94

) ( :)9-4(

)(

sig)(

461. 0.737- 938 46267. 2.8162 375

52301. 2.8407 565

).=0.05( *

0.461 ) 9-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

." .

) 2.8162(

). 2.8407(

)2(

"

)=0.05(

-4( ) ( "

-: )10

) ( :)10-4(

95

)(

sig)(

423. 0.802 3.2238.50135940 375

3.1984.45694 567

).=0.05( *

0.423 ) 10-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

." .

) 3.2238(

). 3.1984(

)3(

"

)=0.05(

"

) One Way ANOVA(

-: )12-4 11-4(

: )11-4(

2.9286 18

2.8483 557

96

2.8689 154

2.7503 190

2.7714 20

) 11-4(

: ) 12-4(

:)12-4(

)P(

) (

1.866 4 466. 1.878 0.111 .248 934 232.03

0

938 233.89 6

)=0.05( *

0.111 ) 12-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

"

97

) 4(

"

)=0.05(

) One Way ANOVA( "

-: )14-4 13-4(

: )13-4(

3.0576 18

3.2130 558

3.2133 155

3.2099 190

3.2455 20

) 13-4(

: ) 14-4(

98

:)14-4(

)P(

) (

450. 4 112. 0.501 0.734 .224 936 209.68

0

940 210.13 0

)=0.05( *

0.734 ) 14-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

"

)5(

"

)=0.05(

"

) One Way ANOVA(

-: )16-4 15-4(

: )15-4(

2.8430 547

2.7706 87

2.8302 282

99

) 15-4(

. ) 16-4(

) 16-4(

)P(

) (

395. 2 198. 0.792 0.453 .249 913 227.73

1

915 228.12 6

)=0.05( *

0.453 ) 16-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

"

)6(

"

)=0.05(

"

) One Way ANOVA(

-: )18-174-4(

100

:)17-4(

3.1913 549

3.2239 87

3.2534 282

) 17-4

: ) 18-4(

: )18-4(

)P(

) (

728. 2 364. 1.612 0.200 .226 915 206.58

1

917 207.30 9

)=0.05( *

0.200 ) 18-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

."

101

)7(

"

)=0.05(

"

) One Way ANOVA(

-: )20-194-4(

: )19-4(

2.7818 60 20

2.8469 517 35-20

2.8137 357 35

) 19-4(

: ) 20-4(

:)20-4(

)P(

) (

382. 2 191. 0.767 0.465 .249 931 231.998 933 232.380

)=0.05( *

102

0.465 ) 20-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

"

)8(

"

)=0.05(

"

) One Way ANOVA(

-: )22-214-4(

:)21-4(

2.1591 60 20

3.2523 519 35-20

3.1527 357 35

) 21-4(

: ) 22-4(

103

:)22-4(

)P(

) (

2.252 2 1.126 5.032 0.07 .224 933 208.76

9

935 211.02 1

)=0.05( *

0.007 ) 22-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

"

LSD

.

LSD : )23-4(

20 35-20 35 20 0.0932- 0.0064- 35-20 0.0996*

104

35

)=0.05( *

-:

. 35-20 35 35-20

) 9(

"

)=0.05(

"

)24-4( ) (

-:

) ( :)24-4(

)(

sig)(

001. 3.298- 3.7575.47953930 320

2.8706.50643 612

).=0.05( *

105

0.001 ) 24-4(

)0.05(

)=0.05( "

." .

) . 2.8706( ) 3.757(

)10(

"

)=0.05(

) ( "

-: )25-4(

) ( :)25-4(

)(

sig)(

0.027 0.046- 3.2082.49445932 321

2.2097.46710 613

).=0.05( *

106

0.027 ) 25-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

." .

). 2.2097( ) 3.208(

)11(

"

)=0.05(

"

) One Way ANOVA(

-: )27-4 26-4(

:)26-4(

2.7405 61

2.7506 142

2.7086 51

2.8056 46

107

2.9998 28

) 26-4(

: ) 27-4(

:)27-4(

)P(

) (

1.835 4 459. 1.916 0.107 77.354 323 239. 79.189 327

)=0.05( *

0.107 ) 27-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

"

)12(

"

)=0.05(

108

One Way( "

ANOVA (29-4 28-4( (

-:

: )28-4(

3.2882 61

3.1838 143

3.1353 51

3.2174 46

3.3110 28

) 28-4(

: ) 29-4(

:)29-4(

)P(

) (

1.044 2 261. 1.091 0.361 77.498 933 239. 78.542 935

109

)=0.05( *

0.361 ) 29-4(

" )0.05(

)=0.05(

.)11( "

110

5:3

, 4 20

.

12

11

.

7 5

. 12

5 5

10 10-5 10

. 9

35-25 12

. 35 12

20 4

,

.

111

13

. 3 8

%83 20 /

%.17 4

.

7 19 9 :

. 7

.

10 14

.

.

4

. 20

112

17

, 6

.

7 10-5

, 10 17

. 10 % 71

20 :

. 6 10 8

.

% 54 , % 46 .1

,

.

% 25 .2

% 46

% 87.5

% 75

,

%.66.5

6 .3

14

18 16

113

12

,

.

.4

22

16

19

9

, )( 6

.

.5

13

22 )(

17 16

,

.

114

24 .6

, % 100

.

.

.7

12

14

18

3

,

.

22 .8

92%

, % 8

,

.

20 .9

4 %83

%. 17

115

.

.

,

.

)9(

5:4

.)7( , )2( .

. )25(

19 5

7

, 5

.

% 72

.

116

11

17

. 3

1000 9

5 9000-1000 9

, 5

.

:

-

.

. -

. -

. -

. -

. -

. -

. -

. -

. -

117

. -

-

. -

. -

-

-

. -

:

.1

.

% 84 .2

,

.

. .3

) (

:

-

-

118

. -

. -

. -

-

-

-

. -

. -

. -

9 11 .4

, 5

.

% 20 % 72 .5

.

% 100 .6

.

% 72 .7

% 32

119

% 44

% 40

% 32

% 36

.

.8

. ,

.9

,

.

.10

.

)10(

120

: 6:1

:

: :

)1(

.

)2(

.

)3(

.

)4(

.

)5(

121

.

% 54.5 )6(

% 73.3 % 45

.

% 42.3 % 56.1 )7(

.

: :

)1(

.

)2(

) (

.

)3(

.

)4(

.

122

)5(

%) 100(

.

.

)6(

. ,

)7(

.

)8(

,

.

123

: :

)1(

.

)2(

.

)3(

.

)4(

,

.

)5(

,

.

124

6:2

:

: ) 1(

)1(

.

)2(

.

)3(

.

)4(

.

)5(

: ) 2(

)1(

125

.

)2(

.

)3(

.

)4(

.

)5(

.

: ) 3(

)1(

.

.

)2(

.

126

)3(

.

)4(

.

)5(

.

.

127

. 1

) 2006(

27/3/2006-26

1969

1985 2

1981

"

1/5/1/2005 "

1990

. ): 977/387 : (

174 1995

1968

1995

351990) .(

2006-2007

128

1974

1982

1985 2

1984

1984

3316

2006

1998

.1989

1986

1964

) 2004(

.

) 2001(

. IDS

129

2001 1

1986

1995

) 2005(

12/9/2005 / 1315

1986

1963

1991 1988-1960

/ 1 ) 2(

.1999

4401

2005

2001

1983

130

"

2001

1997

: "33" :

3312

2005

)1970(

1984

2006

2003

1992

. ) 1998(

"

2008 "

2004

131

2006

"

16/10/2001

132

: . 2

Abott. J . Sharing the City Earth Scan publication. Ltd, London, 1997

Bridlle, William, The Community Development, New York, 1985

Dunham, Arthur, The New Community Organization, Thomas, Crowell

Company, New York, 1970.

Rich, Richard, Neighbourhood Participation edited by Taylor, Ralph,

University of Oxford, London, 1987

Robert, Partmen, Arnold Cunin, Community Organization and Social

Planning, N.Y, 1986

United Nations, Decentralization for National and Local Development

United Nations, New York, 1962

:

. :

133

134

)1(

:

(

).

,

.

:

:

:

:

35 35-20 20 :

: -

: -

. :

135

) X( -:

1

.

2

.

3

4

.

5

.

6

.

7

.

8

.

9

.

10

.

11

.

12

.

13

.

14

.

136

1

.

2

.

3

.

4

.

5

6

.

7

.

8

) (

9

.

..) ( 10 . 11

137

-

) ( -

) ( -

-

-

-

-

)/ (

. 35-15 .1 . .2

. .3 . .4

138

)2(

:

)1( )2( )3( )4( )5( )6( )7( )8(

)9( )10( )11( )12( )13( )14( )15( )16( )17(

)18( )19( )20( )chf( )21( )22( )23( )24( )25(

139

)3(

:

*

%1 82 8227

%1 152 15241

%1 63 6374

%1 72 7197 /

%1 207 20786

%1 76 7697

%1 189 18988

%1 161 16168

.1997 :*

:)4(

. . )1( . . )2( . . )3( . )4(

140

)5(

2006

2006

1997

%)25.2(19

19)25.5(%

2098 2073 6309 8227

3886 3841 11688 15241

1325 1606 4888 6374

1866 1844 5611 7317

16437 12605 4142 4191

367 363 1105 1441

315 311 946 1234

298 2947 8967 11693

817 808 2458 3205

3080 3044 9263 12079

1835 1814 5519 7197

18324 14052 4018 4673

7699 5904 1940 1963

20786 15940 5238 5300

4842 4785 14561 18988

1285 1269 3863 5037

4123 4074 12399 16168

623 616 1874 2444

45872 45332

1997 :

141

)6(

:

(

).

,

.

:

:

:

:

10 10-5 5 :

. 35 35-20 20 :

/ / / / :

:

. :

-

-

142

. :

-

-

-

10 10-5 5

-

. :

:) ( -

:

/

: -

. .1 . .2 . .3 .4 . .5 -

. .1 .2 .3 . .4 .5 .6

: -

. .1

143

. .2 . .3 .4

.

)( .5 . .6

-

)( .1 . .2 . .3

. .4 . .5

-

) ( ) (

) )(( ) (

-

-

:

-

-

: -

144

-

-

: -

:

:

:

:

145

)7(

:

: (

).

,

.

:

:

. :

( )( ) ( ) ( ) :

. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) :

. :

. :

-

: -

-

: -

146

: -

): ( -

. :

: -

.

: -

-

: -

-

.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6

.7 : -

. .1 . .2 ( .3

).

. .4

147

. .5 . .6

-

) (

: -

.1 .2 .3 .4

.: .5 .6

-

). 25-15( / .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 . .6

148

)8(

149

150

An-Najah National University Faculty of Graduate Studies

Community Participation and its Role in the Development of the Local Community:

Case Study of Neighborhood Committees in the City of Nablus

Prepared by: Manal Abdel Mou'ti Saleh Kaddoumi

Supervised by: Dr. Ali Abdelhamid

Dr. Khairi Marei

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of

Graduate Studies, at An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

2008

151

Community Participation and its Role in the Development of the Local Community:

Case Study of Neighborhood Committees in the City of Nablus

Prepared by: Manal Abdel Mou'ti Saleh Kaddoumi

Supervised by:

Dr. Ali Abdelhamid Dr. Khairi Marei

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the role of community participation in the development of the community, to be among the first studies of its kind to examine the relationship between the level of community participation and community development in the city of Nablus. In addition, it shed light on one of the means of public participation, which is the neighborhood committees in the city of Nablus in terms of their existence, role, relevance,

disabilities, and the associated problems.

The study seeks to provide officials and those responsible for local community development programs in the city of Nablus with sufficient information on these committees as well as the awareness of people towards the importance of participation in the development of local community. To achieve these goals, the author used both the descriptive and analytical approaches based on primary and secondary sources of information. Moreover, the he conducted a study on a sample of members of the community, in addition to interviews with members of neighborhood committees in Nablus governorate as well as the officials of community programs in some institutions operating in the city of Nablus.

The findings of the study indicated that there is a desire and positive trend of the searched community members towards community participation and its role in the development of the community, and that they are aware of the role of the neighborhood committees as a tool for community participation in the development of the community. Also, it indicated that people understand the nature of the activities carried out by the neighborhood committees and they participate in these activities. In addition, the results showed that the underlying motivation for joining the neighborhood

152

committees from the viewpoint of some members of these committees was because they want to increase and develop their life experience, enhance their affiliation and collective work, increase their self-confidence, develop

public relations, and fill their leisure time in useful work.

Moreover, the study indicated that voluntary work in the area from the viewpoint of some officials of community-based programs does not depend on the changing age and sex because the association is available to male and female alike, and, most importantly in voluntary work is commitment to work and ability to give education and the willingness and desire to

develop personality.

The study recommended the need to expand voluntary work for community members, in order to strengthen the capacity of neighborhood committees to confront problems and treatment. Also, it recommended raising awareness of the importance of voluntary work and urge them with their families to actively participate in the activities of the neighborhood committees. In addition, it emphasized the role of concerned bodies in identifying the needs of society and the demands of its members through

referendum on the level of services provided to them.

Moreover, the study recommended the need for building a system for the work of the neighborhood committees. Finally, the study has urged the related official institutions to provide the neighborhood committees by the

necessary information and statistics on their neighborhoods.