research method - oral presentation i i (quantitative research)

Post on 30-Jan-2015

2.459 Views

Category:

Technology

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Presenter: Jenny Chen 陳瑩珍Instructor: Dr. Hsiao-Tung Hsu

December 26, 2008

1

Holak, S. L., & Havlena, W. J. (1998). Feelings, fantasies, and memories: An examination of the emotional components of nostalgia. Journal of Business Research, 42(3), 217-226.

2

I. Introduction

II. Purposes of the Study

III. Method

IV. Results and Discussion

V. Reflection

3

“a positively valenced complex feeling,

emotion, or mood produced by reflection on

things (objects, persons, experiences, ideas)

associated with the past.”

(Holak and Havlena, 1998, p.218)

4

Direct – involves memories of the past

Indirect – fantasies about a remote time or place

A feeling or mood that may result in

preferences for things that tend to

produce nostalgic responses.5

Consumers are encouraged by marketers to

experience nostalgic feelings through the use of

nostalgic themes and images in advertising, the

marketing of nostalgic products, and the utilization

of consumer products to capture or create

nostalgia through fantasies or memories.

(Havlena and Holak, 1991)

6

Dimensional Approach

- measures underlying dimensions in an emotional

space (pleasure-arousal-dominance, PAD)

Categorical Approach

- examines the range of emotional experience in

terms of a limited number of discrete emotions

7

1. Break down the complex affective reactions

derived from nostalgic experience into more

basic components of emotion.

2. Broaden the general understanding of the

nature and role of affect in consumer behavior

and provide insights into the specific character

of nostalgia that may be applied to the analysis

and development of advertising and products.8

62 respondents provided written accounts,

describing up to three nostalgic experiences.

164 descriptions of nostalgia experiences were

collected from a diverse group of students and

nonstudents.

Each respondent also completed the form of

Holbrook Nostalgia Index – measures emotion

based on PAD.9

164 nostalgic experiences

4 judges18-item PAD

index

4 judges40-item index based on the standardized

emotional profile (SEP)

10

Mean of each scale item was examined to assess the relative strength of the discrete emotions.

The ratings on each scale item were standardized to reduce systematic response biases in coding toward one position on the scales.

11

The ratings of each set of four judges were then aggregated by averaging the ratings on each item to increase the reliability of the content analysis ratings and reducing the impact of random error.

The reliability of each index was assessed by examining coefficient alpha.

12

The dimensionality of each set of emotion ratings was assessed using exploratory principal components analysis with varimax rotation.

Multiple regression analysis was conducted to explore the relative importance of the emotions to the strength of nostalgia and identify the emotions or dimensions that appear particularly related to nostalgia.

13

1. The positive emotions of warmth, joy, gratitude, affection, and innocence tend to associate in nostalgic experience.

14

2. A connection between sadness and desire was observed.

15

3. Pleasure exhibits a strong positive relationship with nostalgic intensity.

4. Dominance displays a negative association with nostalgia.

16

5. The presence of a number of varied emotions in the more intense nostalgic experiences.

17

Portray the product as a means of recapturing enough of the past to avoid an overwhelming feeling of loss.

a. if the consumption of the product can actually allow him or her to recapture much of the original feeling.

b. if the original experience is remembered as moderately pleasant.

c. if the original reference is less directly connected to the individual.

18

Products and messages appealing to needs involving belongingness or affiliation may be particularly appropriate subjects for nostalgia.

19

Interesting method – rating the descriptions by the judges

Bias?

Lack of the detailed information of the 62 respondents and the judges

20

Thanks for your attention!

21

top related