benchmarkg

Upload: jam-imran-madni

Post on 05-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 benchmarkg

    1/8

    5/19/12

  • 7/31/2019 benchmarkg

    2/8

    5/19/12

    Click to edit Master subtitle style

    Topic

    Examining The Association BetweenBenchmarking In TQMAnd Performance: An Empirical Research ForChange

  • 7/31/2019 benchmarkg

    3/8

    5/19/12

    Introduction

    The main objectives of this paper are:

    (1) To empirically determine whether benchmarking in TQM has significantassociation or impact on product quality

    performance.

    (2) To empirically discover whether benchmarking in TQM has significantassociation or impact on business performance.

  • 7/31/2019 benchmarkg

    4/8

    5/19/12

    Literature ReviewPowell (1995) suggests that there are significant relationships

    between TQM, competitive advantage and business performance.

    TQM can offer many benefits including improved products andservices, reduced costs, more satisfied customer and employees,and improved bottom line financial performance (Powell, 1995).

    According to Zairi (1998:35), benchmarking is used in the followingways:

    As an enabler for achieving and maintaining high levels of

    competitiveness.As a process which can be characterized by a standard andvariables (expectations, performance and measurements).

    As a continuous process of measuring our products, services and

    business.

  • 7/31/2019 benchmarkg

    5/8

    5/19/12

    Theoretical and ConceptualFramework

    The proposed conceptual model is based on threemain constructs(i) benchmarking in TQM(BENCH); (ii) product quality performance (PQP);

    and (iii) business performance (BPERF).the four dimension of benchmarking are:

    Active benchmarking program- (BMPROG),Measurement against the best- (BMEASURE),Continuous Measurement process (BMPROCES) andEmulate the best - (BEMULATE).

    q product quality performance is based on

    three pertinent dimensions namely productconformance ZECONFOR roduct erformance

  • 7/31/2019 benchmarkg

    6/8

    5/19/12

    Hypotheses

    There are three hypotheses:

    H1: Benchmarking in TQM has a positive structuraleffect on product quality performance.

    H 2: Benchmarking in TQM has a positive structuraleffect on business performance.

    H 3: Product quality performance has a positive

    structural effect on business performance.

  • 7/31/2019 benchmarkg

    7/85/19/12

    Research Methodology

    The instrument utilized was a structured surveyquestionnaire, consisting of two major parts. The first

    part comprises several constructs measuring TQM practices including benchmarking, and the second part comprises performance measurement.

    this study divided the performances into two types:1) Product quality performance

    2) Business performance.

  • 7/31/2019 benchmarkg

    8/85/19/12

    Conclusion

    (1) Benchmarking determinants namelyEmulate the best, Measurement against the

    best, Active benchmarking program andContinuous Measurement process havepositive and direct effects on product quality

    performance.

    (2) Benchmarking in TQM has positive anddirect effects on business performance through

    product quality performance.

    3 Product ualit erformance es eciall