0 session 2. overview of the field 2014. 3. 11 발표자 : 김현식, 이연화, 안경선
TRANSCRIPT
1
Session 2. Overview of the Field
2014. 3. 11
발표자 : 김현식 , 이연화 , 안경선
<2014 Spring Seminar on Technological Inno-vation>
2
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Summary & Discussion (1) Nelson, R & Winter, S.(1977), In search of useful theory of innovation,
Research Policy(5), 36-76
(2) Pavitt, K.(1984), Sectoral Patterns of technical change : Toward a taxonomy
and a theory, Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373
(3) Kuhn, T. S.(1970), The Structure of scientific revolutions(2d ed.). Chicago :
University of Chicago Press, [Chapter 2 and 7]
(4) Van de Ven, A. H.(1986), Central Problems in the management of innovation,
Management Science, 32(5), 590-607
3. Implication & Concluding Discussion
3
Introduction
<session 2 : overview of the field>
4
1. Introduction
▲ Joseph A. Schumpeter - Creative destruction[...] The fundamental impulse that sets and keeps the capitalist engine in motion comes from the new consumers’ goods, the new methods of production or transportation, the new markets, the new forms of industrial organization that capitalist enterprise creates.[...] incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.This process of Creative Destruction is the essential fact about capitalism. It is what capitalism consists in and what every capitalist concern has got to live in.
◀ Peter Drucker"Innovation is the fuel of
corporate longevity. It endows resources with a new capacity to create
wealth."
5
Key concepts
1. Introduction
Theory of Innovation
Uncertainty of Innovation
Technological regime
Technical change / Taxonomy
Technology push vs. Demand pull
Product vs. Process Innovation
Diversification
Normal science / Paradigm shift / Science Revolution
Technology trajectory
4 Factors & 4 central problems in the management of innovation
6
발표자 : 안경선
<session 2 : overview of the field>
Nelson, R & Winter, S.(1977) In search of useful theory of innovation,
Research Policy(5), 36-76
7
2-1. Summary : Introduction
The theory integrates existing knowledge, and
enables predictions to go beyond the particulars of what has been observed.
The theory must be wide enough to encompass and link the
relevant variables and their effects, and strong enough to give guidance
as to what would happen if some of these variables changed.
Purpose of the PAPER
Two premises of the current dialogue innovation
The technological advance has been a powerful instrument of
human progress in the past.
We have the knowledge to guide that instrument toward high priority
objectives in the future.
8
2-1. Summary : THE STATE OF CURRENT UNDERSTANDING
The economists' model of differential productivity growth Kendrick’s study - concerned with explaining cross sectoral differences in growth of total factor productivity, rather than output per worker.
Mansfield’s study (dealt only with manufacturing) - was focused in the relationship between growth of total factor productivity and R & D spending
Leonard’s study (dealt only with manufacturing) - separation of R&D spending financed by the industry itself, and R&D spending done in an industry but financed by government.
Brown and Conrad’s study (dealt only with manufacturing) - include in their regressions a measure of R&D done by other industries and embodied in the intermediate goods purchased by the industry
Terleckyj’s study - considers nonmanufacturing industries as well as manufacturing industries. - distinguishes between research and development embodied in capital equipment, and in intermediate inputs
9
Building blocks for a broader theoretical structure
Two of these facts indicate that it is not promising to use the theoretical
structure behind the productivity growth studies as a starting point.
① innovation involves uncertainty in an essential way.
② the institutional structure for innovation often is quite complex
within an economic sector, and varies significantly between economic sectors.
2-1. Summary : THE STATE OF CURRENT UNDERSTANDING
10
2-1. Summary : THE GENERATION OF INNOVATION
The key concept is that of an innovation possibility set associated with a given level of expenditure, or with different elements associated with costs of different amounts. Firms are assumed to choose the profit maximizing element. In many cases, the organizations doing R&D are not motivated by profits at all, but are governmental, or private not-for-profit institutions.
The profit maximization hypothesis and its limitations
R&D strategies and probabilistic outcomes
An R&D project can be viewed as interacting heuristic search processes. Since project selection implies project heuristics, an R&D strategy can be viewed as defining a probability distribution of number and kinds of innovations, given certain variables that influence project selection and project outcome. R&D strategies can be dichotomized into these two. The first strategy has been named ‘demand-pull’; the second ‘capabilities-push’.
11
R&D strategies and probabilistic outcomes If strategies can be so dichotomized, demand-pull is by far the more
common of the two.
Further, when applied, demand-pull is more likely to result in a com-
mercially
successful project than a strategy of capabilities-push.
However, capabilities-push selected projects, when they do pay off,
pay off
handsomely.
Natural trajectories
Marginal changes in external conditions influence at most the ranking in
terms of profitability of the set of profitable projects associated with
pushing technology in a particular direction.
Relating to technicians’ beliefs about what is feasible or
at least worth attempting
특정 계층 내에서 기술혁신의 방향은 특정 방향성을 가지게 되어있다는 것
2-1. Summary : THE GENERATION OF INNOVATION
12
Elements of the selection model
The selection environment influences the path of productivity growth
generated by any given innovation, and also it feeds back the influence
strongly of the kinds of R & D that firms and industry will find profitable
to undertake.
Two roughly distinct kinds of mechanisms for the spread of a
profitable innovation.
① greater use of an innovation by the firm that first introduces it
② imitation
general model of the selection environment can be built from specification of
these three elements: the definition of ‘worth’ or profit that is operative for
the firms in the sector, the, manner in which consumer and regulatory
preferences and rules influence what is profitable, and the investment and
imitation processes that are involved.
2-1. Summary : THE SELECTION ENVIRONMENT
13
2-1. Summary : THE SELECTION ENVIRONMENT
The market as a selection environment
Successful innovation leads to both higher profit for the innovator and
to profitable investment opportunities.
Imitation by a competitor of a process innovation is likely to occur relatively
rapidly, and to be encouraged by a marketing supplier, rather than being
retarded by a patent.
Both expansion of the innovator, and imitation by competitors are essential
to the viability of Schumpeterian process.
Nonmarket selection environment
the motivations of the firms in a nonmarket sector cannot simply be presumed to be monetary profit.
14
2-1. Summary : THOUGHTS ON THE EFFECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
Two critical requirements for a theory
Be treated as inherently stochastic
be capable of encompassing considerable institutional complexity and variety.
Two major theoretical proposals
modeling innovation generation as the conditional probabilistic outcome of
various R & D strategies, and modeling the fate of an innovation in terms of
the workings of a selection environment
15
2-1. Discussion
Steve seemed to say that Apple’s innovation strategy based on capabilities-push rather than demand-pull.Do you agree with him?
대다수의 사람들은 원하는 것을 보여주기 전까지 자신이 무엇을 원하는지 모른다
16
Nelson & Winter said that imitation by a competitor of a process inno-vation is likely to occur relatively rapidly, and to be encouraged by a marketing supplier, rather than being retarded by a patent.
What do you think the difference between imitation and inno-vative imitation?
2-1. Discussion
17
발표자 : 김현식
<session 2 : overview of the field>
Pavitt, K.(1984), Sectoral Patterns of technical change :
Toward a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373
18
2-2. Summary
Overview Purpose
to explain similarities and differences amongst sectors in the sources, nature and impact of innovations
Economic development and social change’s essential factors : production, adoption and spread of technical innovations
Technical innovation is a distinguishing feature of the products and industries where high wage countries compete successfully on world markets
Data base Volume-2,000 significant innovations and of innovating firms in
Britain Period : 1945~1979 (collected by Townsend et al.) Sample of innovations : 3, 4 digit product groups Experts in different sectors Approach and structure A series of statistical tests Econometric analysis
19
2-2. Summary
Analysis of the data Information in the data bank
Source of the main knowledge inputs into the innovation were iden-tified by asking the sectoral experts
Information on the sectors of production of innovations come from the sectoral experts (process innovation, product innovation)
Information on the size and principal sector of activity of innovation firms
Information on the principal activity of innovation firms (diversifica-tion)
Innovation in the data base The sector of production of the innovation The sector of use of the innovation The sector of the innovating firm’s principal activity. ▶ In the sectoral patterns of technological diversification
to compare sectors in terms of The sectoral source of technology used in a sector The institutional source and nature of the technology produced in a
sector The characteristics of innovating firms
20
2-2. Summary
Sectoral technological trajectories Three characteristics : Sources of technology, Users’ needs, Mean of appropriating benefits
21
2-2. Summary
A taxonomy and a theory of sectoral patterns of technical changeHigh degree of depen-dence on external sources forprocess technology
Relatively small proportion of innovative activity devoted toproduct innovations(Percentage of Product inno-vation)
Relatively smallaverage size ofinnovating firm
Technological diversification mainlyvertically into production tech-nologywith very little movement into otherproduct markets
Relatively big contribution toinnovations in the sector by firms with their principal activi-ties
22
2-2. Summary
Pavitt taxonomy Four category of firms
1. Supplier dominated firms are typically small and found in manufacturing and non-manufactur-
ing sectors. Most technology comes from suppliers of equipment and material.
2. Scale intensive firms are found in bulk materials and assembly. Their internal sources of tech-
nology are production engineering and R&D departments. External sources of technology include
mainly interactive learning with specialised suppliers, but also inputs from science-based firms are
of some importance.
3. Specialised suppliers are small firms, which are producers of production equipment and control
instrumentation. Their main internal sources are primarily design and development. External
sources are users (science based and scale-intensive firms).
4. Science based firms are found in the chemical and electronic sectors. Their main internal sources
of technology are internal R&D and production engineering. Important external sources of technol-
ogy include universities, but also specialised suppliers.
23
2-2. Summary
Technological Linkage
Supplier Dominated
Firms
The main technological linkages amongst different categories of firm
Scale-intensiveFirms
SpecialisedEquipmentSuppliers
Science-basedFirms
24
2-2. Summary
Analytical implication Science and technology push vs. demand pull
- The close relationship between investment in user sectors and innovative
activities in
upstream capital goods(Schmooker, Scherer)
- Investment activities in supplier dominated and production intensive firms are
likely to
stimulated innovative activities in both the productions engineering depart-
ments of
user firms, and the upstream firms supplying capital goods.
- Not expect Science-based firms a similarly neat and lagged correspondence be-
tween
the volume of investment in user sectors and of innovative activities.
- Scherer found that in materials sectors, in contrasts to capital goods, the statis-
tical
relationship between the volume of innovative activities and of investment
in user sectors is much weaker
25
2-2. Summary
Product vs. process innovation
Analytical implication
- The relative importance of product innovation in a sector to be positively
associated with its R&D and patent intensity
- Negatively associated with proxy measures of the scale and complexity of
its
process technology (its capital/labour ratio, average size of production
plant, or sales concentration ratios).
- Appendix Table11 : E1, E2, E3
26
2-2. Summary
The locus of process innovation
Analytical implication
- Supplier-dominated firms will be small in size and innovations to come by
definition from suppliers
- In sectors with production intensive firms and plan to be large in size, and
a high proportion of process technology to be generated in-house
- Appendix Table11 : E4
27
2-2. Summary
Diversification
Analytical implication
- The relative importance of upstream(i.e. vertical) technological diversifications
into
sectors supplying equipment is likely to be negatively associated with R&D in-
tensity
- Positively associated with the scale and complexity of production technology
- understand the links at the level of the firm between firm strategy and R&D
strategy
- Appendix Table11 : E5
28
2-2. Summary
Needs to be tested on the basis of complete sectoral coverage of
the characteristics of innovations in Britain.
Needs to be modified and extended
Have a variety of uses for policy makers and analysts
Turn out to have more powerful uses
Contain one obvious and important warning for both practitioners of
policies for technical change, and academic social scientists concerned
with is conceptualisation.
Future perspectives
29
2-2. Discussion
Adoption in recent technology trend Archbugi, D.(2001), Pavitt’s Taxonomy sixteen years on : A Review Article
[FIGURE] Phases of Capitalist Development and Pavitt’s Categories of Firms
Is it possible to adopt in recent technology trend?
30
2-2. Discussion
Applying the Pavitt taxonomy
Laursen, K. & Meliciani V. (1999),
The Importance of Technology
based Inter-sectoral Linkages for
Market Share Dynamics
[Category of Firm]
• Supplier dominated(SDOM)
• Scale intensive(SCAI)
• Specialised suppliers(SPEC)
• Science based(SCIB)
31
2-2. Discussion
Applying the Pavitt taxonomy IPC(International Patent Classification) & KSIC(Korean Standard Industrial Classification)
[Category of Firm]
• Supplier dominated(SDOM)
• Scale intensive(SCAI)
• Specialised suppliers(SPEC)
• Science based(SCIB)
Supplier dominated(SDOM)
Specialised suppliers(SPEC)
섬유제품 제조업 특수기계 제조업의복액세서리 및 모피제품 제조업 전기장비 제조업가죽 , 가방 및 신발 제조업 측정 및 제어기기 제조업목재 및 나무제품 제조업 광학기기 제조업펄프 , 종이 및 종이제품 제조업 시계 제조업코크스 , 연탄 및 석유정제품 제조업 전구 및 조명장치 제조업비금속 광물제품 제조업 전기 , 가스 , 증기 및 수도사업농림어업 컴퓨터 프로그래밍 및 정보서비스업광업
Scale intensive(SCAI)
Science based(SCIB)
음식료품 제조업 기초화학물질 제조업담배 제조업 살충제 및 기타 농약 제조업인쇄 및 기록매체 복제업 잉크 , 페인트 , 코팅제 및 유사제품 제조업고무제품 및 플라스틱제품 제조업 의약용 물질 및 의약품 제조업1 차 금속 제조업 세제 , 화장품 광택제 제조업금속가공제품 제조업 그외 기타 화학제품 제조업자동차 제조업 화학섬유 제조업기타 운송장비 제조업 사무기기 , 컴퓨터 제조업가구 및 기타 제품 제조업 전자부품 제조업 통신장비 제조업 영상 및 음향기기 제조업 의료용 기기 제조업
source : 특허분류와 한국표준산업분류 연계표 작성에 관한 연구 ( 발췌 )
32
2-2. Discussion
Applying the Pavitt taxonomy
GICS(Global Industry Classification Standard)
[Category of Firm] Supplier dominated(SDOM), Scale intensive(SCAI), Specialised suppliers(SPEC), Science based(SCIB)
경제섹터 산업군 Pavitt Taxonomy 경제섹터 산업군 Pavitt Taxonomy
에너지 에너지 SDOM건강관리 건강관리서비스 및 장비 SCIB/SPEC
소재 소재 SCIB 제약 및 생명과학 SCIB
산업재자본재
금융
은행 상업전문서비스 다각화된 금융
운송 SCAI 보험
자유소비재
자동차 및 부품 SCAI 부동산 내구소비재 및 의류 SCAI/SDOM
정보기술소프트웨어 및 IT 서비스 SPEC
소비자 서비스 하드웨어 및 IT 장비 SCIB
미디어 SCIB 반도체 및 반도체장비 SCIB
소매 통신서비스 통신서비스 SCIB
필수소비재음식료 소매
유틸리티 유틸리티 음식료 담배 SCAI
가정 및 개인용품
source : 한국증권선물거래소 (www.krx.co.kr)
33
2-2. Discussion
Source of Innovation(Technology push vs. Demand pull)
Giada Di Stefano, G. D et al.(2012), Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions, Research Policy, 41, 1283-1295
- a detailed review of academic articles dealing with the sources of innovation Factor 1(Technology and Competences for Innovation) Factor 2(New Product Development and Market Learning) Factor 3(Demand and User Innovation) Factor 4(systems of innovation & the system perspective centered on customers). Factor 5(Technology Diffusion and Adoption)
What is your perspec-tives
in your interesting fields/sectors?
34
발표자 : 이연화
<session 2 : overview of the field>
Kuhn, T. S.(1970), The Structure of scientific revolutions(2d ed.).
Chicago : University of Chicago Press, [Chapter 2 and 7]
35
Normal science
2-3. Summary : Chapter2. The route of normal science
정상과학 : 과거의 하나 이상의 과학적 성취에 확고히 기반을 둔 연구 활동
성취 : 몇몇 특정 과학자 사회가 일정 기간 동안 과학의 한 걸음 나아간 활동을
위한 기초를 제공하는 것으로 인정하는 것
- 교재 : 자연학 , 알마게스트 , 프린키피아 , 광학 , 전기학 , 화학 , 지질학 등
역할 : 이런 책들과 다수의 여타 저작이 일정 시기 동안은 연구 분야에서의 합당한
문제들과 방법들을 연구자의 다음 세대에게 묵시적으로 정의해주는 역할
36
2-3. Summary : Chapter2. The route of normal science
개념 : 과학적 인식 - 이론 - 관습 - 사고 - 관념 - 가치관 등이 결합된 총체적인
틀
또는 개념의 집합체
패러다임의 획득과 그것이 허용하는 보다 심원한 연구 형태의 획득은 어느
주어진 과학 영역의 발전에서 성숙의 징조
두 가지 특징을 가진 Achievement
• 과학 활동의 경쟁 방식을 바꿀 수 있는 획기적인 것
• 모든 유형의 문제들에 대해서 새로운 해석이 가능하도록 열려 있는 것
Paradigm
37
2-3. Summary : Chapter2. The route of normal science
의의
- 과학 활동을 수행하기 위한 과학자의 사전 준비의 역할
- 공유된 paradigm 안에서의 동일한 규칙과 표준 제시
- 물리학에서의 paradigm 의 전환은”과학혁명” 하나의 패러다임으로부터 다른
패러다임으로의 연속적인 이행은 성숙된 과학에서의 통상적인 발달 양상
예
- 프톨레마이오스의 천문학
- 아리스토텔레스의 역학
- 입자광학
Paradigm
38
2-3. Summary : Chapter7.Crisis and Emergence of Scientific Theories
Paradigm 변화
“ 과학혁명은… 하나의 Paradigm 이 이와 양립 불가능한 다른 새로운
Paradigm 에 의해 전체적 또는 부분적으로 대체되는 비축적인 변화의
에피소드를 가리킨다”
이러한 과정을 Normal science 의 성과누적을 통해 기존 패러다임이
깨어지면서 경쟁적인 새로운 패러다임이 나타나는 것으로 설명
- 기존의 표준 이념이나 방법에 대한 포기
- 이전 paradigm 의 구성 요소를 다른 것으로 대치
현상에 대한 관심
- 이론 변화의 선수 조건
- 새로운 이론이 출현하게 되면 , 대규모의 패러다임의 파괴와 normal science
및
기술상의 주요 변동이 발생하게 되어 불안정한 이론 선행 시기가 나타나게 됨
- 새로운 이론은 정상적 문제 풀이 활동에서의 현저한 실패 이후 출현 , 결국
이상
현상이나 위기는 “ paradigm” 이 바뀌어야 할 때라는 것을 가리키는 지표
39
Paradigm 변화의 예 코페르니쿠스 1) 기술상의 퍼즐 출이 활동의 붕괴 2) 달력 개혁에 대한 사회적 압력 , 3) 유의미한 역사적 요소
라부아지에의 산소 이론의 탄생에 선행했던 위기 1) 기체화학의 융성과 질량 관계에 대한 의문 :18 세기 화학자들은 공기가 화학 반응에서의 활성 성분임에 틀림없다는 것을 차츰 깨닫게 되었음 2) 1756 년에 이르러 조지프 블랙이 고정된 공기 ( 이산화탄소 ) 는 언제나 보통 공기와는 구별된다는 것을 보여주었을 때 , 두 가지 기체 시료는 오직 그 불순물에서만 차이가 나는 것으로 간주되었음
상대성 이론의 탄생으로의 길을 열어주었던 물리학에서의 19 세기 말의 위기에 대한 것 - 그들은 절대 위치와 절대 운동은 뉴턴의 체계에서는 전혀 아무런 구실을 하지 못한다는 것을 증명할 수 있었다 . 19 세기 말 수십 년 동안 물리학의 실제에 전혀 새로운 관계를 맺게 될 때 비로소 부활되었던 것임
2-3. Summary : Chapter7.Crisis and Emergence of Scientific Theories
40
정상과학은 과거의 하나 이상의 과학적 성취에 확고히 기반을 둔 연구 활동을
뜻하고 정상과학의 성취는 과학 활동의 경쟁 방식으로부터 끈질긴 옹호자들의
무리를 떼어 낼 만큼 전대미문이고 동시에 모든 유형의 문제들을 연구자들의
재편된 그룹이 해결하도록 남겨 놓을 만큼 상당히 융통성이 있었다 .
이 두 가지 특성을 띠는 성취를 패러다임이라고 부른다… .
2-3. Discussion
정상과학 (normal science) 와 패러다임 (paradigm) 의
개념에 어떤 구별이 있는지 ?
패러다임을 설명 할 때 모두 과학자들의 연구과정의 흐름을 논리적으로
표현했다고 하는데 그렇다면 패러다임은 과학분야에서만 나타나는
현상인가 ?
41
새로운 이론은 정상적 문제 풀이 활동에서의 현저한 실패를 본 후에야
비로소 출현했다 . 이는 우리가 논문 연구를 할 때 선행 연구들에만
의거하지 말고 그것의 부족한 점을 찾고 그것을 바탕으로 해야 새로운
무엇인가가 나올 수 있다고 한다 . 이러한 관점에 동의하는가 ?
2-3. Discussion
패러다임은 시대를 지배하는 총체적 틀인데 정상연구가 진행되다 보면
기존 패러다임의 오류를 수정하고자 새로운 패러다임이 나타나는데
어느 범위까지 인정 받아야 패러다임이라 할 수 있는가 ?
Paradigm shift 와 Technological Innovation 사이의 유사성과
차별성을 어떻게 설명할 수 있을까 ?
42
발표자 : 이연화
<session 2 : overview of the field>
Van de Ven, a. H.(1986), Central Problems in the management of innovation,
Management Science, 32(5), 590-607
43
2-4. Summary : Introduction
1980’s
In the wake of a decline in American productivity and obsolescence of its
infrastructure
The need for understanding and managing innovation
Stimulating innovation in popular books, Ouchi(1981),Pascale and Athos(1981)
30 chief executive officers public and private firms
1. How can a large organization develop an maintain a culture of
innovation and entrepreneurship
2.What are the critical factors in successfully launching new organizations?
3.How can a manager achieve balance?
44
Innovation is to understand the factors that facilitate and inhibit,
the factors include ideas, people, transactions and context over time.
2-4. Summary : Introduction
45
2-4. Summary : Factors(1)
New ideas-Human problem of managing attention
Innovation Ideas
- is a new idea, which may be a recombination of old ideas, a scheme that
challenges the present order, a formula, or a unique approach which is perceived
as new by the individuals involved(Zaltman, Duncan, and Holbwk1973)
- technical innovations(new technologies, products, services)
- administrative innovations(new procedures, policies, organizational forms)
“innovations” or ”mistakes”
- (1) How and why certain innovative ideas gain good currency?
- (2) How and why people pay attention to only certain new ideas and ignore?
46
People-Process problem in managing new ideas into good currency
The management of ideas
- People become attached to ideas
over time through a social-politi-
cal
process of pushing and riding
their
ideas into good currency. Limitations to inertia and premature abandonment of
some ideas
① There tends to be a short-term problem orientation in individu-
als and organizations, and a façade of demonstrating progress.
② Inventory of ideas is seldom adequate for the situation
③ Even more basic problem is the management of attention
2-4. Summary : Factors(2)
47
The management of attention
- A more realistic view of innovation should begin with an appreciation of the
physiological limitations of human beings to pay attention to nonroutine issues,
and their corresponding inertial forces in organizational life.
Physiological limitations of human beings
Group and organizational limitations
Way to management attention
→ direct personal confrontations with problem
→ triggering the action thresholds of organizational participants
→ channeling the action toward constructive ends
2-4. Summary : Factors(2)
People-Process problem in managing new ideas into good currency
48
Transactions-Structural problem of managing part whole relationships
Proliferation of ideas, people, and transactions over time is a pervasive
but little
understood characteristic of innovation process, and with it come com-
plexity
and interdependence-and the basic structural problem of managing
part-whole relations An Innovation is a collective achieve-
ment.
The transactions are deals or ex-
changes
which tie people together within an
institutional framework.
The organizational design for a process
for
integrating all the essential functions,
organizational units, and resources.
Fig 2. Linear sequential coupling compared with simultaneous Coupling of knowledge(Galbraith, 1982)
2-4. Summary : Factors(3)
49
Four inter-related design holographic organizations, principles have been
suggested by Morgan(1983)
1) Self-organizing : To solve its problems within an overall mission and set of
constraints prescribed for the unit by the larger organization.
2) Redundant functions : People develop an understanding of the essential
considerations and constraints of all aspects of the innovation in addition to
chose immediately needed to perform their individual assignments.
3) Requisite variety
Making environmental scanning a responsibility of all unit members.
4) Temporal linkage
Integrating parts of time(past, present, and future events) into an overall
chronology of the innovation process
2-4. Summary : Factors(3)
Transactions-Structural problem of managing part whole relationships
50
Institutional context-Leadership and innovation context
Figure 3. Institutional and technical processes(Lodahl and Mitchell, 1980)
2-4. Summary : Factors(4)
51
2-4. Summary : Conclusion
From a managerial viewpoint, to understand the process of innovation
1) How do innovations develop over time?
2) What kinds of problems will most likely be encountered?
3) What responses are appropriate for managing problems
Four basic concepts and four central problems
Three cybernetic principles
52
How can we interpret 4 factors and 4 central problems
in this paper with the structure of scientific revolutions?
2-4. Discussion
53
Recently, many firms conduct open innovation through
collaboration with other innovation actors.
Many researchers interest in performance of cooperation among
subjects participation.
How they do these kinds of cooperation?
2-4. Discussion
54
Implication & Concluding Discussion
<session 2 : overview of the field>
55
Innovation, Technical change, Paradigm Shift Technical innovation is a distinguishing feature of the products and industries
where high wage countries compete successfully on world markets.
Innovation is defined as the development and implementation of new ideas
by people who over time engage in transactions with others
within an institutional context.
Normal Science – Paradigm – Science Revolution
3. Implication & Concluding Discussion
Technology push vs. Demand pull
Product vs. Process Innovation / Diversification
Technology trajectory / Taxonomy
4 Factors and 4 central problems
Management of Innovation
56
User-Led Innovation Model
Innovation process : User roles in technological innovation
Source of Innovation
Themke, s. and von Hippel, E.(2002), “Customers as Innovators : A new Way to Create Value”, Harvard Business Review,
3. Implication & Concluding Discussion
(e.g. : open source software, club community)
57
Human-centered Innovation
Human TechnologyContext
Human-centered Innovation
3. Implication & Concluding Discussion
Now? How?
58
Interpreting in an open innovation point of view
3. Implication & Concluding Discussion
Linked to Sectoral patterns of technological innovation
4 factor and 4 central problems
Chesbrough(2003; 2006)
59
Thank you