynky
Novoveská--Huta
ZHnilec
Hornád
Spi�ské Tomá�ovce
N9
R16Ni�ná Slaná
Henckovce
Goèovo
Vlachovo
Kobeliarovo
Petrovooce¾ovce
Slavo�ka
Brdárka
Vy�ná Slaná
R8Smolnik
�tós
Smolnícka--Huta
R11
Geln ica
KROMPACHY
Kluk na
Helcmanov ce
Slov ink y
Kolinovce
�akarovce
Ko
R9
Jel�
LubeníkTurèok
Revúcka--Lehota
Chy�néMagnNNN
N2Jel� ava
Slav o�ovce
�
Petro
Ro� táOchtiná
Koce¾ovce
Rochov ce
Chy�néMagnezi tovce
Goèaltovo
Rozlo�ná
N1N1N1
Teplièka
Nálepkovo
Závadka
N9
Spi� ský Hru�ov
Tepl ièka
Marku�ovc e
Rudòany
B
Jamnik
Nálepkovo
Odorín
Matejovce
Chr as�n.Hornádom
ZávadkaPoráè
OlcHornád
N9
R7
N2 - Lubeník R9 - Slovinky R11 - Smolník R8 - Ni�ná Slaná R16 - Novoveská Huta N4 - Ko�ice-Bankov N1 - Jel�ava R7 - Rudòany-Poráè N9 - Z latník
Inventory Example: Slovakia
9
Areas of intensive mining and processing waste (�hot spots�) in Poland
PL-Geological Survey
Extracted
matter DISPOSAL
AREA Waste
quantity Annual
Extraction
Hazardous component
MINING BRANCH
Area
NUMBER
OF MINES
Gg
Number of disposals
thous. m2 Gg Gg/a
Upper Silesian Coal Basin
27 49 20 551.01) 441 4411) 90 881.22) NaCl - 1.76 %; FeS2
Hard coal Rybnik Coal District 15 102 480.0
14 6 202.0 252 625.0 50 750.82) NaCl - 1.76 %; FeS2
Lower Silesian Coal Basin
- - 4 2 730.0 74 248.0 - FeS2
Kleszczów Trough 2 34 664.0 2 3 080.0 14 000.0 4 109,03) Na2+, SO4
2-, Pb, Cr, La
Lignite Zittau Depression 1 9 177.0 1 887.5 no 3 456.03) Na2+ - 2,72 %, Hg, Cr,
Cu, Sr, V, Co, Ni Konin District 9 15 700.0 2 4 320,0 29 400.0 1 339.03) Na2
+ - 0.60 %, SO42- -
11.75 %, Sr, Cr Radioactive elements
Kowary Area - - 10 168.5 4 710.0 - UO2 - 0.15 %; 0.1-0.4 µGy/h
Radoniów Area - - 3 no 520.0 - no
Lubin-Głogów Copper District
4 27 142.0 2 14 500.0 71 844.0 19 688.0 Cu - 0.17 %
Copper ore Grodziec Depression
- - 3 3 860.0 40 380.0 - Cu - 0.20 %
Złotoryja District - - 2 no 21 854.1 - no
Bytom Area - - 23 5 492.0 15.861.0 - Zn - 2.47 %, Pb - 0.38 %
Zinc/lead ore
Chrzanów Area 2 - 3 742.0 13 200.0 1 004.0 Zn - 1.02 %, Pb - 0.36 %
Olkusz Area 3 41 200.0 3 1 040.0 24 401.9 2 007.7 Zn - 0.85 %, Pb - 0.38 %
Nickel ore Ząbkowice Śląskie Area
- - 7 591.2 11 030.0 - Ni - 0.35 %
Arsenic ore Złoty Stok Area - - 2 no 100.0 - As
Sulphur Tarnobrzeg Area 3 940.0 1 5 237.5 1 540.6 208.04) H2S, SO2; in �kek� S � 44.0 %
10
Inventory Example: Hungary
Landscape Wounds (incl. mining sites)H-Ministry of
Environment
11
mining site in the database
mining site in the database
pecomines database: Web application
PRESSURESinventory
12
I. Identification and Location
II. Status and Production
III. Geological Characterisation of Mineral Deposit
IV. Mineral Processing and Waste Management
V. Emissions and Environmental Impacts
PRESSURESinventory
13
Support compilation of the inventory by improving spatial details and differentiation of potentially hazardous mining waste materials from other sites in the CORINE LC system. A geo-referenced mapping of surface mining waste deposits at local and national scale, based on spectral discrimination of mineralogical components. Demonstration of the method applied to Landsat-TM data for rapid screening.
The Remote Sensing Component
SLOVAKIA ROMANIA
Multi-temporal satellite scenes at time intervals covering the period 1985 � 2000. Total area covered is ca.120 000 km2.
14
Fe
OH
SPECTRALLY BASED METHODOLOGY FOR RAPID SCREENING SPECTRALLY BASED METHODOLOGY FOR RAPID SCREENING OF MINING WASTES BY USE OF LANDSATOF MINING WASTES BY USE OF LANDSAT--TM IMAGESTM IMAGES
Exposed rock surface:Exposed rock surface:Andesite quarry-RO
Processed remote sensing image pointing out
ferric/ferrous minerals
Strong weathering of iron oxides and hydroxides
Secondary minerals in Secondary minerals in sulfide bearing deposits: sulfide bearing deposits: Porphyry copper open-pit
Oxidation of sulfides with release of acid water and heavy metals
Processed remote sensing image pointing out co-
occurrence of both OH and Fe bearing minerals
15
Processed image showing the zones with iron oxides and OH-bearing minerals
Fe
OH
Landsat-TM image (07.10.1991) Map of mineral fuels and metals
Novoveska Huta �Rudnany (Slovakia)
Output: large-area maps of spatial distribution of mining wastes
Discrimination between weathered materials and others prone to acidification
Detection of changes over time
16
REMOTE SENSING ANOMALIES REMOTE SENSING ANOMALIES DETECTED AND MAPPED IN SLOVAKIADETECTED AND MAPPED IN SLOVAKIA
17
Change detection in Smolnik � SmolnickaHuta area, Slovak Republic
25.08.1987 06.08.1992 20.08.2000
Active mine Closed mine Remediated tailing pond
18
STATE AND IMPACTSassessment
Actions on multi-country level require harmonised criteria and procedures to classify environmental impacts.A comparative assessment and ranking of different mining sites for 37 hot-spots focusing on initial steps of the overall risk assesment. The hot-spot (metal, uranium, fossil fuel, industrial minerals) categoriesare:
CONTAMINANTIDENTIFICATION
RISK CHA -RACTERISATION
TOXICITY ASSESSMENT
EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
FATE ANDTRANSPORT
CONTAMINATION SOURCE
1. Sites emitting hazardous, polluted water2. Large contaminated lands, waste heaps and/or
tailing ponds3. Tailing ponds with large volumes of polluted
water or heaps with unstable slopes, at risk of accidental release of pollutants
19
... and application to other sites, which are compared on log-log scale plotting emission flow-rates and the number of times environmental quality standards are exceeded.
Emissions potential
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08 1.E+09 1.E+10 1.E+11
Emission m3/day (1 m3/day = 0.0116 l/s)
times
sta
ndar
d ex
ceed
ed
Baia Mare
BorsaMotru
Rosia Poeni
ElatziteMedet
BuhovoEleshnitsa
Pang-juriste
Jachymov
Elias Nejdek
Bytiz
Mydlovary
Recsk I
Recsk II
Mecsek I
Mecsek II
Maardu
Estonian oil shale basin
Smolnik
BanskaStiavnica
Upper SilesianCoal Basin
20
Emissions potential
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08 1.E+09 1.E+10 1.E+11
Emission m3/day (1 m3/day = 0.0116 l/s)
times
sta
ndar
d ex
ceed
ed
A
E
D
C
B
1 8764 532
Possible classification of hazardous sites with respect to the emissions potential.
A parameter IH (isohazard) is defined as log(times standard exceeded) + log(emission rate, m3/day), and its value has a meaning of a potential to pollute equal amount of good quality water per day .
21
regulations
The approach addressed and clarified:
! Ownership (land, minerals, waste) ! Authority framework, licensing procedures ! Control, sanctions, liability! Financial aspects and public acceptance! National policies, programmes! Data management and access ! Original regulatory ideas
RESPONSE
22
TYPICAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF MINING IN CANDIDATE COUNTRIES
Council of Ministers (Government)
Ministry of Economy Ministry of Environment
Constitutional Court
Regional or Local Professional Authorities
Mining Authority Geological Survey Water Authority
Supreme Court
County Courts
Local Courts
Env. Authority
Legend
Jurisdiction First-instance AuthoritiesSupervising Authorities
L o c a l G o v e r n m e n t s
23
regulationsLEGAL CLASSIFICATION OF MINES IN
CANDIDATE COUNTRIES
illegal(not licensed)
pre-operational(licensed mining plot)
in operation(licensed technical operation plan)
temporarily suspended
has owner has no owner("orphan" mine)
not remediated remediated
closed
not in operation
legal(licensed)
MINES AND QUARRIES
LEGENDpotentially high environmental riskmedium environmental risk
low environmental risk
RESPONSE
24
regulationsConclusions of the regulatory report
" Adoption of EU waste legislation is advanced." Mining legislation shows differences among Candidate
Countries (e.g. ownership and scope). " Opening and operation of mines are well regulated, closure
and aftercare are less prescribed. Regulatory enforcement requires improvement.
" Geological data (including mineral resources) are well recorded, mining operation and waste data are less accurately managed.
" Mining regulations focus mainly on safety and not on environmental impacts.
" Limited use of royalty incomes for mitigating and remediating mining-related environmental impacts.
RESPONSE
26
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the management of waste from
the extractive industries
Article 19 ... drawing-up inventories of closed waste facilities� identification ...and their classification according to the degree of their impact on human health and the environment
Article 20 Within three years� the Commission shall adopt ...definition of the criteria for the classification of waste facilities,� including threshold concentrations for hazardous waste and dangerous substances
pecomines: a pilot to support implementation
27
Contaminated Sites in Accession Countries
Workshop in Budapest � end of October
!Develop and test a large-scale approach to the inventory and assessment of environmental impacts associated to contaminated sites
!Benchmarking historical heritage and national actions of 13 Accession and Candidate Countries
!Agree on methodologies and establish a platform for information exchange to collect, use and deliver back data
Community Actions on Soil
#Towards a Thematic Strategy on Soil Protection (COM(2002)179 final)
#Proposal for a Directive on Soil Monitoring (mid 2004)
#Proposal for a Commission Communication on contamination, erosion and organic matter content of soil and related research and legislative needs