brian garrod - hatch

93
+ + Eglinton Crosstown - Perseverance Gets the Job Done..... Eventually 14 th Annual Australian Tunnelling Conference October 12, 2016

Upload: informa-australia

Post on 19-Jan-2017

140 views

Category:

Business


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Brian Garrod - Hatch

+

+

Eglinton Crosstown - Perseverance Gets the Job Done..... Eventually

14th Annual Australian Tunnelling Conference

October 12, 2016

Page 2: Brian Garrod - Hatch

History

‒ 1985 -Rapid transit on Eglinton Avenue in Toronto was first proposed.

‒Nothing got built.

Page 3: Brian Garrod - Hatch

History

‒ 1991 - The Rapid Transit Expansion Program (RTEP) was announced

‒ 1994 - Construction started on a subway on EglintonAvenue

‒ 1995 - A change in provincial government resulted in the Eglinton Subway being cancelled.

Page 4: Brian Garrod - Hatch

History

‒ 1995 - The Rapid Transit Expansion Program reduced to the Sheppard Subway.

‒ 2005 - It got built.

Page 5: Brian Garrod - Hatch

History

‒ 2007 - Transit City was announced by the City. It included a 43 stop LRT line mostly on Eglinton Avenue.

‒ 2010 - A new city mayor Rob Ford was elected and immediately cancelled Transit City. Instead he wanted to expand the subway system.

‒ 2010 - Hatch was awarded the design contract by the TTC for a 19 km, all underground Eglinton-Scarborough Crosstown LRT.

Page 6: Brian Garrod - Hatch

History

‒ 2012 - Council overruled the mayor’s “all subway” plan and approved the go ahead of Eglinton LRT line. It was determined that the narrow right-of-way along Eglintonwould require that the LRT would be underground.

‒ Early contracts had already been awarded for the TBM launch shaft and for the procurement of the TBMs and the tunnel linings

Page 7: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Hatch Initial Involvement

‒ Prepare the Project Implementation Plan

Page 8: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Project Implementation Plan

‒ Context ‒ Project now administered by Metrolinx instead of TTC

‒ Four Lovat (Caterpillar) TBMs ordered May 2010, delivery July 2012 and Jan 2013

‒ Precast Concrete Lining contract awarded March 2011

‒ Twin Tunnels design contract October 2010

‒ LRV fleet ordered from Bombardier – deliveries beginning 2015

‒ ECLRT to be completely underground from at least Keele to Kennedy. 19 km

‒ Completion date 2020

Page 9: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Methodology – How and Why

‒ Methodology premised on achieving the earliest delivery of project .

‒ Schedule based on completing tunnel drives as early as possible since these constrain station and systems installation. (Too late for station boxes-before-tunnels)

‒ Additional TBMs (four) for a total of eight will be acquired as needed to optimize the schedule

‒ TBM launch sites will be selected based on efficiency and available undeveloped space. TBM optimum drive length determined to be approx. 3 km.

9

Page 10: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Scope Adjustment

‒Underground portion reduced to 10 km‒West end elevated guideway 1 km‒East portion on street 8 km‒No need for the additional TBMs

10

Page 11: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Adjusted Alignment Overview

• 25 km �10 km underground

�8 km at-grade

�1 km elevated

�6km SRT conversion

• 12 Underground Stations• 12 Surface Stops

Page 12: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnelling Contract Breakdown

‒Two Sections Selected, West and East‒ Separated by the crossing of N-S subway and an interchange station

‒West Section - Keele to Yonge:‒ Two pairs of drives, 3.55 km and 2.71 km, progressing west to east

‒ Drives separated by the crossing of N-S subway and an interchange station

‒ Two TBMs supplied for the contractor’s use

‒ Launch shaft constructed as an advanced separate contract

‒East Section - Yonge to Don Mills‒ One pair of drives, 3.25 km progressing east to west

‒ Two TBMs supplied for the contractor’s use

‒ Launch shaft construction part of tunnelling contract

12

Page 13: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence:

����������

Page 14: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence:

�� ���������

Page 15: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence:

� �������������

��������������

Page 16: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence: Headwalls

���������������

Page 17: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence: Headwalls

������� ��������������

Page 18: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Headwalls by Secant PilingTypical Installation Stages

18

Page 19: Brian Garrod - Hatch

19

Headwalls by Jet GroutingTypical Installation Stages

Page 20: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence

Install Jet Grout Block “Headwalls” from Surface

Page 21: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence

Install Station Sidewall and Headwall Support of Excavation

Page 22: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence

Excavation Station and Commence Removing PCTL

Page 23: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Drive Sequence

Station Box Fully Excavated

Page 24: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Tunnel Construction Scope

‒West Contract – Design/Bid/Build‒ Twin tunnels from West Launch Shaft to Yonge Station

‒ East Contract – Design/Bid/Build‒ Twin tunnels from Don Mills to Yonge

‒ Associated launch and removal shafts, except West Launch Shaft

‒ Emergency Exit Building and Cross Passages‒Headwalls or jet grouted block for support of excavation at each end of stations

Page 25: Brian Garrod - Hatch

West Alignment – Keele to Eglinton West

Page 26: Brian Garrod - Hatch

West Alignment –Eglinton West to Yonge

Page 27: Brian Garrod - Hatch

East Alignment – Yonge to Laird

Page 28: Brian Garrod - Hatch

28

Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM)

‒ Four Earth Pressure Balance TBMs have been procured by Metrolinx

‒Direct contract by Metrolinx and free issue to contractor

Page 29: Brian Garrod - Hatch

West Stratigraphic Profile 106+300 to 107+00

Keele Station

Page 30: Brian Garrod - Hatch

West Stratigraphic Profile 111+000 to 111+500

Chaplin Station

Page 31: Brian Garrod - Hatch

West Stratigraphic Profile 111+700 to 112+300

Avenue Station

Page 32: Brian Garrod - Hatch

East Stratigraphic Profile 113+820 to 114+400

������ ��������� ���������• �����������������• �����������

• ����� � ���������������

• ����������� ��������� ����������������������������������

• ������������������������� ���������� ������������������

Page 33: Brian Garrod - Hatch

East Stratigraphic Profile 114+400 to 115+080

�����!�������" !##$• %���&��������������'• %�������������������'�• (�������������)����*���������&+�����������,��

• ����������������������������������������������� ����������)������������

• ������)�������������• ��������������������������������• &����������������������������������������• �������������������)����������

Page 34: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Stratigraphic Profile 115+080 to 115+760

EEB-3

• ����������� �������'�����������������������������������������������

• -������.��������������������������� ����������������)���������)������������ ��������"��������������$,

• ������������ �������"��������������'�)������ ��������)���$���*������������������������������,

• /����������������������������������������� ���������������������������

• ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������,

• !#��� %������������������

Page 35: Brian Garrod - Hatch

CP13 and Jet Grout Headwalls:Stratigraphic Profile Station 115+760 to 116+440

• (���0�����%�������1• /����-�0�����"�2�������������������.���������

��������$

• /����--�0�����"�����3����������������������$

!#�• %���� �������• 4��������������������

� �������

• ���������)�����.����5�����������'����6�����������&�����������,

Page 36: Brian Garrod - Hatch

EEB4: Stratigraphic Profile Station 116+440 to 117+120

����27�

• ������������������������������������)�������������������������������������,

• -������.��������������������������� ��������)�����.�������������������������)�����������������)�����.���������,

• �������8�����,

• &� ������������������ �������9�����!�����������

• ������.�"0����������9�������$���������������������27,

• 8����)���������.�!������,

Page 37: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Typical Structures

Page 38: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Typical Structures

Page 39: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Typical Structures

Page 40: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Typical Structures

Page 41: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Prediction of Tunnelling Settlement

Page 42: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Typical Tunnelling Settlement Profile

EB TUNNEL

Page 43: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Typical Tunnelling Settlement Profile

EB TUNNEL

WB TUNNEL

Page 44: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Typical Tunnelling Settlement Profile

EB TUNNEL

WB TUNNEL

Page 45: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Combined Settlement Contours

Page 46: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Structural Inventory

Page 47: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Level 1 Impact Methodology

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Half Trough Width (m)

Ve

rtic

al

Mo

ve

me

nt(

mm

)

Building Slope

Typical

Building

Maximum Slope

Page 48: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Building Impact Inventory Sheet

Page 49: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Level 1 Impact Results

Moderate to Severe damage assessment levels perform Level 2 detailed assessment

Page 50: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Level 1 Impact Results

Level 1 building impact assessment graph (from Boscardin & Cording)

Page 51: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Level 2 Analysis

Page 52: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Obstructions to Tunnelling Tieback Anchors

‒Tieback Obstruction Concern:‒ 1500+ buildings along ECLRT Keele to BrentcliffeAlignment

‒Multi storey buildings ranging from 1-30+ ‒Multi storey basements ranging from 1-5 ‒Building offset from ESC TT Reference Line ranges from 10-30 m

‒Sources of Information:‒ Isherwood Geostructural Engineers‒ Excavation Support Record Drawings‒Basement Study

Page 53: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Obstructions to Tunnelling Isherwood Study

Page 54: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Obstructions to Tunnelling Critical Tieback Anchors

989 Eglinton Ave. W212 Eglinton Ave. E

�Tieback anchors confirmed from record dwgs�5 known instances, impact to TBM�Recommended to lower profile by 5 m

�Presence of tieback anchors assumed �Conservative assumptions were made to generate tieback obstructions�Assessment based on probability of a tieback at building, tieback configuration, impact to TBM mining location and adverse cost impact to station and EEBs�Recommended to maintain profile

Feb 16, 11 Alignment

Jun 23, 11 Alignment

Page 55: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Obstructions to Tunnelling Piles at the East Tail Track Structure

‒ Structure part of the Eglinton West Subway Project (1995)

‒ SOE piles were partial installed for the east tail track structure

‒ Approximately 14 piles are recommended to be removed

‒ Sources of Information‒ Isherwood Geostructural Engineers

‒ Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) by TSH

‒ Additional GPR in progress by SPL

Portion of Piles to be Removed

Piles Potentially in Conflict with LS-2

Page 56: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Contract Procurement

‒TBMs procured by owner based on specifications by Hatch

‒Tunnel linings procured by owner based on design and specifications by Hatch

‒Advance contract for launch shaft‒Mostly to improve schedule for tunnels‒Innovations on TBMS

‒Grouting through tail with 2 component grout‒Bentonite injection around shield‒ Inflatable emergency tail seals

56

Page 57: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Contract Procurement

‒Infrastructure Ontario was encouraging the use of alternative procurement methods

‒However, the tunnel procurement was at an advanced stage when Metrolinx took over from TTC

‒Therefore the two tunnel contracts (west and east) were procured by design-bid-build‒ Seven bidders for West Contract (February 2013)

‒ Low bidder was Obayashi/Kenaiden/Kenny at $283M‒ Three bidders for East Contract (November 2013)

‒ Low bidder was Aecon/Dragados at $177M

‒The remainder of work to be P3 procured

57

Page 58: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Reference Design for P3

‒All twelve underground stations. Six already designed.

‒All surface alignment, twelve stops etc‒Elevated alignment over Black Creek Drive‒Maintenance and Storage Facility.‒All rail systems.

58

Page 59: Brian Garrod - Hatch

59

Mount Dennis Station

Page 60: Brian Garrod - Hatch

60

Kodak Building

Page 61: Brian Garrod - Hatch

The P3 Contract

‒Won by a joint venture of SNC-Lavalin, AECON, ACS Infrastructure and EllisDon in November 2015.

‒Total value $9.1Billion‒Includes maintenance of the facilities and vehicles for 30 years.

‒Completion by 2021

Page 62: Brian Garrod - Hatch

West Launch Shaft Rendering

‒Install

Source: thecrosstown.ca

60m long, 20m wide and 16m deep

Page 63: Brian Garrod - Hatch

63

Page 64: Brian Garrod - Hatch

64

Page 65: Brian Garrod - Hatch

65

Page 66: Brian Garrod - Hatch

66

Page 67: Brian Garrod - Hatch

67

Page 68: Brian Garrod - Hatch

68

Page 69: Brian Garrod - Hatch

69

Page 70: Brian Garrod - Hatch

70

Page 71: Brian Garrod - Hatch

71

Page 72: Brian Garrod - Hatch

72

Page 73: Brian Garrod - Hatch

73

Page 74: Brian Garrod - Hatch

74

Page 75: Brian Garrod - Hatch

75

Page 76: Brian Garrod - Hatch

76

Page 77: Brian Garrod - Hatch

77

Page 78: Brian Garrod - Hatch

78

Page 79: Brian Garrod - Hatch

79

Page 80: Brian Garrod - Hatch

80

Page 81: Brian Garrod - Hatch

81

Page 82: Brian Garrod - Hatch

82

Page 83: Brian Garrod - Hatch

83

Page 84: Brian Garrod - Hatch

84

Page 85: Brian Garrod - Hatch

85

Page 86: Brian Garrod - Hatch

86

Page 87: Brian Garrod - Hatch

87

Tunnel Daily Report

Page 88: Brian Garrod - Hatch

88

Tunnel Daily Report

Page 89: Brian Garrod - Hatch

Observed Maximum Settlement

���

���

���

���

���

������� ������ ������ ������ ������� ������ ������ �������

Settlement (m

m)

Station

Eastbound Tunnel Maximum Settlement

������� ������ ������ ������ ������� ������ ������ �������

���

���

���

���

���

���

Station

Settlement (m

m)

Westbound Tunnel Maximum Settlement

� �� ��� ����� �� � � �� ���� ����� �� � �

Page 90: Brian Garrod - Hatch

90

Page 91: Brian Garrod - Hatch

91

Page 92: Brian Garrod - Hatch

92

Page 93: Brian Garrod - Hatch

93

Questions