use of vasopressors in sepsis resuscitation.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
29/08/56
1
Use of Vasopressors in Sepsis Resuscitation
:Guideline Update 2012
นพ.ธรรมศักด ิทวิชศรี
หน่วยเวชบาํบดัวิกฤต
ฝ่ายวิสัญญีวิทยา
โรงพยาบาลจุฬาลงกรณ์
The Sepsis Continuum
A clinical response arising from a nonspecific insult, with 2 of the following: T >38oC or <36oC HR >90 beats/min RR >20/minWBC >12,000/mm3
or <4,000/mm3 or >10% bands
SIRS = systemic inflammatory response syndrome
SIRS with apresumedor confirmed infectiousprocess
Chest 1992;101:1644.
SepsisSIRSSevere Sepsis
SepticShock
Sepsis with organ failure
Refractoryhypotension
Severe sepsis definition = sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion or organ dysfunction
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
Septic shock ; a complex interaction-pathologic vasodilation-relative and absolute hypovolemia-myocardial dysfunction-altered blood flow distribution
Sepsis initiates coagulation by activating endothelium to expression of TF coagulation cascademicrovascular thrombi & obstruction distal
ischemia & tissue hypoxia-clinical consequences of the changes in coagulation caused by sepsis are
levels of markers of DIC & widespread organ dysfunction
Systemic vasodilationmay be primarily counteracted by early initiation of vasopressor support
Rational to treat absolute hypovolemiaresulting from plasma extravasation with aggressive fluid challenge
29/08/56
2
Crit Care Med 2007; 35:1599–1608
Sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction
Echocardiographic studies suggest that 40% to 50% of patients with prolonged septic shock develop myocardial depression
Early aggressive, goal-directed therapy improves the outcome of patients who have severe sepsis & present to ER
N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-77
Early identification of patients at high risk for cardiovascular collapse & Early therapeutic intervention to restore a balance between oxygen
delivery & demand
N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-77
N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-77
N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-77
Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and the Institute for Healthcare
Improvement recommend implementation of
6-hr resuscitation bundle
29/08/56
3
SURVIVING SEPSIS CAMPAIGN BUNDLES
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
Fluid Therapy
Fluid Therapy of Severe Sepsis
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
PROCON
MAY BE
SHOULD BE
Fluid challenge technique
Large amounts of fluids Limited period of time
Close monitoring
Patient’s responseAvoid pulmonary edema
Will cardiac output increase with fluid loading?
- blood pressure- SvO2- heart rate- blood lactate
Current Opinion in Critical Care 2005, 11:264—270
2mmHg
The change in CO. should be in the range of 300 ml/min
2mmHg
29/08/56
4
The changes in aortic blood flow induced by PLR are highly predictive of preload responsiveness in ventilated patients, even in the presence of spontaneous respiratory efforts or arrhythmias
Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402–1407
Vasopressors
Vasopressor therapy initially to target a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mm Hg (grade 1C)
Norepinephrine as the first choice vasopressor (grade 1B)
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
Objective: To examine the effect of titrating NE to different levels of MAP on systemic and regional indices of perfusion
Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shock
Crit Care Med 2000;28:2729–2732
Patients: 10 pts. with the diagnosis of septic shock who required pressor agents to maintain a MAP ≥ 60 mm Hg after fluid resuscitation to a PAOP ≥ 12 mm Hg
Interventions: NE was titrated to MAP of 65, 75,and 85 mm Hg in 10 patients with septic shock
Conclusions: Increasing the MAP from 65 mm Hg to 85 mm Hg with NE does not significantly affect
Crit Care Med 2000;28:2729–2732
- systemic oxygen metabolism- skin microcirculatory blood flow - urine output- splanchnic perfusion
The aim of vasopressor therapy is to improve tissue perfusion pressure while avoiding excessive vasoconstriction
Adequate fluid resuscitation is a fundamental aspect of the hemodynamic managementof patients with septic shock
but using vasopressors early as an emergency measure in patientswith severe shock is frequently necessary
29/08/56
5
Brain: Reversal of consciousness Heart: Improvement of BP, PR
no signs of myocardial ischemia
Kidney: Urine output > 0.5ml/kg/hrSkin : warm, good skin perfusion
Adequate driving pressure & flow>> sustain organ homeostasis
Reversal of lactic acidosis
Does my patient need an increase in CO. ??
Norepinephrine Compared With Dopamine in Severe Sepsis Summary of Evidence
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
•Norepinephrine may be more effective at reversing hypotension
•Dopamine may be particularly useful in patients with compromised systolic function
Crit Care Med 2012; 40:725–730
In the two trials that reported arrhythmias, these were more frequent with dopamine than with norepinephrine(RR, 2.34; CI, 1.46 –3.77; p = .001)
Dopamine was associated with an increased risk of death (RR, 1.12; CI,1.01–1.20; p =.035)
Safety about the administration of low-dose dopamine ?
:Transient decrease in T-cell function
:Decreases growth-hormone secretion negative nitrogen balance in critical illness
:proarrhythmic effect
Crit Care Med 2006; 34:589–597 Crit Care Med 2006; 34:589–597
29/08/56
6
But no clinical study has definitely indicated that one catecholamine is superior to another, so that at present no agent should be preferredover the other
Epinephrine (added to and potentially substituted for norepinephrine) when an additional agent is needed to maintain adequate blood pressure (grade 2B)
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
Lancet 2007; 370: 676–84
to compare the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine plus dobutamine (whenever needed) with those of epinephrine alone in septic shock
prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study was done in 330 pts with septic shock admitted to one of 19 participating ICU in France
Lancet 2007; 370: 676–84
Lancet 2007; 370: 676–84
There is no evidence for a difference in efficacy and safety
between epinephrine alone & norepinephrine plus dobutamine
for the management of septic shock
Lancet 2007; 370: 676–84
Should be the first alternative to norepinephrine!
29/08/56
7
Prospective, double-blind, randomisedcontrolled trialSetting: 4 Australian university-affiliated multidisciplinary ICUs280 patients were randomised to receive either epinephrine or norepinephrine.
Intensive Care Med (2008) 34:2226–2234 Intensive Care Med (2008) 34:2226–2234
Kaplan-Meier estimates for probability of achievement of MAP goal between epinephrine and norepinephrine
Epinephrine was associated with the development of significant but transient metabolic effects that prompted the withdrawal of 18/139 (12.9%) patients from the study byattending clinicians
Vasopressin 0.03 units/minute can be added to norepinephrine (NE) with intent of either raising MAP or decreasing NE dosage (UG)
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
Low dose vasopressin is not recommended as the single initial vasopressor for treatment of sepsis-induced hypotension and vasopressin doses higher than 0.03-0.04 units/minute should be reserved for salvage therapy (failure to achieve adequate MAP with other vasopressor agents) (UG)
Vasopressin is a direct vasoconstrictor without inotropic or chronotropic effects
may result in CO andhepatosplanchnic flow
most published reports excludepatients from treatment with vasopressinif the CI is < 2 or 2.5 L/min/m2, and itshould be used with caution in patientswith cardiac dysfunction
Crit Care Clin 22 (2006) 187– 197
infusion of low-dose vasopressin(0.01– 0.04 units/min yielding plasma levels of 20–100 pg/mL)
restores plasma levels to values found during comparable degrees of hypotension from other origins (20–30 pg/mL)
Crit Care Med 2007 Vol. 35, No. 9 (Suppl.)
“relative vasopressin deficiency in septic shock”
29/08/56
8
N Engl J Med 2008;358:877-87
RCT trial patients (who had septic shock and were receiving a minimum of 5 μg of NE/min) were assigned to receive either low-dose vasopressin (0.01- 0.03 U/min) or NE (5-15 μg/min) in addition to open-label vasopressors
The primary end point was the mortality rate 28 days after the start of infusions
Low-dose vasopressin did not reduce mortality rates as compared with NEamong patients with septic shock who were treated with catecholamine vasopressors
N Engl J Med 2008;358:877-87
N Engl J Med 2008;358:877-87
< 15 μg/min NE
The effects of low-dose vasopressin as a “catecholamine-sparing drug,” not the effects in catecholamine-unresponsive refractory shock
45 septic shock patients with MAP < 65 mmHg were randomized to receive continuous infusions of either terlipressin (1.3 μg/kg/h), vasopressin (0.03 U/min) or norepinephrine (15 μg/min; n = 15 per group)
Critical Care 2009, 13:R130
In all groups, open-label norepinephrine was added to achieve a mean arterial pressure between 65 and 75 mmHg, if necessary
Continuous infusion of a relatively low dose of TP (1.3 μg/kg/h) was effective in reversing sepsis-induced hypotension and in reducing NE requirements
Critical Care 2009, 13:R130
Higher doses of vasopressin have been associated with cardiac, digital, and splanchnic ischemia and should be reserved for situations where alternative vasopressors have failed
Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1394–1398
Dopamine as an alternative vasopressor agent to norepinephrine only in highly selected patients (eg, patients with low risk oftachyarrhythmias and absolute or relative bradycardia) (grade 2C)
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
29/08/56
9
Phenylephrine is not recommended in the treatment of septic shock except in circumstances where
(a) Norepinephrine is associated with serious arrhythmias
(b) Cardiac output is known to be high and blood pressure persistently low
(c) As salvage therapy when combined inotrope/vasopressor drugs and low dose vasopressin have failed to achieve MAP target (grade 1C)
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
Low-dose dopaminenot be used for renal protection(1A)
All patients requiring vasopressorshave an arterial catheter placed as soon as practical if resources are available(UG)
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
Arterial catheter provides a more accurate and reproducible measurement of arterial pressure (also allows beat-to-beat analysis)
Anesthesiology 2005; 103:419–28
Inotropic Therapy
Dobutamine infusionadministered in the presence
of myocardial dysfunction assuggested by elevated cardiacfilling pressures and low C.O.
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
Dobutamine is the first-choiceinotrope for patients with measured or suspected low CO in the presence of adequate left ventricular filling
pressure & adequate MAP
If used in the presence of low BP, it should be combined
with vasopressor therapy
29/08/56
10
Against the use of a strategy to increase Cardiac Index to
predetermined supranormal levels
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637
P values are for the comparison of mortality rates among the three groups
N Engl J Med 1995;333:1025-32
There are recognized limitations to ventricular filling pressure estimates as surrogates for fluid resuscitation
However, measurement of CVP is currently the most readily obtainable
target for fluid resuscitation
There may be advantages to targetingfluid resuscitation to flow and perhaps to
volumetric indices (and even to microcirculation changes)
arterial pulse contour analysis allow stroke volumevariation (SVV) to be tracked continuously
volunteer sepsis
MICROCIRCULATION
TAKE HOME
29/08/56
11
•Vasopressors are indicated to maintain MAP >65 mm Hg, both during and following adequate fluid resuscitation•Norepinephrine are the vasopressorsof choice in the treatment of septic shock •Norepinephrine may be combined with dobutamine when cardiac output is being measured
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT OF SEPTIC PATIENTS •Epinephrine, phenylephrine, &
vasopressin are not recommended as first-line agents •Vasopressin may be considered forsalvage therapy•Low-dose dopamine is not recommended for the purpose of renal protection•Dobutamine is recommended as theagent of choice to increase cardiac output
• Resuscitation“more earlymore effective”
• Monitor in ICU & arterial cannulation
• Clinical end points MAP,HR, urine output, skin
perfusion, mental status, & indexes of tissue perfusion
( blood lactate conc. & SvO2)