القادمة المخاطرالفقر الحضري

القادمة المخاطراالقتصادي النمو معدل

• cities generate a disproportionate share of gross domestic product and provide extensive opportunities for employment and investment

• One has to have a certain sympathy for city politicians and administrators faced with rapidly growing populations and who often have very limited budgets and powers to raise revenues.

Rank City/Urban area Country Est GDP in

2020 in US$bn

Est annual growth 2005-

2020 1 Tokyo Japan 1602 2.0% 2 New York USA 1561 2.2% 3 Los Angeles USA 886 2.2% 4 London UK 708 3.0% 5 Chicago USA 645 2.3% 6 Paris France 611 1.9% 7 Mexico City Mexico 608 4.5% 8 Philadelphia USA 440 2.3% 9 Osaka/Kobe Japan 430 1.6% 10 Washington DC USA 426 2.4% 11 Buenos Aires Argentina 416 3.6% 12 Boston USA 413 2.4% 13 Sao Paulo Brazil 411 4.1% 14 Hong Kong China 407 3.5% 15 Dallas/Fort Worth USA 384 2.4% 16 Shanghai China 360 6.5% 17 Seoul South Korea 349 3.2% 18 Atlanta USA 347 2.6% 19 San Francisco/Oakland USA 346 2.4% 20 Houston USA 339 2.5% 21 Miami USA 331 2.4% 22 Toronto Canada 327 3.0% 23 Moscow Russia 325 4.0% 24 Mumbai India 300 6.0% 25 Madrid Spain 299 3.2% 26 Detroit USA 287 2.3% 27 Istanbul Turkey 287 5.2% 28 Seattle USA 269 2.5% 29 Beijing China 259 6.6% 30 Metro Manila Philippines 257 5.9% 31 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 256 4.1% 32 Sydney Australia 256 2.7% 33 Jakarta Indonesia 253 6.5% 34 Delhi India 229 6.2% 35 Phoenix USA 228 2.5% 36 Guangzhou China 227 6.9% 37 Minneapolis USA 224 2.5% 38 Kolkata India 224 5.9% 39 San Diego USA 220 2.4% 40 Singapore Singapore 218 3.6% 41 Cairo Egypt 212 5.3%

Rank City/Urban area Country GDP in US$bn

1 Tokyo Japan 1191 2 New York USA 1133 3 Los Angeles USA 639 4 Chicago USA 460 5 Paris France 460 6 London UK 452 7 Osaka/Kobe Japan 341 8 Mexico City Mexico 315 9 Philadelphia USA 312

10 Washington DC USA 299 11 Boston USA 290 12 Dallas/Fort Worth USA 268 13 Buenos Aires Argentina 245 14 Hong Kong China 244 15 San Francisco/Oakland USA 242 16 Atlanta USA 236 17 Houston USA 235 18 Miami USA 231 19 Sao Paulo Brazil 225 20 Seoul South Korea 218 21 Toronto Canada 209 22 Detroit USA 203 23 Madrid Spain 188 24 Seattle USA 186 25 Moscow Russia 181 26 Sydney Australia 172 27 Phoenix USA 156 28 Minneapolis USA 155 29 San Diego USA 153 30 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 141 31 Barcelona Spain 140 32 Shanghai China 139 33 Melbourne Australia 135 34 Istanbul Turkey 133 35 Denver USA 130 36 Singapore Singapore 129 37 Mumbai India 126 38 Rome Italy 123 39 Montreal Canada 120 40 Milan Italy 115 41 Baltimore USA 110 42 Metro Manila Philippines 108 43 St Louis USA 101 44 Beijing China 99 45 Cairo Egypt 98

Richest cities and urban areas in2005 & 2020

• By the year 2007 it is anticipated that the total wastewater treatment capacity of the Greater Cairo System will reach 4.5 million m3/day. Designers anticipate that this will be sufficient to serve the projected population to 2020. It is further projected that the collection network will reach 100% of the current urban area to include all areas currently without access to the existing collection system.

القادمة المخاطراالساسية البنية

the gated settlements approach hasdivided the city between six spatial patterns (Fig. 8):• Ruralization of urban fringes and the emergence of spontaneous informal settlements around the city peripheries.• Urbanization of rural villages on the outskirts of Giza to the west and of Qalubia to the north, building on arable land and emphasising the traditionalnorth–south axis.• Densification of the west ban (Mohandessine and Zamalek), of the south (Maadi), and of the northeast (Madinat Nasr).•Saturation of the CBD and the decline of the inner old city as people seek to move out from core areas to the fringes.• Inefficiency of new settlements in providing housing for low-income population, except for emergency shelter schemes for victims of the 1992 earthquake.• Exclusive private suburban districts emergingwithin the new settlements, in eastern Cairo (NewCairo City) and in the western desert (new settlements6a and 6b and the 6th October city). Theseare inhabited by the new elite upper middle class.

المطروحة المخططات

• 1956 predicted 2000

• 1970 Target year is 1990

First Master Plan in 1970

>>>>>>> 4.5m

6m >>>>>>>>>>>> 14 m

198210m

19666 m

• 1982 expected 2002

• 1997 expected 2022

Long term development master plan 1983Creation of small urban settlements and new satellite citiesbeing connected through development corridors

10 >>>>>>>>>>>> 16 m

199313 m

14.8 >>>>>>>>>> 24 m

5.6N.S 4.4U.A

2006 >>>> 18 m

المطروحة المخططات

االستمرار في الوضع الراهن

ما هو القرار المناسب لمشاكل القاهرة؟

تقسيم اقليم القاهرة الكبرى

مدن جديدة للعاصمة .... أم مدن جديدة خارج العاصمة

الحلول المطروحه