title かつおだしの嗜好性に寄与する香気成分の研究( dissertation … · 目次...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Title (Dissertation_ )
Author(s) ,
Citation Kyoto University ()
Issue Date 2015-01-23
URL https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.r12897
Right
Type Thesis or Dissertation
Textversion ETD
Kyoto University
-
2015
-
1
2
12
30
TDD 46
58
77
80
-
- 1 -
GC-O Gas chromatography-olfactometry
AEDA Aroma extract dilution analysis
CPP Conditioned place preference
NIRS Near-infrared right spectroscopy
TDD (4Z,7Z)-Trideca-4,7-dienal
BD Bonito broth flavored dextrin
AD Mixed amino acids-nucleotides dextrin solution
IMP Inosine 5-monophosphate
GMP Guanosine 5-monophosphate
DT Dashi taste solution
sCO2 Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction
KI Kovats Index
RT Retention time
IS Internal standard
FD Flavor dilution
Ch Channel
ANOVA Analysis of variance
-
- 2 -
1
300
800
700 600 [1]
400
[2]
[3]
-
- 3 -
limonene 90
[4]
0.02 0.74 nootkatone[5]
thioterpineol[6]
GC-O
GC-OGC- Olfactometry/
GC-O GC
Aroma Extract Dilution AnalysisAEDA [7]
(6Z,8E)-undeca-6,8,10-trien-3-oneyuzunone [8]
cis-3-methyl-4-decanolide[9]
-
- 4 -
[10-13]1
2 2030 6070
400 [14-16]
252 [17, 18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
Conditioned Place Preference test = CPP CPP
2
-
- 5 -
[22]
CPP
[23]
[24-26]
2
2
[27]
-
- 6 -
NIRS
NIRS
[28]
ethylmaltol
[29]
NIRS NIRS NIRS
[26]
GC-O
(4Z,7Z)-
trideca-4,7-dienal TDD [30]
TDD
-
- 7 -
TDD
[30] TDD
TDD
NIRSTDD
-
- 8 -
1 [31]
95
180
140
125
15
ppm
ppbppm
-
- 9 -
1. Nijssen, L. M., Ingen-Visscher, C. A. van, Donders, J. J. H. (Eds.) VCF
Volatile Compound in Food : database Version 15.2-Zeist (TheNetherlands) :
TNO Triskelion, 1963-2014.
2. . FFI
212: 919-9262007.
3. 8-10
1998.
4. Dugo, G., Controneo, A., Verzera, A., Bonaccorsi, I . Composition of the
volatile fraction of cold-pressed citrus peel oils, in Citrus: The Genus Citrus,
G.Dugo and A. Di Giacomo (Eds.), New York: Taylor & Francis, 217-228,
2002.
5. MacLeod, W. D., Buigues, N. M. Sesquiterpenes, I. Nootkatone, a new
grapefruit flavor constituent. J Food Sci 29: 565-568, 1964.
6. Demole, E., Enggist, P. 1-p-Menthene-8-thiol: A powerful flavor impact
constituent of grapefruit juice (Citrus parodisi MACFAYDEN) . Helvetica
Chimica Acta 65: 17851794, 1982.
7. Grosch, W. Determination of potent oclourants in foods by aroma extract
dilution analysis (AEDA) and calculation of odour activity values (OAVs).
Flavour Fragr J 9: 147-158, 1994.
8. Miyazawa, N., Tomita, N., Kurobayashi, Y., Nakanishi, A., Ohkubo, Y.,
Maeda, T., Fujita, A. Novel character impact compounds in Yuzu (Citrus
junos Sieb.ex Tanaka) peel oil. J Agric Food Chem 57: 1990-1996, 2009.
9. Nakanishi, A., Miyazawa, N., Haraguchi, K., Watanabe, H., Kurobayashi,
Y., Nammoku, T. Determination of the absolute configuration of a novel
odour-active lactone, cis-3-methyl-4-decanolide, in wasabi (Wasabia
japonica Matsum.). Flavour Fragr J 29: 220-227, 2014.
10. . 12-311987.
11. ( ). 138-2332000.
12. EPADHA . 2-101999.
13. . 90-912012.
14. . 74 ) :
-
- 10 -
72-821989.
15. . 38: 104-1111989.
16.
. 12: 123-1302005.
17. Yajima, I., Nakamura, M., Sakakibara, M., Yanai, T., Hayashi, K. Volatile
flavor components of dried bonito (Katsuobushi) I. On basic, acidic and
weak acidic fractions. Agric Biol Chem 45: 2761-2768, 1981.
18. Yajima, I., Nakamura, M., Sakakibara, H., Ide, J, Yanai, T., Hayashi, K.
Volatile flavor components of dried bonito (Katsuobushi) II. From neutral
fraction. Agric Biol Chem 47: 1755-1760, 1983.
19. Doi, M., Ninomiya, M., Matsui, M., Shuto, Y., Kinoshitam, Y. Degradation
and o-methylation of phenols among volatile flavor components of dried
bonito (katsuobushi) by Aspergillus species. Agric Biol Chem 53: 1051-1055,
1989.
20. . 38: 848-8551989.
21. . 26-622008.
22. .
9: 163-1682002.
23.
. 10: 781-7842003.
24. Kawasaki, H., Yamada, A., Fuse, R., Fushiki, T. Preference for dried bonito
broth in olfactory-blocked or taste nerve-sectioned mice in the two-bottle
choice test. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72: 2840-2846, 2008.
25. . Aroma
Research 12: 222-2252011.
26. Amitsuka, T., Okamura, M., Shiibashi, H., Yamamoto, N., Saito, T.,
Nammoku, T., Tsuzuki, S., Inoue, K., Fushiki, T. A study of an aroma
extraction method and evaluation of the aroma extract contribution to the
palatability and reinforcement effect of dried bonito using mice. J Nutr Sci
Vitaminol 60: 329-334, 2014.
27. Kurobayashi, Y., Katsumi, Y., Fujita, A., Morimitsu, Y. , Kubota, K. Flavor
enhancement of chicken broth from boiled celery constituents. J Agric Food
Chem 56: 512-516, 2008.
-
- 11 -
28. Sato, H., Obata, A. N., Moda, I., Ozaki, K., Yasuhara, T., Yamamoto, Y.,
Kiguchi, M., Maki, A., Kubota, K., Koizumi, H. Application of near-infrared
spectroscopy to measurement of hemodynamic signals accompanying
stimulated saliva secretion. J Biomed Opt 16: 047002, 2011.
29. Iizumi-Saito, K., Nakamura, A., Matsumoto, T., Yamamoto, N., Saito, T.,
Nammoku, T., Mori, K. Ethylmaltol odor enhances salivary hemodynamic
responses to sucrose taste as detected by near-infrared spectroscopy.
Chemosens Percept 6: 92-100, 2013.
30.
.
61: 519-5272014.
31. 1988.
-
- 12 -
2
[1, 2]
conditioned place preference testCPP
[3]
Skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis
G
Yellowfin tuna, Thunnus Albacares
-
- 13 -
Spotted mackerel, Scomber australasicusBullet tuna, Auxis
rocheiJapanese anchovy, Engraulis japonicus
Ackroff 2
[4, 5] CPP
BD [6]
NaCl IMPGMP
ADAD
BD
BD
[6]AD citralvaillinmenthol
[6]
2 CPP
8 BALB/cCr SLC
23 2C12
6:00-18:00MF
-
- 14 -
G
DT [4]
1
1%
Inosine 5'-monophosphate IMP
guanosine 5'-monophosphateGMP
NaCl
DIAION HP20
95% 5.0%
95% 75
8022
80%
65%
-
- 15 -
G
40 10 ml/min 25 MPa
1.31.06.01.2
2.0%
2
2 40
50 ml
0.89%
30 3
Preference value% 2
100 %1002
CPP
CPP [6] 10
1 3
20 4 9
30
3
10
3 10
10
-
- 16 -
ShamONX 2
[6-8]Sham
35
20 3
Sham 3
ONX 3
p
-
- 17 -
0.05%
2.
G
2
2 0.05
G
2a
preference value G
2b
3.
DT vs DT
2
0.05
3
4. CPP
3 ADBDAD
21.9 1
0.05
BD AD+sCO2
4
-
- 18 -
1
3
DTDT DT 2
1
[9-12]
[13, 14]
31 [15] 40
[11, 13, 14, 16-18]
-
- 19 -
2
G
2
2 G
preference value G
3 2
3
2 2
2 3 30 2
[19]G
G
alkyl pyrazine
-
- 20 -
[20]
eicosapentaenoic acidEPA docosahexaenoic acidDHA
[21, 22] [22]
[23]
alkyl pyrazine [24]
propanal butanalhexanal 3 6
[25]
4 CPP
CPP BALB/cCr
BD 4
DT AD
AD
AD
AD BD
[6]
-
- 21 -
2
CPP
-
- 22 -
1
-
- 23 -
1
2
SEM (n=7, 8)#, p
-
- 24 -
2 2
(a)
2 SEM (n = 8)*,
p
-
- 25 -
3
2 (n = 9)(n = 7)
SEM*, p
-
- 26 -
4 CPP
AD
BDAD AD + sCO2
(s)SEM (n=11)
*, p
-
- 27 -
1. Manabe, Y., Matsumura, S., Fushiki, T. Preference for high-fat food in
animals. Fat detection: taste, texture, and post ingestive effects. 243, 2010.
2. gmo, A., Galvan, A., Talamantes, B. Reward and reinforcement produced
by drinking sucrose: Two processes that may depend on different
neurotransmitters. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 52: 403-414, 1995.
3. Tzschentke, T. M. Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference
(CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addict Biol 12: 227-462, 2007.
4. Kawasaki, H., Yamada, A., Fuse, R., Fushiki, T. Preference for dried bonito
broth in olfactory-blocked or taste nerve-sectioned mice in the two-bottle
choice test. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72: 2840-2846, 2008.
5. Ackroff, K., Kondoh, T., Sclafani, A. Dried bonito dashi: a preferred fish
broth without postoral reward actions in mice. Chem Senses 39: 159-166,
2014.
6. Kawasaki, H., Yamada, A., Fuse, R., Fushiki, T. Intake of dried bonito broth
flavored with dextrin solution induced conditioned place preference in mice.
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 75: 2288-2292, 2011.
7. Yee, K. K., Costanzo, R. M. Restoration of olfactory mediated behavior after
olfactory bulb deafferentation. Physiol Behav 58: 959-968, 1995.
8. Yee, K. K., Wysocki, C. J. Odorant exposure increases olfactory sensitivity:
olfactory epithelium is implicated. Physiol Behav 72: 705-711, 2001.
9. D az-Maroto, M. C., Prez-Coello, M. S., Cabezudo M. D. Supercritical
carbon dioxide extraction of volatiles from spices: comparison with
simultaneous distillationextraction. J Chromatogr A 947: 23-29, 2002.
10. Richter, J., Schellenberg, I. Comparison of different extraction methods for
the determination of essential oils and related compounds from aromatic
-
- 28 -
plants and optimization of solid-phase microextraction/gas chromatography.
Anal Bioanal Chem 387: 2207-2217, 2007.
11. Ramos, E., Valero, E., Ibanez, E., Reglero, G., Tabera, J. Obtention of a
brewed coffee aroma extract by an optimized supercritical CO 2-based
process. J Agric Food Chem 46: 4011-4016, 1998.
12. Alissandrakis, E., Tarantilis, P. A., Harizanis, P. C., Polissiou, M.
Evaluation of four isolation techniques for honey aroma compounds. J Sci
Food Agric 85: 91-97, 2005.
13. Barton, P., Hughes, R. E. Jr, Hussein, M. M. Supercritical carbon dioxide
extraction of peppermint and spearmint. J Supercrit Fluids 5: 157-162,
1992.
14. Donelian, A., Carlson, L. H. C., Lopes, T. J., Machado, R. A. F. Comparison
of extraction of patchouli (Pogostemon cablin) essential oil with
supercritical CO2 and by steam distillation. J Supercrit Fluids 48: 15-20,
2009.
15. Hawthorne, S. B. Analytical-scale supercritical fluid extraction. Anal Chem
62: 633A-642A, 1990.
16. Reverchon, E., Senatore, F. Isolation of rosemary oil: comparison between
hydrodistillation and supercritical CO2 extraction. Flavour Fragr J 7: 227-
230, 1992.
17. Reis-Vasco, E., Coelho, J., Palavra, A. Comparison of pennyroyal oils
obtained by supercritical CO2 extraction and hydrodistillation. Flavour
Fragr J 14: 156-160, 1999.
18. Da Porto, C., Decorti, D., Kikic, I. Flavour compounds of Lavandula
angustifolia L. to use in food manufacturing: Comparison of three different
extraction methods. Food Chem 112: 1072-1078, 2009.
19. .
-
- 29 -
37: 156-1621971.
20. . 2005.
21. Alkio, M., Gonzalez, C., Jntti, M., Aaltonen, O. Purification of
polyunsaturated fatty acid esters from tuna oil with supercritical fluid
chromatography. J Am Oil Chem Soc 77: 315-321, 2000.
22. Frankel, E. Formation of headspace volatiles by thermal decomposition of
oxidized fish oilsvs. oxidized vegetable oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 70: 767-772,
1993.
23. Frankel, E. Lipid oxidation. Prog Lipid Res 19: 1-22, 1980.
24. Amrani-Hemaimi, M., Cerny, C., Fay, L. B. Mechanisms of formation of
alkylpyrazines in the Maillard reaction. J Agric Food Chem 43: 2818-2822,
1995.
25.
. 71: 215-2172005.
-
- 30 -
400
/GC/O
GC/O
[1]
3-
(methylthio)propanal
[2]
[3]
-
- 31 -
GC/OAEDA
200 ml 120.0 g
40 25 MPa
360 g 0.83 g/ml 10 ml/min 10
1200 g 21.27 g
2-tert-butylphenol 99 on GC 4-tert-butylphenol
99 2,6-dimethylphenol 99 2,6-dimethoxyphenol
99 2-methoxy-4-propylphenol 4-propylguaiacol 99 2-
methoxyphenol guaiacol 99 Sigma-Aldrich
Benzene 99 2-methoxy-5-
methylphenol5-methylguaiacol99
4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde vanillin 99
Rhodia 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone furaneol
99 Firmenich (4Z,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienal
99 Mo [4] 2-octyne- -ol
19 (4Z/E,7E)-trideca-4,7-dienal
(4E,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienal 99 [5]
(2E,7Z)-trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal 98 Miyazawa [6]
-
- 32 -
Sigma-Aldrich 1-bromo-2-pentyne
9%4-ethyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol94 Shu [7]
Sigma-Aldrich 3 ,5 -dimethoxy-4 -
hydroxyacetophenone 1 48
5.0 g 5.0 g
80 250 Pa 120 Pa
26 mg
GC-MS
Agilent 6890N GC Inert Cap WAX 60 m0.32 mm i.d.
405
3 /min 230 1.8
ml/min 250 101 Agilent
5975C MSD 70 eV
250 230 150Scan m/z = 29~500
Agilent ChemStation System
GC Kovats IndexKI GC RT
AEDA
5 GC/O
-
- 33 -
Agilent 7890A GC
GC-MS
1 1 250FID
Gerstel ODPODP
250
50 ml/min
KI
Gerstel 1 2 GC-MS/O
Agilent 7890A GC 1st DB-WAX LTM
30 m0.25 mm i.d.2nd DB-1 LTM 30 m0.25 mm
i.d. Agilent
0.36 MPa Gerstel
CIS1012 /s 2405
min 1st 40 3 /min
150 10 /s 250 2nd
2nd 40 3 /min 1
1 MSD ODP MSD GC-MS ODP
GC/O KI
2nd KI 2nd
10.03 g 2-tert-
butylphenol 1.192 mg4-tert-butylphenol 10.51 gbenzene 164.7 ng
3 GC-MS 1
2 GC-MS/O SIM
2- tert-butylphenol m/z = 1354-tert-butylphenol m/z = 107benzene m/z =
-
- 34 -
78 m/z 3
GC
IS
AEDA
FDFlavor dilution 10 1 FD
KI=1894WAXguaiacol (1)
2,6-dimethylphenol (3) 5-methylguaiacol (4)
2,6-dimethoxyphenol (8) furaneol (5) 4-
propylguaiacol (7) 4-ethyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol (9) vanillin
(10)KI=1906WAX
AKI=2097WAX B
1 2 GC-MS/O
1 2 GC-MS/O 1st GC/O
1st 1 1st
KI=2097WAXRT=45.85 min
B 45.646.0 min 2nd
GC/O KI=1340DB-1 1st
RT=72.17 min 2a 2b
Miyazawa [6]
-
- 35 -
(2E,7Z)-trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal 2c
GC RT
1st KI=1906WAXRT=40.43 min
A40.141.1 min 2nd
GC/O KI=1461DB-1
RT=72.43 min 3a 3b
m/z=194
m/z=150 M44 McLafferty
[8] 13
2C13H22O m/z=123
M71 C5H11
7 M44 McLafferty
2
3 7 2
-6 4 7
4
[5] WAX DB-1 KI 2
4 A KI
(4Z,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienalTDD
AEDA 10 TDD (2E,7Z)-
trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal 8 GC-MS SIM
guaiacol (1)
5-methylguaiacol (4) 2,6-dimethoxyphenol (8) 4-ethyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol
(9) 2-tert-butylphenol 2,6-dimethylphenol (3) furaneol (5) 4-
-
- 36 -
propylguaiacol (7)vanillin (10) 4-tert-butylphenol
3
TDD (2E,7Z)-trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal 1 2 GC-MS/O
SIM
benzene TDD (2) ((2E,7Z)-trans-4,5-
epoxydeca-2,7-dienal (6)2
3
CPP
GC-O AEDA 10
8
[1, 2, 9, 10] 2 GC
Miyazawa
yuzunone [11]
GC
2 (2E,7Z)-
trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal TDD
TDD
-
- 37 -
[4]
-
- 38 -
No. compounda KIb FD factor odor descriptionc identification moded
1 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol) 1894 15625 mediciny M, K, O
2 unknown A 1906 3125 woody, cardboard-like O
3 2,6-dimethylphenol 1940 3125 phenolic M, K, O
4 2-methoxy-5-methylphenol (5-methylguaiacol) 1976 3125 mediciny M, K, O
5 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (furaneol) 2055 3125 sweet M, K, O
6 unknown B 2097 3125 metalic O
7 2-methoxy-4-propylphenol (4-propylguaiacol) 2144 3125 woody, phenolic M, K, O
8 2,6-dimethoxyphenol 2302 3125 mediciny M, K, O
9 4-ethyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol 2442 3125 woody, phenolic M, K, O
10 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (vanillin) 2614 3125 sweet, vanilla-like M, K, O
1 AEDA FD 3125
a MSKI b WAX Kovats ndex c GC/O d MMSKKIKovats ndexOGC/OGC/
-
- 39 -
10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 (min) 0.00
1
1 2 GC-MS/O 1st
-
- 40 -
2
(1 2 GC-MS/O 2nd )
a) KI=2097WAX45.646.0 min
b) KI=1340DB-1
c) (2E,7Z)-trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal
-
- 41 -
70.00 71.00 72.00 73.00 74.00 75.00 76.00 77.00 78.00 79.00 (min)
a) b)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
79
67
55 41
98
150 123
109 137
165
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
(m/z)
(abun
danc
e)
194 179
KI=
1461
(DB
-1)
3
1 2 GC-MS/O 2nd
a) 40.141.1 min
b) KI=1461DB-1
-
- 42 -
compound WAX DB-1 odor descriptionb
unknown A 1906 1461 woody, cardboard-like
(4E,7E)-trideca-4,7-dienal 1906 1465 oily, weak
(4E,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienal 1912 1472 powdery, citrus-like
(4Z,7E)-trideca-4,7-dienal 1907 1465 oily, citrus-like
(4Z,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienal 1906 1461 woody, cardboard-like
2 unknown A (4E/Z,7E/Z)-trideca-4,7-dienal WAX DB-1
KIa
a Kovats ndex b GC/O
-
- 43 -
4 (4E/Z,7E/Z)-trideca-4,7-dienal
a) (4E,7E)-trideca-4,7-dienalb) (4E,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienalc) (4Z,7E)-trideca-4,7-dienald) (4Z,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienal
-
- 44 -
3
a SIM m/z b
-
- 45 -
1.
. 48: 570-5772001.
2. .
48: 16-182004.
3. . 155: 95-104
1987.
4. Mo, W.-P., Burger, B. V., LeRoux, M., Spies, H. S. C. Mammalian exocrine
secretions: IX. Constituents of preorbital secretion of oribi, Ourebia, ourebi.
J Chem Ecol 21: 1191-1215, 1995.
5. . 2012-178984 (2012.9.20).
6. Miyazawa, N., Fujita, A., Kubota, K. Aroma character impact compounds in
Kinokuni mandarin orange (Citrus kinokuni) compared with Satsuma
mandarin orange (Citrus unshiu). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74: 835-842,
2010.
7. Shu, C.-K., Mookherjee, B. D. Volatile components of phenolic fraction of
cooked bacon. J Agric Food Chem 33: 1107-1109, 1985.
8. Budzikiewicz, H., Djerassi, C. , Williams, D. H. Mass spectrometry of
organic compounds. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 129-173, 1967.
9. . 256: 51-562012.
10. . 2011-217632 (2011.11.4)
11. Miyazawa, N., Nakanishi, A., Tomita, N., Okubo, Y., Maeda, T., Fujita, A.
Novel key aroma components of galbanum oil. J Agric Food Chem 57: 1433-
1439, 2009.
-
- 46 -
TDD
AEDA [1]
AEDA GC/O
10
(4Z,7Z)- trideca-4,7-dienalTDD
[2-4]
[5] TDD
.
MT-N
-
- 47 -
2.
7 10
4 3
30 ml 0.1 g
[6]
TDD 9 TDD 10
100 g
guaiacol 910 g 5-methylguaiacol 1.6 mg 2,6 dimethoxyphenol 26
mg4-ethyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol5.5 mg2,6-dimethylphenol120 g4-
propylguaiacol 580 g vanillin 190 g furaneol 290 g (2E,7Z)-
trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal0.11 gTDD0.45 g
25 1
3 30 ml
0.1 g
7
1 2 3 4 5
6 7
5
-
- 48 -
9 TDD 10
t
3. TDD
i ) 6
25 6
105229 20 ppm 20 ppm
TDD 0.2 ppb 3
TDD
60
40 ml
4. TDD
20 13 7
Czerny [7] TDD
5. TDD
20 13 7
-
- 49 -
25 1
( ) TDD 0.05
ppb 3
40 ml
5
t
10 TDD
TDD 9 TDD 10
6
7
5
1 9
5
TDD 10 9
TDD
-
- 50 -
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD 1
TDD
20 TDD
0.014 ppb
TDD
[5]
TDD
TDD 0.014 ppb
TDD 0.05
ppb TDD
2
-
- 51 -
TDD
TDD
[6]
10 6
TDD
TDD
AEDA 10
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
-
- 52 -
TDD
[2-4]
[5]
TDD TDD
[8]
1
-nonalactone
[9] TDD
TDD
-
- 53 -
1.00
3.00
5.00
7.00
*
1 9 9 +TDD
5n7, *, p
-
- 54 -
0
0
+TDD 6
1 6
-
- 55 -
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
TDD
2 TDD
n=20, **, p
-
- 56 -
1. Schieberle, P. New developments in methods for analysis of volatile flavor
compounds and their precursors. In Characterization of Food: Emerging
Methods, Gaonker, A.G., ed. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 403-431, 1995.
2. Stevenson, R. J., Prescott, J., Boakes, R. A. Confusing tastes and smell:
How odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes. Chem
Senses 24: 627-635, 1999.
3. Yokomi, N., Ito, M. Influence of composition upon the variety of tastes in
Cinnamomi cortex. J Nat Med 63: 261-266, 2009.
4. Ito, M. Research and educational activities through perspective of
pharmacognosy. Yakugaku Zasshi 130: 687-695, 2010.
5. Inhibitory effect of
Katsuo-dashi dried bonito stock on the taste and odor of lactic acid .
44: 122-1272011.
6.
. 14: 34-392010.
7. Czerny, M., Christlbauer, M., Christlbauer, M., Fischer, A., Granvogl, M.,
Hammer, M., Hartl, C., Moran, N., Schieberle, P. Re-investigation on odour
thresholds of key food aroma compounds and development of an aroma
language based on odour qualities of defined aqueous odorant solutions .
Eur Food Res Technol 228: 265-273, 2008.
8. . 4925488
(2012.4.25)
9. . 5511210
(2014.4.4)
-
- 57 -
URL
i) http://culinary-academy.jp (2013.12.28)
-
- 58 -
[1, 2]
[3-6]
[7]
NIRS
[8, 9]NIRS
-
- 59 -
NIRS
NIRS NIRS
NIRS
NIRS
(4Z,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienalTDDTDD
NIRS TDD
DT
105229
-
- 60 -
GC/O
10 ppm
2
2,6-dimethoxyphenolphenol4-methylguaiacolm-cresol
guaiacol2,6-dimethoxy-4-methylphenolo-cresol4-ethylguaiacol
5.6 ppm
[10] 10 ppm
10 ppm TDD 0.2 ppb
TDD 4.4 ppm
4
NIRS
10 30.54.6 3 7
NIRS
NIRS ETG-4000
24 55% 50 lux
311 52 Ch
1
-
- 61 -
NIRS
7 -3
3 -3
3 -33
NIRS 10 ml
601
10
2 TDD
2 TDD
2
2 4 4 1
2 1
2 1 2 4
5
5
2 NIRS
NIRS
60 30 60 150
60
5
30
NIRS
-
- 62 -
NIRS Ch oxyHb
deoxyHb totalHb
oxyHb
30
30
10 10
0 0
3 ChCh 43, 44, 33 3 Ch
Ch 52, 51, 41 1
Ch 3 Ch
SPSS 20.0J
NIRS
5
10 2
1 5
-
- 63 -
2 5
3
4a
TDD NIRS
TDD
TDD 4bTDD
NIRS
10
30
5
Ch 44
Ch 51 25
Ch 43, 44, 33Ch 52, 51, 41
6 Ch
-
- 64 -
22ANOVA
F(1, 4)=7.01 p=0.057
F(1, 4)=6.41 p=0.065
6a
F(1, 4)=0.24p=0.65 6c
F(1, 4)=0.006p=0.942F(1, 4)=1.75p=0.26
7
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
-
- 65 -
22
ANOVATDD TDD
TDD
F(1, 4)=0.24p=0.65 6cTDD
F(1, 4)=8.67p=0.042 6d
TDD TDD
F(1,
4)=14.5p=0.019 6bTDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
-
- 66 -
[11-13]NIRS
TDD
TDD
TDD
NIRS 6
NIRS
[10] TDD
1
NIRS
-
- 67 -
TDD
-
- 68 -
52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43
42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32
31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 2223
21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 12
41 (1-52)
5251
41
1 NIRS 311 52
3
-
- 69 -
30
60
60
180
30
60
60
180
A
-60 0 30 90
(-60)
270 0 30 90 270
0
2
2
B
[oxyH
b]
[oxyH
b]
0
(a)
(b)
2 (a) 1 2 (b)
Ch 51
-
- 70 -
3
n=10, **, p
-
- 71 -
4 ab
**, p
-
- 72 -
2.0
[oxyH
b]
-0.5
0 90
0 90
Ch 52 Ch 51 Ch 50 Ch 49 Ch 48 Ch 47 Ch 46 Ch 45 Ch 44 Ch 43
Ch 31 Ch 30 Ch 29 Ch 28 Ch 27 Ch 26 Ch 25 Ch 24 Ch 23 Ch 22
Ch 10 Ch 9 Ch 8 Ch 7 Ch 6 Ch 5 Ch 4 Ch 3 Ch 2 Ch 1
Ch 42 Ch 41 Ch 40 Ch 39 Ch 38 Ch 37 Ch 36 Ch 35 Ch 34 Ch 33 Ch 32
Ch 21 Ch 20 Ch 19 Ch 18 Ch 17 Ch 16 Ch 15 Ch 14 Ch 13 Ch 12 Ch 11
5 10
52 Ch -0.52 mMmm
0 090 30 Ch 52, 51, 44, 43
-
- 73 -
* *
+ n.s.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
TDD
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
TDD
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
a
b
c
d
6 TDD
TDD
abTDD
5 3 ChTDD
c
dTDD
5 3 Ch*, p
-
- 74 -
7 5
n.s., not significant; 22
ANOVA
-
- 75 -
1. Shephard, G. M. Smell images and the flavour system in the human brain.
Nature 444: 316-321, 2006.
2. Verhagen, J. V., Engelen, L. The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal
food perception: sensory integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30: 613-650,
2006.
3. Frank, R. A., Ducheny, K., Mize, S. S. Strawberry odor, but not red color,
enhances the sweetness of sucrose solutions. Chem Senses 14: 371377,
1989.
4. Schifferstein, H. N., Verlegh, P. W. The role of congruency and pleasantness
in odor-induced taste enhancement. Acta Psychologica 94: 87105, 1996.
5. Dalton, P., Doolittle, N., Nagata, H., Breslin, P. A. The merging of the
senses: integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nat Neurosci 3: 431
432, 2003.
6. Stevenson, R. J., Prescott, J. The acquisition of taste properties by odors.
Learn Motiv 26: 433455, 1995.
7. Small, D. M., Voss, J., Mak, Y. E., Simmons, K. B., Parrish, T., Gitelman, D.
Experience-dependent neural integration of taste and smell in the human
brain. J Neurophysiol 92: 1892-1903, 2004.
8. Jobsis, F. F. Noninvasive, infrared monitoring of cerebral and myocardial
oxygen sufficiency and circulatory parameters. Science 198: 1264-1267,
1977.
9. Scholkmann, F., Kleiser, S., Metz, A. J., Zimmermann, R., Mata Pavia, J.,
Wolf, U., Wolf, M. A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared
spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology. Neuroimage
85: 6-27, 2014.
-
- 76 -
10. Matsumoto, T., Saito, K., Nakamura, A., Saito, T. , Nammoku, T., Ishikawa,
M., Mori, K. Dried-bonito aroma components enhance salivary
hemodynamic responses to broth tastes detected by near-infrared
spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem 60: 805-811, 2012.
11. Garrett, J. R. The proper role of nerves in salivary secretion: a review. J
Dent Res 66: 387-397, 1987.
12. Yeomans, M. R. Olfactory influences on appetite and satiety in humans.
Physiol Behav 89: 10-14, 2006.
13. Bender, G., Hummel, T., Negoias, S., Small, D. M. Separate signals for
orthonasal vs. retronasal perception of food but not nonfood odors. Behav
Neurosci 123: 481-489, 2009.
-
- 77 -
2
GC-MS AEDA
guaiacol 5-methylguaiacol 2,6-
-
- 78 -
dimethylphenol 4-ethyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol 2,6-dimethoxyphenol 4-
propylguaiacol vanillin furaneol (2E,7Z)-trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal
(4Z,7Z)-trideca-4,7-dienalTDD 10 (2E,7Z)-
trans-4,5-epoxydeca-2,7-dienal TDD
TDD
TDD
6
TDD 9
TDD 10
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
-
- 79 -
TDD
TDD
TDD TDD
TDD
TDD
NIRS
TDD
TDD
TDD
TDD
-
- 80 -
2
-
- 81 -
4
1 5
3
4
2
5
4
26 11