web view情緒言談涉及正向 ......

Click here to load reader

Upload: lamthuan

Post on 31-Jan-2018

255 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

TRANSCRIPT

Theory of Mind and Maternal Mental Discorse

in High Fuctional Autism Children

100 6

Abstract

Preschool age is the critical time for children to improve the quality of social interaction. Even though children with high functioning autism, in general, have higher intelligence, they still have difficulties in social interaction. Many previous researches have indicated that the reason why high-functioning autism children are facing this obstacle primarily lies in lack of competence of theory-of-mind. How to build up the childrens theory of mind would be a challenge of their mothers. The purpose of this research is to find out whether there is a correlation between the childrens performance in theory-of-mind test and mothers talk on mental states or not.

Forty kindergarteners have participated in this research which includes twenty autism children and twenty normal children. The groups of children were requested to take the test on theory of mind, and then to read a storybook with their mothers. The results as follows:

1. The children with high-functional scored significantly lower than normal groups on the theory of mind test.

2. With the same amount of utterances, the counting numbers and frequencies of high-functional groups mental states are both lower than normal group.

3. The correlations between childrens theory-of-mind test scores and mothers talk on mental states are high in both groups.

Based on the results, the researcher discussed how to promote mental states in joint book reading to help children with high-functioning autism to develop the ability of theory-of-mind.

Key word: kindergartener, high functional actism, thory of mind, joint book reading, mental states

99

( )

2016 8 29

698060222

1.

2.

2011 8 29

i

iii

vi

1

1

6

7

10

10

21

32

40

40

41

44

46

52

56

56

59

68

74

74

77

79

79

81

88

88

89

11

19

ZPD23

40

44

13

Slaughter, Peterson & Mackintosh38

42

42

43

43

47

WellmanLiu200449

51

53

56

58

59

60

62

63

64

68

69

71

72

73

i

1988

Dustin Hoffman

Crain-Thoreson, Dahlin & Powell, 20012005

ASHA Leader2002

:?

:

:

?

(Theory of Mind, ToM)2005

(2007200720092009Blijd-Hoogewys, Geert, Serra & Mindera, 2008Garcia-Perez, Hobson, & Lee , 2008Happe, 1994Losh & Capps, 2003 Sourn-Bissaoui & Hooge-Lespagnol, 2006)

Atkinson200913(STS) false blief(Happe, 1994)(Garcia-Perez, Hobson, & Lee , 2008(2005200720072007200920092009)

mental state discourse2008Bartsch , Wellman, 199520072008(Slaughter, Peterson & Mackintosh , 2007Tager-Flnsberg, 1992)

1.?

2.

3.

1.?

2.?

3.

?

1.

2.

3.

?

(High functional autism)

20001970 DeMyer2000Tsai, 1992(Autism Spectrum DisorderASD2009

International Classification of DiseasesICD-10

70

Theory of mind, TOM

false belief

WellmanWellmanLiu2004theory-of-mind scale

Mental state discourse

( 2007)(Bretherton & Beeghly, 1982)(Ruffman, Slade, & Crowe, 2002Sourn-Bissaoui & Hooge-Lespagnol, 2006)

Theory of mind, TOMWellman19902002Flavell, 2004Bjorklund, 2005

(Wellman,1990,P.100).

2002

(Flavell, 1999Blijd-Hoogewys, Van Geert , Serra, & Mindera, 2008)

Theory Theory

Wellman1990-

Modularity Theory

Leslie(Theory of Body, ToBY) share attention mechanism, SAM2008Baron-Cohen, 1994

Simulation Theory

Harris

Flavell

(Flavell, 1999 Flavell, 2004)

0~1.5

1.

2.

1.5~2

1.

2.

3.

4.

2~3

1.

2.

3.

4~5

1.

2.

Ruderman Lilyan1974FlavellWellman1990Serra, Loth, van Geert, Hurkens, & Mindera, 2002)

Bretherton, Beeghly, 1982

Flavell1999Annual Reviews of Psychology

Piaget2002

Flavell2004

1980

Premack Woodruff197851983WimmerPernerBaron-Cohen, Leslie & Frith1985

WimmerPerner1983Maxiunexpected transferPernerLeekamWimmer1987SmartiesHogrefeWimmer Winnerunexpected containerFlavallFlavellGreen1983Chandler, Fritz & Hala

Maxiunexpected transfer

1.

MaxiMaxiMaxiMaxiMaxi

2.

MaxiMaxi

Smartiesunexpected container

1.

SmartiesSmarties

1

2

3

2.

Smarties

1.

2.

hide-and-seek task

Chandler

1.

TonyTonyTony

2.

SodianChandlerSodianChandler, Fritz, & Hala,1989 Sodian, 1991Sodian, Taylor, Harris, & Perner, 1991

MaxiSmartiesignoranceHogrefe, Wimmer , & Perner, 1986mental representation

thought bubbleKerr & Durkin, 2004Bjorklund, 2005Tomasello1995

www.CartoonStock.com

MaxiSmarties(Astington & Gopnik, 1988Sullivan & Winner, 1993Wimmer & Perner, 1983)Zaitchik1990WimmerPernerfalse photographs

second-order false beliefPerner WimmerPerner, Leekam, & Wimmer, 1987

WellmanWellmanLiu2004theory-of-mind scale

WellmanLiu

Wellman1990(2002Flavell, 2004Bjorklund, 2005)

(Lewis, Freeman, Kyriakidou, & Maridaki-Kassotaki, 1996Meins , 2002)

VygotskyVygotsky(2002)PiagetVygotsky(2002)

(2009Harris, Rosnay & Pons2005scaffold

Vygotskythe zone of proximal developmentscaffold(2002Vygotsky, 1978)Interactionist ApproachesGleason & Ratner, 2009

( ) Performance with assistance

ZPDthe zone of proximal development

Performance on onesown

ZPD

VygotskyLewis, Freeman, Kyriakidou, Maridaki-Kassotaki, & Berridge, 1996Meins , 2002Symons, 2004Symons, Peterson, Slaughter, Roche, & Doyle, 2005Taumoepeau & Ruffman, 2006Sandrine & Fabienne, 2006) thinkinginternalizethinkingSymons, 2004(Cutting, Dunn, 1999Dunn, Brown, Beardsall, 1991; Meins , Fernyhough, 1999; Ruffman, Slade, & Crowe, 2002)

BrethertonBeeghly19821990WellmanBartschWellman1995

Shatz 198330

2003

Shatz 198330Dunn182436

Brown, Donelan-McCall, & Dunn,199639% 7% Brown, Donelan-McCall, & Dunn,1996Dunn, Brown, Slomkowski, Tesla, & Youngblade, 1991Dunn, Brown, & Beardsall1991

Jenkins & Astington,1994Perner, Ruffman, & Leekam, 1994Brown, Donelan-McCall, & Dunn,1996(Lewis, Freeman, Kyriakidou & Maridaki-Kassotaki, 1996)

BrethertonBeeghly1982(Meins, 2002)(Adrian, Clemente-Rosa, Villanueva, & Rieffe, 2005; Garner, Jones, Gaddy, & Rennie, 1997; Symons, Peterson, Slaughter, Roche, Doyle, 2005)(Ruffman, 2002; Taumoepeau & Ruffman, 2006)

pe rception

physiology

positive and negative affect

Garner, Jones, Gaddy, & Rennie, 1997Ruffman, 2002Adrian, Clemente-Rosa, Villanueva, & Rieffe, 2005; Symons, 2005

cognition

(Ruffman, 2002;Adrian, Clemente-Rosa, Villanueva & Rieffe, 2005Symons, Peterson, Slaughter, Roche & Doyle, 2005)

volition and ability

DesireTager-Flnsberg1992

moral judgment and obligation

Brown, Donelan-McCall & Dunn,1996

feeling state talk(Dunn, Brown, Slomkowski, Tesla, Youngblade, 1991)Bartsch WellmanBretherton, Beeghly, 1982Adrian, Clemente-Rosa, Villanueva, & Rieffe, 2005

Virginia, Candida & Emily , 2007Garner, Jones, Gaddy, & Rennie, 1997Ruffman et al., 2002Adrian, Clemente-Rosa, Villanueva, & Rieffe, 2005

Vygotsky

Symons, Peterson, Slaughter, Roche, Doyle2005

2008

(Dunn, Brown, Slomkowski, Tesla, & Youngblade, 1991Dunn, Brown, & Beardsall1991Tager-Flnsberg1992 Ruffman, 2002Sandrine, & Fabienne, 2006)

Dunn, Brown & Beardsall19910.420.300.380.32Taumoepeau & Ruffman2006

Tager-Flnsberg1992BartschWellman 19952007

2007

Kanner1943Bleuler19501970Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental DisordersDSMDSM-I1952DSM-II1968childhood schizophrenia(2000)1970DSM-III1980ICD-101993pervasive developmental disorders)(autistic spectrum disorders) (2005)

ICD-10

theory of mindexecutive functioncentral coherencefield independencefield dependence2005Pellicano, 2010Morgan, Maybery, & Kevin Durkin, 2003

Baron-Cohen, Leslie, & Frith1985WimmerPernerMaxiMaxiABAnneSallySally & AnneHappe1994

Garcia-Perez, Hobson, & Lee, 2008Emerich, 20032000

20072009Losh & Capps, 200320072009200520072007

(2005200720072007200920092009) 2009

2009

Tager-Flnsberg1992Ziatas, Durkin & Pratt1998Slaughter, Peterson & Mackintosh2007

Tager-Flnsberg1992Slaughter, Peterson & Mackintosh2007

Ziatas, Durkin, Pratt1998121212121212Ziatas

Slaughter, Peterson & Mackintosh2007

Slaughter, Peterson & Mackintosh

Slaughter, Peterson & Mackintosh

Simple cognition (S-Cog)

Cognition clarification

(Cl-Cog)

1.

2.

3.

Simple affect (S-Aff)

Affect clarification (Cl-Aff)

Simple perce