校长:教育的守望者 教育部基础教育课程教材发展中心 刘 坚 ...
Post on 08-Jan-2016
213 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
-
ncctlj@sina.com
-
711,7.6725,20
-
610-20618-286 713,10.8
-
,
-
[]
-
[]
-
625,,334
-
50
-
2005.05.15,16:40,,
-
40:
-
:-
-
----------
-
610-20618-286 720-25, ? ? ?
-
:
-
1 1996-1998 1999-20017 200172004 200472007???
-
2001 42 0.5%-1%2002 570 18%-20%2003 1642 40%-50%2004 2576 70%-90%2005
-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 ()2010
-
04 05 0607
-
(04)
-
04
-
(053)
-
123
-
621
-
Hyman Bass385
-
1-3 5-8 20-50-100
-
20070917 14 60 400 7
-
[1] 1415 NCTM2007 90
-
Dr. Zhonghe Wu, National University Dr. Shuhua AnLong Beach, California State University. Dr. Gerald Kulm, Texas A&M University
-
Chart1
0.8787142860.3504285710.688
0.9126666670.2370.589333333
0.82950.2341666670.484166667
0.6058888890.4280.569
0.8183555560.2858444440.580333333
0.9340.369750.69225
0.9250.59350.73305
Sheet1
0.85270.875
0.74080.6857
0.87260.741
0.92010.9402
0.85650.7552
0.82040.8055
0.63730.6131
Sheet1
0.85270.875
0.74080.6857
0.87260.741
0.92010.9402
0.85650.7552
0.82040.8055
0.63730.6131
Sheet2
School# stu.Q 1AQ 2C3QCQ 4AQ 5CQ 6CQ 7DQ 8DQ 9CQ 10CQ11 48%Q12 7x + 4y = 43 and 11x + 12y = 79Q13 "11"Q14 "55"Q15A "64kph"Q15B "80kph"Q16A "140 and 375"Q16B "B with explanation"Q16B "B without explanation"Q16C "150 with work show"Q16C "150 without work show"Q17A "27.1"Q17 EQ18A correctQ18B correctQ18C correctQ19A correctQ19B correctQ20AcorrectQ20AincorrecQ20 AcorrecQ20B corretQ16B "B with explanation"Q16B "B without explanation"16BQ16C "150 with work show"Q16C "150 without work show"16CQ17AQ17B
Unreformed171891.4%98.0%93.7%94.1%82.6%91.7%97.3%88.0%96.9%97.3%95.6%87.3%96.0%71.1%95.6%95.6%65.8%82.1%3.7%57.8%3.8%92.6%93.1%65.7%56.2%35.9%61.8%64.4%55.1%26.1%82.1%3.7%56.0%57.8%3.8%61.6%Unreformed92.6%93.1%
Reformed163486.5%94.7%91.2%90.0%79.7%86.0%95.8%85.7%95.8%96.3%92.3%75.6%93.3%65.5%94.0%88.9%64.9%85.5%2.5%64.5%2.6%92.5%92.5%87.7%92.1%53.4%76.9%75.8%58.8%35.6%85.5%2.5%57.8%64.5%2.6%67.1%Reformed92.5%92.5%
Inter. Average26.0%39.9%63.7%48.3%31.7%39.4%39.6%35.6%26.6%46.1%8.9%24.0%22.4%31.0%35.8%18.3%5.8%21.4%32.4%6.2%2.3%21.4%32.4%25.1%6.2%2.3%8.5%Inter. Average74.9%43.8%
CHinese Taipei49.5%74.0%76.3%73.7%39.7%41.0%73.9%53.5%76.2%69.8%37.0%61.8%56.6%38.6%59.1%39.1%17.6%26.6%47.9%20.0%1.0%26.6%47.9%33.7%20.0%1.0%21.0%Austria84.1%45.0%
Hong Kong43.3%67.4%80.8%80.7%61.0%47.2%81.6%46.6%73.2%58.7%30.3%71.8%55.9%38.9%75.6%47.2%15.5%7.8%55.5%21.4%5.0%7.8%55.5%23.7%21.4%5.0%26.4%Finland85.6%51.4%
Japan38.4%68.2%82.0%51.0%38.7%43.5%72.6%49.7%79.3%64.4%15.9%66.8%37.4%46.1%58.9%33.0%18.7%49.2%32.2%19.5%4.1%49.2%32.2%43.5%19.5%4.1%23.6%Hong Kang77.9%68.7%
Korea, S.42.7%78.5%78.4%53.1%44.6%41.0%75.1%56.3%75.2%70.3%36.5%57.2%64.0%51.1%43.1%27.2%15.3%39.6%42.4%22.3%2.6%39.6%42.4%40.5%22.3%2.6%24.9%France89.5%47.7%
Singapore55.7%57.9%81.9%84.9%70.2%67.8%82.1%56.2%63.8%48.9%56.8%60.3%58.4%49.5%77.6%52.2%27.4%39.6%44.4%27.6%1.1%39.6%44.4%41.2%27.6%1.1%28.7%Japan63.0%53.6%
USA24.8%48.2%74.0%48.3%35.3%33.4%38.6%50.9%48.6%33.7%12.0%20.4%20.2%44.9%54.8%24.0%7.7%36.6%31.6%8.0%2.8%36.6%31.6%34.9%8.0%2.8%10.8%Korea63.0%53.3%
USA40.8%42.3%
SchoolQ 2CQ 4AQ 5CQ 6CQ 7DQ12 7x + 4y = 43 and 11x + 12y = 79Q13 "11"Q17AQ17B
Unreformed98.0%94.1%82.6%91.7%97.3%87.3%96.0%92.4%92.6%93.1%
Reformed94.7%90.0%79.7%86.0%95.8%75.6%93.3%87.9%92.5%92.5%
Inter. Average39.9%48.3%31.7%39.4%39.6%24.0%22.4%35.0%74.9%43.8%
CHinese Taipei74.0%73.7%39.7%41.0%73.9%61.8%56.6%60.1%84.1%45.0%
Hong Kong67.4%80.7%61.0%47.2%81.6%71.8%55.9%66.5%85.6%51.4%
Japan68.2%51.0%38.7%43.5%72.6%66.8%37.4%54.0%77.9%68.7%
Korea, S.78.5%53.1%44.6%41.0%75.1%57.2%64.0%59.1%89.5%47.7%
Singapore57.9%84.9%70.2%67.8%82.1%60.3%58.4%68.8%63.0%53.6%
USA48.2%48.3%35.3%33.4%38.6%20.4%20.2%34.9%63.0%53.3%
40.8%42.3%
Q 8DQ 9CQ11 48%
Unreformed88.0%96.9%95.6%93.50%
Reformed85.7%95.8%92.3%91.27%
Inter. Average35.6%26.6%8.9%23.70%
CHinese Taipei53.5%76.2%37.0%55.57%
Hong Kong46.6%73.2%30.3%50.03%
Japan49.7%79.3%15.9%48.30%
Korea, S.56.3%75.2%36.5%56.00%
Singapore56.2%63.8%56.8%58.93%
USA50.9%48.6%12.0%37.17%
Q 1AQ 10CQ15A "64kph"Q15B "80kph"Q16A "140 and 375"16C
Unreformed91.4%97.3%95.6%95.6%65.8%61.60%84.55%
Reformed86.5%96.3%94.0%88.9%64.9%67.10%82.95%
Inter. Average26.0%46.1%35.8%18.3%5.8%8.50%23.42%
CHinese Taipei49.5%69.8%59.1%39.1%17.6%21.00%42.68%
Hong Kong43.3%58.7%75.6%47.2%15.5%26.40%44.45%
Japan38.4%64.4%58.9%33.0%18.7%23.60%39.50%
Korea, S.42.7%70.3%43.1%27.2%15.3%24.90%37.25%
Singapore55.7%48.9%77.6%52.2%27.4%28.70%48.42%
USA24.8%33.7%54.8%24.0%7.7%10.80%25.97%
3QCQ14 "55"16B
Unreformed93.7%71.1%57.8%74.21%
Reformed91.2%65.5%25.1%60.59%
Inter. Average63.7%31.0%33.7%42.80%
CHinese Taipei76.3%38.6%23.7%46.20%
Hong Kong80.8%38.9%43.5%54.41%
Japan82.0%46.1%40.5%56.21%
Korea, S.78.4%51.1%41.2%56.90%
Singapore81.9%49.5%34.9%55.44%
USA74.0%44.9%36.6%51.83%
Q 1AQ 2C3QCQ 4AQ 5CQ 6CQ11 48%Q12 7x + 4y = 43 and 11x + 12y = 79Q13 "11"Q14 "55"Q15A "64kph"Q15B "80kph"Q16A "140 and 375"16B16C
Unreformed91.4%98.0%93.7%94.1%82.6%91.7%95.6%87.3%96.0%71.1%95.6%95.6%65.8%56.0%61.60%85.07%
Reformed86.5%94.7%91.2%90.0%79.7%86.0%92.3%75.6%93.3%65.5%94.0%88.9%64.9%57.8%67.10%81.84%
Inter. Average26.0%39.9%63.7%48.3%31.7%39.4%8.9%24.0%22.4%31.0%35.8%18.3%5.8%25.1%8.50%28.58%
CHinese Taipei49.5%74.0%76.3%73.7%39.7%41.0%37.0%61.8%56.6%38.6%59.1%39.1%17.6%33.7%21.00%47.91%
Hong Kong43.3%67.4%80.8%80.7%61.0%47.2%30.3%71.8%55.9%38.9%75.6%47.2%15.5%23.7%26.40%51.05%
Japan38.4%68.2%82.0%51.0%38.7%43.5%15.9%66.8%37.4%46.1%58.9%33.0%18.7%43.5%23.60%44.38%
Korea, S.42.7%78.5%78.4%53.1%44.6%41.0%36.5%57.2%64.0%51.1%43.1%27.2%15.3%40.5%24.90%46.54%
Singapore55.7%57.9%81.9%84.9%70.2%67.8%56.8%60.3%58.4%49.5%77.6%52.2%27.4%41.2%28.70%58.03%
USA24.8%48.2%74.0%48.3%35.3%33.4%12.0%20.4%20.2%44.9%54.8%24.0%7.7%34.9%10.80%32.92%
Q 7DQ 8DQ 9CQ 10C
Unreformed97.3%88.0%96.9%97.3%94.88%
Reformed95.8%85.7%95.8%96.3%93.40%
Inter. Average39.6%35.6%26.6%46.1%36.98%
CHinese Taipei73.9%53.5%76.2%69.8%68.35%
Hong Kong81.6%46.6%73.2%58.7%65.03%
Japan72.6%49.7%79.3%64.4%66.50%
Korea, S.75.1%56.3%75.2%70.3%69.23%
Singapore82.1%56.2%63.8%48.9%62.75%
USA38.6%50.9%48.6%33.7%42.95%
Q17AQ17B
Unreformed92.6%93.1%92.9%
Reformed92.5%92.5%92.5%
Inter. Average74.9%43.8%59.4%
Austria84.1%45.0%64.5%
Finland85.6%51.4%68.5%
Hong Kang77.9%68.7%73.3%
France89.5%47.7%68.6%
Japan63.0%53.6%58.3%
Korea63.0%53.3%58.2%
USA40.8%42.3%41.6%
School
Unreformed92.43%93.50%84.55%74.21%85.07%94.88%92.85%Unreformed
Reformed87.87%91.27%82.95%60.59%81.84%93.40%92.50%Reformed
Inter. Average35.04%23.70%23.42%42.80%28.58%36.98%59.35%Inter. Average
CHinese Taipei60.10%55.57%42.68%46.20%47.91%68.35%64.54%Austria
Hong Kong66.51%50.03%44.45%54.41%51.05%65.03%68.47%Finland
Japan54.03%48.30%39.50%56.21%44.38%66.50%73.31%Hong Kang
Korea, S.59.07%56.00%37.25%56.90%46.54%69.23%68.60%France
Singapore68.80%58.93%48.42%55.44%58.03%62.75%58.30%Japan
USA34.91%37.17%25.97%51.83%32.92%42.95%58.15%Korea
41.55%USA
Unreformed0.92428571430.9350.84550.74211111110.85071111110.948750.9285
Reformed0.87871428570.91266666670.82950.60588888890.81835555560.9340.925
Inter. Average0.35042857140.2370.23416666670.4280.28584444440.369750.5935
0.6880.58933333330.48416666670.5690.58033333330.692250.73305
0.90150.92383333330.83750.6740.83453333330.9413750.92675
0.35042857140.2370.23416666670.4280.28584444440.369750.5935
0.6880.58933333330.48416666670.5690.58033333330.692250.73305
0.8787142860.9126666670.82950.6058888890.8183555560.9340.925
0.3504285710.2370.2341666670.4280.2858444440.369750.5935
0.6880.5893333330.4841666670.5690.5803333330.692250.73305
Sheet2
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
Unreformed
Reformed
Inter. Average
Sheet3
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
-
(Cai, 2000,2001)
-
[2]2005~2008
-
2005()
-
1
2
-
3 4
-
5 6
-
90%
-
50023
-
[]
-
----
-
[] 4375
62073580012001235600
-
4375115348845692415
-
21
-
[]
-
,,
-
Sara Bongiorni
-
20043925DVD 200511
-
2006
-
iPod
-
1,51,81,0.075
-
200412
-
1996-1998 1999-20017 200172004 200472007
-
,
-
20050909
-
20060907
-
20070614
-
200803
-
20060605
-
20070831:
-
519,528,
-
,,,
-
, ,:,:--;--;--,:?--:,,
-
--- !
-
010-66096172
-
Sara Bongiorni and her family attempted to live without goods made in China for a year, and found that it was no simple task. She has documented the project in a book called, A Year Without 'Made in China.It wasn't motivated by a patriotic urge to buy American, but more as an experiment to see how global the sources of our goods are. Bongiorni said, "I wanted our story to be a friendly, nonjudgmental look at the ways ordinary people are connected to the global economy." In the foreword, written by economist Joel Naroff, it's said that 15 percent of the $1.7 trillion spent on imported goods the US imported in 2006 came from China. This book would certainly be worth a read if you're at all interested in buying more local products. The same problems involved with not buying Chinese goods would apply to purchasing local goods. Purchasing a pair of shoes made in your own country is likely to reduce your footrpint, so to speak - transporting goods half way around the world is not green, even if it is cheaper
top related