workshop d, benefits for whom? by ben pinches
TRANSCRIPT
Oxford Major Programmes Ltd.
“Benefits for Whom?”
Benedict Pinches
Hard and SoftDrag picture to placeholder or click icon to addQuantitative Qualitative
Financial Non-Financial
Cash flow
User fees
Customer SatisfactionSafety
Dignity
Well-being
Tax revenue
Competitiveness
Sellable data
Brand equity
Pride
Legacy
Direct
Indirect
P Chapman et al, Authoritative Literature Review into the Benefits of Health ICT Investments
‘Literature Review into the Benefits of Health ICT Investments’ (DoH)
1,242 articles for Health ICT1,810 articles for Government ICT investments
5,576 articles for Major Programmes
196 articles for Health ICT167 articles for Government ICT investments
1,064 articles for Major Programmes
128 articles for Health ICT126 articles for Government ICT investments
147 articles for Major Programmes
82 articles for Health ICT57 articles for Government ICT investments
65 articles for Major Programmes
Initial re
sults
Title sc
reen
Abstract
screen
Fully
relevant
P Chapman et al, Authoritative Literature Review into the Benefits of Health ICT Investments
‘Determining and Delivering the Benefits of Major Projects’ (MPA, 29 April 2015) How is benefits realisation currently being performed?What knowledge for projects from one sector can be valuable to projects from other sectors?Is there something ‘special’ about major projects?Where does UK stand?What is the relationship between good sponsorship and benefits?How can stakeholder be aligned around benefits?
MPA, The Value of Major Projects
‘Benefits’ Definition from the Office of Government Commerce:
The measurement of an outcome, or part of an outcome
An end benefit is a direct contribution to a strategic objective
Describes an advantage accruing from the outcome
Answers the question of what a project delivers: why is this required?
outcome
output
output
output
outcome
output
Benefit
OGC, Managing Successful Programmes
What Do We Measure?
Benefit Categories
economic social environmental
learning
How Can We Measure?Evaluation Method Description Use
Transaction costs Uses segmentation methods to calculate use and benefits to different user groups
Quick and easy way to estimate potential cost savings from the introduction of eGovernment
Net present value A straightforward method that examines monetary values and measures tangible benefits
Relatively straightforward; use when cash flows are private and benefits tangible
Cost benefit analysis A flexible method that measures tangible and intangible benefits and assesses these against net total cost
Good consideration of all benefits, but can be expensive and time consuming
Cost effectiveness analysis Focuses on achieving specific goals in relation to marginal costs
Good for considering incremental benefits against specific goals
Portfolio analysis A complex method that quantifies aggregate risks relative to expected returns for a portfolio of initiatives
Good for consideration of risk, just use a consistent approach across a portfolio
Value assessment A complex method that captures and measures benefits unaccounted for in traditional ‘Return on Investment’ (RoI) calculations
Used by several governments to consider performance against all policy goals
P Foley & X Alfonso, eGovernment and the Transformation Agenda
When Do We Measure?Drag picture to placeholder or click icon to add
Project Output
Business Change
Intermediate Benefit
End Benefit
Strategic Objective
Chain of benefits from output to objective
OGC, Managing Successful Programmes
Buyers
Builders
Users
PM Team
lawyers
special interest groupsGovernment
Regulators
audit
financial beneficiaries
negative stakeholders
PR
designersarchitects
consultants
technicians
general public
operators
support
Builder/Buyer/User Groups
A leading architect has won a competition organised by local university to build a railway bridge connecting the finance area of a capital city with a large housing development recently constructed the other side of a river.
What benefits might you consider defining and how would you measure them?
D Gray et al, Gamestorming
The Affect Heuristic“The psychologist Paul Slovic has proposed an affect heuristic in which people let their likes and dislikes determine their beliefs about the world. Your political preference determines the arguments that you find compelling. If you like the current health policy, you believe its benefits are substantial and its costs more manageable than the costs of alternatives.”D Kahneman, Thinking Fast and Slow G Morgan, Imaginization
Experts rule?
“Risk does not exist ‘out there’, independent of our minds and culture, waiting to be measured. Human beings have invented the concept of ‘risk’ to help them understand and cope with the dangers and uncertainties of life. Although these dangers are real, there is no such things as ‘real risk’ or ‘objective risk’.”
Activity or Technology
League of Women Voters
College Students
Experts
Nuclear power 1 1 20
Motor vehicles 2 5 1
Handguns 3 2 4
Smoking 4 3 2
Motorcycles 5 6 6
Alcohol 6 7 3
Police work 8 8 17
Surgery 10 11 5
Mountaineering
15 22 29
Swimming 19 30 10
Preservatives 25 12 14
P Slovic, Perception of Risk
Major Projects
Unanticipated Benefits
Disbenefits
How Can We Compare?
Function
Cost
Quality
Form
Safety
Whole-life
Environmental
Societal
1980 1990 2000 2010
Academic Findings
Lack of construct clarity
Insufficient empirical depth
Normative models
Case studies
Lower rated journals
No reference class
P Chapman et al, Authoritative Literature Review into the Benefits of Health ICT Investments
Future Trends fault line
P Chapman et al, Authoritative Literature Review into the Benefits of Health ICT Investments
The Importance of Vision
“Leaders are Dealers in Hope”
Benedict PinchesFounder and DirectorOxford Major ProgrammesPhone: +44 (0) 7956 677 483Email: [email protected]: @oxmpWeb: www.oxmp.coFacebook: http://on.fb.me/PzavIu
Bibliography
P Chapman et al, Authoritative Literature Review into the Benefits of Health ICT Investments
Major Projects Association, The Value of Major Projects
OGC, Managing Successful Programmes
P Foley & X Alfonso, eGovernment and the Transformation Agenda
D Gray et al, Gamestorming
D Kahnehman, Thinking Fast and Slow
G Morgan, Imaginization
P Slovic, Perception of Risk
P Tetlock, Expert Political Judgement: How Good is it? How Can We Know?
CBI, Building Trust, Making the Case for Infrastructure
B Flyvbjerg, What You Should Know About Megaprojects and Why
A King & I Crewe, The Blunders of our Governments