58

59

2009 6

A Study on the Factors Investigate of Influence Childrens Mathematic Pattern Generalized Performances among 6th Graders

Chia-Huang Chen

Abstract

This study reports on a data of 58 sixth-graders performances in mathematical

pattern generalized and affective and cognitive test and introducing two reasoning tasks

including verbal and spatial. The analysis has revealed the following outcomes:

performances of solving representation problem, influence factors of pattern generalized,

transfer strategies of self-integrated. From these results, this study is supply some

suggestion to curricula design and teaching practice of algebraic reasoning future.

Keywords: pattern generalized, representation, affective, cognitive, transfer.

Assistant Professor,Kun Shan University

60

(Mason, 1996)

(Friel, Curcio & Bright, 2001)

(Kieran,

2004)(Carpenter, Franke &

Levi, 2003)

Blanton Kaput

(Blanton & Kaput, 2002)

Kieran

(Kieran, 2004)

(Kieran, 2004)

(Greeno, 1977 Schoenfeld, 1992)

(Malmivuori, 2006)

(Bransford, Brown,

& Cocking, 1999)

1

61

2009 6

2

3

4

Goldin(2000)

()/

()///

()

()

()

DeBellis Goldin(2006)

1.

62

(empower)(dis-empower)

2.

1

3.

1

2

3

63

2009 6

//

//

1

Debellis & Goldin(2006). A representation perspective on affect. Educational

Studies in Mathematics, 63, 135.

4.//

1

2(Valence)(Arousal)

1989

3

64

4

Malmivuori(2006)

(agents)

(self-initiative)(self-direction)Zimmerman

(1998) 2

1.

2

2.

3.

65

2009 6

(Goldin, 2000)

(self-awareness)

Shan

Kruglanski Friedman2003

1.(commitment transfer)

2.(affective transfer)(flavor)

3.(strategic transfer)

(Debellis & Goldin, 2006)

Blanton & Kaput, 2002

Kieran(2004)

1.Silver(1987) Schoenfeld(1992)

(sensory buffers)

66

2.(Dual Coding Theory, DCT)(representation)

(referential) (organizational/ transformational)

1.

(Goldin & Janvier, 1998)

2.

(Paivio, 1990)

(Paivio, 1990)

3.(Paivio, 1990)

(Paivio, 1990)

67

2009 6

(Friel, Curcio & Bright, 2001; Koedinger & Nathan, 2004; Nathan & Kim,

2007)Nathan Kim(2007)

Koedinger Nathan(2004) 6 8

FrielCurcio Bright(2001)

3

1 2 3

3

68

1.2.3.

4.

CarpenterFranke Levi(2003)1(explore)2

(conjecture)3(test)4(generalize)

1

2

3

4

5

2 58

29

20 24

69

2009 6

16 23 45

5 6 30

Cronbach .93

.86.90.82.86.79.90 KMO

.91.83.84.88.89.98

.86 40

50

2001 Cronbach

.89 Cronbach

.75 .85

30

1.

5 Likert

.57 Cronbach

.75.75.76

2.

Likert 5

.52

Cronbach .74.85.67

1986

70

1 1

4346 .77.924603

.82.87.42.82.30.76

SPM1994

12 60

1 1

.53-.92.49-.93

.31-.79.37-.78

ShanKruglanski Friedman2003

1.

2.

3.

20

.05

2007 11 2008

2

40

71

2009 6

1

1 M SD M SD

36.3 10.2 42.5 7.0

8.1 2.9 3.0 2.2

1.1.63.63.78

8.42.92.72.7

1.6.68.68.60

1 36.3

42.5 10.2 7.0

2.5 .63

2.5

.78

2.5

2 19.7 30

72

t3.6p.01

(Friel, Curcio & Bright,

2001; Koedinger & Nathan, 2004; Nathan & Kim, 2007)

p.05

2

M SD M SD

3.3 3.4 2.9 3.6 3.7 2.8

1.11.11.51.11.11.5

4.95.64.53.01.7

19.7

1.1.671.41.92.4

5.56

3

.49

(Paivio, 1990)

(Debellis & Goldin, 2006)

73

2009 6

3

R 2 R 2 F

.39 .39 36.38 .000 .46 .06 6.19 .016 .49 .04 4.14 .047

.42.48

.42

.0640.375.95

.000

.018

.21.32

.21

.1115.158.80

.000

.004 .19 .19 13.38 .001 .40 .40 37.49 .000 .09 .09 5.83 .019 .23 .23 17.03 .000

4

.22

.16

.26

.29

.38

1.

2.

74

3.

4

R 2 R 2 F

1

.13

.22.13.09

8.246.75

.006

.0122 .16 .16 10.34 .0023

.18.26

.18

.0812.556.05

.001

.0074 .29 .29 22.73 .0005 .38 .38 33.92 .000

5

5 (%)

1.

3764

2.

1322

3.

3460

75

2009 6

4.

1119

5.

3662

5

60

19

62

6 41

28

6 (%)

1. 2441

2. 1526

3. 1628

4. 1628

5. 1119

7

76

15

7

1. 4781

2. 4577

3. 1119

4. 3866

5. 915

8

70

ShanKruglanski Friedman2003

1.

2.

3.

77

2009 6

8

%

1. 4171

2. 2848

3. 814

4. 4577

5. 814

78

79

2009 6

(1994)

(1989)

(2001)

51-71

(1986)

Blanton, M., & Kaput, J.(2002). Developing elementary teachers algebra eyes and

ears: Understanding characteristics of professional development that promote

generative and self-sustaining change in teacher practice. Paper represented at the

annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans,

LA.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R.(1999). How people learn: Mind, brain

and experience. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L.(2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating

arithmetic & algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

DeBellis, V. & Goldin, G.(2006).Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem

solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63,

131-147.

Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W.(2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical

factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for

Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 124-158.

Goldin, G. A.(2000). Affective pathways and representations in mathematical problem

solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, 209-219.

Goldin, G. A., & Janvier, C.(1998). Representation and psychology of mathematics

education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 1-4.

Greeno, G.(1977). Processes of understanding in problem solving. In N. J. Castellan Jr.,

D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts(Eds.), Cognitive theory(pp. 43-48). Hillsdale, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

80

Kieran, C.(2004). The core of algebra: Reflections on its main activities. In k. Stacey., H.

Chick., & M. Kendal(Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra(pp.

21-33). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J.(2004). The real story behind story problems:

Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning

Science, 13, 129-164.

Malmivuori, M. L.(2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in

Mathematics, 63, 149-164.

Mason, J.(1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran

& R. A. Lesh(Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and

teaching(pp. 65-86). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Nathan, M. J., & Kim, S.(2007). Pattern generalization with graphs and words: A

cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of middle school students

representational fluency. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 193-219.

Paivio, A.(1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford

University Press.

Schoenfeld, A.H.(1992). Learning to thinking mathematically: Problem solving,

meta-cognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws(Ed.),

Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning(pp. 334-370). New

York: Macmillan.

Shan, J. Y., Kruglansk, A. W., & Friedman, R.(2003). Goal systems theory: Integrating

the cognitive and motivational aspect of self-regulation. In s. J. Spencer, S. Fen., M.

P. Zanna., & J. M. Olson(Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario

Symposium(pp. 247-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Silver, E. A.(1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics

problem solving instruction. In A. Schoenfeld(Ed.), Cognitive science and

mathematics education(pp. 33-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Zimmerman, B. J.(1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An

analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.

81

2009 6

82

Zimmerman(Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflection

practice(pp. 1-19). New York: Guilford Press.