tech competency and supervising staff

55
Technological Competency and Ethical Duty to Supervise Staff Michael Downey Downey Law Group LLC August 2017

Upload: downey-law-group-llc

Post on 29-Jan-2018

31 views

Category:

Law


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

TechnologicalCompetencyandEthicalDutytoSuperviseStaff

MichaelDowneyDowneyLawGroupLLC

August2017

Page 2: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

DutytoSupervise

2

Page 3: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Rule4-8.4

Itisprofessionalmisconductforalawyerto:(a) violateorattempttoviolatetheRulesof

ProfessionalConduct,knowinglyassistorinduceanothertodoso,ordosothroughtheactsofanother ...

3

Page 4: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

DutytoSupervise– Rule4-5.1(a) Apartner inalawfirm,andalawyerwhoindividuallyor

togetherwithotherlawyerspossessescomparablemanagerialauthorityinalawfirm,shallmakereasonableeffortstoensurethatthefirmhasineffectmeasures givingreasonableassurancethatalllawyersinthefirmconformtotheRulesofProfessionalConduct.

(b) AlawyerhavingdirectsupervisoryauthorityoveranotherlawyershallmakereasonableeffortstoensurethattheotherlawyerconformstotheRulesofProfessionalConduct.

4

Page 5: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

"Vicarious" Liability– Rule4-5.1(c)Alawyershallberesponsibleforanotherlawyer'sviolationoftheRulesofProfessionalConductif:(1) thelawyerorders or,withknowledge ofthespecific

conduct,ratifies theconductinvolved;or(2) thelawyerisapartner orhascomparablemanagerial

authority inthelawfirminwhichtheotherlawyerpractices,orhasdirectsupervisoryauthorityovertheotherlawyer,andknowsoftheconductatatimewhenitsconsequencescanbeavoidedormitigatedbutfailstotakereasonableremedialaction.

5

Page 6: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

DutytoSupervise– Rule4-5.3Withrespecttoanonlawyeremployedorretainedbyorassociatedwithalawyer:(a) apartner,andalawyerwhoindividuallyortogetherwithother

lawyerspossessescomparablemanagerialauthorityinalawfirmshallmakereasonableeffortstoensurethatthefirmhasineffectmeasures givingreasonableassurancethattheperson'sconductiscompatiblewiththeprofessionalobligationsofthelawyer;

(b) alawyerhavingdirectsupervisoryauthorityoverthenonlawyershallmakereasonableefforts toensurethattheperson'sconductiscompatiblewiththeprofessionalobligationsofthelawyer;and...

6

Page 7: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

DutytoSupervise– Rule4-5.3Withrespecttoanonlawyeremployedorretainedbyorassociatedwithalawyer:...(a)(b)

(c) alawyershallberesponsible forconductofsuchapersonthatwouldbeaviolationoftheRulesofProfessionalConductifengagedinbyalawyerif:(1) thelawyerorders or,withtheknowledgeofthespecific

conduct,ratifies theconductinvolved;or(2) thelawyerisapartnerorhascomparablemanagerial

authority inthelawfirminwhichthepersonisemployed,orhasdirectsupervisoryauthorityovertheperson,andknowsoftheconductatatimewhenitsconsequencescanbeavoidedormitigatedbutfailstotakereasonableremedialaction.

7

Page 8: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

ChoosingOutsourceProviders

• Doestheproviderhaveexperienceworkingwiththelegalprofession?– Lawyersarequirky– Rule1.6confidentialityissues

• Willyourclientsconsidertheprovidertobereliableandappropriateiftheprovidercomesincontactwithclient-relatedinformation?

• Howdifficultwillitbetosupervisetheoutsourcedprovider?– Localordistant?

Page 9: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

DutytoKeepClients(reasonably)Informed:Rule4-1.4

(a) Alawyershall:(1) keeptheclientreasonablyinformedaboutthestatusof

thematter;(2) promptlycomplywithreasonablerequestsfor

information;and(3) consultwiththeclientaboutanyrelevantlimitationon

thelawyer'sconductwhenthelawyerknowstheclientexpectsassistancenotpermittedbytheRulesofProfessionalConductorotherlaw.

(b) Alawyershallexplainamattertotheextentreasonablynecessarytopermittheclienttomakeinformeddecisionsregardingtherepresentation.

Page 10: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Noticetoclients?• Changeinwhosupervisestheservices?• Changeintheamountofsupervisiontheoriginallawyerretains?• Whohasfinalresponsibilityforthework?• Howsensitivityistheinformationsharedwiththeoutsourced

provider?• Whattypeandimportanceofservicestheproviderwillperform?• Whatsafeguardsareemployedtoensuretheworkisperformed

withoutcompromisingclientinterests(confidentiality)?• Whatunderstandingoragreementdoesclienthavewithoriginal

lawyerregardingwhowouldprovidelegalservices?• Isclientlikelytomisperceivetheprovider'srelationshipwiththe

firm?

Page 11: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

ReasonableFees– Rule4-1.5(a)• Alawyershallnotmakeanagreementfor,charge,orcollectan

unreasonablefeeoranunreasonableamountforexpenses....

Page 12: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Chargingforoutsourcedwork?• Generallymaynot chargeclientsforoverhead• Maynot profitfrom"expenses"– Contractattorney(1)actualcostsor(2)slightupchargetocoveractual additionalcosts

• Areyouirritating yourclientswithexcesscharges?

Page 13: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

BewareImproperFeeSharingorReferralFees

Rule4-5.4(a)Alawyerorlawfirmshallnotsharelegalfeeswithanonlawyer,exceptthat....(3)alawyerorlawfirmmayincludenonlawyeremployeesinacompensationorretirementplan,eventhoughtheplanisbasedinwholeorinpartonaprofit-sharingarrangement....

AlsoRule4-7.2(b):Alawyershallnotgiveanythingofvaluetoapersonforrecommendingthelawyer'sservices,exceptthat:(1)alawyermaypaythereasonablecostofadvertisingorwrittencommunicationpermittedbythisRule4-7.2....

Page 14: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

TechnologicalCompetency

14

Page 15: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Competence– Rule4-1.1

"Alawyershallprovidecompetentrepresentationtoaclient.Competentrepresentationrequiresthelegalknowledge,skill,thoroughness andpreparationreasonablynecessaryfortherepresentation."

15

Page 16: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

MissouriRule 4-1.1cmt[6]

• Tomaintaintherequisiteknowledgeandskill,alawyershouldkeepabreastofchangesinthelawanditspractice,engageincontinuingstudyandeducationandcomplywithallcontinuinglegaleducationrequirementstowhichthelawyerissubject.

16

Page 17: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

ABAModelRule1.1cmt[8]

• Tomaintaintherequisiteknowledgeandskill,alawyershouldkeepabreastofchangesinthelawanditspractice,includingthebenefitsandrisksassociatedwithrelevanttechnology,engageincontinuingstudyandeducationandcomplywithallcontinuinglegaleducationrequirementstowhichthelawyerissubject.

17

Page 18: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

UsesofTechnology

• Marketing• Servingclients• ProtectingInformation(otherprogram)• Billingandcollectingpayments

18

Page 19: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

DiffusionofInnovation

19

Page 20: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Marketing

20

Page 21: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

MarketingandTechnology

• Protectclient-relatedinformation

• Understandlimitsonpayingformarketing– Nosharingoffees– Nopayperclients

– Payperclickorlead– probablyokay

21

Page 22: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

22

Page 23: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

SEOandSEM

• SEO– SearchEngineOptimization• SEM– SearchEngineMarketing

23

Page 24: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

24

SEM

SEO

SEM

"Old" Results

Page 25: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

SEM(SearchEngineMarketing)MostExpensiveGoogleAdWord

"SanAntonioCarWreckAttorney"

25

>$700perclickin2016

Page 26: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

SearchEngineOptimization(SEO)–"ContentMarketing"

• Haveaplan• Writefortheprospect,notthefirm• Encouragetwo-waycommunications• Promotecontent– yoursandothers• Tryvideoandaudio,notjusttext

26

Page 27: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

(NewResults)

27

Page 28: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

28

Page 29: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

WhatNOTtoDo

Page 30: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

ServingClients

30

Page 31: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

E-Filing

• Methodsandlimits

• Protectionofclient-relatedinformation

31

Page 32: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

E-Discovery

• Collectionandreviewofinformation– Socialmedia– Devices

• Avoidingspoliation

32

Page 33: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

ConsequencesofSpoliation• InreMatthewB.Murray,(VirginiaStateBarJune9,2013)– lawyerwassanctioned$722Kbytrialcourtandsuspendedfor5years

• Advisedclienttodeletephotos• Withheldemailsinstructingclient

todeletecontent

33

Page 34: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Ethical GuidanceonRemoval

• NewYorkCountyLawyers' AssociationEthicsOpinion745(2013)– lawyermayadvisehisclienttoremovesuchpostingsfromhissocialmediawebsitesolongasthelawyerfollowsthelawandethicsrulesinregardtospoliationofevidence

34

Page 35: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Redactions

35

Page 36: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

ThegovernmentclaimsaconspiracyexistedfromOctober22,2008continuingthroughDecember9,2008.6Thatconversation isrelevanttothedefenseofthegovernment'stheoryofanongoingconspiracy.OnlyRodBlagojevichandPresidentObamacantestifytothecontentsofthatconversation.Thedefenseisallowedtopresentevidencethatcorroboratesthedefendant'stestimony.7

18. President-electObamaalsosuggested SenateCandidateAtoGovernorBlagojevich.JohnHarristoldtheFBIandtheUnitedStatesAttorneysthathespoketoPresident'sChiefofStaffonNovember12,2008.HarristooknotesoftheconversationandwrotethatPresident'sChiefhadpreviouslyworkedasBlagojevich'spresssecretary.ObamaagreedofStafftoldHarristhatSenate

CandidateAwasacceptabletoObamaasasenatepick.(Harrishandwrittennotes,OOG1004463)President'sChiefofStafftoldtheFBIthat"hecouldnotsaywherebutsomewhereitwascommunicatedtohimthat" SenateCandidateAwasasuggestedcandidateviewedasoneofthefour"right" candidates"bytheObamatransitionteam." (RahmEmanuel302,p.5,December20,2008).HarristoldBlagojevichObama'ssuggestiononNovember12,2008(BlagojevichHome

PhoneCall#539).

36

Page 37: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

37

Rule4-4.4RespectForRightsOfThirdPersons

(a)Inrepresentingaclient,alawyershallnotusemeansthathavenosubstantialpurposeotherthantoembarrass,delay,orburdenathirdperson,orusemethodsofobtainingevidencethatviolatethelegalrightsofsuchaperson.

(b)Alawyerwhoreceivesadocumentrelatingtotherepresentationofthelawyer'sclientandknowsorreasonablyshouldknowthatthedocumentwasinadvertentlysentshallpromptlynotify thesender.

Page 38: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

38

InadvertentProduction

• OldRule– recipientofmetadata– Notify producingpartyofproductionofprivilegedinformation

– Refrain fromreviewingprivilegedinformation– Abide byproducingcounsel'sinstruction– atleastuntilacourtordersotherwise

Page 39: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

39

NewRule4-4.4(b)

Alawyerwhoreceivesadocumentrelatingtotherepresentationofthelawyer'sclientandknowsorreasonablyshouldknowthatthedocumentwasinadvertentlysentshallpromptlynotifythesender.

Page 40: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

InreEisenstein (Mo.4/5/2016)• EisensteinrepresentedHusbandindivorce• HusbandaccessedWife'semailwithoutpermission,andgave

EisensteindocumentsincludingquestionsWife'sattorneyhadpreparedfordirectexamination

• EisensteindidnotproducethedocumentsreceivedfromWife'semail,untilgivingthemtoopposingcounselasexhibitsduringtrial

40

Page 41: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

ConsequencesinEisenstein

• Eisensteinwasfoundtohaveusedimproperlyobtainedinformation(violatingRule4-4.4)andconcealingdocumentswithevidentiaryvalue(violatingRule4-3.4)

• Eisensteinreceivedanindefinite(minimum6month)suspension

41

Page 42: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

ImproperAccess– Rule4-4.4(a)

• Inrepresentingaclient,alawyershallnotusemeansthathavenosubstantialpurposeotherthantoembarrass,delay,orburdenathirdperson,orusemethodsofobtainingevidencethatviolatethelegalrightsofsuchaperson.

42

Page 43: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

WhyImproper

• Illegal– maybeincriminatingclient– Evidencemaybebarred– Lawyermaybedisqualified

• Permitted– mayusedocuments

43

Page 44: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Operations,BillingandCollecting

44

Page 45: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

PracticeManagementSoftware

• Mattermanagement– Documentscreation/management– Timekeeping– Tasks

• Practicemanagement– Billingandinvoicing– Calendar– Communication

Page 46: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

PracticeManagementOptions

• AbacusLaw• Clio• MyCase• ProLaw• RocketMatter• TabsIII

• TimeMatters• Worlddox

46

http://bit.ly/2uZ6plY

Page 47: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

WhyPracticeManagementSoftware?

• Mattercreation• Conflictchecks• Calendaring• Contacts• Documentmanagement(cloud)

– Clientportal

• Timekeepingandbilling• Communications– tasks,email, andmore

47

Page 48: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Clio

48

Page 49: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Invoicing

49

Page 50: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

BasicRuleonHandlingFundsPaidforLegalServices

50

PaymentPayment Payment

TrustAccount

OperatingAccount

FeeEarnedWorkstarts

Page 51: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

Receivingfunds

MethodofPayment ActualReceiptofFunds

RiskofUnilateralCancelationorWithdrawal

Amountreceived

Cash Immediate None Amountpaid

Check

Minimumofseveraldaysanduptotwoweeks,*presumingnoattemptto"stop

payment"

None

(afterfundsarereceived)

Amountpaid

CreditCard SeveraldaysConsiderable– oftenforsixmonths(or

more)

Amountpaidlessfees

ElectronicFundTransfer Immediate None Amountpaid

Page 52: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

CreditCards• Paymentsafter earned– Fundstointooperatingaccount– Allfeesand"chargebacks" (canceledpayments)comeoutofoperatingaccount

• Paymentinadvance(before earned)– Fundsgointotrustaccount– Whataboutfeesand"chargebacks" (canceledpayments)?

• Lawyerspecificprocessing:cansettocomeoutofoperatingaccount

• Non-lawyerspecific:havetomanageanotherway.Myadvice:TOODANGEROUS,DON'TDOIT)

52

Page 53: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

AccountingSystem

53

Page 54: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

PayrollSystem

54

Page 55: Tech Competency and Supervising Staff

MichaelDowneyDowneyLawGroupLLC

(314)961-6644(844)961-6644tollfree

[email protected]

ThankYou