3d_0320_zarillo_ppthhh

Sediment Transport Modeling off the Northeast Coast of Florida

Gary A. Zarillo Florida Institute of Technology and Scientific Environmental Applications, Inc., Melbourne, FL

1

Florida Inner Continental Shelf Study Areas

NE FL Shelf

2

Geology of Shelf Sand Ridges

Origin and Dynamics

Numerical Modeling

• Strategy

• Applications

• Results

Combining Geological and Numerical Models to Assess the Impacts of Mining Sand Resources on the

Inner Continental Shelf of Northeast Florida

3

Cretaceous Shannon Sandstone – Powder River Basin, WY

Cross-Bedded Shallow Water Sandstones

(Higley et al. 1997)

Geology of Shelf Sand Ridges

From Tillman 1985 4

Wave-Generated Bedforms at 12 m: A8 Shoal NE FL

5

Sand Ridges in the Rock Record Mesozoic- Cenozoic Stratigraphy

From USGS 6

Oil Production from Ridge Sandstones

From USGS

Sussex B Sandstone

7

Modern – Ancient Analogues

Cretaceous Period Sand Ridge A6 Sand Ridge NE Florida Continental Shelf

8

Transgressive Sand Ridge Deposits – Fox Hills Sandstone

9

Cross-bedded Storm Unit – Fox Hills Sandstone

10

Modern Sand Ridge : A6 NE Florida Ancient Sand Ridge

See Tillman 1985; Rine et. al. 1991 for shelf sand ridge geology

Geology of Modern Shelf Sand Ridges

11

Sand Ridge Origin in a Transgressive Barrier Island Setting

McBride and Moslow 1991 12

McBride and Moslow 1991

Shelf Sand Ridges – Florida Examples

13

Indian River Shoal off East Central Florida Inner Continental Shelf

Beach Sand Borrow Area

14

Sand Ridges/Linear Shoals of the NE FL Study Area

15

Perspective Views of NE FL Shoals B11/B12

Shoals B12 and B11

16

Model Grid Boundaries

17

Spectral Wind-Wave Transformation Model CMS-WAVE Based on a spectral wave energy conservation equation: Considers wind input, shoaling, refraction, diffraction, and dissipation wave-current interaction

Circulation Model – CMS-FLOW Two-dimensional, finite-volume numerical solution of the depth-integrated continuity and momentum equations: Considers wave-current interaction, advection - diffusion, nonlinear continuity terms, forcing by water level, tidal constituents, flow-rate, wave stresses, and wind

Sand Transport Model – “LUND” Formulation Considers bed load, suspended load, wave-current interaction, initiation of motion, slope effects, and asymmetric wave velocity

The Numerical Models: USACOE/ERDC Coastal Modeling System

18

Coastal Modeling System

http://cirp.usace.army.mil/products/index.html

19

Model Setup

20

- -

Tides

Wave Spectra

Water Level/ Winds

Model Setup – Boundary Time Series

21

Storm-Related Wave Events

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

12/11/97 3/21/98 6/29/98 10/7/98 1/15/99 4/25/99 8/3/99 11/11/99

Date

Hsi

g, m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Per

iod,

s

Significnt Wave Height, mPeak Period, s

Maximum Wave Event

Significant Wave Height, m

22

Wave Model Calibration: NE Florida

23

Measure v

Measured vs. Model Wave Period

Measured vs. Model Wave Direction

Wave Model

Calibration for

NE Florida

24

• Time advancing runs of 2 years

• Event scale predictions for storm conditions

• Model predictions with/without borrow cuts

• Test single & multiple cuts from potential borrow areas

• Examine potential for modification of sediment transport

Numerical Modeling Strategy

ERDC/CHL Coastal Modeling System Coupled Wave and Circulation Models

25

Model Test Location Borrow Cut Volume (m3) Duration Case1 B11_B12 Shoals None 0 2 years

Case 2 B11_B12 Shoals Single 600,000 2 years

Case 3 B11/B12 Shoals Multiple 8 million 2 years Case 4 A9 Shoal None 0 2 years

Case 5 A9 Shoal Single 1.2 million 2 years

Case 6 A9 Shoal Multiple 6 million 2 years

Case 7 A8 Shoal None 0 2 years

Case 8 A8 Shoal Single 1.2 million 2 years

Case 9 A8 Shoal Multiple 9.3 million 2 years

Case 10 A4-A6 Shoals None 0 2 years

Case 11 A4-A6 Shoals Single 2.8 million 2 years

Case 12 A4-A6 Shoals Multiple 18 million 2 years

Summary of NE Florida Model Test Cases

26

B11-B12 Model Test Case 3

B11 B12

27

Existing vs. Borrow Cuts: Hurricane Waves

Predicted Difference in Wave Height

B11

B12

28

Event Scale Topographic Change

Deposition: Lower Shoreface

Erosion: Upper Shoreface

Deposition Lower Shoreface

Hurricane Floyd 1999 29

Model Predictions in the Littoral Environment

Numerical Recording Stations

30

Predicted Annualized Net Littoral Sand Transport

Negative values indicate south-directed littoral sand transport 31

Predicted Difference Annualized Net Sand Transport in the Littoral Zone

32

Shoal A6: Model Test Case 12

Federal Limit

Shoreline

33

Predicted Event Scale Sand Transport

St. Augustine Inlet

34

A6 Shoal Crest

Predicted Topographic Change – 24 Months at Shoal A6 (Predicted Topographic Change Over Ridge Crest +/-1 m)

No Sand Borrow Excavations

35

Predicted Morphologic Change over Borrow Excavations (24-month model run A6 Shoal NE Florida Shelf)

Borrow Excavation

36

Predicted Annualized Net Littoral Sand Transport A4 – A6 Shoals

37

Predicted Difference: A4 – A6 Shoals Annualized Net Sand Transport in the Littoral Zone

38

• Sand Ridges of NE Florida Continental Shelf are consistent with the sand geological model having clean sand units at the crest reworked and maintained by storms • Influence of the borrow cuts is at the event scale due to passing storms and associated long period waves • Along the NE Florida shoreline the influence of large borrow cuts is detectable but small compared to the annual sand budget and natural variability

Major Conclusions from the Model Simulations

39

Acknowledgments

BOEMRE

U.S. Geological Survey

Florida Geologic Survey

40

Higley D.K., M.P. Pantea and R.M. Slatt. 1997. 3-D Reservoir Characterization of the House Creek Oil Field, Powder River Basin, Wyoming, V1.00. U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-33.

McBride, R.A. and T.F. Moslow. 1991. Origin, evolution, and distribution of

shoreface sand ridges, Atlantic inner shelf, U.S.A. Marine Geology 97:57–85.

Rine, J.M., R.W. Tillman, S.J. Culver, and D.J.P. Swift. 1991. Generation of

late Holocene sand ridges on the middle continental shelf of New Jersey, USA – Evidence of formation in a mid-shelf setting based on comparisons with a nearshore ridge. International Association of Sedimentologists, Special Publication No. 14, pp. 395–423.

Tillman, R.W. 1985. A spectrum of shelf sands and sandstones. In: Tillman,

R.W., D. Swift, and R. Walker, eds. Shelf Sand and Sandstone Reservoirs. SEPM Short Course 13:1–46.

References

41